@article{FalibeneRocesRoessleretal.2016, author = {Falibene, Augustine and Roces, Flavio and R{\"o}ssler, Wolfgang and Groh, Claudia}, title = {Daily Thermal Fluctuations Experienced by Pupae via Rhythmic Nursing Behavior Increase Numbers of Mushroom Body Microglomeruli in the Adult Ant Brain}, series = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience}, volume = {10}, journal = {Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience}, number = {73}, doi = {10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00073}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-146711}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Social insects control brood development by using different thermoregulatory strategies. Camponotus mus ants expose their brood to daily temperature fluctuations by translocating them inside the nest following a circadian rhythm of thermal preferences. At the middle of the photophase brood is moved to locations at 30.8°C; 8 h later, during the night, the brood is transferred back to locations at 27.5°C. We investigated whether daily thermal fluctuations experienced by developing pupae affect the neuroarchitecture in the adult brain, in particular in sensory input regions of the mushroom bodies (MB calyces). The complexity of synaptic microcircuits was estimated by quantifying MB-calyx volumes together with densities of presynaptic boutons of microglomeruli (MG) in the olfactory lip and visual collar regions. We compared young adult workers that were reared either under controlled daily thermal fluctuations of different amplitudes, or at different constant temperatures. Thermal regimes significantly affected the large (non-dense) olfactory lip region of the adult MB calyx, while changes in the dense lip and the visual collar were less evident. Thermal fluctuations mimicking the amplitudes of natural temperature fluctuations via circadian rhythmic translocation of pupae by nurses (amplitude 3.3°C) lead to higher numbers of MG in the MB calyces compared to those in pupae reared at smaller or larger thermal amplitudes (0.0, 1.5, 9.6°C), or at constant temperatures (25.4, 35.0°C). We conclude that rhythmic control of brood temperature by nursing ants optimizes brain development by increasing MG densities and numbers in specific brain areas. Resulting differences in synaptic microcircuits are expected to affect sensory processing and learning abilities in adult ants, and may also promote interindividual behavioral variability within colonies.}, language = {en} } @article{GrittnerBairdStoeckl2022, author = {Grittner, Rebecca and Baird, Emily and St{\"o}ckl, Anna}, title = {Spatial tuning of translational optic flow responses in hawkmoths of varying body size}, series = {Journal of Comparative Physiology A}, volume = {208}, journal = {Journal of Comparative Physiology A}, number = {2}, issn = {1432-1351}, doi = {10.1007/s00359-021-01530-1}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266565}, pages = {279-296}, year = {2022}, abstract = {To safely navigate their environment, flying insects rely on visual cues, such as optic flow. Which cues insects can extract from their environment depends closely on the spatial and temporal response properties of their visual system. These in turn can vary between individuals that differ in body size. How optic flow-based flight control depends on the spatial structure of visual cues, and how this relationship scales with body size, has previously been investigated in insects with apposition compound eyes. Here, we characterised the visual flight control response limits and their relationship to body size in an insect with superposition compound eyes: the hummingbird hawkmoth Macroglossum stellatarum. We used the hawkmoths' centring response in a flight tunnel as a readout for their reception of translational optic flow stimuli of different spatial frequencies. We show that their responses cut off at different spatial frequencies when translational optic flow was presented on either one, or both tunnel walls. Combined with differences in flight speed, this suggests that their flight control was primarily limited by their temporal rather than spatial resolution. We also observed strong individual differences in flight performance, but no correlation between the spatial response cutoffs and body or eye size.}, language = {en} } @article{GrohRoessler2020, author = {Groh, Claudia and R{\"o}ssler, Wolfgang}, title = {Analysis of Synaptic Microcircuits in the Mushroom Bodies of the Honeybee}, series = {Insects}, volume = {11}, journal = {Insects}, number = {1}, issn = {2075-4450}, doi = {10.3390/insects11010043}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200774}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Mushroom bodies (MBs) are multisensory integration centers in the insect brain involved in learning and memory formation. In the honeybee, the main sensory input region (calyx) of MBs is comparatively large and receives input from mainly olfactory and visual senses, but also from gustatory/tactile modalities. Behavioral plasticity following differential brood care, changes in sensory exposure or the formation of associative long-term memory (LTM) was shown to be associated with structural plasticity in synaptic microcircuits (microglomeruli) within olfactory and visual compartments of the MB calyx. In the same line, physiological studies have demonstrated that MB-calyx microcircuits change response properties after associative learning. The aim of this review is to provide an update and synthesis of recent research on the plasticity of microcircuits in the MB calyx of the honeybee, specifically looking at the synaptic connectivity between sensory projection neurons (PNs) and MB intrinsic neurons (Kenyon cells). We focus on the honeybee as a favorable experimental insect for studying neuronal mechanisms underlying complex social behavior, but also compare it with other insect species for certain aspects. This review concludes by highlighting open questions and promising routes for future research aimed at understanding the causal relationships between neuronal and behavioral plasticity in this charismatic social insect.}, language = {en} } @article{HeisswolfUlmannObermaieretal.2007, author = {Heisswolf, Annette and Ulmann, Sandra and Obermaier, Elisabeth and Mitesser, Oliver and Poethke, Hans J.}, title = {Host plant finding in the specialised leaf beetle Cassida canaliculata: an analysis of small-scale movement behaviour}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-49485}, year = {2007}, abstract = {1. Host plant finding in walking herbivorous beetles is still poorly understood. Analysis of small-scale movement patterns under semi-natural conditions can be a useful tool to detect behavioural responses towards host plant cues. 2. In this study, the small-scale movement behaviour of the monophagous leaf beetle Cassida canaliculata Laich. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) was studied in a semi-natural arena (r = 1 m). In three different settings, a host (Salvia pratensis L., Lamiales: Lamiaceae), a non-host (Rumex conglomeratus Murr., Caryophyllales: Polygonaceae), or no plant was presented in the centre of the arena. 3. The beetles showed no differences in the absolute movement variables, straightness and mean walking speed, between the three settings. However, the relative movement variables, mean distance to the centre and mean angular deviation from walking straight to the centre, were significantly smaller when a host plant was offered. Likewise, the angular deviation from walking straight to the centre tended to decline with decreasing distance from the centre. Finally, significantly more beetles were found on the host than on the non-host at the end of all the trials. 4. It is concluded that C. canaliculata is able to recognise its host plant from a distance. Whether olfactory or visual cues (or a combination of both) are used to find the host plant remains to be elucidated by further studies.}, subject = {K{\"a}fer}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Mronz2004, author = {Mronz, Markus}, title = {Die visuell motivierte Objektwahl laufender Taufliegen (Drosophila melanogaster) - Verhaltensphysiologie, Modellbildung und Implementierung in einem Roboter}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-11748}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2004}, abstract = {Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wurden offene Fragen zur Objektwahl, zur Objektbeibehaltung und zur Aufgabe von Zielobjekten bei laufenden Taufliegen (Drosophila melanogaster) untersucht. Die Erkenntnisse zur Objektwahl wurden als kybernetisches Modell formuliert, auf einem eigens daf{\"u}r konstruierten, autonom navigierenden Roboter mit Kameraauge implementiert und dessen Verhalten bei verschiedenen Landmarkenkonstellationen quantitativ mit dem Orientierungsverhalten laufender Fliegen verglichen. Es war bekannt, dass Drosophila in einer Wahlsituation zwischen unterschiedlich weit entfernten Objekten eine ausgepr{\"a}gte Pr{\"a}ferenz f{\"u}r nahe Objekte zeigt, wobei die Entfernung {\"u}ber das Ausmaß der retinalen Bildverschiebung auf dem Auge (Parallaxe) erfasst wird. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde analysiert, ob die Parallaxe streng aus der Eigenbewegung der Fliege resultieren muss oder ob Eigenbewegung der Objekte N{\"a}he vort{\"a}uschen und deren Attraktivit{\"a}t erh{\"o}hen kann. Es wurde gezeigt, dass die Pr{\"a}ferenz f{\"u}r ein Objekt bei Drosophila umso gr{\"o}ßer wird, je mehr Bewegung dessen Abbild auf der Retina erzeugt; die relative Verschiebung des Objektabbildes muss dabei nicht mit der Eigenbewegung der Fliege gekoppelt sein. {\"U}berraschenderweise verschwand die Pr{\"a}ferenz f{\"u}r nahe Objekte, wenn eine zusammenstehende Gruppe aus einer nahen und mehreren fernen Objekten pr{\"a}sentiert wurden, solange sie zusammen einen Sehwinkel von weniger als etwa 90° einnahmen. Diese Beobachtung ist konform mit einer Vorstellung, wonach Bewegung {\"u}ber gr{\"o}ßere Augenbereiche integriert und nicht einzelnen Objekten zugeordnet wird. Obwohl Drosophila bei gleichem Pr{\"a}sentationsort auf der Retina die gr{\"o}ßere parallaktische Bewegung bevorzugte, wurden bei gleicher Entfernung dennoch frontalere gegen{\"u}ber lateraleren Objekten bevorzugt. Es wird postuliert, dass der frontale und der caudale Sehbereich eine Verst{\"a}rkung erfahren, die die physikalisch bedingt geringere Parallaxe {\"u}berkompensiert. Laufende Fliegen reagieren verz{\"o}gert auf die Pr{\"a}sentation eines Objekts; dies wird im Sinne einer zeitlichen Bewegungsintegration interpretiert. Die darauf folgende Richtungs{\"a}nderung h{\"a}ngt vom Pr{\"a}sentationswinkel des Objektes ab. Erscheint das Objekt frontolateral, findet eine Hinwendung statt, erscheint es caudolateral, kommt es bevorzugt zur Abwendung. Eine weitere wichtige kognitive Leistung der Fliege ist das Aufgeben eines zuvor ausgew{\"a}hlten Ziels, wenn sich dieses Ziel w{\"a}hrend des Anlaufs als unerreichbar herausstellt. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde gezeigt, dass Fliegen mit stark reduzierten Pilzk{\"o}rpern erheblich mehr Zeit ben{\"o}tigen als wildtypische Fliegen, um vom gew{\"a}hlten Zielobjekt abzulassen. Dieser dem Perseveranzverhalten bei Parkinson-kranken Menschen {\"a}hnliche Ph{\"a}notyp wurde unabh{\"a}ngig von der Methode der Ausschaltung der Pilzk{\"o}rper gefunden. Die Dauer der Perseveranz nahm mit zunehmender Attraktivit{\"a}t des Zielobjekts, d. h. mit abnehmender Distanz, zu. Es wird vorgeschlagen, dass die Pilzk{\"o}rper f{\"u}r die Evaluierung von eingehender sensorischer Information oder f{\"u}r Entscheidungsfindungen im Allgemeinen ben{\"o}tig werden. Basierend auf diesen Ergebnissen wurde ein Minimalmodell f{\"u}r die visuelle Orientierung nach Landmarken entwickelt. Das Modell beinhaltet eine zeitliche Integration des optischen Flusses in einem frontolateralen und einem caudolateralen Kompartiment pro Auge. Je nachdem, in welchem Kompartiment eine festgesetzte Schwelle zuerst erreicht wird, kommt es entweder zu einer Hin- (frontolateral) oder zu einer Abwendungsreaktion (caudolateral). Eine Gewichtungsfunktion kompensiert die geringe parallaktische Verschiebung in diesen Sehregionen. Das Modell wurde in einem mobilen Roboter mit Kameraauge implementiert und mit dem visuellen Orientierungsverhalten der Fliege quantitativ verglichen. Der Roboter war in der Lage, viele Aspekte der Landmarkenwahl von laufenden Fliegen erfolgreich zu reproduzieren und fliegen{\"a}hnliches, autonomes Orientierungsverhalten unter verschiedenen Landmarkenkonfigurationen zu zeigen.}, subject = {Taufliege}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Schmalz2023, author = {Schmalz, Fabian Dominik}, title = {Processing of behaviorally relevant stimuli at different levels in the bee brain}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-28882}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-288824}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2023}, abstract = {The behavior of honeybees and bumblebees relies on a constant sensory integration of abiotic or biotic stimuli. As eusocial insects, a sophisticated intraspecific communication as well as the processing of multisensory cues during foraging is of utter importance. To tackle the arising challenges, both honeybees and bumblebees have evolved a sophisticated olfactory and visual processing system. In both organisms, olfactory reception starts at the antennae, where olfactory sensilla cover the antennal surface in a sex-specific manner. These sensilla house olfactory receptor neurons (ORN) that express olfactory receptors. ORNs send their axons via four tracts to the antennal lobe (AL), the prime olfactory processing center in the bee brain. Here, ORNs specifically innervate spheroidal structures, so-called glomeruli, in which they form synapses with local interneurons and projection neurons (PN). PNs subsequently project the olfactory information via two distinct tracts, the medial and the lateral antennal-lobe tract, to the mushroom body (MB), the main center of sensory integration and memory formation. In the honeybee calyx, the sensory input region of the MB, PNs synapse on Kenyon cells (KC), the principal neuron type of the MB. Olfactory PNs mainly innervate the lip and basal ring layer of the calyx. In addition, the basal ring receives input from visual PNs, making it the first site of integration of visual and olfactory information. Visual PNs, carrying sensory information from the optic lobes, send their terminals not only to the to the basal ring compartment but also to the collar of the calyx. Receiving olfactory or visual input, KCs send their axons along the MB peduncle and terminate in the main output regions of the MB, the medial and the vertical lobe (VL) in a layer-specific manner. In the MB lobes, KCs synapse onto mushroom body output neurons (MBON). In so far barely understood processes, multimodal information is integrated by the MBONs and then relayed further into the protocerebral lobes, the contralateral brain hemisphere, or the central brain among others. This dissertation comprises a dichotomous structure that (i) aims to gain more insight into the olfactory processing in bumblebees and (ii) sets out to broaden our understanding of visual processing in honeybee MBONs. The first manuscript examines the olfactory processing of Bombus terrestris and specifically investigates sex-specific differences. We used behavioral (absolute conditioning) and electrophysiological approaches to elaborate the processing of ecologically relevant odors (components of plant odors and pheromones) at three distinct levels, in the periphery, in the AL and during olfactory conditioning. We found both sexes to form robust memories after absolute conditioning and to generalize towards the carbon chain length of the presented odors. On the contrary, electroantennographic (EAG) activity showed distinct stimulus and sex-specific activity, e.g. reduced activity towards citronellol in drones. Interestingly, extracellular multi-unit recordings in the AL confirmed stimulus and sex-specific differences in olfactory processing, but did not reflect the differences previously found in the EAG. Here, farnesol and 2,3-dihydrofarnesol, components of sex-specific pheromones, show a distinct representation, especially in workers, corroborating the results of a previous study. This explicitly different representation suggests that the peripheral stimulus representation is an imperfect indication for neuronal representation in high-order neuropils and ecological importance of a specific odor. The second manuscript investigates MBONs in honeybees to gain more insights into visual processing in the VL. Honeybee MBONs can be categorized into visually responsive, olfactory responsive and multimodal. To clarify which visual features are represented at this high-order integration center, we used extracellular multi-unit recordings in combination with visual and olfactory stimulation. We show for the first time that information about brightness and wavelength is preserved in the VL. Furthermore, we defined three specific classes of visual MBONs that distinctly encode the intensity, identity or simply the onset of a stimulus. The identity-subgroup exhibits a specific tuning towards UV light. These results support the view of the MB as the center of multimodal integration that categorizes sensory input and subsequently channels this information into specific MBON populations. Finally, I discuss differences between the peripheral representations of stimuli and their distinct processing in high-order neuropils. The unique activity of farnesol in manuscript 1 or the representation of UV light in manuscript 2 suggest that the peripheral representation of a stimulus is insufficient as a sole indicator for its neural activity in subsequent neuropils or its putative behavioral importance. In addition, I discuss the influence of hard-wired concepts or plasticity induced changes in the sensory pathways on the processing of such key stimuli in the peripheral reception as well as in high-order centers like the AL or the MB. The MB as the center of multisensory integration has been broadly examined for its olfactory processing capabilities and receives increasing interest about its visual coding properties. To further unravel its role of sensory integration and to include neglected modalities, future studies need to combine additional approaches and gain more insights on the multimodal aspects in both the input and output region.}, subject = {Biene}, language = {en} } @article{SenthilanHelfrichFoerster2016, author = {Senthilan, Pingkalai R. and Helfrich-F{\"o}rster, Charlotte}, title = {Rhodopsin 7-The unusual Rhodopsin in Drosophila}, series = {PeerJ}, volume = {4}, journal = {PeerJ}, doi = {10.7717/peerj.2427}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177998}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Rhodopsins are the major photopigments in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila express six well-characterized Rhodopsins (Rh1-Rh6) with distinct absorption maxima and expression pattern. In 2000, when the Drosophila genome was published, a novel Rhodopsin gene was discovered: Rhodopsin 7 (Rh7). Rh7 is highly conserved among the Drosophila genus and is also found in other arthropods. Phylogenetic trees based on protein sequences suggest that the seven Drosophila Rhodopsins cluster in three different groups. While Rh1, Rh2 and Rh6 form a "vertebrate-melanopsin-type"-cluster, and Rh3, Rh4 and Rh5 form an "insect-type"-Rhodopsin cluster, Rh7 seem to form its own cluster. Although Rh7 has nearly all important features of a functional Rhodopsin, it differs from other Rhodopsins in its genomic and structural properties, suggesting it might have an overall different role than other known Rhodopsins.}, language = {en} } @article{SommerlandtSpaetheRoessleretal.2016, author = {Sommerlandt, Frank M. J. and Spaethe, Johannes and R{\"o}ssler, Wolfgang and Dyer, Adrian G.}, title = {Does Fine Color Discrimination Learning in Free-Flying Honeybees Change Mushroom-Body Calyx Neuroarchitecture?}, series = {PLoS One}, volume = {11}, journal = {PLoS One}, number = {10}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0164386}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-147932}, pages = {e0164386}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Honeybees learn color information of rewarding flowers and recall these memories in future decisions. For fine color discrimination, bees require differential conditioning with a concurrent presentation of target and distractor stimuli to form a long-term memory. Here we investigated whether the long-term storage of color information shapes the neural network of microglomeruli in the mushroom body calyces and if this depends on the type of conditioning. Free-flying honeybees were individually trained to a pair of perceptually similar colors in either absolute conditioning towards one of the colors or in differential conditioning with both colors. Subsequently, bees of either conditioning groups were tested in non-rewarded discrimination tests with the two colors. Only bees trained with differential conditioning preferred the previously learned color, whereas bees of the absolute conditioning group, and a stimuli-na{\"i}ve group, chose randomly among color stimuli. All bees were then kept individually for three days in the dark to allow for complete long-term memory formation. Whole-mount immunostaining was subsequently used to quantify variation of microglomeruli number and density in the mushroom-body lip and collar. We found no significant differences among groups in neuropil volumes and total microglomeruli numbers, but learning performance was negatively correlated with microglomeruli density in the absolute conditioning group. Based on these findings we aim to promote future research approaches combining behaviorally relevant color learning tests in honeybees under free-flight conditions with neuroimaging analysis; we also discuss possible limitations of this approach.q}, language = {en} } @article{StejskalStreinzerDyeretal.2015, author = {Stejskal, Kerstin and Streinzer, Martin and Dyer, Adrian and Paulus, Hannes F. and Spaethe, Johannes}, title = {Functional Significance of Labellum Pattern Variation in a Sexually Deceptive Orchid (Ophrys heldreichii): Evidence of Individual Signature Learning Effects}, series = {PLoS One}, volume = {10}, journal = {PLoS One}, number = {11}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0142971}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-137582}, pages = {e0142971}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Mimicking female insects to attract male pollinators is an important strategy in sexually deceptive orchids of the genus Ophrys, and some species possess flowers with conspicuous labellum patterns. The function of the variation of the patterns remains unresolved, with suggestions that these enhance pollinator communication. We investigated the possible function of the labellum pattern in Ophrys heldreichii, an orchid species in which the conspicuous and complex labellum pattern contrasts with a dark background. The orchid is pollinated exclusively by males of the solitary bee, Eucera berlandi. Comparisons of labellum patterns revealed that patterns within inflorescences are more similar than those of other conspecific plants. Field observations showed that the males approach at a great speed and directly land on flowers, but after an unsuccessful copulation attempt, bees hover close and visually scan the labellum pattern for up to a minute. Learning experiments conducted with honeybees as an accessible model of bee vision demonstrated that labellum patterns of different plants can be reliably learnt; in contrast, patterns of flowers from the same inflorescence could not be discriminated. These results support the hypothesis that variable labellum patterns in O. heldreichii are involved in flower-pollinator communication which would likely help these plants to avoid geitonogamy.}, language = {en} } @article{StreinzerBrockmannNagarajaetal.2013, author = {Streinzer, Martin and Brockmann, Axel and Nagaraja, Narayanappa and Spaethe, Johannes}, title = {Sex and Caste-Specific Variation in Compound Eye Morphology of Five Honeybee Species}, series = {PLoS ONE}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0057702}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-96412}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Ranging from dwarfs to giants, the species of honeybees show remarkable differences in body size that have placed evolutionary constrains on the size of sensory organs and the brain. Colonies comprise three adult phenotypes, drones and two female castes, the reproductive queen and sterile workers. The phenotypes differ with respect to tasks and thus selection pressures which additionally constrain the shape of sensory systems. In a first step to explore the variability and interaction between species size-limitations and sex and caste-specific selection pressures in sensory and neural structures in honeybees, we compared eye size, ommatidia number and distribution of facet lens diameters in drones, queens and workers of five species (Apis andreniformis, A. florea, A. dorsata, A. mellifera, A. cerana). In these species, male and female eyes show a consistent sex-specific organization with respect to eye size and regional specialization of facet diameters. Drones possess distinctly enlarged eyes with large dorsal facets. Aside from these general patterns, we found signs of unique adaptations in eyes of A. florea and A. dorsata drones. In both species, drone eyes are disproportionately enlarged. In A. dorsata the increased eye size results from enlarged facets, a likely adaptation to crepuscular mating flights. In contrast, the relative enlargement of A. florea drone eyes results from an increase in ommatidia number, suggesting strong selection for high spatial resolution. Comparison of eye morphology and published mating flight times indicates a correlation between overall light sensitivity and species-specific mating flight times. The correlation suggests an important role of ambient light intensities in the regulation of species-specific mating flight times and the evolution of the visual system. Our study further deepens insights into visual adaptations within the genus Apis and opens up future perspectives for research to better understand the timing mechanisms and sensory physiology of mating related signals.}, language = {en} }