@article{HoseSchrederHefneretal.2021,
  author    = {Hose, Dorothea and Schreder, Martin and Hefner, Jochen and Bittrich, Max and Danhof, Sophia and Strifler, Susanne and Krauth, Maria-Theresa and Schoder, Renate and Gisslinger, Bettina and Einsele, Hermann and Gisslinger, Heinz and Knop, Stefan},
  title     = {Elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone is a very well tolerated regimen associated with durable remission even in very advanced myeloma: a retrospective study from two academic centers},
  series = {Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology},
  volume    = {147},
  journal   = {Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology},
  issn      = {0171-5216},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00432-020-03323-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-235762},
  pages     = {205-212},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background The anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibody, elotuzumab (elo), plus lenalidomide (len) and dexamethasone (dex) is approved for relapsed/refractory MM in the U.S. and Europe. Recently, a small phase 2 study demonstrated an advantage in progression-free survival (PFS) for elo plus pomalidomide (pom)/dex compared to pom/dex alone and resulted in licensing of this novel triplet combination, but clinical experience is still limited. Purpose To analyze the efficacy and safety of elo/pom/dex in a "real world" cohort of patients with advanced MM, we queried the databases of the university hospitals of W{\"u}rzburg and Vienna. Findings We identified 22 patients with a median number of five prior lines of therapy who received elo/pom/dex prior to licensing within an early access program. Patients received a median number of 5 four-week treatment cycles. Median PFS was 6.4 months with 12-month and 18-month PFS rates of 35\% and 28\%, respectively. The overall response rate was 50\% and 64\% of responding patients who achieved a longer PFS with elo/pom/dex compared to their most recent line of therapy. Objective responses were also seen in five patients who had been pretreated with pomalidomide. Low tumor burden was associated with improved PFS (13.5 months for patients with ISS stage I/II at study entry v 6.4 months for ISS III), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. No infusion-related reactions were reported. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia and pneumonia. Conclusion Elo/pom/dex is an active and well-tolerated regimen in highly advanced MM even after pretreatment with pomalidomide.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DanhofSchrederStrifleretal.2015,
  author    = {Danhof, Sophia and Schreder, Martin and Strifler, Susanne and Einsele, Hermann and Knop, Stefan},
  title     = {Long-Term Disease Control by Pomalidomide-/Dexamethasone-Based Therapy in a Patient with Advanced Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature},
  series = {Case Reports in Oncology},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Case Reports in Oncology},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1159/000381983},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126093},
  pages     = {189-195},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: Therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) has substantially improved in the era of immunomodulatory drugs and bortezomib. However, the prognosis of patients with progressive disease despite treatment with these 'novel agents' remains poor. Recently, pomalidomide was approved in this setting, but a median progression-free survival of <4 months still leaves room for improvement. Pomalidomide-based combination therapies are currently under investigation, but data on long-term treatment are lacking. Case Report: We present the case of a 68-year-old woman with refractory MM who received pomalidomide in combination with various drugs including anthracyclines, alkylators and proteasome inhibitors. Initially, major hematological toxicities and infectious complications including a hepatitis B virus reactivation were encountered. With careful dose adjustments and selection of combination partners, pomalidomide treatment was maintained for over 4 years and led to a sustained partial remission. In particular, the well-tolerated regimen of bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone together with pomalidomide was administered for >30 cycles. Conclusion: This case illustrates the value of an individualized approach to myeloma care given an increasing availability of 'novel agents'. Tailored treatment using these drugs as a backbone is essential to achieve long-lasting responses and minimize side effects.},
  language  = {en}
}