@article{DresenPimientoPateletal.2023,
  author    = {Dresen, Ellen and Pimiento, Jose M. and Patel, Jayshil J. and Heyland, Daren K. and Rice, Todd W. and Stoppe, Christian},
  title     = {Overview of oxidative stress and the role of micronutrients in critical illness},
  series = {Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition},
  volume    = {47},
  journal   = {Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition},
  doi       = {10.1002/jpen.2421},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-318186},
  pages     = {S38 -- S49},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Inflammation and oxidative stress represent physiological response mechanisms to different types of stimuli and injury during critical illness. Its proper regulation is fundamental to cellular and organismal survival and are paramount to outcomes and recovery from critical illness. A proper maintenance of the delicate balance between inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune response is crucial for resolution from critical illness with important implications for patient outcome. The extent of inflammation and oxidative stress under normal conditions is limited by the antioxidant defense system of the human body, whereas the antioxidant capacity is commonly significantly compromised, and serum levels of micronutrients and vitamins significantly depleted in patients who are critically ill. Hence, the provision of antioxidants and anti-inflammatory nutrients may help to reduce the extent of oxidative stress and therefore improve clinical outcomes in patients who are critically ill. As existing evidence of the beneficial effects of antioxidant supplementation in patients who are critically ill is still unclear, actual findings about the most promising anti-inflammatory and antioxidative candidates selenium, vitamin C, zinc, and vitamin D will be discussed in this narrative review. The existing evidence provided so far demonstrates that several factors need to be considered to determine the efficacy of an antioxidant supplementation strategy in patients who are critically ill and indicates the need for adequately designed multicenter prospective randomized control trials to evaluate the clinical significance of different types and doses of micronutrients and vitamins in selected groups of patients with different types of critical illness.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MengerLeeNotzetal.2022,
  author    = {Menger, Johannes and Lee, Zheng-Yii and Notz, Quirin and Wallqvist, Julia and Hasan, M. Shahnaz and Elke, Gunnar and Dworschak, Martin and Meybohm, Patrick and Heyland, Daren K. and Stoppe, Christian},
  title     = {Administration of vitamin D and its metabolites in critically ill adult patients: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials},
  series = {Critical Care},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Critical Care},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13054-022-04139-1},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-299700},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Background The clinical significance of vitamin D administration in critically ill patients remains inconclusive. The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of vitamin D and its metabolites on major clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, including a subgroup analysis based on vitamin D status and route of vitamin D administration. Methods Major databases were searched through February 9, 2022. Randomized controlled trials of adult critically ill patients with an intervention group receiving vitamin D or its metabolites were included. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled risk ratio (dichotomized outcomes) or mean difference (continuous outcomes). Risk of bias assessment included the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Results Sixteen randomized clinical trials with 2449 patients were included. Vitamin D administration was associated with lower overall mortality (16 studies: risk ratio 0.78, 95\% confidence interval 0.62-0.97, p = 0.03; I2 = 30\%), reduced intensive care unit length of stay (12 studies: mean difference - 3.13 days, 95\% CI - 5.36 to - 0.89, n = 1250, p = 0.006; I2 = 70\%), and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (9 studies: mean difference - 5.07 days, 95\% CI - 7.42 to - 2.73, n = 572, p < 0.0001; I2 = 54\%). Parenteral administration was associated with a greater effect on overall mortality than enteral administration (test of subgroup differences, p = 0.04), whereas studies of parenteral subgroups had lower quality. There were no subgroup differences based on baseline vitamin D levels. Conclusions Vitamin D supplementation in critically ill patients may reduce mortality. Parenteral administration might be associated with a greater impact on mortality. Heterogeneity and assessed certainty among the studies limits the generalizability of the results.},
  language  = {en}
}