@article{Wajant2019,
  author    = {Wajant, Harald},
  title     = {Molecular mode of action of TRAIL receptor agonists—common principles and their translational exploitation},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers11070954},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202416},
  pages     = {954},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and its death receptors TRAILR1/death receptor 4 (DR4) and TRAILR2/DR5 trigger cell death in many cancer cells but rarely exert cytotoxic activity on non-transformed cells. Against this background, a variety of recombinant TRAIL variants and anti-TRAIL death receptor antibodies have been developed and tested in preclinical and clinical studies. Despite promising results from mice tumor models, TRAIL death receptor targeting has failed so far in clinical studies to show satisfying anti-tumor efficacy. These disappointing results can largely be explained by two issues: First, tumor cells can acquire TRAIL resistance by several mechanisms defining a need for combination therapies with appropriate sensitizing drugs. Second, there is now growing preclinical evidence that soluble TRAIL variants but also bivalent anti-TRAIL death receptor antibodies typically require oligomerization or plasma membrane anchoring to achieve maximum activity. This review discusses the need for oligomerization and plasma membrane attachment for the activity of TRAIL death receptor agonists in view of what is known about the molecular mechanisms of how TRAIL death receptors trigger intracellular cell death signaling. In particular, it will be highlighted which consequences this has for the development of next generation TRAIL death receptor agonists and their potential clinical application.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Wajant2019,
  author    = {Wajant, Harald},
  title     = {Molecular mode of action of TRAIL receptor agonists—common principles and their translational exploitation},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {7},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers11070954},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201833},
  pages     = {954},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and its death receptors TRAILR1/death receptor 4 (DR4) and TRAILR2/DR5 trigger cell death in many cancer cells but rarely exert cytotoxic activity on non-transformed cells. Against this background, a variety of recombinant TRAIL variants and anti-TRAIL death receptor antibodies have been developed and tested in preclinical and clinical studies. Despite promising results from mice tumor models, TRAIL death receptor targeting has failed so far in clinical studies to show satisfying anti-tumor efficacy. These disappointing results can largely be explained by two issues: First, tumor cells can acquire TRAIL resistance by several mechanisms defining a need for combination therapies with appropriate sensitizing drugs. Second, there is now growing preclinical evidence that soluble TRAIL variants but also bivalent anti-TRAIL death receptor antibodies typically require oligomerization or plasma membrane anchoring to achieve maximum activity. This review discusses the need for oligomerization and plasma membrane attachment for the activity of TRAIL death receptor agonists in view of what is known about the molecular mechanisms of how TRAIL death receptors trigger intracellular cell death signaling. In particular, it will be highlighted which consequences this has for the development of next generation TRAIL death receptor agonists and their potential clinical application.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Fuellsack2019,
  author    = {F{\"u}llsack, Simone Alexandra},
  title     = {Die Bedeutung von Todesdom{\"a}ne Adapterproteinen f{\"u}r die Signaltransduktion des TNFR1 und der TRAIL Todesrezeptoren},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-18451},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-184518},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Die NFκB-Signalwege, Apoptose und Nekroptose sind essentielle Prozesse in der Immunantwort. Außerdem sind diese Signalwege Teil der Regulation von Zelldifferenzierung, -proliferation, -tod und Entz{\"u}ndungsreaktionen. Dabei wird zuerst der Rezeptor (TNFR1 oder TRAILR 1/2) aktiviert, die rekrutierten DD-Adapterproteine TRADD, FADD und RIPK1 leiten dann die entsprechende Signalkaskade weiter und bestimmen durch ihre Zusammenwirkung, ob der NFκB-Signalweg, Apoptose oder Nekroptose induziert wird. TNFR1 und TRAILR 1/2 ben{\"o}tigen die DD-Adapterproteine TRADD, FADD und RIPK1 f{\"u}r die Zelltodinduktion, deren konkrete Bedeutung in Bezug auf Rezeptor-Spezifit{\"a}t, Zusammenwirken und Relevanz allerdings noch unklar ist. Um das Zusammenspiel dieser Proteine besser zu verstehen, wurden in dieser Arbeit Nekroptose-kompetente RIPK3-exprimierende HeLa-Zellen verwendet, bei denen die DD-Adapterproteine FADD, TRADD und RIPK1 einzeln oder in Kombination von zweien ausgeknockt wurden. Es stellte sich heraus, dass RIPK1 essentiell f{\"u}r die TNFR1- und TRAILR 1/2-vermittelte Nekroptose-Induktion ist, doch RIPK1 alleine, d.h. ohne FADD- oder TRADD-Mitbeteiligung, nur bei der TNFR1-Nekroptose-Induktion ausreicht. Wiederum inhibiert TRADD die TNFR1- und TRAILR 1/2-induzierte Nekroptose. RIPK1 und TRADD sind aber unverzichtbar f{\"u}r die NFκB-Aktivierung durch TNFR1 oder TRAILR 1/2 und spielen eine wichtige Rolle bei TNFR1-induzierter Apoptose. Andererseits ist FADD alleine ausreichend f{\"u}r die TRAILR 1/2-bezogene Caspase-8 Aktivierung. Zudem ist FADD notwendig f{\"u}r die TRAIL-induzierte NFκB-Signalaktivierung. In Abwesenheit von FADD und TRADD vermittelt RIPK1 die TNF-induzierte Caspase-8 Aktivierung. FADD wird f{\"u}r die TRAIL-induzierte Nekroptose ben{\"o}tigt, aber gegenl{\"a}ufig wirkt die TNF-induzierte Nektroptose in einer Caspase-8 abh{\"a}ngigen und unabh{\"a}ngigen Weise. Zudem sensitiviert TWEAK die TNF- und TRAIL-induzierte Nekroptose. Zusammenfassend wurde in dieser Arbeit die Auswirkung von TNFR1 und TRAILR 1/2 auf die Aktivierung der unterschiedlichen Signalkaskaden untersucht. Des Weiteren wurde gezeigt, in welcher Weise sich das Zusammenspiel von TRADD, FADD und RIPK1 auf die Induktion von NFκB, Apoptose und Nekroptose auswirkt.},
  subject      = {Signaltransduktion},
  language  = {de}
}