@article{GesslerLehmannBoeseletal.2021,
  author    = {Gessler, Florian and Lehmann, Felix and B{\"o}sel, Julian and Fuhrer, Hannah and Neugebauer, Hermann and Wartenberg, Katja E. and Wolf, Stefan and Bernstock, Joshua D. and Niesen, Wolf-Dirk and Schuss, Patrick},
  title     = {Triage and Allocation of Neurocritical Care Resources During the COVID 19 Pandemic - A National Survey},
  series = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Neurology},
  issn      = {1664-2295},
  doi       = {10.3389/fneur.2020.609227},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-221593},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objective: In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the associated hospitalization of an overwhelming number of ventilator-dependent patients, medical and/or ethical patient triage paradigms have become essential. While guidelines on the allocation of scarce resources do exist, such work within the subdisciplines of intensive care (e.g., neurocritical care) remains limited. Methods: A 16-item questionnaire was developed that sought to explore/quantify the expert opinions of German neurointensivists with regard to triage decisions. The anonymous survey was conducted via a web-based platform and in total, 96 members of the Initiative of German Neurointensive Trial Engagement (IGNITE)-study group were contacted via e-mail. The IGNITE consortium consists of an interdisciplinary panel of specialists with expertise in neuro-critical care (i.e., anesthetists, neurologists and neurosurgeons). Results: Fifty members of the IGNITE consortium responded to the questionnaire; in total the respondents were in charge of more than 500 Neuro ICU beds throughout Germany. Common determinants reported which affected triage decisions included known patient wishes (98\%), the state of health before admission (96\%), SOFA-score (85\%) and patient age (69\%). Interestingly, other principles of allocation, such as a treatment of "youngest first" (61\%) and members of the healthcare sector (50\%) were also noted. While these were the most accepted parameters affecting the triage of patients, a "first-come, first-served" principle appeared to be more accepted than a lottery for the allocation of ICU beds which contradicts much of what has been reported within the literature. The respondents also felt that at least one neurointensivist should serve on any interdisciplinary triage team. Conclusions: The data gathered in the context of this survey reveal the estimation/perception of triage algorithms among neurointensive care specialists facing COVID-19. Further, it is apparent that German neurointensivists strongly feel that they should be involved in any triage decisions at an institutional level given the unique resources needed to treat patients within the Neuro ICU.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchmidbauerFerseSalihetal.2022,
  author    = {Schmidbauer, Moritz L. and Ferse, Caroline and Salih, Farid and Klingner, Carsten and Musleh, Rita and Kunst, Stefan and Wittstock, Matthias and Neumann, Bernhard and Schebesch, Karl-Michael and B{\"o}sel, Julian and Godau, Jana and Lochner, Piergiorgio and Adam, Elisabeth H. and Jahnke, Kolja and Knier, Benjamin and Schirotzek, Ingo and M{\"u}llges, Wolfgang and Notz, Quirin and Dengl, Markus and G{\"u}ldner, Andreas and Onur, Oezguer A. and Garcia Borrega, Jorge and Dimitriadis, Konstantinos and G{\"u}nther, Albrecht},
  title     = {COVID-19 and intracranial hemorrhage: a multicenter case series, systematic review and pooled analysis},
  series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Journal of Clinical Medicine},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {2077-0383},
  doi       = {10.3390/jcm11030605},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-255236},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) profoundly impacts hemostasis and microvasculature. In the light of the dilemma between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, in the present paper, we systematically investigate the prevalence, mortality, radiological subtypes, and clinical characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the literature by screening the PubMed database and included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitant ICH. We performed a pooled analysis, including a prospectively collected cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients with ICH, as part of the PANDEMIC registry (Pooled Analysis of Neurologic Disorders Manifesting in Intensive Care of COVID-19). Results: Our literature review revealed a total of 217 citations. After the selection process, 79 studies and a total of 477 patients were included. The median age was 58.8 years. A total of 23.3\% of patients experienced the critical stage of COVID-19, 62.7\% of patients were on anticoagulation and 27.5\% of the patients received ECMO. The prevalence of ICH was at 0.85\% and the mortality at 52.18\%, respectively. Conclusion: ICH in COVID-19 patients is rare, but it has a very poor prognosis. Different subtypes of ICH seen in COVID-19, support the assumption of heterogeneous and multifaceted pathomechanisms contributing to ICH in COVID-19. Further clinical and pathophysiological investigations are warranted to resolve the conflict between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in the future.},
  language  = {en}
}