@phdthesis{Gerdes2008,
  author    = {Gerdes, Antje B. M.},
  title     = {Preferential Processing of Phobic Cues : Attention and Perception in Spider Phobic Patients},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-28684},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {Cognitive views of the psychopathology of anxiety propose that attentional biases toward threatening information play a substantial role in the disorders' etiology and maintenance. For healthy subjects, converging evidence show that threatening stimuli attract attention and lead to enhanced activation in visual processing areas. It is assumed that this preferential processing of threat occurs at a preattentive level and is followed by fast attentional engagement. High-anxious individuals show augmented tendencies to selectively attend toward fear-relevant cues (Mathews, 1990) and exhibit elevated neural processing of threatening cues compared to non-anxious individuals (Dilger et al., 2003). Regarding attentional biases in high-anxious subjects, it remains unanswered up to now whether initial engagement of attention toward threat or difficulties to disengage from threat is an underlying mechanism. Furthermore, little is known whether the preferential (attentive) processing of threatening cues does influence perceptional outcomes of anxious subjects. In order to directly study separate components of attentional bias the first study of this dissertation was a combined reaction time and eye-tracking experiment. Twenty one spider phobic patients and 21 control participants were instructed to search for a neutral target while ignoring task-irrelevant abrupt-onset distractor circles which contained either a small picture of a spider (phobic), a flower (non-phobic, but similar to spiders in shape), a mushroom (non-phobic, and not similar to spiders in shape), or small circles with no picture. As expected, patients' reaction times to targets were longer on trials with spider distractors. However, analyses of eye movements revealed that this was not due to attentional capture by spider distractors; patients more often fixated on all distractors with pictures. Instead, reaction times were delayed by longer fixation durations on spider distractors. This result does not support automatic capture of attention by phobic cues but suggests that phobic patients fail to disengage attention from spiders. To assess whether preferential processing of phobic cues differentially affects visual perception in phobic patients compared to healthy controls, the second study of this dissertation used a binocular rivalry paradigm, where two incompatible pictures were presented to each eye. These pictures cannot be merged to a meaningful percept and temporarily, one picture predominates in conscious perception whereas the other is suppressed. 23 spider phobic patients and 20 non-anxious control participants were shown standardized pictures of spiders or flowers, each paired with a neutral pattern under conditions of binocular rivalry. Their task was to continuously indicate the predominant percept by key presses. Analyses show that spider phobic patients perceived the spider picture more often and longer as dominant compared to non-anxious control participants. Thus, predominance of phobic cues in binocular rivalry provides evidence that preferential processing of fear-relevant cues in the visual system actually leads to superior perception. In combination both studies support the notion that phobic patients process phobic cues preferentially within the visual system resulting in enhanced attention and perception. At early stages of visual processing, this is mainly reflected by delayed attentional disengagement and across time, preferential processing leads to improved perception of threat cues.},
  subject      = {Phobie},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Nguyen2023,
  author    = {Nguyen, Tu Anh Thi},
  title     = {Neural coding of different visual cues in the monarch butterfly sun compass},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-30380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-303807},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Monarch butterflies are famous for their annual long-distance migration. Decreasing temperatures and reduced daylight induce the migratory state in the autumn generation of monarch butterflies. Not only are they in a reproductive diapause, they also produce fat deposits to be prepared for the upcoming journey: Driven by their instinct to migrate, they depart from their eclosion grounds in the northern regions of the North American continent and start their southern journey to their hibernation spots in Central Mexico. The butterflies cover a distance of up to 4000 km across the United States. In the next spring, the same butterflies invert their preferred heading direction due to seasonal changes and start their northward spring migration. The spring migration is continued by three consecutive butterfly generations, until the animals repopulate the northern regions in North America as non-migratory monarch butterflies. The monarch butterflies' migratory state is genetically and epigenetically regulated, including the directed flight behavior. Therefore, the insect's internal compass system does not only have to encode the butterflies preferred, but also its current heading direction. However, the butterfly's internal heading representation has to be matched to external cues, to avoid departing from its initial flight path and increasing its risk of missing its desired destination. During the migratory flight, visual cues provide the butterflies with reliable orientation information. The butterflies refer to the sun as their main orientation cue. In addition to the sun, the butterflies likely use the polarization pattern of the sky for orientation. The sky compass signals are processed within a region in the brain, termed the central complex (CX). Previous research on the CX neural circuitry of the monarch butterflies demonstrated that tangential central complex neurons (TL) carry the visual input information into the CX and respond to a simulated sun and polarized light. However, whether these cells process additional visual cues like the panoramic skyline is still unknown. Furthermore, little is known about how the migratory state affects visual cue processing. In addition to this, most experiments studying the monarch butterfly CX focused on how neurons process single visual cues. However, how combined visual stimuli are processed in the CX is still unknown. This thesis is investigating the following questions: 1) How does the migratory state affect visual cue processing in the TL cells within the monarch butterfly brain? 2) How are multiple visual cues integrated in the TL cells? 3) How is compass information modulated in the CX? To study these questions, TL neurons from both animal groups (migratory and non-migratory) were electrophysiologically characterized using intracellular recordings while presenting different simulated celestial cues and visual sceneries. I showed that the TL neurons of migratory butterflies are more narrowly tuned to the sun, possibly helping them in keeping a directed flight course during migration. Furthermore, I found that TL cells encode a panoramic skyline, suggesting that the CX network combines celestial and terrestrial information. Experiments with combined celestial stimuli revealed that the TL cells combine both cue information linearly. However, if exposing the animals to a simulated visual scenery containing a panoramic skyline and a simulated sun, the single visual cues are weighted differently. These results indicate that the CX's input region can flexibly adapt to different visual cue conditions. Furthermore, I characterize a previously unknown neuron in the monarch butterfly CX which responds to celestial stimuli and connects the CX with other brain neuropiles. How this cell type affects heading direction encoding has yet to be determined.},
  subject      = {Monarchfalter},
  language  = {en}
}