@article{MayrKleinRutzingeretal.2021,
  author    = {Mayr, Stefan and Klein, Igor and Rutzinger, Martin and Kuenzer, Claudia},
  title     = {Determining temporal uncertainty of a global inland surface water time series},
  series = {Remote Sensing},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Remote Sensing},
  number    = {17},
  issn      = {2072-4292},
  doi       = {10.3390/rs13173454},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-245234},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Earth observation time series are well suited to monitor global surface dynamics. However, data products that are aimed at assessing large-area dynamics with a high temporal resolution often face various error sources (e.g., retrieval errors, sampling errors) in their acquisition chain. Addressing uncertainties in a spatiotemporal consistent manner is challenging, as extensive high-quality validation data is typically scarce. Here we propose a new method that utilizes time series inherent information to assess the temporal interpolation uncertainty of time series datasets. For this, we utilized data from the DLR-DFD Global WaterPack (GWP), which provides daily information on global inland surface water. As the time series is primarily based on optical MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) images, the requirement of data gap interpolation due to clouds constitutes the main uncertainty source of the product. With a focus on different temporal and spatial characteristics of surface water dynamics, seven auxiliary layers were derived. Each layer provides probability and reliability estimates regarding water observations at pixel-level. This enables the quantification of uncertainty corresponding to the full spatiotemporal range of the product. Furthermore, the ability of temporal layers to approximate unknown pixel states was evaluated for stratified artificial gaps, which were introduced into the original time series of four climatologic diverse test regions. Results show that uncertainty is quantified accurately (>90\%), consequently enhancing the product's quality with respect to its use for modeling and the geoscientific community.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RemelgadoLeutnerSafietal.2018,
  author    = {Remelgado, Ruben and Leutner, Benjamin and Safi, Kamran and Sonnenschein, Ruth and Kuebert, Carina and Wegmann, Martin},
  title     = {Linking animal movement and remote sensing - mapping resource suitability from a remote sensing perspective},
  series = {Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation},
  number    = {3},
  doi       = {10.1002/rse2.70},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-225199},
  pages     = {211-224},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Optical remote sensing is an important tool in the study of animal behavior providing ecologists with the means to understand species-environment interactions in combination with animal movement data. However, differences in spatial and temporal resolution between movement and remote sensing data limit their direct assimilation. In this context, we built a data-driven framework to map resource suitability that addresses these differences as well as the limitations of satellite imagery. It combines seasonal composites of multiyear surface reflectances and optimized presence and absence samples acquired with animal movement data within a cross-validation modeling scheme. Moreover, it responds to dynamic, site-specific environmental conditions making it applicable to contrasting landscapes. We tested this framework using five populations of White Storks (Ciconia ciconia) to model resource suitability related to foraging achieving accuracies from 0.40 to 0.94 for presences and 0.66 to 0.93 for absences. These results were influenced by the temporal composition of the seasonal reflectances indicated by the lower accuracies associated with higher day differences in relation to the target dates. Additionally, population differences in resource selection influenced our results marked by the negative relationship between the model accuracies and the variability of the surface reflectances associated with the presence samples. Our modeling approach spatially splits presences between training and validation. As a result, when these represent different and unique resources, we face a negative bias during validation. Despite these inaccuracies, our framework offers an important basis to analyze species-environment interactions. As it standardizes site-dependent behavioral and environmental characteristics, it can be used in the comparison of intra- and interspecies environmental requirements and improves the analysis of resource selection along migratory paths. Moreover, due to its sensitivity to differences in resource selection, our approach can contribute toward a better understanding of species requirements.},
  language  = {en}
}