@article{GagyorGreserHeuschmannetal.2021,
  author    = {G{\´a}gyor, Ildik{\´o} and Greser, Alexandra and Heuschmann, Peter and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Maun, Andy and Bleidorn, Jutta and Heintze, Christoph and Jede, Felix and Eckmanns, Tim and Klingeberg, Anja and Mentzel, Anja and Schiemann, Guido},
  title     = {REDuction of Antibiotic RESistance (REDARES) in urinary tract infections using treatments according to national clinical guidelines: study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with a multimodal intervention in primary care},
  series = {BMC Infectious Diseases},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {BMC Infectious Diseases},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12879-021-06660-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-264725},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are a common cause of prescribing antibiotics in family medicine. In Germany, about 40\% of UTI-related prescriptions are second-line antibiotics, which contributes to emerging resistance rates. To achieve a change in the prescribing behaviour among family physicians (FPs), this trial aims to implement the guideline recommendations in German family medicine. Methods/design: In a randomized controlled trial, a multimodal intervention will be developed and tested in family practices in four regions across Germany. The intervention will consist of three elements: information on guideline recommendations, information on regional resistance and feedback of prescribing behaviour for FPs on a quarterly basis. The effect of the intervention will be compared to usual practice. The primary endpoint is the absolute difference in the mean of prescribing rates of second-line antibiotics among the intervention and the control group after 12 months. To detect a 10\% absolute difference in the prescribing rate after one year, with a significance level of 5\% and a power of 86\%, a sample size of 57 practices per group will be needed. Assuming a dropout rate of 10\%, an overall number of 128 practices will be required. The accompanying process evaluation will provide information on feasibility and acceptance of the intervention. Discussion: If proven effective and feasible, the components of the intervention can improve adherence to antibiotic prescribing guidelines and contribute to antimicrobial stewardship in ambulatory care.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmiemannGreserMaunetal.2023,
  author    = {Schmiemann, Guido and Greser, Alexandra and Maun, Andy and Bleidorn, Jutta and Schuster, Angela and Miljukov, Olga and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Klingeberg, Anja and Mentzel, Anja and Minin, Vitalii and Eckmanns, Tim and Heintze, Christoph and Heuschmann, Peter and G{\´a}gyor, Ildik{\´o}},
  title     = {Effects of a multimodal intervention in primary care to reduce second line antibiotic prescriptions for urinary tract infections in women: parallel, cluster randomised, controlled trial},
  series = {BMJ},
  volume    = {383},
  journal   = {BMJ},
  issn      = {1756-1833},
  doi       = {10.1136/bmj-2023-076305},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-349395},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Objectives To evaluate whether a multimodal intervention in general practice reduces the proportion of second line antibiotic prescriptions and the overall proportion of antibiotic prescriptions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women. Design Parallel, cluster randomised, controlled trial. Setting General practices in five regions in Germany. Data were collected between 1 April 2021 and 31 March 2022. Participants General practitioners from 128 randomly assigned practices. Interventions Multimodal intervention consisting of guideline recommendations for general practitioners and patients, provision of regional data for antibiotic resistance, and quarterly feedback, which included individual first line and second line proportions of antibiotic prescribing, benchmarking with regional or supra-regional practices, and telephone counselling. Participants in the control group received no information on the intervention. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was the proportion of second line antibiotics prescribed by general practices, in relation to all antibiotics prescribed, for uncomplicated urinary tract infections after one year between the intervention and control group. General practices were randomly assigned in blocks (1:1), with a block size of four, into the intervention or control group using SAS version 9.4; randomisation was stratified by region. The secondary outcome was the prescription proportion of all antibiotics, relative within all cases (instances of UTI diagnosis), for the treatment of urinary tract infections after one year between the groups. Adverse events were assessed as exploratory outcomes. Results 110 practices with full datasets identified 10 323 cases during five quarters (ie, 15 months). The mean proportion of second line antibiotics prescribed was 0.19 (standard deviation 0.20) in the intervention group and 0.35 (0.25) in the control group after 12 months. After adjustment for preintervention proportions, the mean difference was -0.13 (95\% confidence interval -0.21 to -0.06, P\<0.001). The overall proportion of all antibiotic prescriptions for urinary tract infections over 12 months was 0.74 (standard deviation 0.22) in the intervention and 0.80 (0.15) in the control group with a mean difference of -0.08 (95\% confidence interval -0.15 to -0.02, P\<0.029). No differences were noted in the number of complications (ie, pyelonephritis, admission to hospital, or fever) between the groups. Conclusions The multimodal intervention in general practice significantly reduced the proportion of second line antibiotics and all antibiotic prescriptions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00020389},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WagnerEikenHaubitzetal.2019,
  author    = {Wagner, Johanna and Eiken, Barbara and Haubitz, Imme and Lichthardt, Sven and Matthes, Niels and L{\"o}b, Stefan and Klein, Ingo and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Suprapubic bladder drainage and epidural catheters following abdominal surgery—a risk for urinary tract infections?},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0209825},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177731},
  pages     = {e0209825},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background Epidural catheters are state of the art for postoperative analgesic in abdominal surgery. Due to neurolysis it can lead to postoperative urinary tract retention (POUR), which leads to prolonged bladder catheterization, which has an increased risk for urinary tract infections (UTI). Our aim was to identify the current perioperative management of urinary catheters and, second, to identify the optimal time of suprapubic bladder catheter removal in regard to the removal of the epidural catheter. Methods We sent a questionnaire to 102 German hospitals and analyzed the 83 received answers to evaluate the current handling of bladder drainage and epidural catheters. Then, we conducted a retrospective study including 501 patients, who received an epidural and suprapubic catheter after abdominal surgery at the University Hospital W{\"u}rzburg. We divided the patients into three groups according to the point in time of suprapubic bladder drainage removal in regard to the removal of the epidural catheter and analyzed the onset of a UTI. Results Our survey showed that in almost all hospitals (98.8\%), patients received an epidural catheter and a bladder drainage after abdominal surgery. The point in time of urinary catheter removal was equally distributed between before, simultaneously and after the removal of the epidural catheter (respectively: ~28-29\%). The retrospective study showed a catheter-associated UTI in 6.7\%. Women were affected significantly more often than men (10,7\% versus 2,5\%, p<0.001). There was a non-significant trend to more UTIs when the suprapubic catheter was removed after the epidural catheter (before: 5.7\%, after: 8.4\%). Conclusion The point in time of suprapubic bladder drainage removal in relation to the removal of the epidural catheter does not seem to correlate with the rate of UTIs. The current handling in Germany is inhomogeneous, so further studies to standardize treatment are recommended.},
  language  = {en}
}