@article{KlitschEvdokimovFranketal.2020, author = {Klitsch, Alexander and Evdokimov, Dimitar and Frank, Johanna and Thomas, Dominique and Saffer, Nadine and Meyer zu Altenschildesche, Caren and Sisignano, Marco and Kampik, Daniel and Malik, Rayaz A. and Sommer, Claudia and {\"U}{\c{c}}eyler, Nurcan}, title = {Reduced association between dendritic cells and corneal sub-basal nerve fibers in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome}, series = {Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System}, volume = {25}, journal = {Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1111/jns.12360}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214150}, pages = {9-18}, year = {2020}, abstract = {In our study, we aimed at investigating corneal langerhans cells (LC) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and small fiber neuropathy (SFN) as potential contributors to corneal small fiber pathology. We enrolled women with FMS (n = 134) and SFN (n = 41) who underwent neurological examination, neurophysiology, prostaglandin analysis in tear fluid, and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). Data were compared with those of 60 age-matched female controls. After screening for dry eye disease, corneal LC were counted and sub-classified as dendritic (dLC) and non-dendritic (ndLC) cells with or without nerve fiber association. We further analyzed corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), length (CNFL), and branch density (CNBD). Neurological examination indicated deficits of small fiber function in patients with SFN. Nerve conduction studies were normal in all participants. Dry eye disease was more prevalent in FMS (17\%) and SFN (28\%) patients than in controls (5\%). Tear fluid prostaglandin levels did not differ between FMS patients and controls. While corneal LC density in FMS and SFN patients was not different from controls, there were fewer dLC in association with nerve fibers in FMS and SFN patients than in controls (P < .01 each). Compared to controls, CNFL was lower in FMS and SFN patients (P < .05 each), CNFD was lower only in FMS patients (P < .05), and CNBD was lower only in SFN patients (P < .001). There was no difference in any CCM parameter between patients with and without dry eyes. Our data indicate changes in corneal innervation and LC distribution in FMS and SFN, potentially based on altered LC signaling.}, language = {en} } @article{EgenolfAltenschildescheKressetal.2021, author = {Egenolf, Nadine and Altenschildesche, Caren Meyer zu and Kreß, Luisa and Eggermann, Katja and Namer, Barbara and Gross, Franziska and Klitsch, Alexander and Malzacher, Tobias and Kampik, Daniel and Malik, Rayaz A. and Kurth, Ingo and Sommer, Claudia and {\"U}{\c{c}}eyler, Nurcan}, title = {Diagnosing small fiber neuropathy in clinical practice: a deep phenotyping study}, series = {Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders}, volume = {14}, journal = {Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders}, issn = {1756-2864}, doi = {10.1177/17562864211004318}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-232019}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Background and aims: Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) is increasingly suspected in patients with pain of uncertain origin, and making the diagnosis remains a challenge lacking a diagnostic gold standard. Methods: In this case-control study, we prospectively recruited 86 patients with a medical history and clinical phenotype suggestive of SFN. Patients underwent neurological examination, quantitative sensory testing (QST), and distal and proximal skin punch biopsy, and were tested for pain-associated gene loci. Fifty-five of these patients additionally underwent pain-related evoked potentials (PREP), corneal confocal microscopy (CCM), and a quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART). Results: Abnormal distal intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) (60/86, 70\%) and neurological examination (53/86, 62\%) most frequently reflected small fiber disease. Adding CCM and/or PREP further increased the number of patients with small fiber impairment to 47/55 (85\%). Genetic testing revealed potentially pathogenic gene variants in 14/86 (16\%) index patients. QST, QSART, and proximal IENFD were of lower impact. Conclusion: We propose to diagnose SFN primarily based on the results of neurological examination and distal IENFD, with more detailed phenotyping in specialized centers.}, language = {en} }