@article{GrobTritscherGruebeletal.2021, author = {Grob, Robin and Tritscher, Clara and Gr{\"u}bel, Kornelia and Stigloher, Christian and Groh, Claudia and Fleischmann, Pauline N. and R{\"o}ssler, Wolfgang}, title = {Johnston's organ and its central projections in Cataglyphis desert ants}, series = {Journal of Comparative Neurology}, volume = {529}, journal = {Journal of Comparative Neurology}, number = {8}, doi = {10.1002/cne.25077}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-225679}, pages = {2138 -- 2155}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The Johnston's organ (JO) in the insect antenna is a multisensory organ involved in several navigational tasks including wind-compass orientation, flight control, graviception, and, possibly, magnetoreception. Here we investigate the three dimensional anatomy of the JO and its neuronal projections into the brain of the desert ant Cataglyphis, a marvelous long-distance navigator. The JO of C. nodus workers consists of 40 scolopidia comprising three sensory neurons each. The numbers of scolopidia slightly vary between different sexes (female/male) and castes (worker/queen). Individual scolopidia attach to the intersegmental membrane between pedicel and flagellum of the antenna and line up in a ring-like organization. Three JO nerves project along the two antennal nerve branches into the brain. Anterograde double staining of the antennal afferents revealed that JO receptor neurons project to several distinct neuropils in the central brain. The T5 tract projects into the antennal mechanosensory and motor center (AMMC), while the T6 tract bypasses the AMMC via the saddle and forms collaterals terminating in the posterior slope (PS) (T6I), the ventral complex (T6II), and the ventrolateral protocerebrum (T6III). Double labeling of JO and ocellar afferents revealed that input from the JO and visual information from the ocelli converge in tight apposition in the PS. The general JO anatomy and its central projection patterns resemble situations in honeybees and Drosophila. The multisensory nature of the JO together with its projections to multisensory neuropils in the ant brain likely serves synchronization and calibration of different sensory modalities during the ontogeny of navigation in Cataglyphis.}, language = {en} } @article{FleischmannGrobRoessler2022, author = {Fleischmann, Pauline N. and Grob, Robin and R{\"o}ssler, Wolfgang}, title = {Magnetosensation during re-learning walks in desert ants (Cataglyphis nodus)}, series = {Journal of Comparative Physiology A}, volume = {208}, journal = {Journal of Comparative Physiology A}, number = {1}, issn = {1432-1351}, doi = {10.1007/s00359-021-01511-4}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266556}, pages = {125-133}, year = {2022}, abstract = {At the beginning of their foraging careers, Cataglyphis desert ants calibrate their compass systems and learn the visual panorama surrounding the nest entrance. For that, they perform well-structured initial learning walks. During rotational body movements (pirouettes), na{\"i}ve ants (novices) gaze back to the nest entrance to memorize their way back to the nest. To align their gaze directions, they rely on the geomagnetic field as a compass cue. In contrast, experienced ants (foragers) use celestial compass cues for path integration during food search. If the panorama at the nest entrance is changed, foragers perform re-learning walks prior to heading out on new foraging excursions. Here, we show that initial learning walks and re-learning walks are structurally different. During re-learning walks, foragers circle around the nest entrance before leaving the nest area to search for food. During pirouettes, they do not gaze back to the nest entrance. In addition, foragers do not use the magnetic field as a compass cue to align their gaze directions during re-learning walk pirouettes. Nevertheless, magnetic alterations during re-learning walks under manipulated panoramic conditions induce changes in nest-directed views indicating that foragers are still magnetosensitive in a cue conflict situation.}, language = {en} } @article{BeetzKrauselJundi2023, author = {Beetz, M. Jerome and Kraus, Christian and el Jundi, Basil}, title = {Neural representation of goal direction in the monarch butterfly brain}, series = {Nature Communications}, volume = {14}, journal = {Nature Communications}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-023-41526-w}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-358073}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Neural processing of a desired moving direction requires the continuous comparison between the current heading and the goal direction. While the neural basis underlying the current heading is well-studied, the coding of the goal direction remains unclear in insects. Here, we used tetrode recordings in tethered flying monarch butterflies to unravel how a goal direction is represented in the insect brain. While recording, the butterflies maintained robust goal directions relative to a virtual sun. By resetting their goal directions, we found neurons whose spatial tuning was tightly linked to the goal directions. Importantly, their tuning was unaffected when the butterflies changed their heading after compass perturbations, showing that these neurons specifically encode the goal direction. Overall, we here discovered invertebrate goal-direction neurons that share functional similarities to goal-direction cells reported in mammals. Our results give insights into the evolutionarily conserved principles of goal-directed spatial orientation in animals.}, language = {en} } @article{NguyenBeetzMerlinetal.2022, author = {Nguyen, Tu Anh Thi and Beetz, M. Jerome and Merlin, Christine and Pfeiffer, Keram and el Jundi, Basil}, title = {Weighting of celestial and terrestrial cues in the monarch butterfly central complex}, series = {Frontiers in Neural Circuits}, volume = {16}, journal = {Frontiers in Neural Circuits}, issn = {1662-5110}, doi = {10.3389/fncir.2022.862279}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-279445}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Monarch butterflies rely on external cues for orientation during their annual long-distance migration from Northern US and Canada to Central Mexico. These external cues can be celestial cues, such as the sun or polarized light, which are processed in a brain region termed the central complex (CX). Previous research typically focused on how individual simulated celestial cues are encoded in the butterfly's CX. However, in nature, the butterflies perceive several celestial cues at the same time and need to integrate them to effectively use the compound of all cues for orientation. In addition, a recent behavioral study revealed that monarch butterflies can rely on terrestrial cues, such as the panoramic skyline, for orientation and use them in combination with the sun to maintain a directed flight course. How the CX encodes a combination of celestial and terrestrial cues and how they are weighted in the butterfly's CX is still unknown. Here, we examined how input neurons of the CX, termed TL neurons, combine celestial and terrestrial information. While recording intracellularly from the neurons, we presented a sun stimulus and polarized light to the butterflies as well as a simulated sun and a panoramic scene simultaneously. Our results show that celestial cues are integrated linearly in these cells, while the combination of the sun and a panoramic skyline did not always follow a linear integration of action potential rates. Interestingly, while the sun and polarized light were invariantly weighted between individual neurons, the sun stimulus and panoramic skyline were dynamically weighted when both stimuli were simultaneously presented. Taken together, this dynamic weighting between celestial and terrestrial cues may allow the butterflies to flexibly set their cue preference during navigation.}, language = {en} }