@article{HollenhorstJurastowNandigamaetal.2020,
  author    = {Hollenhorst, Monika I. and Jurastow, Innokentij and Nandigama, Rajender and Appenzeller, Silke and Li, Lei and Vogel, J{\"o}rg and Wiederhold, Stephanie and Althaus, Mike and Empting, Martin and Altm{\"u}ller, Janine and Hirsch, Anna K. H. and Flockerzi, Veit and Canning, Brendan J. and Saliba, Antoine-Emmanuel and Krasteva-Christ, Gabriela},
  title     = {Tracheal brush cells release acetylcholine in response to bitter tastants for paracrine and autocrine signaling},
  series = {The FASEB Journal},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {The FASEB Journal},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1096/fj.201901314RR},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213516},
  pages     = {316 -- 332},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {For protection from inhaled pathogens many strategies have evolved in the airways such as mucociliary clearance and cough. We have previously shown that protective respiratory reflexes to locally released bacterial bitter "taste" substances are most probably initiated by tracheal brush cells (BC). Our single-cell RNA-seq analysis of murine BC revealed high expression levels of cholinergic and bitter taste signaling transcripts (Tas2r108, Gnat3, Trpm5). We directly demonstrate the secretion of acetylcholine (ACh) from BC upon stimulation with the Tas2R agonist denatonium. Inhibition of the taste transduction cascade abolished the increase in [Ca\(^{2+}\)]\(_{i}\) in BC and subsequent ACh-release. ACh-release is regulated in an autocrine manner. While the muscarinic ACh-receptors M3R and M1R are activating, M2R is inhibitory. Paracrine effects of ACh released in response to denatonium included increased [Ca\(^{2+}\)]\(_{i}\) in ciliated cells. Stimulation by denatonium or with Pseudomonas quinolone signaling molecules led to an increase in mucociliary clearance in explanted tracheae that was Trpm5- and M3R-mediated. We show that ACh-release from BC via the bitter taste cascade leads to immediate paracrine protective responses that can be boosted in an autocrine manner. This mechanism represents the initial step for the activation of innate immune responses against pathogens in the airways.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RiedererLaux2011,
  author    = {Riederer, Peter and Laux, Gerd},
  title     = {MAO-inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease},
  series = {Experimental Neurobiology},
  volume    = {20},
  journal   = {Experimental Neurobiology},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.5607/en.2011.20.1.1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-140930},
  pages     = {1-17},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAO-I) belong to the earliest drugs tried in Parkinson's disease (PD). They have been used with or without levodopa (L-DOPA). Non-selective MAO-I due to their side-effect/adverse reaction profile, like tranylcypromine have limited use in the treatment of depression in PD, while selective, reversible MAO-A inhibitors are recommended due to their easier clinical handling. For the treatment of akinesia and motor fluctuations selective irreversible MAO-B inhibitors selegiline and rasagiline are recommended. They are safe and well tolerated at the recommended daily doses. Their main differences are related to (1) metabolism, (2) interaction with CYP-enzymes and (3) quantitative properties at the molecular biological/genetic level. Rasagiline is more potent in clinical practise and has a hypothesis driven more favourable side effect/adverse reaction profile due to its metabolism to aminoindan. Both selegiline and rasagiline have a neuroprotective and neurorestaurative potential. A head-to head clinical trial would be of utmost interest from both the clinical outcome and a hypothesis-driven point of view. Selegiline is available as tablet and melting tablet for PD and as transdermal selegiline for depression, while rasagiline is marketed as tablet for PD. In general, the clinical use of MAO-I nowadays is underestimated. There should be more efforts to evaluate their clinical potency as antidepressants and antidementive drugs in addition to the final proof of their disease-modifying potential. In line with this are recent innovative developments of MAO-I plus inhibition of acetylcholine esterase for Alzheimer's disease as well as combined MAO-I and iron chelation for PD.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JaiswalLambrechtMutschleretal.1991,
  author    = {Jaiswal, Neelam and Lambrecht, G{\"u}nter and Mutschler, Ernst and Tacke, Reinhold and Malik, Kafait U.},
  title     = {Pharmacological characterization of the vascular muscarinic receptors mediating relaxation and contraction in rabbit aorta},
  series = {Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics},
  volume    = {258},
  journal   = {Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics},
  number    = {3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-128358},
  pages     = {842-850},
  year      = {1991},
  abstract  = {Studies were performed in the rabbit aortic rings, precontracted with norepinephrine, to determine the subtype(s) of muscarinic receptors involved in endothelium-dependent relaxation and contraction in the absence of endothelium elicited by cholinergic stimuli. Acetylcholine (ACh) and arecaidine propargyl ester (APE), a M2 and M3 agonist, produced a dose-dependent relaxation and contraction in endothelium-intact and endothelium-denuded rabbit aortic rings, respectively. Both of these responses were blocked by the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine. M1 selective agonist McN-A-343 [4-[N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamoyloxy]-2-butinyltrimethylammonium+ ++ chloride] did not produce any effect on the tone of precontracted aortic rings. ACh- and APE-induced relaxation in aortic rings with intact endothelium was selectively blocked by M3 receptor antagonists hexahydrosila-difenidol and p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol (pA2 of 7.84 and 7.18) but not by M1 antagonist pirenzepine or M2 receptor antagonists AF-DX 116 [11-(2-[(diethylamino)methyl]- 1-piperidinyl]acetyl)-5, 11-dihydro-6H-pyrido-[2,3-b][1,4]-benzo-diazepin-6-one] and methoctramine. ACh- and APE-induced contraction was inhibited by M2 receptor antagonists AF-DX 116 and methoctramine (pA2 of 7.11 and 6.71) but not by pirenzepine, hexahydro-sila-difenidol or p-fluoro-hexahydro-sila-difenidol. ACh- and APE-induced relaxation or contraction were not altered by nicotinic receptor antagonist hexamethonium or cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin. These data suggest that relaxation elicited by cholinergic stimulin in endothelium-intact aortic rings is mediated via release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor consequent to activation of M3 receptors located on endothelial cells, whereas the contraction in aortic rings denuded of their endothelium is mediated via stimulation of M2 receptors located on smooth muscle cells.},
  language  = {en}
}