@article{BachmannSchrederEngelhardtetal.2021,
  author    = {Bachmann, Friederike and Schreder, Martin and Engelhardt, Monika and Langer, Christian and Wolleschak, Denise and M{\"u}gge, Lars Olof and D{\"u}rk, Heinz and Sch{\"a}fer-Eckart, Kerstin and Blau, Igor Wolfgang and Gramatzki, Martin and Liebisch, Peter and Grube, Matthias and Metzler, Ivana v. and Bassermann, Florian and Metzner, Bernd and R{\"o}llig, Christoph and Hertenstein, Bernd and Khandanpour, Cyrus and Dechow, Tobias and Hebart, Holger and Jung, Wolfram and Theurich, Sebastian and Maschmeyer, Georg and Salwender, Hans and Hess, Georg and Bittrich, Max and Rasche, Leo and Brioli, Annamaria and Eckardt, Kai-Uwe and Straka, Christian and Held, Swantje and Einsele, Hermann and Knop, Stefan},
  title     = {Kinetics of renal function during induction in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of two prospective studies by the German Myeloma Study Group DSMM},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers13061322},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234139},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background: Preservation of kidney function in newly diagnosed (ND) multiple myeloma (MM) helps to prevent excess toxicity. Patients (pts) from two prospective trials were analyzed, provided postinduction (PInd) restaging was performed. Pts received three cycles with bortezomib (btz), cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (dex; VCD) or btz, lenalidomide (len), and dex (VRd) or len, adriamycin, and dex (RAD). The minimum required estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was >30 mL/min. We analyzed the percent change of the renal function using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)-defined categories. Results: Seven hundred and seventy-two patients were eligible. Three hundred and fifty-six received VCD, 214 VRd, and 202 RAD. VCD patients had the best baseline eGFR. The proportion of pts with eGFR <45 mL/min decreased from 7.3\% at baseline to 1.9\% PInd (p < 0.0001). Thirty-seven point one percent of VCD versus 49\% of VRd patients had a decrease of GFR (p = 0.0872). IMWG-defined "renal complete response (CRrenal)" was achieved in 17/25 (68\%) pts after VCD, 12/19 (63\%) after RAD, and 14/27 (52\%) after VRd (p = 0.4747). Conclusions: Analyzing a large and representative newly diagnosed myeloma (NDMM) group, we found no difference in CRrenal that occurred independently from the myeloma response across the three regimens. A trend towards deterioration of the renal function with VRd versus VCD may be explained by a better pretreatment "renal fitness" in the latter group.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DimopoulosWeiselSongetal.2015,
  author    = {Dimopoulos, Meletios A. and Weisel, Katja C. and Song, Kevin W. and Delforge, Michel and Karlin, Lionel and Goldschmidt, Hartmut and Moreau, Philippe and Banos, Anne and Oriol, Albert and Garderet, Laurent and Cavo, Michele and Ivanova, Valentina and Alegre, Adrian and Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin and Chen, Christine and Spencer, Andrew and Knop, Stefan and Bahlis, Nizar J. and Renner, Christoph and Yu, Xin and Hong, Kevin and Sternas, Lars and Jacques, Christian and Zaki, Mohamed H. and San Miguel, Jesus F.},
  title     = {Cytogenetics and long-term survival of patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone},
  series = {Haematologica},
  volume    = {100},
  journal   = {Haematologica},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.3324/haematol.2014.117077},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-140349},
  pages     = {1327 -- 1333},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who no longer receive benefit from novel agents have limited treatment options and short expected survival. del(17p) and t(4;14) are correlated with shortened survival. The phase 3 MM-003 trial demonstrated significant progression-free and overall survival benefits from treatment with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone compared to high-dose dexamethasone among patients in whom bortezomib and lenalidomide treatment had failed. At an updated median follow-up of 15.4 months, the progression-free survival was 4.0 versus 1.9 months (HR, 0.50; P<0.001), and median overall survival was 13.1 versus 8.1 months (HR, 0.72; P=0.009). Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone, compared with high-dose dexamethasone, improved progression-free survival in patients with del(17p) (4.6 versus 1.1 months; HR, 0.34; P < 0.001), t(4;14) (2.8 versus 1.9 months; HR, 0.49; P=0.028), and in standard-risk patients (4.2 versus 2.3 months; HR, 0.55; P<0.001). Although the majority of patients treated with high-dose dexamethasone took pomalidomide after discontinuation, the overall survival of patients treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone or highdose dexamethasone was 12.6 versus 7.7 months (HR, 0.45; P=0.008) in patients with del(17p), 7.5 versus 4.9 months (HR, 1.12; P=0.761) in those with t(4;14), and 14.0 versus 9.0 months (HR, 0.85; P=0.380) in standard-risk subjects. The overall response rate was higher in patients treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone than in those treated with high-dose dexamethasone both among standard-risk patients (35.2\% versus 9.7\%) and those with del(17p) (31.8\% versus 4.3\%), whereas it was similar in patients with t(4; 14) (15.9\% versus 13.3\%). The safety of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone was consistent with initial reports. In conclusion, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is efficacious in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and del(17p) and/or t(4;14).},
  language  = {en}
}