@article{GersztenSahgalSheehanetal.2013, author = {Gerszten, Peter C. and Sahgal, Arjun and Sheehan, Jason P. and Kersh, Ronald and Chen, Stephanie and Flickinger, John C. and Quader, Mubina and Fahim, Daniel and Grills, Inga and Shin, John H. and Winey, Brian and Oh, Kevin and Sweeney, Reinhart A. and Guckenberger, Matthias}, title = {A multi-national report on methods for institutional credentialing for spine radiosurgery}, series = {Radiation Oncology}, volume = {8}, journal = {Radiation Oncology}, number = {158}, doi = {10.1186/1748-717X-8-158}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-131485}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiosurgery are rapidly emerging treatment options for both malignant and benign spine tumors. Proper institutional credentialing by physicians and medical physicists as well as other personnel is important for the safe and effective adoption of spine radiosurgery. This article describes the methods for institutional credentialing for spine radiosurgery at seven highly experienced international institutions. Methods: All institutions (n = 7) are members of the Elekta Spine Radiosurgery Research Consortium and have a dedicated research and clinical focus on image-guided spine radiosurgery. A questionnaire consisting of 24 items covering various aspects of institutional credentialing for spine radiosurgery was completed by all seven institutions. Results: Close agreement was observed in most aspects of spine radiosurgery credentialing at each institution. A formal credentialing process was believed to be important for the implementation of a new spine radiosurgery program, for patient safety and clinical outcomes. One institution has a written policy specific for spine radiosurgery credentialing, but all have an undocumented credentialing system in place. All institutions rely upon an in-house proctoring system for the training of both physicians and medical physicists. Four institutions require physicians and medical physicists to attend corporate sponsored training. Two of these 4 institutions also require attendance at a non-corporate sponsored academic society radiosurgery course. Corporate as well as non-corporate sponsored training were believed to be complimentary and both important for training. In 5 centers, all cases must be reviewed at a multidisciplinary conference prior to radiosurgery treatment. At 3 centers, neurosurgeons are not required to be involved in all cases if there is no evidence for instability or spinal cord compression. Backup physicians and physicists are required at only 1 institution, but all institutions have more than one specialist trained to perform spine radiosurgery. All centers believed that credentialing should also be device specific, and all believed that professional societies should formulate guidelines for institutions on the requirements for spine radiosurgery credentialing. Finally, in 4 institutions radiation therapists were required to attend corporate-sponsored device specific training for credentialing, and in only 1 institution were radiation therapists required to also attend academic society training for credentialing. Conclusions: This study represents the first multi-national report of the current practice of institutional credentialing for spine radiosurgery. Key methodologies for safe implementation and credentialing of spine radiosurgery have been identified. There is strong agreement among experienced centers that credentialing is an important component of the safe and effective implementation of a spine radiosurgery program.}, language = {en} } @article{MuellenbachRoewerKranke2013, author = {M{\"u}llenbach, Ralf Michael and Roewer, Norbert and Kranke, Peter}, title = {Quality Assurance Would Be Welcome}, series = {Deutsches {\"A}rzteblatt international}, volume = {110}, journal = {Deutsches {\"A}rzteblatt international}, number = {27-28}, doi = {10.3238/arztebl.2013.0485a}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-128844}, pages = {485}, year = {2013}, abstract = {No abstract available.}, language = {en} } @article{StrahlGerlichAlpersetal.2018, author = {Strahl, Andr{\´e} and Gerlich, Christian and Alpers, Georg W. and Ehrmann, Katja and Gehrke, J{\"o}rg and M{\"u}ller-Garnn, Annette and Vogel, Heiner}, title = {Development and evaluation of a standardized peer-training in the context of peer review for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation}, series = {BMC Medical Education}, volume = {18}, journal = {BMC Medical Education}, number = {135}, doi = {10.1186/s12909-018-1233-z}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-175738}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Background: The German quality assurance programme for evaluating work capacity is based on peer review that evaluates the quality of medical experts' reports. Low reliability is thought to be due to systematic differences among peers. For this purpose, we developed a curriculum for a standardized peer-training (SPT). This study investigates, whether the SPT increases the inter-rater reliability of social medical physicians participating in a cross-institutional peer review. Methods: Forty physicians from 16 regional German Pension Insurances were subjected to SPT. The three-day training course consist of nine educational objectives recorded in a training manual. The SPT is split into a basic module providing basic information about the peer review and an advanced module for small groups of up to 12 peers training peer review using medical reports. Feasibility was tested by assessing selection, comprehensibility and subjective use of contents delivered, the trainers' delivery and design of training materials. The effectiveness of SPT was determined by evaluating peer concordance using three anonymised medical reports assessed by each peer. Percentage agreement and Fleiss' kappa (κ\(_m\)) were calculated. Concordance was compared with review results from a previous unstructured, non-standardized peer-training programme (control condition) performed by 19 peers from 12 German Pension Insurances departments. The control condition focused exclusively on the application of peer review in small groups. No specifically training materials, methods and trainer instructions were used. Results: Peer-training was shown to be feasible. The level of subjective confidence in handling the peer review instrument varied between 70 and 90\%. Average percentage agreement for the main outcome criterion was 60.2\%, resulting in a κ\(_m\) of 0.39. By comparison, the average percentage concordance was 40.2\% and the κ\(_m\) was 0.12 for the control condition. Conclusion: Concordance with the main criterion was relevant but not significant (p = 0.2) higher for SPT than for the control condition. Fleiss' kappa coefficient showed that peer concordance was higher for SPT than randomly expected. Nevertheless, a score of 0.39 for the main criterion indicated only fair inter-rater reliability, considerably lower than the conventional standard of 0.7 for adequate reliability.}, language = {en} } @article{StrahlGerlichAlpersetal.2019, author = {Strahl, Andr{\´e} and Gerlich, Christian and Alpers, Georg W. and Gehrke, J{\"o}rg and M{\"u}ller-Garnn, Annette and Vogel, Heiner}, title = {An instrument for quality assurance in work capacity evaluation: development, evaluation, and inter-rater reliability}, series = {BMC Health Services Research}, volume = {19}, journal = {BMC Health Services Research}, doi = {10.1186/s12913-019-4387-4}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200289}, pages = {556}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Background: Employees insured in pension insurance, who are incapable of working due to ill health, are entitled to a disability pension. To assess whether an individual meets the medical requirements to be considered as disabled, a work capacity evaluation is conducted. However, there are no official guidelines on how to perform an external quality assurance for this evaluation process. Furthermore, the quality of medical reports in the field of insurance medicine can vary substantially, and systematic evaluations are scarce. Reliability studies using peer review have repeatedly shown insufficient ability to distinguish between high, moderate and low quality. Considering literature recommendations, we developed an instrument to examine the quality of medical experts'reports. Methods: The peer review manual developed contains six quality domains (formal structure, clarity, transparency, completeness, medical-scientific principles, and efficiency) comprising 22 items. In addition, a superordinate criterion (survey confirmability) rank the overall quality and usefulness of a report. This criterion evaluates problems of innerlogic and reasoning. Development of the manual was assisted by experienced physicians in a pre-test. We examined the observable variance in peer judgements and reliability as the most important outcome criteria. To evaluate inter-rater reliability, 20 anonymous experts' reports detailing the work capacity evaluation were reviewed by 19 trained raters (peers). Percentage agreement and Kendall's W, a reliability measure of concordance between two or more peers, were calculated. A total of 325 reviews were conducted. Results: Agreement of peer judgements with respect to the superordinate criterion ranged from 29.2 to 87.5\%. Kendall's W for the quality domain items varied greatly, ranging from 0.09 to 0.88. With respect to the superordinate criterion, Kendall's W was 0.39, which indicates fair agreement. The results of the percentage agreement revealed systemic peer preferences for certain deficit scale categories. Conclusion: The superordinate criterion was not sufficiently reliable. However, in comparison to other reliability studies, this criterion showed an equivalent reliability value. This report aims to encourage further efforts to improve evaluation instruments. To reduce disagreement between peer judgments, we propose the revision of the peer review instrumentand the development and implementation of a standardized rater training to improve reliability.}, language = {en} } @article{KrupitzerEberhardingerGerostathopoulosetal.2020, author = {Krupitzer, Christian and Eberhardinger, Benedikt and Gerostathopoulos, Ilias and Raibulet, Claudia}, title = {Introduction to the special issue "Applications in Self-Aware Computing Systems and their Evaluation"}, series = {Computers}, volume = {9}, journal = {Computers}, number = {1}, issn = {2073-431X}, doi = {10.3390/computers9010022}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-203439}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The joint 1st Workshop on Evaluations and Measurements in Self-Aware Computing Systems (EMSAC 2019) and Workshop on Self-Aware Computing (SeAC) was held as part of the FAS* conference alliance in conjunction with the 16th IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC) and the 13th IEEE International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems (SASO) in Ume{\aa}, Sweden on 20 June 2019. The goal of this one-day workshop was to bring together researchers and practitioners from academic environments and from the industry to share their solutions, ideas, visions, and doubts in self-aware computing systems in general and in the evaluation and measurements of such systems in particular. The workshop aimed to enable discussions, partnerships, and collaborations among the participants. This special issue follows the theme of the workshop. It contains extended versions of workshop presentations as well as additional contributions.}, language = {en} } @article{WackExnerWegeneretal.2020, author = {Wack, Linda J. and Exner, Florian and Wegener, Sonja and Sauer, Otto A.}, title = {The impact of isocentric shifts on delivery accuracy during the irradiation of small cerebral targets — Quantification and possible corrections}, series = {Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics}, volume = {21}, journal = {Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics}, number = {5}, doi = {10.1002/acm2.12854}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-218146}, pages = {56-64}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Purpose To assess the impact of isocenter shifts due to linac gantry and table rotation during cranial stereotactic radiosurgery on D\(_{98}\), target volume coverage (TVC), conformity (CI), and gradient index (GI). Methods Winston-Lutz (WL) checks were performed on two Elekta Synergy linacs. A stereotactic quality assurance (QA) plan was applied to the ArcCHECK phantom to assess the impact of isocenter shift corrections on Gamma pass rates. These corrections included gantry sag, distance of collimator and couch axes to the gantry axis, and distance between cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) isocenter and treatment beam (MV) isocenter. We applied the shifts via script to the treatment plan in Pinnacle 16.2. In a planning study, isocenter and mechanical rotation axis shifts of 0.25 to 2 mm were applied to stereotactic plans of spherical planning target volumes (PTVs) of various volumes. The shifts determined via WL measurements were applied to 16 patient plans with PTV sizes between 0.22 and 10.4 cm3. Results ArcCHECK measurements of a stereotactic treatment showed significant increases in Gamma pass rate for all three measurements (up to 3.8 percentage points) after correction of measured isocenter deviations. For spherical targets of 1 cm3, CI was most severely affected by increasing the distance of the CBCT isocenter (1.22 to 1.62). Gradient index increased with an isocenter-collimator axis distance of 1.5 mm (3.84 vs 4.62). D98 (normalized to reference) dropped to 0.85 (CBCT), 0.92 (table axis), 0.95 (collimator axis), and 0.98 (gantry sag), with similar but smaller changes for larger targets. Applying measured shifts to patient plans lead to relevant drops in D\(_{98}\) and TVC (7\%) for targets below 2 cm\(^3\) treated on linac 1. Conclusion Mechanical deviations during gantry, collimator, and table rotation may adversely affect the treatment of small stereotactic lesions. Adjustments of beam isocenters in the treatment planning system (TPS) can be used to both quantify their impact and for prospective correction of treatment plans.}, language = {en} } @article{EgbertsFeketeHaegeetal.2022, author = {Egberts, Karin and Fekete, Stefanie and H{\"a}ge, Alexander and Hiemke, Christoph and Scherf-Clavel, Maike and Taurines, Regina and Unterecker, Stefan and Gerlach, Manfred and Romanos, Marcel}, title = {Therapeutisches Drug Monitoring zur Optimierung der Psychopharmakotherapie von Kindern und Jugendlichen: Update und Leitfaden f{\"u}r die Praxis}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie}, volume = {50}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie}, number = {2}, issn = {1422-4917}, doi = {10.1024/1422-4917/a000845}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-262038}, pages = {133-152}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Trotz verbesserter Evidenzbasis bestehen in der kinder- und jugendpsychiatrischen Pharmakotherapie viele Unsicherheiten {\"u}ber die Wirkung und Vertr{\"a}glichkeit der h{\"a}ufig off-label oder in Kombinationstherapie verordneten Medikamente. Gerade auch vor dem Hintergrund der in vielen F{\"a}llen notwendigen mittel- bis langfristigen Einnahme sollen unerw{\"u}nschte Arzneimittelwirkungen in dieser Altersstufe m{\"o}glichst minimiert und eine auf die individuellen Charakteristika der Patientin oder des Patienten zugeschnittene, effektive Dosierung gefunden werden. Kinder und Jugendliche scheinen nicht nur besonders anf{\"a}llig f{\"u}r bestimmte unerw{\"u}nschte Arzneimittelwirkungen, sondern sind auch iatrogenen Risiken durch Dosierungs- oder Applikationsfehler ausgesetzt, die zu Unter- oder {\"U}berdosierungen f{\"u}hren k{\"o}nnen mit entsprechend negativen Auswirkungen auf den Therapieerfolg. Neben einer strengen Indikationsstellung sind daher eine pr{\"a}zise Dosisfindung sowie systematische {\"U}berwachung der Sicherheit der Psychopharmakotherapie unverzichtbar. In diesem Artikel wird Therapeutisches Drug Monitoring als hilfreiches klinisches Instrument vorgestellt und beschrieben, wie dessen richtige Anwendung sowohl die Wirksamkeit als auch die Sicherheit und Vertr{\"a}glichkeit einer Psychopharmakotherapie im Kindes- und Jugendalter zum unmittelbaren Nutzen f{\"u}r die Patientinnen und Patienten verbessern kann.}, language = {de} } @article{WegenerSchindhelmSauer2022, author = {Wegener, Sonja and Schindhelm, Robert and Sauer, Otto A.}, title = {Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation}, series = {Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics}, volume = {23}, journal = {Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics}, number = {5}, doi = {10.1002/acm2.13577}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-312906}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Purpose: Any Linac will show geometric imprecisions, including non-ideal alignment of the gantry, collimator and couch axes, and gantry sag or wobble. Their angular dependence can be quantified and resulting changes of the dose distribution predicted (Wack, JACMP 20(5), 2020). We analyzed whether it is feasible to correct geometric shifts during treatment planning. The successful implementation of such a correction procedure was verified by measurements of different stereotactic treatment plans. Methods: Isocentric shifts were quantified for two Elekta Synergy Agility Linacs using the QualiForMed ISO-CBCT+ module, yielding the shift between kV and MV isocenters, the gantry flex and wobble as well as the positions of couch and collimator rotation axes. Next, the position of each field's isocenter in the Pinnacle treatment planning system was adjusted accordingly using a script. Fifteen stereotactic treatment plans of cerebral metastases (0.34 to 26.53 cm3) comprising 9-11 beams were investigated; 54 gantry and couch combinations in total. Unmodified plans and corrected plans were measured using the Sun Nuclear SRS-MapCHECK with the Stereophan phantom and evaluated using gamma analysis. Results: Geometric imprecisions, such as shifts of up to 0.8 mm between kV and MV isocenter, a couch rotation axis 0.9 mm off the kV isocente,r and gantry flex with an amplitude of 1.1 mm, were found. For eight, mostly small PTVs D98 values declined more than 5\% by simulating these shifts. The average gamma (2\%/2 mm, absolute, global, 20\% threshold) was reduced from 0.53 to 0.31 (0.32 to 0.30) for Linac 1 (Linac 2) when including the isocentric corrections. Thus, Linac 1 reached the accuracy level of Linac 2 after correction. Conclusion: Correcting for Linac geometric deviations during the planning process is feasible and was dosimetrically validated. The dosimetric impact of the geometric imperfections can vary between Linacs and should be assessed and corrected where necessary.}, language = {en} } @article{VloetFetekeGerlachetal.2022, author = {Vloet, Timo D. and Feteke, Stefanie and Gerlach, Manfred and Romanos, Marcel}, title = {Das pharmakologische Management kinder- und jugendpsychiatrischer Notf{\"a}lle : Evidenz und Qualit{\"a}tssicherung}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie}, volume = {50}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie}, number = {4}, issn = {1422-4917}, doi = {10.1024/1422-4917/a000833}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-280982}, pages = {262-274}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Kinder- und jugendpsychiatrische Notf{\"a}lle sind h{\"a}ufig und stellen die beteiligten {\"A}rztinnen und {\"A}rzte vor besondere Herausforderungen, da eine erhebliche Gefahr f{\"u}r die Patient_innen oder Dritte unter Anwendung m{\"o}glichst wenig invasiver Mittel abzuwenden ist. In diesem Kontext werden neben haltgebenden, deeskalierenden und psychotherapeutischen Optionen h{\"a}ufig auch pharmakologische Interventionen eingesetzt. Da ein Mangel an systematisch erhobenen Daten besteht, findet die pharmakologische Notfallbehandlung in der Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie regelhaft im off-label-Bereich statt. Vor dem Hintergrund der komplexen klinischen und rechtlichen Anforderungen an die {\"A}rztinnen und {\"A}rzte werden im vorliegenden Artikel praxisrelevante Hinweise insbesondere zum pharmakologischen Management von in der Praxis h{\"a}ufig auftretenden kinder- und jugendpsychiatrischen Notf{\"a}llen wie akuter Suizidalit{\"a}t, akut psychotischem Erleben, Delir und Bewusstseinsst{\"o}rungen sowie akuter Intoxikation und Alkoholentzugssyndrom gegeben. Weiterhin werden Maßnahmen zur Qualit{\"a}tssicherung und Arzneimittelsicherheit diskutiert.}, language = {de} } @article{DietzschBraesigkSeideletal.2022, author = {Dietzsch, Stefan and Braesigk, Annett and Seidel, Clemens and Remmele, Julia and Kitzing, Ralf and Schlender, Tina and Mynarek, Martin and Geismar, Dirk and Jablonska, Karolina and Schwarz, Rudolf and Pazos, Montserrat and Weber, Damien C. and Frick, Silke and Gurtner, Kristin and Matuschek, Christiane and Harrabi, Semi Ben and Gl{\"u}ck, Albrecht and Lewitzki, Victor and Dieckmann, Karin and Benesch, Martin and Gerber, Nicolas U. and Obrecht, Denise and Rutkowski, Stefan and Timmermann, Beate and Kortmann, Rolf-Dieter}, title = {Types of deviation and review criteria in pretreatment central quality control of tumor bed boost in medulloblastoma—an analysis of the German Radiotherapy Quality Control Panel in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial}, series = {Strahlentherapie und Onkologie}, volume = {198}, journal = {Strahlentherapie und Onkologie}, number = {3}, issn = {0179-7158}, doi = {10.1007/s00066-021-01822-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-307812}, pages = {282-290}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Purpose In Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, pretreatment radiotherapy quality control (RT-QC) for tumor bed boost (TB) in non-metastatic medulloblastoma (MB) was not mandatory but was recommended for patients enrolled in the SIOP PNET5 MB trial between 2014 and 2018. This individual case review (ICR) analysis aimed to evaluate types of deviations in the initial plan proposals and develop uniform review criteria for TB boost. Patients and methods A total of 78 patients were registered in this trial, of whom a subgroup of 65 patients were available for evaluation of the TB treatment plans. Dose uniformity was evaluated according to the definitions of the protocol. Additional RT-QC criteria for standardized review of target contours were elaborated and data evaluated accordingly. Results Of 65 initial TB plan proposals, 27 (41.5\%) revealed deviations of target volume delineation. Deviations according to the dose uniformity criteria were present in 14 (21.5\%) TB plans. In 25 (38.5\%) cases a modification of the RT plan was recommended. Rejection of the TB plans was rather related to unacceptable target volume delineation than to insufficient dose uniformity. Conclusion In this analysis of pretreatment RT-QC, protocol deviations were present in a high proportion of initial TB plan proposals. These findings emphasize the importance of pretreatment RT-QC in clinical trials for MB. Based on these data, a proposal for RT-QC criteria for tumor bed boost in non-metastatic MB was developed.}, language = {en} }