@article{KressBaurOttoetal.2018,
  author    = {Kress, Sebastian and Baur, Johannes and Otto, Christoph and Burkard, Natalie and Braspenning, Joris and Walles, Heike and Nickel, Joachim and Metzger, Marco},
  title     = {Evaluation of a miniaturized biologically vascularized scaffold in vitro and in vivo},
  series = {Scientific Reports},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Scientific Reports},
  number    = {4719},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-018-22688-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176343},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In tissue engineering, the generation and functional maintenance of dense voluminous tissues is mainly restricted due to insufficient nutrient supply. Larger three-dimensional constructs, which exceed the nutrient diffusion limit become necrotic and/or apoptotic in long-term culture if not provided with an appropriate vascularization. Here, we established protocols for the generation of a pre-vascularized biological scaffold with intact arterio-venous capillary loops from rat intestine, which is decellularized under preservation of the feeding and draining vascular tree. Vessel integrity was proven by marker expression, media/blood reflow and endothelial LDL uptake. In vitro maintenance persisted up to 7 weeks in a bioreactor system allowing a stepwise reconstruction of fully vascularized human tissues and successful in vivo implantation for up to 4 weeks, although with time-dependent decrease of cell viability. The vascularization of the construct lead to a 1.5× increase in cellular drug release compared to a conventional static culture in vitro. For the first time, we performed proof-of-concept studies demonstrating that 3D tissues can be maintained within a miniaturized vascularized scaffold in vitro and successfully implanted after re-anastomosis to the intrinsic blood circulation in vivo. We hypothesize that this technology could serve as a powerful platform technology in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PelzWagnerLichthardtetal.2018,
  author    = {Pelz, J{\"o}rg O. W. and Wagner, Johanna and Lichthardt, Sven and Baur, Johannes and Kastner, Caroline and Matthes, Niels and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Wiegering, Armin},
  title     = {Laparoscopic right-sided colon resection for colon cancer - has the control group so far been chosen correctly?},
  series = {World Journal of Surgical Oncology},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {World Journal of Surgical Oncology},
  number    = {117},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12957-018-1417-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-176186},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Background: The treatment strategies for colorectal cancer located in the right side of the colon have changed dramatically during the last decade. Due to the introduction of complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central ligation of the vessels and systematic lymph node dissection, the long-term survival of affected patients has increased significantly. It has also been proposed that right-sided colon resection can be performed laparoscopically with the same extent of resection and equal long-term results. Methods: A retrospective evaluation of a prospectively expanded database on right-sided colorectal cancer or adenoma treated at the University Hospital of Wuerzburg between 2009 and 2016 was performed. All patients underwent CME. This data was analyzed alone and in comparison to the published data describing laparoscopic right-sided colon resection for colon cancer. Results: The database contains 279 patients, who underwent right-sided colon resection due to colorectal cancer or colorectal adenoma (255 open; 24 laparoscopic). Operation data (time, length of stay, time on ICU) was equal or superior to laparoscopy, which is comparable to the published results. Surprisingly, the surrogate parameter for correct CME (the number of removed lymph nodes) was significantly higher in the open group. In a subgroup analysis only including patients who were feasible for laparoscopic resection and had been operated with an open procedure by an experienced surgeon, operation time was significantly shorter and the number of removed lymph nodes is significantly higher in the open group. Conclusion: So far, several studies demonstrate that laparoscopic right-sided colon resection is comparable to open resection. Our data suggests that a consequent CME during an open operation leads to significantly more removed lymph nodes than in laparoscopically resected patients and in several so far published data of open control groups from Europe. Further prospective randomized trials comparing the long-term outcome are urgently needed before laparoscopy for right-sided colon resection can be recommended ubiquitously.},
  language  = {en}
}