@article{ReibetanzKelmUttingeretal.2022, author = {Reibetanz, Joachim and Kelm, Matthias and Uttinger, Konstantin L. and Reuter, Miriam and Schlegel, Nicolas and Hankir, Mohamed and Wiegering, Verena and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Fassnacht, Martin and Lock, Johan Friso and Wiegering, Armin}, title = {Differences in morbidity and mortality between unilateral adrenalectomy for adrenal Cushing's syndrome and bilateral adrenalectomy for therapy refractory extra-adrenal Cushing's syndrome}, series = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery}, volume = {407}, journal = {Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery}, number = {6}, doi = {10.1007/s00423-022-02568-8}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323947}, pages = {2481-2488}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Purpose In selected cases of severe Cushing's syndrome due to uncontrolled ACTH secretion, bilateral adrenalectomy appears unavoidable. Compared with unilateral adrenalectomy (for adrenal Cushing's syndrome), bilateral adrenalectomy has a perceived higher perioperative morbidity. The aim of the current study was to compare both interventions in endogenous Cushing's syndrome regarding postoperative outcomes. Methods We report a single-center, retrospective cohort study comparing patients with hypercortisolism undergoing bilateral vs. unilateral adrenalectomy during 2008-2021. Patients with adrenal Cushing's syndrome due to adenoma were compared with patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome (Cushing's disease and ectopic ACTH production) focusing on postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as long-term survival. Results Of 83 patients with adrenalectomy for hypercortisolism (65.1\% female, median age 53 years), the indication for adrenalectomy was due to adrenal Cushing's syndrome in 60 patients (72.2\%; 59 unilateral and one bilateral), and due to hypercortisolism caused by Cushing's disease (n = 16) or non-pituitary uncontrolled ACTH secretion of unknown origin (n = 7) (27.7\% of all adrenalectomies). Compared with unilateral adrenalectomy (n = 59), patients with bilateral adrenalectomy (n = 24) had a higher rate of severe complications (0\% vs. 33\%; p < 0.001) and delayed recovery (median: 10.2\% vs. 79.2\%; p < 0.001). Using the MTL30 marker, patients with bilateral adrenalectomy fared worse than patients after unilateral surgery (MTL30 positive: 7.2\% vs. 25.0\% p < 0.001). Postoperative mortality was increased in patients with bilateral adrenalectomy (0\% vs. 8.3\%; p = 0.081). Conclusion While unilateral adrenalectomy for adrenal Cushing's syndrome represents a safe and definitive therapeutic option, bilateral adrenalectomy to control ACTH-dependent extra-adrenal Cushing's syndrome or Cushing's disease is a more complicated intervention with a mortality of nearly 10\%.}, language = {en} } @article{HendricksMuellerFassnachtetal.2022, author = {Hendricks, Anne and M{\"u}ller, Sophie and Fassnacht, Martin and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Verena A. and Wiegering, Armin and Reibetanz, Joachim}, title = {Impact of lymphadenectomy on the oncologic outcome of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma — a systematic review and meta-analysis}, series = {Cancers}, volume = {14}, journal = {Cancers}, number = {2}, issn = {2072-6694}, doi = {10.3390/cancers14020291}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-254798}, year = {2022}, abstract = {(1) Background: Locoregional lymphadenectomy (LND) in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) may impact oncological outcome, but the findings from individual studies are conflicting. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the oncological value of LND in ACC by summarizing the available literature. (2) Methods: A systematic search on studies published until December 2020 was performed according to the PRISMA statement. The primary outcome was the impact of lymphadenectomy on overall survival (OS). Two separate meta-analyses were performed for studies including patients with localized ACC (stage I-III) and those including all tumor stages (I-IV). Secondary endpoints included postoperative mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS). (3) Results: 11 publications were identified for inclusion. All studies were retrospective studies, published between 2001-2020, and 5 were included in the meta-analysis. Three studies (N = 807 patients) reported the impact of LND on disease-specific survival in patients with stage I-III ACC and revealed a survival benefit of LND (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.42, 95\% confidence interval (95\% CI): 0.26-0.68). Based on results of studies including patients with ACC stage I-IV (2 studies, N = 3934 patients), LND was not associated with a survival benefit (HR = 1.00, 95\% CI: 0.70-1.42). None of the included studies showed an association between LND and postoperative mortality or LOS. (4) Conclusion: Locoregional lymphadenectomy seems to offer an oncologic benefit in patients undergoing curative-intended surgery for localized ACC (stage I-III).}, language = {en} } @article{FilserDickMeyeretal.2015, author = {Filser, J{\"o}rg and Dick, Anke and Meyer, Thomas and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and von Rahden, Burkard H. A.}, title = {Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia in a 10-year-old male patient.}, series = {European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Reports}, volume = {3}, journal = {European Journal of Pediatric Surgery Reports}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1055/s-0034-1372461}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-149502}, pages = {18-22}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a new endoscopic treatment for achalasia with very good short-term results in adults. Data about POEM in pediatric patients are missing. We present the case of a 10-year-old male patient with type I (classic) achalasia, successfully treated with POEM. The procedure was accomplished in a similar fashion to the technique used in adults. Short-term results were fine, with a complete control of dysphagia and absence of reflux. We suggest that POEM is a suitable option in pediatric patients—similar to adults—but long-term results must be awaited.}, language = {en} }