@article{ScherthanLeeMausetal.2019,
  author    = {Scherthan, Harry and Lee, Jin-Ho and Maus, Emanuel and Schumann, Sarah and Muhtadi, Razan and Chojowski, Robert and Port, Matthias and Lassmann, Michael and Bestvater, Felix and Hausmann, Michael},
  title     = {Nanostructure of clustered DNA damage in leukocytes after in-solution irradiation with the alpha emitter Ra-223},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers11121877},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-193038},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background: Cancer patients are increasingly treated with alpha-particle-emitting radiopharmaceuticals. At the subcellular level, alpha particles induce densely spaced ionizations and molecular damage. Induction of DNA lesions, especially clustered DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), threatens a cell's survival. Currently, it is under debate to what extent the spatial topology of the damaged chromatin regions and the repair protein arrangements are contributing. Methods: Super-resolution light microscopy (SMLM) in combination with cluster analysis of single molecule signal-point density regions of DSB repair markers was applied to investigate the nano-structure of DNA damage foci tracks of Ra-223 in-solution irradiated leukocytes. Results: Alpha-damaged chromatin tracks were efficiently outlined by γ-H2AX that formed large (super) foci composed of numerous 60-80 nm-sized nano-foci. Alpha damage tracks contained 60-70\% of all γ-H2AX point signals in a nucleus, while less than 30\% of 53BP1, MRE11 or p-ATM signals were located inside γ-H2AX damage tracks. MRE11 and p-ATM protein fluorescent tags formed focal nano-clusters of about 20 nm peak size. There were, on average, 12 (±9) MRE11 nanoclusters in a typical γ-H2AX-marked alpha track, suggesting a minimal number of MRE11-processed DSBs per track. Our SMLM data suggest regularly arranged nano-structures during DNA repair in the damaged chromatin domain.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WondergemHerrmannSyrbuetal.2014,
  author    = {Wondergem, Marielle J. and Herrmann, Ken and Syrbu, Sergei and Zijlstra, Jos{\´e}e M. and Hoetjes, Nikie and Hoekstra, Otto S. and Cillessen, Saskia A. G. M. and Moesbergen, Laura M. and Buck, Andreas K. and Vose, Julie M. and Juweid, Malik E.},
  title     = {18 F-fluorothymidine uptake in follicular lymphoma and error-prone DNA repair},
  series = {EJNMMI Research},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {EJNMMI Research},
  doi       = {10.1186/2191-219x-4-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121233},
  pages     = {3},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {BACKGROUND: We observed a disproportional 18 F-fluorothymidine (F-FLT) uptake in follicular lymphoma (FL) relative to its low cell proliferation. We tested the hypothesis that the 'excess' uptake of 18 F-FLT in FL is related to error-prone DNA repair and investigated whether this also contributes to 18 F-FLT uptake in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: We performed immunohistochemical stainings to assess the pure DNA replication marker MIB-1 as well as markers of both DNA replication and repair like PCNA, TK-1 and RPA1 on lymph node biopsies of 27 FLs and 35 DLBCLs. In 7 FL and 15 DLBCL patients, 18 F-FLT-PET had been performed. RESULTS: 18 F-FLT uptake was lower in FL than in DLBCL (median SUVmax 5.7 vs. 8.9, p = 0,004), but the ratio of 18 F-FLT-SUVmax to percentage of MIB-1 positive cells was significantly higher in FL compared with DLBCL (p = 0.001). The median percentage of MIB-1 positive cells was 10\% (range, 10\% to 20\%) in FL and 70\% (40\% to 80\%) in DLBCL. In contrast, the median percentages of PCNA, TK-1 and RPA1 positive cells were 90\% (range, 80 to 100), 90\% (80 to 100) and 100\% (80 to 100) in FL versus 90\% (60 to 100), 90\% (60 to 100) and 100\% (80 to 100) in DLBCL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration of a striking discordance between 18 F-FLT uptake in FL and tumour cell proliferation. High expression of DNA replication and repair markers compared with the pure proliferation marker MIB-1 in FL suggests that this discordance might be due to error-prone DNA repair. While DNA repair-related 18 F-FLT uptake considerably contributes to 18 F-FLT uptake in FL, its contribution to 18 F-FLT uptake in highly proliferative DLBCL is small. This apparently high contribution of DNA repair to the 18 F-FLT signal in FL may hamper studies where 18 F-FLT is used to assess response to cytostatic therapy or to distinguish between FL and transformed lymphoma.},
  language  = {en}
}