@article{SchulSchmittRegnerietal.2013,
  author    = {Schul, Daniela and Schmitt, Alexandra and Regneri, Janine and Schartl, Manfred and Wagner, Toni Ulrich},
  title     = {Bursted BMP Triggered Receptor Kinase Activity Drives Smad1 Mediated Long-Term Target Gene Oscillation in c2c12 Cells},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0059442},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-130131},
  pages     = {e59442},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs) are important growth factors that regulate many cellular processes. During embryogenesis they act as morphogens and play a critical role during organ development. They influence cell fates via concentration-gradients in the embryos where cells transduce this extracellular information into gene expression profiles and cell fate decisions. How receiving cells decode and quantify BMP2/4 signals is hardly understood. There is little data on the quantitative relationships between signal input, transducing molecules, their states and location, and ultimately their ability to integrate graded systemic inputs and generate qualitative responses. Understanding this signaling network on a quantitative level should be considered a prerequisite for efficient pathway modulation, as the BMP pathway is a prime target for therapeutic invention. Hence, we quantified the spatial distribution of the main signal transducer of the BMP2/4 pathway in response to different types and levels of stimuli in c2c12 cells. We found that the subcellular localization of Smad1 is independent of ligand concentration. In contrast, Smad1 phosphorylation levels relate proportionally to BMP2 ligand concentrations and they are entirely located in the nucleus. Interestingly, we found that BMP2 stimulates target gene expression in non-linear, wave-like forms. Amplitudes showed a clear concentration-dependency, for sustained and transient stimulation. We found that even burst-stimulation triggers gene-expression wave-like modulations that are detectable for at least 30 h. Finally, we show here that target gene expression oscillations depend on receptor kinase activity, as the kinase drives further expression pulses without receptor reactivation and the target gene expression breaks off after inhibitor treatment in c2c12 cells.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Regneri2013,
  author    = {Regneri, Janine},
  title     = {Transcriptional regulation of cancer genes in the Xiphophorus melanoma system},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-82319},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The Xiphophorus melanoma system is a useful animal model for the study of the genetic basis of tumor formation. The development of hereditary melanomas in interspecific hybrids of Xiphophorus is connected to pigment cell specific overexpression of the mutationally activated receptor tyrosine kinase Xmrk. In purebred fish the oncogenic function of xmrk is suppressed by the molecularly still unidentified locus R. The xmrk oncogene was generated by a gene duplication event from the Xiphophorus egfrb gene and thereby has acquired a new 5' regulatory sequence, which has probably altered the transcriptional control of the oncogene. So far, the xmrk promoter region was still poorly characterized and the molecular mechanism by which R controls xmrk-induced melanoma formation in Xiphophorus still remained to be elucidated. To test the hypothesis that R controls melanoma development in Xiphophorus on the transcriptional level, the first aim of the thesis was to gain a deeper insight into the transcriptional regulation of the xmrk oncogene. To this end, a quantitative analysis of xmrk transcript levels in different Xiphophorus genotypes carrying either the highly tumorigenic xmrkB or the non-tumorigenic xmrkA allele was performed. I was able to demonstrate that expression of the tumorigenic xmrkB allele is strongly increased in malignant melanomas of R-free backcross hybrids compared to benign lesions, macromelanophore spots, and healthy skin. The expression level of the non-tumorigenic xmrkA allele, in contrast, is not influenced by the presence or absence of R. These findings strongly indicate that differential transcriptional regulation of the xmrk promoter triggers the tumorigenic potential of these xmrk alleles. To functionally characterize the xmrk promoter region, I established a luciferase assay using BAC clones containing the genomic regions where xmrk and egfrb are located for generation of reporter constructs. This approach showed for the first time a melanoma cell specific transcriptional activation of xmrkB by its flanking regions, thereby providing the first functional evidence that the xmrk oncogene is controlled by a pigment cell specific promoter region. Subsequent analysis of different deletion constructs of the xmrkB BAC reporter construct strongly indicated that the regulatory elements responsible for the tumor-inducing overexpression of xmrkB in melanoma cells are located within 67 kb upstream of the xmrk oncogene. Taken together, these data indicate that melanoma formation in Xiphophorus is regulated by a tight transcriptional control of the xmrk oncogene and that the R locus acts through this mechanism. As the identification of the R-encoded gene(s) is necessary to fully understand how melanoma formation in Xiphophorus is regulated, I furthermore searched for alternative R candidate genes in this study. To this end, three genes, which are located in the genomic region where R has been mapped, were evaluated for their potential to be a crucial constituent of the regulator locus R. Among these genes, I identified pdcd4a, the ortholog of the human tumor suppressor gene PDCD4, as promising new candidate, because this gene showed the expression pattern expected from the crucial tumor suppressor gene encoded at the R locus.},
  subject      = {Melanom},
  language  = {en}
}