@article{HohmHappelHurtienneetal.2022,
  author    = {Hohm, Anna and Happel, Oliver and Hurtienne, J{\"o}rn and Grundgeiger, Tobias},
  title     = {User experience in safety-critical domains: a survey on motivational orientations and psychological need satisfaction in acute care},
  series = {Cognition, Technology \& Work},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {Cognition, Technology \& Work},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {1435-5558},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10111-022-00697-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-324486},
  pages     = {247-260},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The relevance of user experience in safety-critical domains has been questioned and lacks empirical investigation. Based on previous studies examining user experience in consumer technology, we conducted an online survey on positive experiences with interactive technology in acute care. The participants of the study consisted of anaesthesiologists, nurses, and paramedics (N = 55) from three German cities. We report qualitative and quantitative data examining (1) the relevance and notion of user experience, (2) motivational orientations and psychological need satisfaction, and (3) potential correlates of hedonic, eudaimonic, and extrinsic motivations such as affect or meaning. Our findings reveal that eudaimonia was the most salient aspect in these experiences and that the relevance of psychological needs is differently ranked than in experiences with interactive consumer technology. We conclude that user experience should be considered in safety-critical domains, but research needs to develop further tools and methods to address the domain-specific requirements.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Halbig Babu Gatter etal.2022,
  author    = {Halbig , Andreas and Babu , Sooraj K. and Gatter , Shirin and Latoschik , Marc Erich and Brukamp, Kirsten and von Mammen , Sebastian},
  title     = {Opportunities and challenges of Virtual Reality in healthcare - a domain experts inquiry},
  series = {Frontiers in Virtual Reality},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Virtual Reality},
  issn      = {2673-4192},
  doi       = {10.3389/frvir.2022.837616},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-284752},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the applications and accessibility of Virtual Reality (VR) for the healthcare sector have continued to grow. However, so far, most VR applications are only relevant in research settings. Information about what healthcare professionals would need to independently integrate VR applications into their daily working routines is missing. The actual needs and concerns of the people who work in the healthcare sector are often disregarded in the development of VR applications, even though they are the ones who are supposed to use them in practice. By means of this study, we systematically involve health professionals in the development process of VR applications. In particular, we conducted an online survey with 102 healthcare professionals based on a video prototype which demonstrates a software platform that allows them to create and utilise VR experiences on their own. For this study, we adapted and extended the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The survey focused on the perceived usefulness and the ease of use of such a platform, as well as the attitude and ethical concerns the users might have. The results show a generally positive attitude toward such a software platform. The users can imagine various use cases in different health domains. However, the perceived usefulness is tied to the actual ease of use of the platform and sufficient support for learning and working with the platform. In the discussion, we explain how these results can be generalized to facilitate the integration of VR in healthcare practice.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MehdiDodePryssetal.2020,
  author    = {Mehdi, Muntazir and Dode, Albi and Pryss, R{\"u}diger and Schlee, Winfried and Reichert, Manfred and Hauck, Franz J.},
  title     = {Contemporary review of smartphone apps for tinnitus management and treatment},
  series = {Brain Sciences},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Brain Sciences},
  number    = {11},
  issn      = {2076-3425},
  doi       = {10.3390/brainsci10110867},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-219367},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Tinnitus is a complex and heterogeneous psycho-physiological disorder responsible for causing a phantom ringing or buzzing sound albeit the absence of an external sound source. It has a direct influence on affecting the quality of life of its sufferers. Despite being around for a while, there has not been a cure for tinnitus, and the usual course of action for its treatment involves use of tinnitus retaining and sound therapy, or Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). One positive aspect about these therapies is that they can be administered face-to-face as well as delivered via internet or smartphone. Smartphones are especially helpful as they are highly personalized devices, and offer a well-established ecosystem of apps, accessible via respective marketplaces of differing mobile platforms. Note that current therapeutic treatments such as CBT have shown to be effective in suppressing the tinnitus symptoms when administered face-to-face, their effectiveness when being delivered using smartphones is not known so far. A quick search on the prominent market places of popular mobile platforms (Android and iOS) yielded roughly 250 smartphone apps offering tinnitus-related therapies and tinnitus management. As this number is expected to steadily increase due to high interest in smartphone app development, a contemporary review of such apps is crucial. In this paper, we aim to review scientific studies validating the smartphone apps, particularly to test their effectiveness in tinnitus management and treatment. We use the PRISMA guidelines for identification of studies on major scientific literature sources and delineate the outcomes of identified studies.},
  language  = {en}
}