@phdthesis{Fricke2022, author = {Fricke, Ute}, title = {Herbivory, predation and pest control in the context of climate and land use}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-28732}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-287328}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Chapter 1 - General introduction Anthropogenic land-use and climate change are the major drivers of the global biodiversity loss. Yet, biodiversity is essential for human well-being, as we depend on the availability of potable water, sufficient food and further benefits obtained from nature. Each species makes a somewhat unique contribution to these ecosystem services. Furthermore, species tolerate environmental stressors, such as climate change, differently. Thus, biodiversity is both the "engine" and the "insurance" for human well-being in a changing climate. Here, I investigate the effects of temperature and land use on herbivory (Chapter 2), predation (Chapter 3) and pest control (Chapter 4), and at the same time identify features of habitats (e.g. plant richness, proximity to different habitat types) and landscapes (e.g. landscape diversity, proportion of oilseed rape area) as potential management targets in an adaptation strategy to climate change. Finally, I discuss the similarities and differences between factors influencing herbivory, predation and pest control, while placing the observations in the context of climate change as a multifaceted phenomenon, and highlighting starting points for sustainable insect pest management (Chapter 5). Chapter 2 - Plant richness, land use and temperature differently shape invertebrate leaf-chewing herbivory on major plant functional groups Invertebrate herbivores are temperature-sensitive. Rising temperatures increase their metabolic rates and thus their demand for carbon-rich relative to protein-rich resources, which can lead to changes in the diets of generalist herbivores. Here, we quantified leaf-area loss to chewing invertebrates among three plant functional groups (legumes, non-leguminous forbs and grasses), which largely differ in C:N (carbon:nitrogen) ratio. This reseach was conducted along spatial temperature and land-use gradients in open herbaceous vegetation adjacent to different habitat types (forest, grassland, arable field, settlement). Herbivory largely differed among plant functional groups and was higher on legumes than forbs and grasses, except in open areas in forests. There, herbivory was similar among plant functional groups and on legumes lower than in grasslands. Also the presence of many plant families lowered herbivory on legumes. This suggests that open areas in forests and diverse vegetation provide certain protection against leaf damage to some plant families (e.g. legumes). This could be used as part of a conservation strategy for protected species. Overall, the effects of the dominant habitat type in the vicinity and diverse vegetation outweighed those of temperature and large-scale land use (e.g. grassland proportion, landscape diversity) on herbivory of legumes, forbs and grasses at the present time. Chapter 3 - Landscape diversity and local temperature, but not climate, affect arthropod predation among habitat types Herbivorous insects underlie top-down regulation by arthropod predators. Thereby, predation rates depend on predator community composition and behaviour, which is shaped by temperature, plant richness and land use. How the interaction of these factors affects the regulatory performance of predators was unknown. Therefore, we assessed arthropod predation rates on artificial caterpillars along temperature, and land-use gradients. On plots with low local mean temperature (≤ 7°C) often not a single caterpillar was attacked, which may be due to the temperature-dependent inactivity of arthropods. However, multi-annual mean temperature, plant richness and the dominant habitat type in the vicinity did not substantially affect arthropod predation rates. Highest arthropod predation rates were observed in diverse landscapes (2-km scale) independently of the locally dominanting habitat type. As landscape diversity, but not multi-annual mean temperature, affected arthropod predation rates, the diversification of landscapes may also support top-down regulation of herbivores independent of moderate increases of multi-annual mean temperature in the near future. Chapter 4 - Pest control and yield of winter oilseed rape depend on spatiotemporal crop-cover dynamics and flowering onset: implications for global warming Winter oilseed rape is an important oilseed crop in Europe, yet its seed yield is diminished through pests such as the pollen beetle and stem weevils. Damage from pollen beetles depends on pest abundances, but also on the timing of infestation relative to crop development as the bud stage is particularly vulnerable. The development of both oilseed rape and pollen beetles is temperature-dependent, while temperature effects on pest abundances are yet unknown, which brings opportunities and dangers to oilseed rape cropping under increased temperatures. We obtained measures of winter oilseed rape (flowering time, seed yield) and two of its major pests (pollen beetle, stem weevils) for the first time along both land-use and temperature gradients. Infestation with stem weevils was not influenced by any temperature or land-use aspect considered, and natural pest regulation of pollen beetles in terms of parasitism rates of pollen beetle larvae was low (< 30\%), except on three out of 29 plots. Nonetheless, we could identify conditions favouring low pollen beetle abundances per plant and high seed yields. Low pollen beetle densities were favoured by a constant oilseed rape area relative to the preceding year (5-km scale), whereas a strong reduction in area (> 40\%) caused high pest densities (concentration effect). This occurred more frequently in warmer regions, due to drought around sowing, which contributed to increased pollen beetle numbers in those regions. Yet, in warmer regions, oilseed rape flowered early, which possibly led to partial escape from pollen beetle infestation in the most vulnerable bud stage. This is also suggested by higher seed yields of early flowering oilseed rape fields, but not per se at higher temperatures. Thus, early flowering (e.g. cultivar selection) and the interannual coordination of oilseed rape area offer opportunities for environmental-friendly pollen beetle management. Chapter 5 - General discussion Anthropogenic land-use and climate change are major threats to biodiversity, and consequently to ecosystem functions, although I could show that ecosystem functions such as herbivory and predation barely responded to temperature along a spatial gradient at present time. Yet, it is important to keep several points in mind: (i) The high rate of climate warming likely reduces the time that species will have to adapt to temperature in the future; (ii) Beyond mean temperatures, many aspects of climate will change; (iii) The compensation of biodiversity loss through functional redundancy in arthropod communities may be depleted at some point; (iv) Measures of ecosystem functions are limited by methodological filters, so that changes may be captured incompletely. Although much uncertainty of the effects of climate and land-use change on ecosystem functions remains, actions to halt biodiversity loss and to interfere with natural processes in an environmentally friendly way, e.g. reduction of herbivory on crops, are urgently needed. With this thesis, I contribute options to the environment-friendly regulation of herbivory, which are at least to some extent climate resilient, and at the same time make a contribution to halt biodiversity loss. Yet, more research and a transformation process is needed to make human action more sustainable. In terms of crop protection, this means that the most common method of treating pests with fast-acting pesticides is not necessarily the most sustainable. To realize sustainable strategies, collective efforts will be needed targeted at crop damage prevention through reducing pest populations and densities in the medium to long term. The sooner we transform human action from environmentally damaging to biodiversity promoting, the higher is our insurance asset that secures human well-being under a changing climate.}, subject = {{\"O}kologie}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Steckel2013, author = {Steckel, Juliane}, title = {Effects of landscape heterogeneity and land use on interacting groups of solitary bees, wasps and their flying and ground-dwelling antagonists}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87900}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Die Heterogenit{\"a}t unserer heutigen Landschaften und Habitate ist gepr{\"a}gt und von jahrzehntelanger Landnutzungsintensivierung. Die daraus hervorgegangene Verarmung von weitr{\"a}umigen Arealen f{\"u}hrte zu einer zeitlich und r{\"a}umlich stark eingeschr{\"a}nkten Verf{\"u}gbarkeit von Nistm{\"o}glichkeiten und Nahrungsressourcen f{\"u}r Wildbienen und Wespen. Die Folgen sich ver{\"a}ndernder Ressourcenverf{\"u}gbarkeit f{\"u}r Wildbienen und Wespen war und ist eine Gef{\"a}hrdung der Artenvielfalt und der {\"O}kosystemprozesse, die diese Arten in Gang halten. Konsequenzen f{\"u}r diese wichtigen Best{\"a}uber und Pr{\"a}datoren sind kaum erforscht, genauso wenig wie f{\"u}r ihre Gegenspieler als nat{\"u}rliche Top-Down-Regulatoren. Nisthilfen f{\"u}r Wildbienen, Wespen und ihre nat{\"u}rlichen Gegenspieler eignen sich hervorragend um diese Wissensl{\"u}cken zu f{\"u}llen, da sie wertvolle Einblicke gew{\"a}hren in ansonsten verborgene trophische Interaktionen, wie Parasitierung und Pr{\"a}dation, aber auch in {\"O}kosystemprozesse wie Best{\"a}ubung und Reproduktion. Somit stellten wir uns in Kapitel II zun{\"a}chst die Frage, wie die Abundanz von st{\"a}ngelnistenden Bienen und Wespen im Gr{\"u}nland von dessen Bewirtschaftung abh{\"a}ngt. Außerdem untersuchten wir, wie Landnutzung die Effektivit{\"a}t der Top-Down-Regulation von Wildbienen und Wespen durch zwei verschiedene Gruppen von Gegenspielern beeinflusst. Dazu haben wir einer der beiden Gruppen, den bodenlebenden Gegenspielern, den Zugang zu den Nisthilfen vorenthalten. In einer großangelegten Feldstudie, die sich {\"u}ber drei verschiedene Regionen Deutschlands erstreckte, installierten wir 760 Nisthilfen auf 95 Gr{\"u}nlandfl{\"a}chen. Der Versuchsplan beinhaltete gem{\"a}hte und nicht gem{\"a}hte Versuchsplots, sowie Plots mit und ohne Ausschluss von Bodenpr{\"a}datoren. Wildbienen und Wespen besiedelten die Nisthilfen unabh{\"a}ngig davon, ob Bodenpr{\"a}datoren nun Zugang zu den Nisthilfen hatten oder nicht. Allerdings erh{\"o}hte sich die Rate der von fliegenden Gegenspielern gefressenen und parasitierten Brutzellen (Fressrate) sobald bodenlebende Gegenspieler ausgeschlossen wurden. Diese Fressrate war vom experimentellen M{\"a}hen unabh{\"a}ngig. Jedoch wiesen ungem{\"a}hte Versuchsplots marginal signifikant mehr Brutzellen von Wespen auf. Beide Manipulationen, das M{\"a}hen und der Pr{\"a}datorausschluss, interagierten signifikant. So wurden auf gem{\"a}hten Plots, auf denen Bodenpr{\"a}datoren ausgeschlossen waren, h{\"o}here Fressraten der fliegenden Gegenspieler beobachtet, w{\"a}hrend dieser Effekt auf der ungem{\"a}hten Plots ausblieb. Das Thema in Kapitel III ist der relative Einfluss lokaler Gr{\"u}nlandnutzung, Landschaftsdiversit{\"a}t und Landschaftsstruktur auf Artenvielfalt und -abundanz von Wildbienen, Wespen und ihrer fliegenden Gegenspieler. Dazu kartierten wir Landnutzungstypen innerhalb konzentrischer Kreise um die Versuchsplots. Mithilfe der digitalisierten Landschaftsdaten berechneten wir Indices als Maße f{\"u}r Landschaftsdiversit{\"a}t und -struktur f{\"u}r acht Radien bis 2000 m. Der negative Effekt lokaler Landnutzung auf die Wirtsabundanz war nur marginal signifikant. Jedoch stellten wir einen positiven Effekt der Landschaftsdiversit{\"a}t innerhalb kleiner Radien auf die Artenvielfalt und -abundanz der Wirte fest. Die fliegenden Gegenspieler allerdings profitierten von einer komplexen Landschaftsstruktur innerhalb großer Radien. Die letzte Studie, vorgestellt in Kapitel IV, behandelt die Bedeutung von Ressourcenverf{\"u}gbarkeit f{\"u}r die Dauer von Fouragierfl{\"u}gen und die sich daraus ergebenen Konsequenzen f{\"u}r den Reproduktionserfolg der Roten Mauerbiene. Dazu beobachteten wir nistenden Bienen auf 18 Gr{\"u}nlandfl{\"a}chen in zwei der Untersuchungsregionen in Deuschland. Wir ermittelten die lokale Landnutzungsintensit{\"a}t, lokale Bl{\"u}tendeckung sowie Landschaftsdiversit{\"a}t und -struktur als wichtige potentielle Einflussfaktoren. Jede Gr{\"u}nlandfl{\"a}che wurde mit acht Nisthilfen und 50 weiblichen Bienen ausgestattet. Verschiedene Nestbau-Aktivit{\"a}ten, wie Fouragierfl{\"u}ge f{\"u}r Pollen und Nektar, wurden aufgenommen. Wir stellten fest, dass Fouragierfl{\"u}ge f{\"u}r Pollen und Nektar in komplexen, strukturreichen Landschaften signifikant k{\"u}rzer waren, dass jedoch weder lokale Faktoren, noch Landschaftsdiversit{\"a}t eine Rolle spielten. Wir konnten keinen Zusammenhang zwischen der Dauer von Fouragierfl{\"u}gen und Reproduktionserfolg feststellen. Um eine r{\"a}umlich und zeitlich konstante Versorgung von Nahrungs- und Nistressourcen zu gew{\"a}hrleisten und damit biotische Interaktionen, Diversit{\"a}t und Besiedlungserfolg von Wildbienen, Wespen und ihrer Gegenspieler zu unterst{\"u}tzen, empfehlen wir Maßnahmen, die sowohl die lokale Landnutzung als auch unterschiedliche Landschaftsfaktoren ber{\"u}cksichtigen.}, subject = {Wildbienen}, language = {en} }