@article{SausseleHehlmannFabariusetal.2018,
  author    = {Saussele, Susanne and Hehlmann, Ruediger and Fabarius, Alice and Jeromin, Sabine and Proetel, Ulrike and Rinaldetti, Sebastien and Kohlbrenner, Katharina and Einsele, Hermann and Falge, Christine and Kanz, Lothar and Neubauer, Andreas and Kneba, Michael and Stegelmann, Frank and Pfreundschuh, Michael and Waller, Cornelius F. and Oppliger Leibundgut, Elisabeth and Heim, Dominik and Krause, Stefan W. and Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten and Hasford, Joerg and Pfirrmann, Markus and M{\"u}ller, Martin C. and Hochhaus, Andreas and Lauseker, Michael},
  title     = {Defining therapy goals for major molecular remission in chronic myeloid leukemia: results of the randomized CML Study IV},
  series = {Leukemia},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Leukemia},
  number    = {5},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41375-018-0055-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-227528},
  pages     = {1222-1228},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Major molecular remission (MMR) is an important therapy goal in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). So far, MMR is not a failure criterion according to ELN management recommendation leading to uncertainties when to change therapy in CML patients not reaching MMR after 12 months. At monthly landmarks, for different molecular remission status Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated for patients registered to CML study IV who were divided in a learning and a validation sample. The minimum HR for MMR was found at 2.5 years with 0.28 (compared to patients without remission). In the validation sample, a significant advantage for progression-free survival (PFS) for patients in MMR could be detected (p-value 0.007). The optimal time to predict PFS in patients with MMR could be validated in an independent sample at 2.5 years. With our model we provide a suggestion when to define lack of MMR as therapy failure and thus treatment change should be considered. The optimal response time for 1\% BCR-ABL at about 12-15 months was confirmed and for deep molecular remission no specific time point was detected. Nevertheless, it was demonstrated that the earlier the MMR is achieved the higher is the chance to attain deep molecular response later.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{NeuchelFuerstNiederwieseretal.2017,
  author    = {Neuchel, Christine and F{\"u}rst, Daniel and Niederwieser, Dietger and Bunjes, Donald and Tsamadou, Chrysanthi and Wulf, Gerald and Pfreundschuh, Michael and Wagner, Eva and Stuhler, Gernot and Einsele, Hermann and Schrezenmeier, Hubert and Mytilineos, Joannis},
  title     = {Impact of donor activating KIR genes on HSCT outcome in C1-ligand negative myeloid disease patients transplanted with unrelated donors - a retrospective study},
  series = {PLOS One},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {PLOS One},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0169512},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-180995},
  pages     = {39},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Natural Killer cells (NK) are lymphocytes with the potential to recognize and lyse cells which escaped T-cell mediated lysis due to their aberrant HLA expression profiles. Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) influence NK-cell activity by mediation of activating or inhibitory signals upon interaction with HLA-C (C1, C2) ligands. Therefore, absence of ligands for donor inhibitory KIRs following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) may have an influence on its outcome. Previous studies showed that C1 negative patients have a decreased HSCT outcome. Our study, based on a cohort of 200 C1-negative patients, confirmed these findings for the endpoints: overall survival (OS: HR = 1.41, CI = 1.14-1.74, p = 0.0012), disease free survival (DFS: HR = 1.27, CI = 1.05-1.53, p = 0.015), treatment related mortality (TRM: HR = 1.41, CI = 1.01-1.96, p = 0.04), and relapse incidence (RI: HR = 1.33, CI = 1.01-1.75, p = 0.04) all being inferior when compared to C1-positive patients (n = 1246). Subsequent analysis showed that these findings applied for patients with myeloid malignancies but not for patients with lymphoproliferative diseases (OS: myeloid: HR = 1.51, CI = 1.15-1.99, p = 0.003; lymphoblastic: HR = 1.26, CI = 0.91-1.75, p = 0.16; DFS: myeloid: HR = 1.31, CI = 1.01-1.70, p = 0.04; lymphoblastic: HR = 1.21, CI = 0.90-1.61, p = 0.21; RI: myeloid: HR = 1.31, CI = 1.01-1.70, p = 0.04; lymphoblastic: HR = 1.21, CI = 0.90-1.61, p = 0.21). Interestingly, within the C1-negative patient group, transplantation with KIR2DS2 resulted in better OS (9/10 matched: HR = 0.24, CI = 0.08-0.67, p = 0.007) as well as DFS (9/10 matched: HR = 0,26, CI = 0.11-0.60, p = 0.002), and transplantation with KIR2DS1 positive donors was associated with a decreased RI (HR = 0.30, CI = 0.13-0.69, p = 0.005). TRM was increased when the donor was positive for KIR2DS1 (HR = 2.61, CI = 1.26-5.41, p = 0.001). Our findings suggest that inclusion of KIR2DS1/2/5 and KIR3DS1-genotyping in the unrelated donor search algorithm of C1-ligand negative patients with myeloid malignancies may prove to be of clinical relevance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HanfsteinLausekerHehlmannetal.2014,
  author    = {Hanfstein, Benjamin and Lauseker, Michael and Hehlmann, R{\"u}diger and Saussele, Susanne and Erben, Philipp and Dietz, Christian and Fabarius, Alice and Proetel, Ulrike and Schnittger, Susanne and Haferlach, Claudia and Krause, Stefan W. and Schubert, J{\"o}rg and Einsele, Hermann and H{\"a}nel, Mathias and Dengler, Jolanta and Falge, Christiane and Kanz, Lothar and Neubauer, Andreas and Kneba, Michael and Stengelmann, Frank and Pfreundschuh, Michael and Waller, Cornelius F. and Spiekerman, Karsten and Baerlocher, Gabriela M. and Pfirrmann, Markus and Hasford, Joerg and Hofmann, Wolf-Karsten and Hochhaus, Andreas and M{\"u}ller, Martin C.},
  title     = {Distinct characteristics of e13a2 versus e14a2 BCR-ABL1 driven chronic myeloid leukemia under first-line therapy with imatinib},
  series = {Haematologica},
  volume    = {99},
  journal   = {Haematologica},
  number    = {9},
  issn      = {1592-8721},
  doi       = {10.3324/haematol.2013.096537},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115476},
  pages     = {1441-1447},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {The vast majority of chronic myeloid leukemia patients express a BCR-ABL1 fusion gene mRNA encoding a 210 kDa tyrosine kinase which promotes leukemic transformation. A possible differential impact of the corresponding BCR-ABL1 transcript variants e13a2 ("b2a2") and e14a2 ("b3a2") on disease phenotype and outcome is still a subject of debate. A total of 1105 newly diagnosed imatinib-treated patients were analyzed according to transcript type at diagnosis (e13a2, n=451; e14a2, n=496; e13a2+e14a2, n=158). No differences regarding age, sex, or Euro risk score were observed. A significant difference was found between e13a2 and e14a2 when comparing white blood cells (88 vs. 65 x 10(9)/L, respectively; P<0.001) and platelets (296 vs. 430 x 109/L, respectively; P<0.001) at diagnosis, indicating a distinct disease phenotype. No significant difference was observed regarding other hematologic features, including spleen size and hematologic adverse events, during imatinib-based therapies. Cumulative molecular response was inferior in e13a2 patients (P=0.002 for major molecular response; P<0.001 for MR4). No difference was observed with regard to cytogenetic response and overall survival. In conclusion, e13a2 and e14a2 chronic myeloid leukemia seem to represent distinct biological entities. However, clinical outcome under imatinib treatment was comparable and no risk prediction can be made according to e13a2 versus e14a2 BCR-ABL1 transcript type at diagnosis. (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 00055874)},
  language  = {en}
}