@phdthesis{Hoerner2020,
  author    = {H{\"o}rner, Sven},
  title     = {Empirical Studies on Accounting - Shareholders' Perceptions of Earnings Quality},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-18847},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-188473},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Accounting plays an essential role in solving the principal-agent problem between managers and shareholders of capital market-oriented companies through the provision of information by the manager. However, this can succeed only if the accounting information is of high quality. In this context, the perceptions of shareholders regarding earnings quality are of particular importance. The present dissertation intends to contribute to a deeper understanding regarding earnings quality from the perspective of shareholders of capital market-oriented companies. In particular, the thesis deals with indicators of shareholders' perceptions of earnings quality, the influence of the auditor's independence on these perceptions, and the shareholders' assessment of the importance of earnings quality in general. Therefore, this dissertation examines market reactions to earnings announcements, measures of earnings quality and the auditor's independence, as well as shareholders' voting behavior at annual general meetings. Following the introduction and a theoretical part consisting of two chapters, which deal with the purposes of accounting and auditing as well as the relevance of shareholder voting at the annual general meeting in the context of the principal-agent theory, the dissertation presents three empirical studies. The empirical study presented in chapter 4 investigates auditor ratification votes in a U.S. setting. The study addresses the question of whether the results of auditor ratification votes are informative regarding shareholders' perceptions of earnings quality. Using a returns-earnings design, the study demonstrates that the results of auditor ratification votes are associated with market reactions to unexpected earnings at the earnings announcement date. Furthermore, there are indications that this association seems to be positively related to higher levels of information asymmetry between managers and shareholders. Thus, there is empirical support for the notion that the results of auditor ratification votes are earnings-related information that might help shareholders to make informed investment decisions. Chapter 5 investigates the relation between the economic importance of the client and perceived earnings quality. In particular, it is examined whether and when shareholders have a negative perception of an auditor's economic dependence on the client. The results from a Big 4 client sample in the U.S. (fiscal years 2010 through 2014) indicate a negative association between the economic importance of the client and shareholders' perceptions of earnings quality. The results are interpreted to mean that shareholders are still concerned about auditor independence even ten years after the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Furthermore, the association between the economic importance of the client and shareholders' perceptions of earnings quality applies predominantly to the subsample of clients that are more likely to be financially distressed. Therefore, the empirical results reveal that shareholders' perceptions of auditor independence are conditional on the client's circumstances. The study presented in chapter 6 sheds light on the question of whether earnings quality influences shareholders' satisfaction with the members of the company's board. Using data from 1,237 annual general meetings of German listed companies from 2010 through 2015, the study provides evidence that earnings quality - measured by the absolute value of discretionary accruals - is related to shareholders' satisfaction with the company's board. Moreover, the findings imply that shareholders predominantly blame the management board for inferior earnings quality. Overall, the evidence that earnings quality positively influences shareholders' satisfaction emphasizes the relevance of earnings quality.},
  subject      = {Qualit{\"a}t},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Hoehn2014,
  author    = {H{\"o}hn, Balthasar},
  title     = {Voluntary Interim Auditor Reviews and the Enforcement System in Germany},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-98957},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Diese Dissertation behandelt das Thema der Finanzberichterstattung und Wirtschaftspr{\"u}fung. In einer allgemeinen Einleitung werden die gesetzlichen Grundlagen zur kapitalmarktorientierten Rechnungslegung und deren Kontrollen beschrieben. Als Folge des Bilanzkontrollgesetzes (BilKoG) wurde die Deutsche Pr{\"u}fstelle f{\"u}r Rechnungslegung (DPR) gegr{\"u}ndet. Diese privatrechtlich organisierte Kontrollinstanz pr{\"u}ft seit dem Jahr 2005 die Rechnungslegung von Unternehmen in Deutschland, die am regulierten Kapitalmarkt gelistet sind (Enforcement). Ziel ist es, eine wahrhafte und transparente Rechnungslegung im Interesse des Kapitalmarkts zu gew{\"a}hrleisten. Neben dem BilKoG wurde durch das am 20.01.2007 in Kraft getretene Transparenzrichtlinie-Umsetzungsgesetz (TUG) die Richtlinie 2004/109/EG in deutsches Recht transformiert. Ziel der EU-Transparenzrichtlinie war 'die Schaffung effizienter, integrierter und transparenter Wertpapierm{\"a}rkte, die Anleger und Kapitalgeber besser {\"u}ber die Finanzlage kapitalmarktorientierter Unternehmen informieren' (Henkel et al. (2008), S. 36). In der vorliegenden Arbeit werden in drei Studien spezielle Fragestellungen ausgehend von der gesetzlichen Entwicklung in Deutschland analysiert. Es werden die Zusammenh{\"a}nge zwischen freiwilligen Kontrollen eines Wirtschaftspr{\"u}fers, staatlichem Enforcement, Pr{\"u}fungskosten und Bilanzpolitik untersucht. Die erste Studie befasst sich mit der freiwilligen Kontrolle der Zwischenberichterstattung kapitalmarktorientierter Unternehmen. Die unterj{\"a}hrige Ver{\"o}ffentlichung von Zwischenberichten bietet entscheidungsrelevante und zeitnahe Informationen f{\"u}r Kapitalmarktakteure. Eine pr{\"u}ferische Durchsicht durch einen Wirtschaftspr{\"u}fer kann zus{\"a}tzliches Vertrauen in die Berichterstattung liefern. Bei der Implementierung des TUG wurde eine pflichtm{\"a}ßige pr{\"u}ferische Durchsicht von Zwischenberichten in Deutschland diskutiert. Der Gesetzgeber entschied sich gegen eine gesetzliche Verpflichtung und {\"u}bertrug die Entscheidung einer freiwilligen unterj{\"a}hrigen Kontrolle an Unternehmen und Wirtschaftspr{\"u}fer. Dieser Marktl{\"o}sung in Deutschland steht eine gesetzlich verpflichtete pr{\"u}ferische Durchsicht z.B. in den USA, Frankreich oder Australien gegen{\"u}ber. Es stellt sich folglich die Frage nach Kosten und Nutzen einer solchen Kontrollleistung, um die Vorteilhaftigkeit der gesetzlichen Pflicht oder der Marktl{\"o}sung zu bewerten. Diese erste Studie nutzt ausgehend vom TUG einen neu entstandenen, beobachtbaren Markt f{\"u}r pr{\"u}ferische Durchsichten in Deutschland. Die Kategorisierung der Pr{\"u}fungskosten in ‚Abschlusspr{\"u}fungskosten' und ‚Pr{\"u}fungsnahen Dienstleistungen' erm{\"o}glicht eine detaillierte Untersuchung der Kosten f{\"u}r das Unternehmen. Weiter wird der Nutzen in Bezug auf die Qualit{\"a}t der unterj{\"a}hrigen Berichterstattung analysiert. In der zweiten Studie wird das Angebot und die Nachfrage von pr{\"u}ferischen Durchsichten beleuchtet. In der Literatur werden die Agency-Kosten, die Corporate Governance Struktur und verschiedene Kostentreiber dieser Pr{\"u}fungsleistung als Einflussfaktoren identifiziert. Der positive Nachfrageschock bei pr{\"u}ferischen Durchsichten im Jahr 2007 l{\"a}sst sich durch diese Faktoren jedoch nicht erkl{\"a}ren. Ausgehend von der neu beobachtbaren Nachfrage stellt die Studie einen Zusammenhang zwischen dem erstmaligen Enforcement von Zwischenberichten durch die DPR und dem Inkrafttretens des TUG im Jahr 2007 her. Die gesetzlichen {\"A}nderungen werden dem theoretischen Rahmen von Angebot und Nachfrage freiwilliger externer Kontrollen zugeordnet. Im n{\"a}chsten Schritt wird der Einfluss von Fehlerentdeckungsrisiken durch die DPR f{\"u}r Management und Aufsichtsrat auf die Nachfrage von externen Kontrollen untersucht. Die dritte Studie befasst sich mit der Effektivit{\"a}t des deutschen Enforcement-Systems, dem Einfluss von Bilanzpolitik und dessen Antizipation in den Pr{\"u}fungskosten. Die Untersuchung analysiert den zeitlichen Aspekt von Bilanzpolitik auf Fehlerver{\"o}ffentlichungen in sp{\"a}teren Perioden. Es besteht die M{\"o}glichkeit die Verschlechterung der wirtschaftlichen Situation eines Unternehmens durch Bilanzpolitik zu verdecken. Ohne Verbesserung der wirtschaftlichen Lage des Unternehmens f{\"u}hrt dieses Verhalten zu einem Bilanzpolitikausmaß außerhalb des gesetzlichen Rahmens und folglich zu einer hohen Wahrscheinlichkeit der Fehlerentdeckung bei DPR Untersuchungen. Die Entwicklung der Bilanzpolitik eines solchen Unternehmens m{\"u}sste im zweiten Schritt mit der Risikokomponente in den Pr{\"u}fungskosten des Wirtschaftspr{\"u}fers in Verbindung stehen. Der risikoorientierte Pr{\"u}fungsansatz und die Antizipation von Bilanzpolitik in den Pr{\"u}fungskosten sollte demnach vor Fehlerbekanntmachung zu einem Anstieg der Pr{\"u}fungskosten f{\"u}hren. Zus{\"a}tzlich ist nach offizieller Fehlerver{\"o}ffentlichung und somit durch eine objektiv beobachtbare Schw{\"a}che im Rechnungslegungssystem oder einem hohen Ausmaß an Bilanzpolitik ein Risikoaufschlag zu vermuten. Der letzte Abschnitt fasst die wichtigsten Aussagen der Dissertation zusammen und erl{\"a}utert die Zusammenh{\"a}nge der Ergebnisse.},
  subject      = {Rechnungslegung},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Strohmenger2014,
  author    = {Strohmenger, Manuel},
  title     = {Three Essays on the Enforcement of Accounting Standards in Germany},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-97707},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {The dissertation at hand focuses on the enforcement of accounting standards in Germany. The legal basis of the external enforcement of accounting standards in Germany was created by the „Bilanzkontrollgesetz" (Financial Reporting Enforcement Act) at the end of 2004. An enforcement mechanism was installed to enforce accounting standard compliance by regular reviews of disclosed financial statements. The system was established as implementation of EU guidelines. Since 2005, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) shall be applied for consolidated financial statement of firms listed on a regulated market segment within the European Union (EU) (Regulation EC No. 1606/2002). Simultaneously to the harmonization of accounting standards, the EU fostered the standardization of enforcement systems to ensure compliance with international accounting standards. Par. 16 of the so-called "IAS Regulation" mandates the "Committee of European Securities Regulators" (CESR) to "develop a common approach to enforcement". Germany's unique two-tiered system operates since July 2005; it involves the "Deutsche Pruefstelle fuer Rechnungslegung" (Financial Reporting Enforcement Panel), a newly established private organization primarily assigned to conduct the reviews. As the second tier, the „Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht" (Federal Financial Supervisory Authority) has the sovereign authority to order the publication of errors („error announcements") and if necessary, to force the cooperation of firms in the review process. The dissertation is structured as follows. A general introduction focuses on the theoretical background and the reasoning for the need of external enforcement mechanisms. The common approach to enforcement in the European Union is described. Building on this, the thesis consists of three individual essays that analyze three specific questions in the context of the enforcement of financial reporting standards in Germany. The first paper focuses on the systematical evaluation of the information contained in 100 selected error announcements (from a total population of 151 evaluable announcements). The study finds that error announcements on average contain 3.64 single errors and 77\% affect the reported profit. Relatively small as well as big, highly levered and rather unprofitable firms are overrepresented in the sample of misstatement firms. In a second step, the essay investigates the development of censured firms over time; the pre- and post-misstatement development of the firms in terms of balance sheet data, financial ratios and (real) earnings management are tracked. The analysis detects increasing leverage ratios and a decline in profitability over time. In the year of misstatement firms report large total and discretionary accruals, indicating earnings management. Compared to matched control firms, significant differences in profitability, market valuation, earnings management and real activities manipulations are observable. A major contribution of this first study is the examination of trends in financial data and (real) earnings management over a number of years surrounding misstatements as well as the elaboration of the distinction to non-misstating firms. The results show the meaning of the enforcement of IFRS for the quality of financial reporting to standard setters, policy makers, and investors in Germany. The second paper examines the interrelation of enforcement releases, firm characteristics and earnings quality. Prior literature documents the correlation between underperformance in financial ratios and the probability of erroneous disclosure of financial statements; this study provides evidence for differences in characteristics between firms with enforcement releases and control firms as well as a broad sample of German publicly traded firms (4,730 firm-year observations). Furthermore, research affirms the connection of financial ratios to earnings quality metrics. The accuracy of financial information is considered to be correlated with its quality and therefore the differences in earnings quality between various sub-samples is examined. Overall, the results document the underperformance in important financial ratios as well as indicate an inferior earnings quality of firms subject to enforcement releases vis-a-vis the control groups. These results hold with regard to both different earnings quality specifications and different periods observed. This study appends the earnings quality discussion and contributes to develop a comprehensive picture of accounting quality for the unique institutional settings of Germany. The paper shows that a conjoint two-tier public and private enforcement system is effective and might be an adequate model for other countries. Implications for the regulation of corporate governance, the enforcement panel and the auditor are identified. The third essay additionally considers the role of the auditor. The firms subject to error announcements are used to evaluate the consequences of increasing earnings management over time on enforcement releases and their recognition in audit fees. Prior literature provides evidence on a phenomenon called „balance sheet bloat" that is due to income increasing earnings management and later influences the disclosure of misstated financial statements. The evidence of earnings management recognition in audit fees and findings on the content of future information in audit fees leads to the hypothesis that auditors recognize increasing audit risk in fees before the enforcement process starts. The study extends related earnings management and audit fee literature by modeling the development of earnings management within the misstatement firms and systematically link it to auditor reactions. Significant predictive power of different commonly used accrual measures for enforcement releases in the period prior and up to the misstatement period are found by the study. In the same period of time an increase in audit fees, e.g. the recognition of increased audit risk, can be observed. A possible audit fee effect after the misstatement period is investigated, but no significant relation is obtained. The dissertation closes with a summary of the main findings, a conclusion to the connection of the three essays as well as subsumption of findings in the accounting literature.},
  subject      = {Rechnungslegung},
  language  = {en}
}