@article{SelchoMillanPalaciosMunozetal.2017,
  author    = {Selcho, Mareike and Mill{\´a}n, Carola and Palacios-Mu{\~n}oz, Angelina and Ruf, Franziska and Ubillo, Lilian and Chen, Jiangtian and Bergmann, Gregor and Ito, Chihiro and Silva, Valeria and Wegener, Christian and Ewer, John},
  title     = {Central and peripheral clocks are coupled by a neuropeptide pathway in Drosophila},
  series = {Nature Communications},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Nature Communications},
  number    = {15563},
  doi       = {10.1038/ncomms15563},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-170831},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Animal circadian clocks consist of central and peripheral pacemakers, which are coordinated to produce daily rhythms in physiology and behaviour. Despite its importance for optimal performance and health, the mechanism of clock coordination is poorly understood. Here we dissect the pathway through which the circadian clock of Drosophila imposes daily rhythmicity to the pattern of adult emergence. Rhythmicity depends on the coupling between the brain clock and a peripheral clock in the prothoracic gland (PG), which produces the steroid hormone, ecdysone. Time information from the central clock is transmitted via the neuropeptide, sNPF, to non-clock neurons that produce the neuropeptide, PTTH. These secretory neurons then forward time information to the PG clock. We also show that the central clock exerts a dominant role on the peripheral clock. This use of two coupled clocks could serve as a paradigm to understand how daily steroid hormone rhythms are generated in animals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WidmannArtingerBiesingeretal.2016,
  author    = {Widmann, Annekathrin and Artinger, Marc and Biesinger, Lukas and Boepple, Kathrin and Peters, Christina and Schlechter, Jana and Selcho, Mareike and Thum, Andreas S.},
  title     = {Genetic Dissection of Aversive Associative Olfactory Learning and Memory in Drosophila Larvae},
  series = {PLoS Genetics},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {PLoS Genetics},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1006378},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166672},
  pages     = {e1006378},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Memory formation is a highly complex and dynamic process. It consists of different phases, which depend on various neuronal and molecular mechanisms. In adult Drosophila it was shown that memory formation after aversive Pavlovian conditioning includes—besides other forms—a labile short-term component that consolidates within hours to a longer-lasting memory. Accordingly, memory formation requires the timely controlled action of different neuronal circuits, neurotransmitters, neuromodulators and molecules that were initially identified by classical forward genetic approaches. Compared to adult Drosophila, memory formation was only sporadically analyzed at its larval stage. Here we deconstruct the larval mnemonic organization after aversive olfactory conditioning. We show that after odor-high salt conditioning larvae form two parallel memory phases; a short lasting component that depends on cyclic adenosine 3'5'-monophosphate (cAMP) signaling and synapsin gene function. In addition, we show for the first time for Drosophila larvae an anesthesia resistant component, which relies on radish and bruchpilot gene function, protein kinase C activity, requires presynaptic output of mushroom body Kenyon cells and dopamine function. Given the numerical simplicity of the larval nervous system this work offers a unique prospect for studying memory formation of defined specifications, at full-brain scope with single-cell, and single-synapse resolution.},
  language  = {en}
}