@phdthesis{Schmitt2017,
  author    = {Schmitt, Franziska},
  title     = {Neuronal basis of temporal polyethism and sky-compass based navigation in \(Cataglyphis\) desert ants},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-142049},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Desert ants of the genus Cataglyphis (Formicinae) are widely distributed in arid areas of the palearctic ecozone. Their habitats range from relatively cluttered environments in the Mediterranean area to almost landmark free deserts. Due to their sophisticated navigational toolkit, mainly based on the sky-compass, they were studied extensively for the last 4 decades and are an exceptional model organism for navigation. Cataglyphis ants exhibit a temporal polyethism: interior workers stay inside the dark nest and serve as repletes for the first ∼2 weeks of their adult life (interior I). They then switch to nursing and nest maintenance (interior II) until they transition to become day-active outdoor foragers after ∼4 weeks. The latter switch in tasks involves a transition phase of ∼2-3 days during which the ants perform learning and orientation walks. Only after this last phase do the ants start to scavenge for food as foragers. In this present thesis I address two main questions using Cataglyphis desert ants as a model organism: 1. What are the underlying mechanisms of temporal polyethism? 2. What is the neuronal basis of sky-compass based navigation in Cataglyphis ants? Neuropeptides are important regulators of insect physiology and behavior and as such are promising candidates regarding the regulation of temporal polyethism in Cataglyphis ants. Neuropeptides are processed from large precursor proteins and undergo substantial post-translational modifications. Therefore, it is crucial to biochemically identify annotated peptides. As hardly any peptide data are available for ants and no relevant genomic data has been recorded for Cataglyphis, I started out to identify the neuropeptidome of adult Camponotus floridanus (Formicinae) workers (manuscript 1). This resulted in the first neuropeptidome described in an ant species - 39 neuropeptides out of 18 peptide families. Employing a targeted approach, I identified allatostatin A (AstA), allatotropin (AT), short neuropeptide F (sNPF) and tachykinin (TK) using mass spectrometry and immunohistology to investigate the distribution of AstA, AT and TK in the brain (manuscript 2). All three peptides are localized in the central complex, a brain center for sensory integration and high-order control of locomotion behavior. In addition, AstA and TK were also found in visual and olfactory input regions and in the mushroom bodies, the centers for learning and memory formation. Comparing the TK immunostaining in the brain of 1, 7 and 14 days old dark kept animals revealed that the distribution in the central complex changes, most prominently in the 14 day old group. In the Drosophila central complex TK modulates locomotor activity levels. I therefore hypothesize that TK is involved in the internal regulation of the interior I-interior II transition which occurs after ∼2 weeks of age. I designed a behavioral setup to test the effect of neuropeptides on the two traits: 'locomotor activity level' and 'phototaxis' (manuscript 3). The test showed that interior I ants are less active than interior II ants, which again are less active than foragers. Furthermore, interior ants are negatively phototactic compared to a higher frequency of positive phototaxis in foragers. Testing the influence of AstA and AT on the ants' behavior revealed a stage-specific effect: while interior I behavior is not obviously influenced, foragers become positively phototactic and more active after AT injection and less active after AstA injection. I further tested the effect of light exposure on the two behavioral traits of interior workers and show that it rises locomotor activity and results in decreased negative phototaxis in interior ants. However, both interior stages are still more negatively phototactic than foragers and only the activity level of interior II ants is raised to the forager level. These results support the hypothesis that neuropeptides and light influence behavior in a stage-specific manner. The second objective of this thesis was to investigate the neuronal basis of skycompass navigation in Cataglyphis (manuscript 4). Anatomical localization of the sky-compass pathway revealed that its general organization is highly similar to other insect species. I further focused on giant synapses in the lateral complex, the last relay station before sky-compass information enters the central complex. A comparison of their numbers between newly eclosed ants and foragers discloses a rise in synapse numbers from indoor worker to forager, suggesting task-related synaptic plasticity in the sky-compass pathway. Subsequently I compared synapse numbers in light preexposed ants and in dark-kept, aged ants. This experiment showed that light as opposed to age is necessary and sufficient to trigger this rise in synapse number. The number of newly formed synapses further depends on the spectral properties of the light to which the ants were exposed to. Taken together, I described neuropeptides in C. floridanus and C. fortis, and provided first evidence that they influence temporal polyethism in Cataglyphis ants. I further showed that the extent to which neuropeptides and light can influence behavior depends on the animals' state, suggesting that the system is only responsive under certain circumstances. These results provided first insight into the neuronal regulation of temporal polyethism in Cataglyphis. Furthermore, I characterized the neuronal substrate for sky-compass navigation for the first time in Cataglyphis. The high level of structural synaptic plasticity in this pathway linked to the interior-forager transition might be particularly relevant for the initial calibration of the ants' compass system.},
  subject      = {Cataglyphis},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Sommerlandt2017,
  author    = {Sommerlandt, Frank M. J.},
  title     = {Mechanisms of visual memory formation in bees: About immediate early genes and synaptic plasticity},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-136997},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Animals form perceptual associations through processes of learning, and retain that information through mechanisms of memory. Honeybees and bumblebees are classic models for insect perception and learning, and despite their small brains with about one million neurons, they are organized in highly social colonies and possess an astonishing rich behavioral repertoire including navigation, communication and cognition. Honeybees are able to harvest hundreds of morphologically divergent flower types in a quick and efficient manner to gain nutrition and, back in the hive, communicate discovered food sources to nest mates. To accomplish such complex tasks, bees must be equipped with diverse sensory organs receptive to stimuli of different modalities and must be able to associatively learn and memorize the acquired information. Particularly color vision plays a prominent role, e.g. in navigation along landmarks and when bees identify inflorescences by their color signals. Once acquired, bees are known to retain visual information for days or even months. Numerous studies on visual perception and color vision have been conducted in the past decades and largely revealed the information processing pathways in the brain. In contrast, there are no data available on how the brain may change in the course of color learning experience and whether pathways differ for coarse and fine color learning. Although long-term memory (LTM) storage is assumed to generally include reorganization of the neuronal network, to date it is unclear where in the bee brain such changes occur in the course of color learning and whether visual memories are stored in one particular site or decentrally distributed over different brain domains. The present dissertation research aimed to dissect the visual memory trace in bees that is beyond mere stimulus processing and therefore two different approaches were elaborated: first, the application of immediate early genes (IEG) as genetic markers for neuronal activation to localize early processes underlying the formation of a stable LTM. Second, the analysis of late consequences of memory formation, including synaptic reorganization in central brain areas and dependencies of color discrimination complexity. Immediate early genes (IEG) are a group of rapidly and transiently expressed genes that are induced by various types of cellular stimulation. A great number of different IEGs are routinely used as markers for the localization of neuronal activation in vertebrate brains. The present dissertation research was dedicated to establish this approach for application in bees, with focus on the candidate genes Amjra and Amegr, which are orthologous to the two common vertebrate IEGs c-jun and egr-1. First the general requirement of gene transcription for visual LTM formation was proved. Bumblebees were trained in associative proboscis extension response (PER) conditioning to monochromatic light and subsequently injected with an inhibitor of gene transcription. Memory retention tests at different intervals revealed that gene transcription is not required for the formation of a mid-term memory, but for stable LTM. Next, the appliance of the candidate genes was validated. Honeybees were exposed to stimulation with either alarm pheromone or a light pulse, followed by qPCR analysis of gene expression. Both genes differed in their expression response to sensory exposure: Amjra was upregulated in all analyzed brain parts (antennal lobes, optic lobes and mushroom bodies, MB), independent from stimulus modality, suggesting the gene as a genetic marker for unspecific general arousal. In contrast, Amegr was not significantly affected by mere sensory exposure. Therefore, the relevance of associative learning on Amegr expression was assessed. Honeybees were trained in visual PER conditioning followed by a qPCR-based analysis of the expression of all three Amegr isoforms at different intervals after conditioning. No learning-dependent alteration of gene expression was observed. However, the presence of AmEgr protein in virtually all cerebral cell nuclei was validated by immunofluorescence staining. The most prominent immune-reactivity was detected in MB calyx neurons. Analysis of task-dependent neuronal correlates underlying visual long-term memory was conducted in free-flying honeybees confronted with either absolute conditioning to one of two perceptually similar colors or differential conditioning with both colors. Subsequent presentation of the two colors in non-rewarded discrimination tests revealed that only bees trained with differential conditioning preferred the previously learned color. In contrast, bees of the absolute conditioning group chose randomly among color stimuli. To investigate whether the observed difference in memory acquisition is also reflected at the level of synaptic microcircuits, so called microglomeruli (MG), within the visual domains of the MB calyces, MG distribution was quantified by whole-mount immunostaining three days following conditioning. Although learning-dependent differences in neuroarchitecture were absent, a significant correlation between learning performance and MG density was observed. Taken together, this dissertation research provides fundamental work on the potential use of IEGs as markers for neuronal activation and promotes future research approaches combining behaviorally relevant color learning tests in bees with examination of the neuroarchitecture to pave the way for unraveling the visual memory trace.},
  subject      = {Biene},
  language  = {en}
}