@article{VandenbergChahoudHeindeletal.2012,
  author    = {Vandenberg, Laura N. and Chahoud, Ibrahim and Heindel, Jerrold J. and Padmanabhan, Vasantha and Paumgartten, Francisco J. R. and Sch{\"o}nfelder, Gilbert},
  title     = {Urinary, Circulating, and Tissue Biomonitoring Studies Indicate Widespread Exposure to Bisphenol A},
  series = {Ci{\^e}ncia \& Sa{\´u}de Coletiva},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Ci{\^e}ncia \& Sa{\´u}de Coletiva},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1289/ehp.0901716},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-134332},
  pages     = {407-434},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Bisphenol A (BPA) is one of the highest-volume chemicals produced worldwide, and human exposure to BPA is thought to be ubiquitous. Thus, there are concerns that the amount of BPA to which humans are exposed may cause adverse health effects. We examined many possibilities for why biomonitoring and toxicokinetic studies could come to seemingly conflicting conclusions. More than 80 published human biomonitoring studies that measured BPA concentrations in human tissues, urine, blood, and other fluids, along with two toxicokinetic studies of human BPA metabolism were examined. Unconjugated BPA was routinely detected in blood (in the nanograms per milliliter range), and conjugated BPA was routinely detected in the vast majority of urine samples (also in the nanograms per milliliter range). In stark contrast, toxicokinetic studies proposed that humans are not internally exposed to BPA. Available data from biomonitoring studies clearly indicate that the general population is exposed to BPA and is at risk from internal exposure to unconjugated BPA. The two toxicokinetic studies that suggested human BPA exposure is negligible have significant deficiencies, are directly contradicted by hypothesis-driven studies, and are therefore not reliable for risk assessment purposes.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BrachnerFragouliDuarteetal.2020,
  author    = {Brachner, Andreas and Fragouli, Despina and Duarte, Iola F. and Farias, Patricia M. A. and Dembski, Sofia and Ghosh, Manosij and Barisic, Ivan and Zdzieblo, Daniela and Vanoirbeek, Jeroen and Schwabl, Philipp and Neuhaus, Winfried},
  title     = {Assessment of human health risks posed by nano-and microplastics is currently not feasible},
  series = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health},
  number    = {23},
  issn      = {1660-4601},
  doi       = {10.3390/ijerph17238832},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-219423},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The exposure of humans to nano-and microplastic particles (NMPs) is an issue recognized as a potential health hazard by scientists, authorities, politics, non-governmental organizations and the general public. The concentration of NMPs in the environment is increasing concomitantly with global plastic production and the usage of plastic materials. NMPs are detectable in numerous aquatic organisms and also in human samples, therefore necessitating a risk assessment of NMPs for human health. So far, a comprehensive risk assessment of NMPs is hampered by limited availability of appropriate reference materials, analytical obstacles and a lack of definitions and standardized study designs. Most studies conducted so far used polystyrene (PS) spheres as a matter of availability, although this polymer type accounts for only about 7\% of total plastic production. Differently sized particles, different concentration and incubation times, and various biological models have been used, yielding hardly comparable data sets. Crucial physico-chemical properties of NMPs such as surface (charge, polarity, chemical reactivity), supplemented additives and adsorbed chemicals have been widely excluded from studies, although in particular the surface of NMPs determines the interaction with cellular membranes. In this manuscript we give an overview about the critical parameters which should be considered when performing risk assessments of NMPs, including novel reference materials, taking into account surface modifications (e.g., reflecting weathering processes), and the possible role of NMPs as a substrate and/or carrier for (pathogenic) microbes. Moreover, we make suggestions for biological model systems to evaluate immediate toxicity, long-term effects and the potential of NMPs to cross biological barriers. We are convinced that standardized reference materials and experimental parameters along with technical innovations in (nano)-particle sampling and analytics are a prerequisite for the successful realization of conclusive human health risk assessments of NMPs.},
  language  = {en}
}