@phdthesis{Alkhargi2020, author = {Alkhargi, Manuel}, title = {Cancer And Living Meaningfully: eine qualitative Studie zur Treatment Integrity der CALM-Therapie im Vergleich zu einer Kontrollbedingung}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-19939}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-199390}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Hintergrund: Circa ein Drittel der Patientinnen und Patienten mit fortgeschrittenen Krebserkrankungen ist von psychischen Komorbidit{\"a}ten betroffen und circa die H{\"a}lfte weist eine psychische Belastung im klinisch signifikanten Bereich auf. Zur psychotherapeutischen Behandlung dieser Patientengruppe stehen unterschiedliche psychotherapeutische Interventionen zur Verf{\"u}gung. Die CALM-Therapie, eine manualisierte Kurzintervention im Einzelsetting, ist eine dieser Interventionen. Hier bilden vier Module, welche auf den wichtigsten Anliegen und Belastungsfaktoren von Patientinnen und Patienten mit fortgeschrittenen Krebserkrankungen basieren, den inhaltlichen Rahmen. Ziel: Die Treatment Integrity beschreibt das Maß, inwieweit eine psychotherapeutische Intervention wie vorgesehen umgesetzt wurde. F{\"u}r eine fundierte Interpretation psychotherapeutischer Interventionseffekte sind Kenntnisse {\"u}ber die Treatment Integrity entscheidend. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersuchte Teilaspekte der Treatment Integrity durchgef{\"u}hrter CALM-Therapien im Vergleich zu durchgef{\"u}hrten konventionellen psychoonkologischen Therapien, um einen Beitrag zu einer fundierten Interpretation von Interventionseffekten der CALM-Therapie zu leisten. Methoden: Transkriptionen von zwei CALM-Therapien und zwei Therapien einer konventionellen psychoonkologischen Intervention wurden anhand einer qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse nach P. Mayring untersucht. Im Zentrum stand hierbei ein selbst entwickeltes Kategoriensystem zur Analyse des gesamten Textmaterials. Zus{\"a}tzlich wurden Auff{\"a}lligkeiten bez{\"u}glich Ansprachen von Themenbereichen der CALM-Module unsystematisch beobachtet. Ergebnisse: Die Inhalte der untersuchten CALM-Therapien bezogen sich durchschnittlich zu 99,54\% und die der konventionellen psychoonkologischen Therapien durchschnittlich zu 98,71\% auf die Themenbereiche der CALM-Module. Die ermittelten Werte f{\"u}r einzelne Therapiesitzungen lagen f{\"u}r CALM-Sitzungen zwischen 98,12\% und 100\% und f{\"u}r Sitzungen der konventionellen psychoonkologischen Therapie zwischen 96,20\% und 100\%. Unsystematisch beobachtete Auff{\"a}lligkeiten zeigten, dass die Themenbereiche der CALM-Module zum Teil sehr spezifisch durch die CALM-Therapeutinnen und -Therapeuten angesprochen und vernetzt wurden. Schlussfolgerung: Unter Ber{\"u}cksichtigung von methodischen Grenzen zeigte sich bez{\"u}glich des Anteils von Themenbereichen der CALM-Module innerhalb der beiden untersuchten Therapiegruppen kein maßgeblicher Unterschied. Zus{\"a}tzlich liefert die vorliegende Arbeit Hinweise f{\"u}r einen spezifischen therapeutischen Umgang mit den Themenbereichen der CALM-Module innerhalb der untersuchten CALM-Therapien. Um ermittelte Interventionseffekte der CALM-Therapie fundiert interpretieren zu k{\"o}nnen, sollten zuk{\"u}nftige Untersuchungen unterschiedliche Umgangsweisen von Therapeutinnen und Therapeuten der beiden Therapiegruppen mit den Themenbereichen der CALM-Module genauer in den Blick nehmen.}, subject = {Psychoonkologie}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Allgaier2024, author = {Allgaier, Johannes}, title = {Machine Learning Explainability on Multi-Modal Data using Ecological Momentary Assessments in the Medical Domain}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-35118}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-351189}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Introduction. Mobile health (mHealth) integrates mobile devices into healthcare, enabling remote monitoring, data collection, and personalized interventions. Machine Learning (ML), a subfield of Artificial Intelligence (AI), can use mHealth data to confirm or extend domain knowledge by finding associations within the data, i.e., with the goal of improving healthcare decisions. In this work, two data collection techniques were used for mHealth data fed into ML systems: Mobile Crowdsensing (MCS), which is a collaborative data gathering approach, and Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMA), which capture real-time individual experiences within the individual's common environments using questionnaires and sensors. We collected EMA and MCS data on tinnitus and COVID-19. About 15 \% of the world's population suffers from tinnitus. Materials \& Methods. This thesis investigates the challenges of ML systems when using MCS and EMA data. It asks: How can ML confirm or broad domain knowledge? Domain knowledge refers to expertise and understanding in a specific field, gained through experience and education. Are ML systems always superior to simple heuristics and if yes, how can one reach explainable AI (XAI) in the presence of mHealth data? An XAI method enables a human to understand why a model makes certain predictions. Finally, which guidelines can be beneficial for the use of ML within the mHealth domain? In tinnitus research, ML discerns gender, temperature, and season-related variations among patients. In the realm of COVID-19, we collaboratively designed a COVID-19 check app for public education, incorporating EMA data to offer informative feedback on COVID-19-related matters. This thesis uses seven EMA datasets with more than 250,000 assessments. Our analyses revealed a set of challenges: App user over-representation, time gaps, identity ambiguity, and operating system specific rounding errors, among others. Our systematic review of 450 medical studies assessed prior utilization of XAI methods. Results. ML models predict gender and tinnitus perception, validating gender-linked tinnitus disparities. Using season and temperature to predict tinnitus shows the association of these variables with tinnitus. Multiple assessments of one app user can constitute a group. Neglecting these groups in data sets leads to model overfitting. In select instances, heuristics outperform ML models, highlighting the need for domain expert consultation to unveil hidden groups or find simple heuristics. Conclusion. This thesis suggests guidelines for mHealth related data analyses and improves estimates for ML performance. Close communication with medical domain experts to identify latent user subsets and incremental benefits of ML is essential.}, subject = {Maschinelles Lernen}, language = {en} } @article{AllgaierSchleeLangguthetal.2021, author = {Allgaier, Johannes and Schlee, Winfried and Langguth, Berthold and Probst, Thomas and Pryss, R{\"u}diger}, title = {Predicting the Gender of Individuals with Tinnitus based on Daily Life Data of the TrackYourTinnitus mHealth Platform}, series = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {11}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1038/s41598-021-96731-8}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-261753}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Tinnitus is an auditory phantom perception in the absence of an external sound stimulation. People with tinnitus often report severe constraints in their daily life. Interestingly, indications exist on gender differences between women and men both in the symptom profile as well as in the response to specific tinnitus treatments. In this paper, data of the TrackYourTinnitus platform (TYT) were analyzed to investigate whether the gender of users can be predicted. In general, the TYT mobile Health crowdsensing platform was developed to demystify the daily and momentary variations of tinnitus symptoms over time. The goal of the presented investigation is a better understanding of gender-related differences in the symptom profiles of users from TYT. Based on two questionnaires of TYT, four machine learning based classifiers were trained and analyzed. With respect to the provided daily answers, the gender of TYT users can be predicted with an accuracy of 81.7\%. In this context, worries, difficulties in concentration, and irritability towards the family are the three most important characteristics for predicting the gender. Note that in contrast to existing studies on TYT, daily answers to the worst symptom question were firstly investigated in more detail. It was found that results of this question significantly contribute to the prediction of the gender of TYT users. Overall, our findings indicate gender-related differences in tinnitus and tinnitus-related symptoms. Based on evidence that gender impacts the development of tinnitus, the gathered insights can be considered relevant and justify further investigations in this direction.}, language = {en} } @article{AllgaierSchleeProbstetal.2022, author = {Allgaier, Johannes and Schlee, Winfried and Probst, Thomas and Pryss, R{\"u}diger}, title = {Prediction of tinnitus perception based on daily life mHealth data using country origin and season}, series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, volume = {11}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, number = {15}, issn = {2077-0383}, doi = {10.3390/jcm11154270}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-281812}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Tinnitus is an auditory phantom perception without external sound stimuli. This chronic perception can severely affect quality of life. Because tinnitus symptoms are highly heterogeneous, multimodal data analyses are increasingly used to gain new insights. MHealth data sources, with their particular focus on country- and season-specific differences, can provide a promising avenue for new insights. Therefore, we examined data from the TrackYourTinnitus (TYT) mHealth platform to create symptom profiles of TYT users. We used gradient boosting engines to classify momentary tinnitus and regress tinnitus loudness, using country of origin and season as features. At the daily assessment level, tinnitus loudness can be regressed with a mean absolute error rate of 7.9\% points. In turn, momentary tinnitus can be classified with an F1 score of 93.79\%. Both results indicate differences in the tinnitus of TYT users with respect to season and country of origin. The significance of the features was evaluated using statistical and explainable machine learning methods. It was further shown that tinnitus varies with temperature in certain countries. The results presented show that season and country of origin appear to be valuable features when combined with longitudinal mHealth data at the level of daily assessment.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Appel2018, author = {Appel, Patricia}, title = {Gef{\"a}hrdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung im Gesundheitswesen: Faktorielle Struktur des Kurzfragebogens zur Arbeitsanalyse (KFZA)}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-143815}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Hintergrund. Die gesetzlich vorgeschriebene Gef{\"a}hrdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung gewinnt zunehmend an Bedeutung. Ein Standardinstrument, das in diesem Rahmen seit einigen Jahren zur Anwendung kommt, ist der Kurzfragebogens zur Arbeitsanalyse (KFZA), von Pr{\"u}mper et al. (1995). Dieser Fragebogen wurde urspr{\"u}nglich f{\"u}r die Beurteilung von Bildschirmarbeitspl{\"a}tzen konzipiert und f{\"u}r diese Berufsgruppe validiert. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, die faktorielle Validit{\"a}t des KFZA bei einem Einsatz im Gesundheitswesen mittels einer explorativen Faktorenanalyse zu {\"u}berpr{\"u}fen. Da eine Fragebogenversion zum Einsatz kam, die zus{\"a}tzlich spezifische Erg{\"a}nzungsfragen f{\"u}r das Gesundheitswesen enthielt, sollte in einem zweiten Schritt auch dieser erweiterte KFZA einer Faktorenanalyse unterzogen werden. Methodik. Insgesamt 1731 Datens{\"a}tze waren {\"u}ber einen Zeitraum von zehn Jahren in verschiedenen norddeutschen Krankenh{\"a}usern als Routinedaten erhoben worden. Nach listenweisem Fallausschluss in Folge des Einsatzes unterschiedlicher Fragebogenvarianten standen f{\"u}r den KFZA 1163 Datens{\"a}tze und davon 1095 Datens{\"a}tze f{\"u}r den erweiterten KFZA zur faktorenanalytischen Auswertung zur Verf{\"u}gung. Die 26 Items des KFZA bzw. die 37 Items der erweiterten Version wurden einer explorativen Faktorenanalyse nach der Hauptkomponentenmethode unterzogen. Die Zahl der Faktoren wurde sowohl mittels Kaiser- als auch Scree-Kriterium bestimmt. F{\"u}r die Interpretation der Faktoren wurden diese sowohl orthogonal nach der Varimax-Methode als auch direct-oblimin rotiert. Zur Absch{\"a}tzung der Reliabilit{\"a}t wurde die interne Konsistenz anhand des Cronbach-α-Koeffizienten berechnet. Ergebnisse. F{\"u}r die 26 Items des KFZA f{\"u}hrte das Kaiser-Kriterium zu einer 7-Faktoren-L{\"o}sung mit einer Gesamtvarianzaufkl{\"a}rung von 62,0\%, der Scree-Plot dagegen deutete auf vier Faktoren hin. Orthogonale und oblique Rotation brachten vergleichbare Ergebnisse. Die inhaltliche Interpretation unterst{\"u}tzte die Anzahl von sieben Faktoren, die wie folgt benannt wurden: „Soziale Beziehungen", „Handlungsspielraum", „Partizipations- und Entwicklungs-m{\"o}glichkeiten", „Quantitative Arbeitsbelastungen", „Umgebungsbelastungen", „Vielseitigkeit" und „Qualitative Arbeitsbelastungen". F{\"u}r diese Skalen, die jeweils 2 bis 6 Items umfassten, konnten Cronbach-α-Koeffizienten zwischen 0,63 und 0,80 ermittelt werden. Die Faktorenanalyse des erweiterten KFZA mit insgesamt 37 Items f{\"u}hrte nach Bestimmung des Kaiser-Kriteriums und Betrachtung der inhaltlichen Plausibilit{\"a}t zu einer 9-Faktoren-L{\"o}sung mit einer Gesamtvarianzaufkl{\"a}rung von 59,5\%. Die beiden zus{\"a}tzlichen Faktoren wurden mit „Fehlbeanspruchungsfolgen" und „Emotionale Belastungen" benannt. Die Werte des Cronbach-α-Koeffizienten lagen f{\"u}r diese Skalen zwischen 0,63 und 0,87. Diskussion. Statt der von den Autoren des KFZA beschriebenen elf Faktoren wurden bei einem Einsatz im Gesundheitswesen sieben Faktoren ermittelt. Auch wenn sich die Anzahl der Faktoren reduzierte, ließ sich die Struktur inhaltlich relativ gut replizieren. Besonders die Items des KFZA-Faktors „Ganzheitlichkeit" erwiesen sich jedoch f{\"u}r den Einsatz im Gesundheitswesen als nicht passgenau. Die Erg{\"a}nzungsitems des erweiterten KFZA bildeten zwei zus{\"a}tzliche Faktoren bzw. ließen sich den zuvor ermittelten Faktoren sinnvoll zuordnen. Die vorliegende Arbeit liefert somit einen Beitrag zur Einsch{\"a}tzung der Validit{\"a}t dieses in der Praxis h{\"a}ufig eingesetzten Instruments. Die psychometrische Pr{\"u}fung kann jedoch noch nicht als vollst{\"a}ndig erachtet werden und sollte in nachfolgenden Studien fortgef{\"u}hrt werden.}, subject = {Psychische Belastung}, language = {de} } @article{BarbieriGardonRuizCastelletal.2016, author = {Barbieri, Flavia L. and Gardon, Jacques and Ruiz-Castell, Mar{\´i}a and Paco V., Pamela and Muckelbauer, Rebecca and Casiot, Corinne and Freydier, R{\´e}mi and Duprey, Jean-Louis and Chen, Chih-Mei and M{\"u}ller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline and Keil, Thomas}, title = {Toxic trace elements in maternal and cord blood and social determinants in a Bolivian mining city}, series = {International Journal of Environmental Health Research}, volume = {26}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Health Research}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1080/09603123.2015.1061114}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-150385}, pages = {158-174}, year = {2016}, abstract = {This study assessed lead, arsenic, and antimony in maternal and cord blood, and associations between maternal concentrations and social determinants in the Bolivian mining city of Oruro using the baseline assessment of the ToxBol/Mine-Ni{\~n}o birth cohort. We recruited 467 pregnant women, collecting venous blood and sociodemographic information as well as placental cord blood at birth. Metallic/semimetallic trace elements were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Lead medians in maternal and cord blood were significantly correlated (Spearman coefficient = 0.59; p < 0.001; 19.35 and 13.50 μg/L, respectively). Arsenic concentrations were above detection limit (3.30 μg/L) in 17.9 \% of maternal and 34.6 \% of cord blood samples. They were not associated (Fischer's p = 0.72). Antimony medians in maternal and cord blood were weakly correlated (Spearman coefficient = 0.15; p < 0.03; 9.00 and 8.62 μg/L, respectively). Higher concentrations of toxic elements in maternal blood were associated with maternal smoking, low educational level, and partner involved in mining.}, language = {en} } @article{BarbieriGardonRuizCastelletal.2016, author = {Barbieri, Flavia L. and Gardon, Jacques and Ruiz-Castell, Mar{\´i}a and Paco V., Pamela and Muckelbauer, Rebecca and Casiot, Corinne and Freydier, R{\´e}mi and Duprey, Jean-Louis and Chen, Chih-Mei and M{\"u}ller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline and Keil, Thomas}, title = {Toxic trace elements in maternal and cord blood and social determinants in a Bolivian mining city}, series = {International Journal of Environmental Health Research}, volume = {26}, journal = {International Journal of Environmental Health Research}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1080/09603123.2015.1061114}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-190703}, pages = {158-174}, year = {2016}, abstract = {This study assessed lead, arsenic, and antimony in maternal and cord blood, and associations between maternal concentrations and social determinants in the Bolivian mining city of Oruro using the baseline assessment of the ToxBol/Mine-Nino birth cohort. We recruited 467 pregnant women, collecting venous blood and sociodemographic information as well as placental cord blood at birth. Metallic/semimetallic trace elements were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Lead medians in maternal and cord blood were significantly correlated (Spearman coefficient=0.59; p<0.001; 19.35 and 13.50 μg/L, respectively). Arsenic concentrations were above detection limit (3.30 μg/L) in 17.9\% of maternal and 34.6\% of cord blood samples. They were not associated (Fischer's p=0.72). Antimony medians in maternal and cord blood were weakly correlated (Spearman coefficient=0.15; p<0.03; 9.00 and 8.62 μg/L, respectively). Higher concentrations of toxic elements in maternal blood were associated with maternal smoking, low educational level, and partner involved in mining.}, language = {en} } @article{BeckerRauSchmittetal.2015, author = {Becker, Philip P. and Rau, Monika and Schmitt, Johannes and Malsch, Carolin and Hammer, Christian and Bantel, Heike and M{\"u}llhaupt, Beat and Geier, Andreas}, title = {Performance of serum microRNAs -122, -192 and -21 as biomarkers in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis}, series = {PLoS ONE}, volume = {10}, journal = {PLoS ONE}, number = {11}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0142661}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-145147}, pages = {e0142661}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Objectives Liver biopsies are the current gold standard in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) diagnosis. Their invasive nature, however, still carries an increased risk for patients' health. The development of non-invasive diagnostic tools to differentiate between bland steatosis (NAFL) and NASH remains crucial. The aim of this study is the evaluation of investigated circulating microRNAs in combination with new targets in order to optimize the discrimination of NASH patients by non-invasive serum biomarkers. Methods Serum profiles of four microRNAs were evaluated in two cohorts consisting of 137 NAFLD patients and 61 healthy controls. In a binary logistic regression model microRNAs of relevance were detected. Correlation of microRNA appearance with known biomarkers like ALT and CK18-Asp396 was evaluated. A simplified scoring model was developed, combining the levels of microRNA in circulation and CK18-Asp396 fragments. Receiver operating characteristics were used to evaluate the potential of discriminating NASH. Results The new finding of our study is the different profile of circulating miR-21 in NASH patients (p<0.0001). Also, it validates recently published results of miR-122 and miR-192 to be differentially regulated in NAFL and NASH. Combined microRNA expression profiles with CK18-Asp396 fragment level scoring model had a higher potential of NASH prediction compared to other risk biomarkers (AUROC = 0.83, 95\% CI = 0.754-0.908; p<0.001). Evaluation of score model for NAFL (Score = 0) and NASH (Score = 4) had shown high rates of sensitivity (91\%) and specificity (83\%). Conclusions Our study defines candidates for a combined model of miRNAs and CK18-Asp396 levels relevant as a promising expansion for diagnosis and in turn treatment of NASH.}, language = {en} } @article{BeierlePryssAizawa2023, author = {Beierle, Felix and Pryss, R{\"u}diger and Aizawa, Akiko}, title = {Sentiments about mental health on Twitter — before and during the COVID-19 pandemic}, series = {Healthcare}, volume = {11}, journal = {Healthcare}, number = {21}, issn = {2227-9032}, doi = {10.3390/healthcare11212893}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-355192}, year = {2023}, abstract = {During the COVID-19 pandemic, the novel coronavirus had an impact not only on public health but also on the mental health of the population. Public sentiment on mental health and depression is often captured only in small, survey-based studies, while work based on Twitter data often only looks at the period during the pandemic and does not make comparisons with the pre-pandemic situation. We collected tweets that included the hashtags \#MentalHealth and \#Depression from before and during the pandemic (8.5 months each). We used LDA (Latent Dirichlet Allocation) for topic modeling and LIWC, VADER, and NRC for sentiment analysis. We used three machine-learning classifiers to seek evidence regarding an automatically detectable change in tweets before vs. during the pandemic: (1) based on TF-IDF values, (2) based on the values from the sentiment libraries, (3) based on tweet content (deep-learning BERT classifier). Topic modeling revealed that Twitter users who explicitly used the hashtags \#Depression and especially \#MentalHealth did so to raise awareness. We observed an overall positive sentiment, and in tough times such as during the COVID-19 pandemic, tweets with \#MentalHealth were often associated with gratitude. Among the three classification approaches, the BERT classifier showed the best performance, with an accuracy of 81\% for \#MentalHealth and 79\% for \#Depression. Although the data may have come from users familiar with mental health, these findings can help gauge public sentiment on the topic. The combination of (1) sentiment analysis, (2) topic modeling, and (3) tweet classification with machine learning proved useful in gaining comprehensive insight into public sentiment and could be applied to other data sources and topics.}, language = {en} } @article{BellingerWehrmannRohdeetal.2023, author = {Bellinger, Daniel and Wehrmann, Kristin and Rohde, Anna and Schuppert, Maria and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Flohr-Jost, Michael and Gall, Dominik and Pauli, Paul and Deckert, J{\"u}rgen and Herrmann, Martin J. and Erhardt-Lehmann, Angelika}, title = {The application of virtual reality exposure versus relaxation training in music performance anxiety: a randomized controlled study}, series = {BMC Psychiatry}, volume = {23}, journal = {BMC Psychiatry}, doi = {10.1186/s12888-023-05040-z}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-357833}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Background Performance anxiety is the most frequently reported anxiety disorder among professional musicians. Typical symptoms are - on a physical level - the consequences of an increase in sympathetic tone with cardiac stress, such as acceleration of heartbeat, increase in blood pressure, increased respiratory rate and tremor up to nausea or flush reactions. These symptoms can cause emotional distress, a reduced musical and artistical performance up to an impaired functioning. While anxiety disorders are preferably treated using cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure, this approach is rather difficult for treating music performance anxiety since the presence of a public or professional jury is required and not easily available. The use of virtual reality (VR) could therefore display an alternative. So far, no therapy studies on music performance anxiety applying virtual reality exposure therapy have investigated the therapy outcome including cardiovascular changes as outcome parameters. Methods This mono-center, prospective, randomized and controlled clinical trial has a pre-post design with a follow-up period of 6 months. 46 professional and semi-professional musicians will be recruited and allocated randomly to an VR exposure group or a control group receiving progressive muscle relaxation training. Both groups will be treated over 4 single sessions. Music performance anxiety will be diagnosed based on a clinical interview using ICD-10 and DSM-5 criteria for specific phobia or social anxiety. A behavioral assessment test is conducted three times (pre, post, follow-up) in VR through an audition in a concert hall. Primary outcomes are the changes in music performance anxiety measured by the German B{\"u}hnenangstfragebogen and the cardiovascular reactivity reflected by heart rate variability (HRV). Secondary outcomes are changes in blood pressure, stress parameters such as cortisol in the blood and saliva, neuropeptides, and DNA-methylation. Discussion The trial investigates the effect of VR exposure in musicians with performance anxiety compared to a relaxation technique on anxiety symptoms and corresponding cardiovascular parameters. We expect a reduction of anxiety but also a consecutive improvement of HRV with cardiovascular protective effects. Trial registration This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov. (ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT05735860)}, language = {en} } @article{BeningHamoudaOezkuretal.2017, author = {Bening, Constanze and Hamouda, Khaled and Oezkur, Mehmet and Schimmer, Christoph and Schade, Ina and Gorski, Armin and Aleksic, Ivan and Leyh, Rainer}, title = {Rapid deployment valve system shortens operative times for aortic valve replacement through right anterior minithoracotomy}, series = {Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery}, volume = {12}, journal = {Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery}, number = {27}, doi = {10.1186/s13019-017-0598-0}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-159439}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Background: There is growing evidence from the literature that right anterior minithoracotomy aortic valve replacement (RAT-AVR) improves clinical outcome. However, increased cross clamp time is the strongest argument for surgeons not performing RAT-AVR. Rapid deployment aortic valve systems have the potential to decrease cross-clamp time and ease this procedure. We assessed clinical outcome of rapid deployment and conventional valves through RAT. Methods: Sixty-eight patients (mean age 76 ± 6 years, 32\% females) underwent RAT-AVR between 9/2013 and 7/2015. According to the valve type implanted the patients were divided into two groups. In 43 patients (R-group; mean age 74.1 ± 6.6 years) a rapid deployment valve system (Edwards Intuity, Edwards Lifesciences Corp; Irvine, Calif) and in 25 patients (C-group; mean age 74.2 ± 6.6 years) a conventional stented biological aortic valve was implanted. Results: Aortic cross-clamp (42.1 ± 12 min vs. 68.3 ± 20.3 min; p < 0.001) and bypass time (80.4 ± 39.3 min vs. 106.6 ± 23.2 min; p = 0.001) were shorter in the rapid deployment group (R-group). We observed no differences in clinical outcome. Postoperative gradients (R-group: max gradient, 14.3 ± 8 mmHg vs. 15.5 ± 5 mmHg (C-group), mean gradient, 9.2 ± 1.7 mmHg (R-group) vs. 9.1 ± 2.3 mmHg (C-group) revealed no differences. However, larger prostheses were implanted in C-group (25 mm; IQR 23-27 mm vs. 23 mm; IQR 21-25; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the rapid deployment aortic valve system reduced cross clamp and bypass time in patients undergoing RAT-AVR with similar hemodynamics as with larger size stented prosthesis. However, larger studies and long-term follow-up are mandatory to confirm our findings.}, language = {en} } @article{BolmZemskovZelleretal.2022, author = {Bolm, Louisa and Zemskov, Sergii and Zeller, Maria and Baba, Taisuke and Roldan, Jorge and Harrison, Jon M. and Petruch, Natalie and Sato, Hiroki and Petrova, Ekaterina and Lapshyn, Hryhoriy and Braun, Ruediger and Honselmann, Kim C. and Hummel, Richard and Dronov, Oleksii and Kirichenko, Alexander V. and Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika and Kleihues-van Tol, Kees and Zeissig, Sylke R. and Rades, Dirk and Keck, Tobias and Fernandez-del Castillo, Carlos and Wellner, Ulrich F. and Wegner, Rodney E.}, title = {Concepts and outcomes of perioperative therapy in stage IA-III pancreatic cancer — a cross-validation of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers (GCRG/ADT)}, series = {Cancers}, volume = {14}, journal = {Cancers}, number = {4}, issn = {2072-6694}, doi = {10.3390/cancers14040868}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-262174}, year = {2022}, abstract = {(1) Background: The aim of this study is to assess perioperative therapy in stage IA-III pancreatic cancer cross-validating the German Cancer Registry Group of the Society of German Tumor Centers — Network for Care, Quality, and Research in Oncology, Berlin (GCRG/ADT) and the National Cancer Database (NCDB). (2) Methods: Patients with clinical stage IA-III PDAC undergoing surgery alone (OP), neoadjuvant therapy (TX) + surgery (neo + OP), surgery+adjuvantTX (OP + adj) and neoadjuvantTX + surgery + adjuvantTX (neo + OP + adj) were identified. Baseline characteristics, histopathological parameters, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. (3) Results: 1392 patients from the GCRG/ADT and 29,081 patients from the NCDB were included. Patient selection and strategies of perioperative therapy remained consistent across the registries for stage IA-III pancreatic cancer. Combined neo + OP + adj was associated with prolonged OS as compared to neo + OP alone (17.8 m vs. 21.3 m, p = 0.012) across all stages in the GCRG/ADT registry. Similarly, OS with neo + OP + adj was improved as compared to neo + OP in the NCDB registry (26.4 m vs. 35.4 m, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: The cross-validation study demonstrated similar concepts and patient selection criteria of perioperative therapy across clinical stages of PDAC. Neoadjuvant therapy combined with adjuvant therapy is associated with improved overall survival as compared to either therapy alone.}, language = {en} } @article{BousquetAntoAkdisetal.2016, author = {Bousquet, J. and Anto, J. M. and Akdis, M. and Auffray, C. and Keil, T. and Momas, I. and Postma, D. S. and Valenta, R. and Wickman, M. and Cambon-Thomsen, A. and Haahtela, T. and Lambrecht, B. N. and Lodrup Carlsen, K. C. and Koppelman, G. H. and Sunyer, J. and Zuberbier, T. and Annesi-Maesano, I. and Arno, A. and Bindslev-Jensen, C. and De Carlo, G. and Forastiere, F. and Heinrich, J. and Kowalski, M. L. and Maier, D. and Melen, E. and Palkonen, S. and Smit, H. A. and Standl, M. and Wright, J. and Asarnoj, A. and Benet, M. and Ballardini, N. and Garcia-Aymerich, J. and Gehring, U. and Guerra, S. and Hohman, C. and Kull, I. and Lupinek, C. and Pinart, M. and Skrindo, I. and Westman, M. and Smagghe, D. and Akdis, C. and Albang, R. and Anastasova, V. and Anderson, N. and Bachert, C. and Ballereau, S. and Ballester, F. and Basagana, X. and Bedbrook, A. and Bergstrom, A. and von Berg, A. and Brunekreef, B. and Burte, E. and Carlsen, K.H. and Chatzi, L. and Coquet, J.M. and Curin, M. and Demoly, P. and Eller, E. and Fantini, M.P. and Gerhard, B. and Hammad, H. and von Hertzen, L. and Hovland, V. and Jacquemin, B. and Just, J. and Keller, T. and Kerkhof, M. and Kiss, R. and Kogevinas, M. and Koletzko, S. and Lau, S. and Lehmann, I. and Lemonnier, N. and McEachan, R. and Makela, M. and Mestres, J. and Minina, E. and Mowinckel, P. and Nadif, R. and Nawijn, M. and Oddie, S. and Pellet, J. and Pin, I. and Porta, D. and Ranci{\`e}re, F. and Rial-Sebbag, A. and Schuijs, M.J. and Siroux, V. and Tischer, C.G. and Torrent, M. and Varraso, R. and De Vocht, J. and Wenger, K. and Wieser, S. and Xu, C.}, title = {Paving the way of systems biology and precision medicine in allergic diseases: the MeDALL success story Mechanisms of the Development of ALLergy; EUFP7-CP-IP; Project No: 261357; 2010-2015}, series = {Allergy}, volume = {71}, journal = {Allergy}, number = {11}, doi = {10.1111/all.12880}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-186858}, pages = {1513-1525}, year = {2016}, abstract = {MeDALL (Mechanisms of the Development of ALLergy; EU FP7-CP-IP; Project No: 261357; 2010-2015) has proposed an innovative approach to develop early indicators for the prediction, diagnosis, prevention and targets for therapy. MeDALL has linked epidemiological, clinical and basic research using a stepwise, large-scale and integrative approach: MeDALL data of precisely phenotyped children followed in 14 birth cohorts spread across Europe were combined with systems biology (omics, IgE measurement using microarrays) and environmental data. Multimorbidity in the same child is more common than expected by chance alone, suggesting that these diseases share causal mechanisms irrespective of IgE sensitization. IgE sensitization should be considered differently in monosensitized and polysensitized individuals. Allergic multimorbidities and IgE polysensitization are often associated with the persistence or severity of allergic diseases. Environmental exposures are relevant for the development of allergy-related diseases. To complement the population-based studies in children, MeDALL included mechanistic experimental animal studies and in vitro studies in humans. The integration of multimorbidities and polysensitization has resulted in a new classification framework of allergic diseases that could help to improve the understanding of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms of allergy as well as to better manage allergic diseases. Ethics and gender were considered. MeDALL has deployed translational activities within the EU agenda.}, language = {en} } @article{BousquetFarrellCrooksetal.2016, author = {Bousquet, J. and Farrell, J. and Crooks, G. and Hellings, P. and Bel, E. H. and Bewick, M. and Chavannes, N. H. and Correia de Sousa, J. and Cruz, A. A. and Haahtela, T. and Joos, G. and Khaltaev, N. and Malva, J. and Muraro, A. and Nogues, M. and Palkonen, S. and Pedersen, S. and Robalo-Cordeiro, C. and Samolinski, B. and Strandberg, T. and Valiulis, A. and Yorgancioglu, A. and Zuberbier, T. and Bedbrook, A. and Aberer, W. and Adachi, M. and Agusti, A. and Akdis, C. A. and Akdis, M. and Ankri, J. and Alonso, A. and Annesi-Maesano, I. and Ansotegui, I. J. and Anto, J. M. and Arnavielhe, S. and Arshad, H. and Bai, C. and Baiardini, I. and Bachert, C. and Baigenzhin, A. K. and Barbara, C. and Bateman, E. D. and Begh{\´e}, B. and Ben Kheder, A. and Bennoor, K. S. and Benson, M. and Bergmann, K. C. and Bieber, T. and Bindslev-Jensen, C. and Bjermer, L. and Blain, H. and Blasi, F. and Boner, A. L. and Bonini, M. and Bonini, S. and Bosnic-Anticevitch, S. and Boulet, L. P. and Bourret, R. and Bousquet, P. J. and Braido, F. and Briggs, A. H. and Brightling, C. E. and Brozek, J. and Buhl, R. and Burney, P. G. and Bush, A. and Caballero-Fonseca, F. and Caimmi, D. and Calderon, M. A. and Calverley, P. M. and Camargos, P. A. M. and Canonica, G. W. and Camuzat, T. and Carlsen, K. H. and Carr, W. and Carriazo, A. and Casale, T. and Cepeda Sarabia, A. M. and Chatzi, L. and Chen, Y. Z. and Chiron, R. and Chkhartishvili, E. and Chuchalin, A. G. and Chung, K. F. and Ciprandi, G. and Cirule, I. and Cox, L. and Costa, D. J. and Custovic, A. and Dahl, R. and Dahlen, S. E. and Darsow, U. and De Carlo, G. and De Blay, F. and Dedeu, T. and Deleanu, D. and De Manuel Keenoy, E. and Demoly, P. and Denburg, J. A. and Devillier, P. and Didier, A. and Dinh-Xuan, A. T. and Djukanovic, R. and Dokic, D. and Douagui, H. and Dray, G. and Dubakiene, R. and Durham, S. R. and Dykewicz, M. S. and El-Gamal, Y. and Emuzyte, R. and Fabbri, L. M. and Fletcher, M. and Fiocchi, A. and Fink Wagner, A. and Fonseca, J. and Fokkens, W. J. and Forastiere, F. and Frith, P. and Gaga, M. and Gamkrelidze, A. and Garces, J. and Garcia-Aymerich, J. and Gemicioğlu, B. and Gereda, J. E. and Gonz{\´a}lez Diaz, S. and Gotua, M. and Grisle, I. and Grouse, L. and Gutter, Z. and Guzm{\´a}n, M. A. and Heaney, L. G. and Hellquist-Dahl, B. and Henderson, D. and Hendry, A. and Heinrich, J. and Heve, D. and Horak, F. and Hourihane, J. O'. B. and Howarth, P. and Humbert, M. and Hyland, M. E. and Illario, M. and Ivancevich, J. C. and Jardim, J. R. and Jares, E. J. and Jeandel, C. and Jenkins, C. and Johnston, S. L. and Jonquet, O. and Julge, K. and Jung, K. S. and Just, J. and Kaidashev, I. and Kaitov, M. R. and Kalayci, O. and Kalyoncu, A. F. and Keil, T. and Keith, P. K. and Klimek, L. and Koffi N'Goran, B. and Kolek, V. and Koppelman, G. H. and Kowalski, M. L. and Kull, I. and Kuna, P. and Kvedariene, V. and Lambrecht, B. and Lau, S. and Larenas‑Linnemann, D. and Laune, D. and Le, L. T. T. and Lieberman, P. and Lipworth, B. and Li, J. and Lodrup Carlsen, K. and Louis, R. and MacNee, W. and Magard, Y. and Magnan, A. and Mahboub, B. and Mair, A. and Majer, I. and Makela, M. J. and Manning, P. and Mara, S. and Marshall, G. D. and Masjedi, M. R. and Matignon, P. and Maurer, M. and Mavale‑Manuel, S. and Mel{\´e}n, E. and Melo‑Gomes, E. and Meltzer, E. O. and Menzies‑Gow, A. and Merk, H. and Michel, J. P. and Miculinic, N. and Mihaltan, F. and Milenkovic, B. and Mohammad, G. M. Y. and Molimard, M. and Momas, I. and Montilla‑Santana, A. and Morais‑Almeida, M. and Morgan, M. and M{\"o}sges, R. and Mullol, J. and Nafti, S. and Namazova‑Baranova, L. and Naclerio, R. and Neou, A. and Neffen, H. and Nekam, K. and Niggemann, B. and Ninot, G. and Nyembue, T. D. and O'Hehir, R. E. and Ohta, K. and Okamoto, Y. and Okubo, K. and Ouedraogo, S. and Paggiaro, P. and Pali‑Sch{\"o}ll, I. and Panzner, P. and Papadopoulos, N. and Papi, A. and Park, H. S. and Passalacqua, G. and Pavord, I. and Pawankar, R. and Pengelly, R. and Pfaar, O. and Picard, R. and Pigearias, B. and Pin, I. and Plavec, D. and Poethig, D. and Pohl, W. and Popov, T. A. and Portejoie, F. and Potter, P. and Postma, D. and Price, D. and Rabe, K. F. and Raciborski, F. and Radier Pontal, F. and Repka‑Ramirez, S. and Reitamo, S. and Rennard, S. and Rodenas, F. and Roberts, J. and Roca, J. and Rodriguez Ma{\~n}as, L. and et al,}, title = {Scaling up strategies of the chronic respiratory disease programme of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (Action Plan B3: Area 5)}, series = {Clinical and Translational Allergy}, volume = {6}, journal = {Clinical and Translational Allergy}, number = {29}, doi = {10.1186/s13601-016-0116-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-166874}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Action Plan B3 of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP on AHA) focuses on the integrated care of chronic diseases. Area 5 (Care Pathways) was initiated using chronic respiratory diseases as a model. The chronic respiratory disease action plan includes (1) AIRWAYS integrated care pathways (ICPs), (2) the joint initiative between the Reference site MACVIA-LR (Contre les MAladies Chroniques pour un VIeillissement Actif) and ARIA (Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma), (3) Commitments for Action to the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing and the AIRWAYS ICPs network. It is deployed in collaboration with the World Health Organization Global Alliance against Chronic Respiratory Diseases (GARD). The European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing has proposed a 5-step framework for developing an individual scaling up strategy: (1) what to scale up: (1-a) databases of good practices, (1-b) assessment of viability of the scaling up of good practices, (1-c) classification of good practices for local replication and (2) how to scale up: (2-a) facilitating partnerships for scaling up, (2-b) implementation of key success factors and lessons learnt, including emerging technologies for individualised and predictive medicine. This strategy has already been applied to the chronic respiratory disease action plan of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing.}, language = {en} } @article{BousquetOnoratoBachertetal.2017, author = {Bousquet, J. and Onorato, G. L. and Bachert, C. and Barbolini, M. and Bedbrook, A. and Bjermer, L. and Correia de Sousa, J. and Chavannes, N. H. and Cruz, A. A. and De Manuel Keenoy, E. and Devillier, P. and Fonseca, J. and Hun, S. and Kostka, T. and Hellings, P. W. and Illario, M. and Ivancevich, J. C. and Larenas-Linnemann, D. and Millot-Keurinck, J. and Ryan, D. and Samolinski, B. and Sheikh, A. and Yorgancioglu, A. and Agache, I. and Arnavielhe, S. and Bewick, M. and Annesi-Maesano, I. and Anto, J. M. and Bergmann, K. C. and Bindslev-Jensen, C. and Bosnic-Anticevich, S. and Bouchard, J. and Caimmi, D. P. and Camargos, P. and Canonica, G. W. and Cardona, V. and Carriazo, A. M. and Cingi, C. and Cogan, E. and Custovic, A. and Dahl, R. and Demoly, P. and De Vries, G. and Fokkens, W. J. and Fontaine, J. F. and Gemicioğlu, B. and Guldemond, N. and Gutter, Z. and Haahtela, T. and Hellqvist-Dahl, B. and Jares, E. and Joos, G. and Just, J. and Khaltaev, N. and Keil, T. and Klimek, L. and Kowalski, M. L. and Kull, I. and Kuna, P. and Kvedariene, V. and Laune, D. and Louis, R. and Magnan, A. and Malva, J. and Mathieu-Dupas, E. and Mel{\´e}n, E. and Menditto, E. and Morais-Almeida, M. and M{\"o}sges, R. and Mullol, J. and Murray, R. and Neffen, H. and O'Hehir, R. and Palkonen, S. and Papadopoulos, N. G. and Passalacqua, G. and P{\´e}pin, J. L. and Portejoie, F. and Price, D. and Pugin, B. and Raciborski, F. and Simons, F. E. R. and Sova, M. and Spranger, O. and Stellato, C. and Todo Bom, A. and Tomazic, P. V. and Triggiani, M. and Valero, A. and Valovirta, E. and VandenPlas, O. and Valiulis, A. and van Eerd, M. and Ventura, M. T. and Wickmann, M. and Young, I. and Zuberbier, T. and Zurkuhlen, A. and Senn, A.}, title = {CHRODIS criteria applied to the MASK (MACVIA-ARIA Sentinel NetworK) Good Practice in allergic rhinitis: a SUNFRAIL report}, series = {Clinical and Translational Allergy}, volume = {2017}, journal = {Clinical and Translational Allergy}, number = {7}, doi = {10.1186/s13601-017-0173-8}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-173527}, year = {2017}, abstract = {A Good Practice is a practice that works well, produces good results, and is recommended as a model. MACVIA-ARIA Sentinel Network (MASK), the new Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) initiative, is an example of a Good Practice focusing on the implementation of multi-sectoral care pathways using emerging technologies with real life data in rhinitis and asthma multi-morbidity. The European Union Joint Action on Chronic Diseases and Promoting Healthy Ageing across the Life Cycle (JA-CHRODIS) has developed a checklist of 28 items for the evaluation of Good Practices. SUNFRAIL (Reference Sites Network for Prevention and Care of Frailty and Chronic Conditions in community dwelling persons of EU Countries), a European Union project, assessed whether MASK is in line with the 28 items of JA-CHRODIS. A short summary was proposed for each item and 18 experts, all members of ARIA and SUNFRAIL from 12 countries, assessed the 28 items using a Survey Monkey-based questionnaire. A visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (strongly disagree) to 100 (strongly agree) was used. Agreement equal or over 75\% was observed for 14 items (50\%). MASK is following the JA-CHRODIS recommendations for the evaluation of Good Practices.}, language = {en} } @article{BousquetAntoBachertetal.2021, author = {Bousquet, Jean and Anto, Josep M. and Bachert, Claus and Haahtela, Tari and Zuberbier, Torsten and Czarlewski, Wienczyslawa and Bedbrook, Anna and Bosnic-Anticevich, Sinthia and Walter Canonica, G. and Cardona, Victoria and Costa, Elisio and Cruz, Alvaro A. and Erhola, Marina and Fokkens, Wytske J. and Fonseca, Joao A. and Illario, Maddalena and Ivancevich, Juan-Carlos and Jutel, Marek and Klimek, Ludger and Kuna, Piotr and Kvedariene, Violeta and Le, LTT and Larenas-Linnemann, D{\´e}sir{\´e}e E. and Laune, Daniel and Louren{\c{c}}o, Olga M. and Mel{\´e}n, Erik and Mullol, Joaquim and Niedoszytko, Marek and Odemyr, Mika{\"e}la and Okamoto, Yoshitaka and Papadopoulos, Nikos G. and Patella, Vincenzo and Pfaar, Oliver and Pham-Thi, Nh{\^a}n and Rolland, Christine and Samolinski, Boleslaw and Sheikh, Aziz and Sofiev, Mikhail and Suppli Ulrik, Charlotte and Todo-Bom, Ana and Tomazic, Peter-Valentin and Toppila-Salmi, Sanna and Tsiligianni, Ioanna and Valiulis, Arunas and Valovirta, Erkka and Ventura, Maria-Teresa and Walker, Samantha and Williams, Sian and Yorgancioglu, Arzu and Agache, Ioana and Akdis, Cezmi A. and Almeida, Rute and Ansotegui, Ignacio J. and Annesi-Maesano, Isabella and Arnavielhe, Sylvie and Basaga{\~n}a, Xavier and D. Bateman, Eric and B{\´e}dard, Annabelle and Bedolla-Barajas, Martin and Becker, Sven and Bennoor, Kazi S. and Benveniste, Samuel and Bergmann, Karl C. and Bewick, Michael and Bialek, Slawomir and E. Billo, Nils and Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten and Bjermer, Leif and Blain, Hubert and Bonini, Matteo and Bonniaud, Philippe and Bosse, Isabelle and Bouchard, Jacques and Boulet, Louis-Philippe and Bourret, Rodolphe and Boussery, Koen and Braido, Fluvio and Briedis, Vitalis and Briggs, Andrew and Brightling, Christopher E. and Brozek, Jan and Brusselle, Guy and Brussino, Luisa and Buhl, Roland and Buonaiuto, Roland and Calderon, Moises A. and Camargos, Paulo and Camuzat, Thierry and Caraballo, Luis and Carriazo, Ana-Maria and Carr, Warner and Cartier, Christine and Casale, Thomas and Cecchi, Lorenzo and Cepeda Sarabia, Alfonso M. and H. Chavannes, Niels and Chkhartishvili, Ekaterine and Chu, Derek K. and Cingi, Cemal and Correia de Sousa, Jaime and Costa, David J. and Courbis, Anne-Lise and Custovic, Adnan and Cvetkosvki, Biljana and D'Amato, Gennaro and da Silva, Jane and Dantas, Carina and Dokic, Dejan and Dauvilliers, Yves and De Feo, Giulia and De Vries, Govert and Devillier, Philippe and Di Capua, Stefania and Dray, Gerard and Dubakiene, Ruta and Durham, Stephen R. and Dykewicz, Mark and Ebisawa, Motohiro and Gaga, Mina and El-Gamal, Yehia and Heffler, Enrico and Emuzyte, Regina and Farrell, John and Fauquert, Jean-Luc and Fiocchi, Alessandro and Fink-Wagner, Antje and Fontaine, Jean-Fran{\c{c}}ois and Fuentes Perez, Jos{\´e} M. and Gemicioğlu, Bilun and Gamkrelidze, Amiran and Garcia-Aymerich, Judith and Gevaert, Philippe and Gomez, Ren{\´e} Maximiliano and Gonz{\´a}lez Diaz, Sandra and Gotua, Maia and Guldemond, Nick A. and Guzm{\´a}n, Maria-Antonieta and Hajjam, Jawad and Huerta Villalobos, Yunuen R. and Humbert, Marc and Iaccarino, Guido and Ierodiakonou, Despo and Iinuma, Tomohisa and Jassem, Ewa and Joos, Guy and Jung, Ki-Suck and Kaidashev, Igor and Kalayci, Omer and Kardas, Przemyslaw and Keil, Thomas and Khaitov, Musa and Khaltaev, Nikolai and Kleine-Tebbe, Jorg and Kouznetsov, Rostislav and Kowalski, Marek L. and Kritikos, Vicky and Kull, Inger and La Grutta, Stefania and Leonardini, Lisa and Ljungberg, Henrik and Lieberman, Philip and Lipworth, Brian and Lodrup Carlsen, Karin C. and Lopes-Pereira, Catarina and Loureiro, Claudia C. and Louis, Renaud and Mair, Alpana and Mahboub, Bassam and Makris, Micha{\"e}l and Malva, Joao and Manning, Patrick and Marshall, Gailen D. and Masjedi, Mohamed R. and Maspero, Jorge F. and Carreiro-Martins, Pedro and Makela, Mika and Mathieu-Dupas, Eve and Maurer, Marcus and De Manuel Keenoy, Esteban and Melo-Gomes, Elisabete and Meltzer, Eli O. and Menditto, Enrica and Mercier, Jacques and Micheli, Yann and Miculinic, Neven and Mihaltan, Florin and Milenkovic, Branislava and Mitsias, Dimitirios I. and Moda, Giuliana and Mogica-Martinez, Maria-Dolores and Mohammad, Yousser and Montefort, Steve and Monti, Ricardo and Morais-Almeida, Mario and M{\"o}sges, Ralph and M{\"u}nter, Lars and Muraro, Antonella and Murray, Ruth and Naclerio, Robert and Napoli, Luigi and Namazova-Baranova, Leyla and Neffen, Hugo and Nekam, Kristoff and Neou, Angelo and Nordlund, Bj{\"o}rn and Novellino, Ettore and Nyembue, Dieudonn{\´e} and O'Hehir, Robyn and Ohta, Ken and Okubo, Kimi and Onorato, Gabrielle L. and Orlando, Valentina and Ouedraogo, Solange and Palamarchuk, Julia and Pali-Sch{\"o}ll, Isabella and Panzner, Peter and Park, Hae-Sim and Passalacqua, Gianni and P{\´e}pin, Jean-Louis and Paulino, Ema and Pawankar, Ruby and Phillips, Jim and Picard, Robert and Pinnock, Hilary and Plavec, Davor and Popov, Todor A. and Portejoie, Fabienne and Price, David and Prokopakis, Emmanuel P. and Psarros, Fotis and Pugin, Benoit and Puggioni, Francesca and Quinones-Delgado, Pablo and Raciborski, Filip and Rajabian-S{\"o}derlund, Rojin and Regateiro, Frederico S. and Reitsma, Sietze and Rivero-Yeverino, Daniela and Roberts, Graham and Roche, Nicolas and Rodriguez-Zagal, Erendira and Rolland, Christine and Roller-Wirnsberger, Regina E. and Rosario, Nelson and Romano, Antonino and Rottem, Menachem and Ryan, Dermot and Salim{\"a}ki, Johanna and Sanchez-Borges, Mario M. and Sastre, Joaquin and Scadding, Glenis K. and Scheire, Sophie and Schmid-Grendelmeier, Peter and Sch{\"u}nemann, Holger J. and Sarquis Serpa, Faradiba and Shamji, Mohamed and Sisul, Juan-Carlos and Sofiev, Mikhail and Sol{\´e}, Dirceu and Somekh, David and Sooronbaev, Talant and Sova, Milan and Spertini, Fran{\c{c}}ois and Spranger, Otto and Stellato, Cristiana and Stelmach, Rafael and Thibaudon, Michel and To, Teresa and Toumi, Mondher and Usmani, Omar and Valero, Antonio A. and Valenta, Rudolph and Valentin-Rostan, Marylin and Pereira, Marilyn Urrutia and van der Kleij, Rianne and Van Eerd, Michiel and Vandenplas, Olivier and Vasankari, Tuula and Vaz Carneiro, Antonio and Vezzani, Giorgio and Viart, Fr{\´e}d{\´e}ric and Viegi, Giovanni and Wallace, Dana and Wagenmann, Martin and Wang, De Yun and Waserman, Susan and Wickman, Magnus and Williams, Dennis M. and Wong, Gary and Wroczynski, Piotr and Yiallouros, Panayiotis K. and Yusuf, Osman M. and Zar, Heather J. and Zeng, St{\´e}phane and Zernotti, Mario E. and Zhang, Luo and Shan Zhong, Nan and Zidarn, Mihaela}, title = {ARIA digital anamorphosis: Digital transformation of health and care in airway diseases from research to practice}, series = {Allergy}, volume = {76}, journal = {Allergy}, number = {1}, doi = {10.1111/all.14422}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-228339}, pages = {168 -- 190}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Digital anamorphosis is used to define a distorted image of health and care that may be viewed correctly using digital tools and strategies. MASK digital anamorphosis represents the process used by MASK to develop the digital transformation of health and care in rhinitis. It strengthens the ARIA change management strategy in the prevention and management of airway disease. The MASK strategy is based on validated digital tools. Using the MASK digital tool and the CARAT online enhanced clinical framework, solutions for practical steps of digital enhancement of care are proposed.}, language = {en} } @article{BuderGesierichGelbrichetal.2013, author = {Buder, Kristina and Gesierich, Anja and Gelbrich, G{\"o}tz and Goebeler, Matthias}, title = {Systemic treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma: review of literature and future perspectives}, series = {Cancer Medicine}, volume = {2}, journal = {Cancer Medicine}, number = {5}, doi = {10.1002/cam4.133}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-97175}, pages = {674-686}, year = {2013}, abstract = {Up to 50\% of patients with uveal melanoma develop metastatic disease with poor prognosis. Regional, mainly liver-directed, therapies may induce limited tumor responses but do not improve overall survival. Response rates of metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) to systemic chemotherapy are poor. Insights into the molecular biology of MUM recently led to investigation of new drugs. In this study, to compare response rates of systemic treatment for MUM we searched Pubmed/Web of Knowledge databases and ASCO website (1980-2013) for "metastatic/uveal/melanoma" and "melanoma/eye." Forty studies (one case series, three phase I, five pilot, 22 nonrandomized, and two randomized phase II, one randomized phase III study, data of three expanded access programs, three retrospective studies) with 841 evaluable patients were included in the numeric outcome analysis. Complete or partial remissions were observed in 39/841 patients (overall response rate [ORR] 4.6\%; 95\% confidence intervals [CI] 3.3-6.3\%), no responses were observed in 22/40 studies. Progression-free survival ranged from 1.8 to 7.2, median overall survival from 5.2 to 19.0 months as reported in 21/40 and 26/40 studies, respectively. Best responses were seen for chemoimmunotherapy (ORR 10.3\%; 95\% CI 4.8-18.7\%) though mainly in first-line patients. Immunotherapy with ipilimumab, antiangiogenetic approaches, and kinase inhibitors have not yet proven to be superior to chemotherapy. MEK inhibitors are currently investigated in a phase II trial with promising preliminary data. Despite new insights into genetic and molecular background of MUM, satisfying systemic treatment approaches are currently lacking. Study results of innovative treatment strategies are urgently awaited.}, language = {en} } @article{BuergerEmserSeideletal.2022, author = {Buerger, Arne and Emser, Theresa and Seidel, Alexandra and Scheiner, Christin and von Schoenfeld, Cornelia and Ruecker, Viktoria and Heuschmann, Peter U. and Romanos, Marcel}, title = {DUDE - a universal prevention program for non-suicidal self-injurious behavior in adolescence based on effective emotion regulation: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial}, series = {Trials}, volume = {23}, journal = {Trials}, doi = {10.1186/s13063-021-05973-4}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265874}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Background Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has become a substantial public health problem. NSSI is a high-risk marker for the development and persistence of mental health problems, shows high rates of morbidity and mortality, and causes substantial health care costs. Thus, there is an urgent need for action to develop universal prevention programs for NSSI before adolescents begin to show this dangerous behavior. Currently, however, universal prevention programs are lacking. Methods The main objective of the present study is to evaluate a newly developed universal prevention program ("DUDE - Du und deine Emotionen / You and your emotions"), based on a skills-based approach in schools, in 3200 young adolescents (age 11-14 years). The effectiveness of DUDE will be investigated in a cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) in schools (N = 16). All groups will receive a minimal intervention called "Stress-free through the school day" as a mental health literacy program to prevent burnout in school. The treatment group (N = 1600; 8 schools) will additionally undergo the universal prevention program DUDE and will be divided into treatment group 1 (DUDE conducted by trained clinical psychologists; N = 800; 4 schools) and treatment group 2 (DUDE conducted by trained teachers; N = 800; 4 schools). The active control group (N = 1600; 8 schools) will only receive the mental health literacy prevention. Besides baseline assessment (T0), measurements will occur at the end of the treatment (T1) and at 6- (T2) and 12-month (T3) follow-up evaluations. The main outcome is the occurrence of NSSI within the last 6 months assessed by a short version of the Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory (DSHI-9) at the 1-year follow-up (primary endpoint; T3). Secondary outcomes are emotion regulation, suicidality, health-related quality of life, self-esteem, and comorbid psychopathology and willingness to change. Discussion DUDE is tailored to diminish the incidence of NSSI and to prevent its possible long-term consequences (e.g., suicidality) in adolescents. It is easy to access in the school environment. Furthermore, DUDE is a comprehensive approach to improve mental health via improved emotion regulation.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Carl2020, author = {Carl, Corinna}, title = {Vergleichende Bestimmung des dentalen Alters von Kindern und Jugendlichen mit Hilfe des "London Atlas of Dental Development", der Score-Methode nach Demirjian sowie ihrer Modifikation nach Willems}, doi = {10.25972/OPUS-21536}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-215362}, school = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Es wurde anhand von 500 OPGs aus der kieferorthop{\"a}dischen Abteilung des Universit{\"a}tsklinikums W{\"u}rzburg eine dentale Altersbestimmung mit Hilfe des London Atlas of Dental Development, der Methode nach Demirjian sowie ihrer Modifikation nach Willems durchgef{\"u}hrt. Ziel war es herauszufinden, ob zuverl{\"a}ssig vom dentalen auf das chronologische Alter geschlossen werden kann. Die Methode nach Willems (M= -0,33J, SD=1,06J) ist der Methode nach Demirjian (M=-0,08J SD= 1,27J) und dem London Atlas (M=0,34J SD=1,09J) {\"u}berlegen und kann auf die deutsche Population angewendet werden.}, subject = {Altersbestimmung}, language = {de} } @article{ChungGedeborgNicholasetal.2014, author = {Chung, Shen-Chia and Gedeborg, Rolf and Nicholas, Owen and James, Stefan and Jeppsson, Anders and Wolfe, Charles and Heuschmann, Peter and Wallentin, Lars and Deanfield, John and Timmis, Adam and Jernberg, Tomas and Hemingway, Harry}, title = {Acute myocardial infarction: a comparison of short-term survival in national outcome registries in Sweden and the UK}, series = {Lancet}, volume = {383}, journal = {Lancet}, number = {9925}, doi = {10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62070-x}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121327}, pages = {1305-12}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Background International research for acute myocardial infarction lacks comparisons of whole health systems. We assessed time trends for care and outcomes in Sweden and the UK. Methods We used data from national registries on consecutive patients registered between 2004 and 2010 in all hospitals providing care for acute coronary syndrome in Sweden and the UK. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality 30 days after admission. We compared effectiveness of treatment by indirect casemix standardisation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01359033. Findings We assessed data for 119 786 patients in Sweden and 391 077 in the UK. 30-day mortality was 7·6\% (95\% CI 7·4-7·7) in Sweden and 10·5\% (10·4-10·6) in the UK. Mortality was higher in the UK in clinically relevant subgroups defined by troponin concentration, ST-segment elevation, age, sex, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus status, and smoking status. In Sweden, compared with the UK, there was earlier and more extensive uptake of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (59\% vs 22\%) and more frequent use of β blockers at discharge (89\% vs 78\%). After casemix standardisation the 30-day mortality ratio for UK versus Sweden was 1·37 (95\% CI 1·30-1·45), which corresponds to 11 263 (95\% CI 9620-12 827) excess deaths, but did decline over time (from 1·47, 95\% CI 1·38-1·58 in 2004 to 1·20, 1·12-1·29 in 2010; p=0·01). Interpretation We found clinically important differences between countries in acute myocardial infarction care and outcomes. International comparisons research might help to improve health systems and prevent deaths.}, language = {en} }