@article{PirothBoelmansAmtageetal.2017, author = {Piroth, Tobias and Boelmans, Kai and Amtage, Florian and Rijntjes, Michel and Wierciochin, Anna and Musacchio, Thomas and Weiller, Cornelius and Volkmann, Jens and Klebe, Stephan}, title = {Adult-Onset Niemann-Pick Disease Type C: Rapid Treatment Initiation Advised but Early Diagnosis Remains Difficult}, series = {Frontiers in Neurology}, volume = {8}, journal = {Frontiers in Neurology}, number = {108}, doi = {10.3389/fneur.2017.00108}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-171001}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Niemann-Pick type C disease (NP-C) presents with heterogeneous neurological and psychiatric symptoms. Adult onset is rare and possibly underdiagnosed due to frequent lack of specific and obvious key symptoms. For both early and adolescent/adult onset, the available data from studies and case reports describe a positive effect of Miglustat (symptom relief or stabilization). However, due to the low frequency of NP-C, experience with this therapy is still limited. We describe two adult-onset cases of NP-C. In both cases, vertical supranuclear gaze palsy was not recognized at symptom onset. Correct diagnosis was delayed from onset of symptoms by more than 10 years. The video demonstrates the broad spectrum of symptoms in later stages of the disease. Compared with published data, the treatment outcome observed in our cases after delayed initiation of Miglustat therapy was disappointing, with continuing disease progression in both cases. Thus, early treatment initiation could be necessary to achieve a good symptomatic effect. Hence, early biochemical testing for NP-C should be considered in patients suffering from atypical neurological/neuropsychological and psychiatric symptoms, even in cases of uncertainty.}, language = {en} } @article{CoenenAmtageVolkmannetal.2015, author = {Coenen, Volker A. and Amtage, Florian and Volkmann, Jens and Schl{\"a}pfer, Thomas E.}, title = {Deep Brain Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders}, series = {Deutsches {\"A}rzteblatt International}, volume = {112}, journal = {Deutsches {\"A}rzteblatt International}, doi = {10.3238/arztebl.2015.0519}, pages = {519 -- 526}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is the chronic electrical stimulation of selected target sites in the brain through stereotactically implanted electrodes. More than 150 000 patients around the world have been treated to date with DBS for medically intractable conditions. The indications for DBS include movement disorders, epilepsy, and some types of mental illness. Methods: This review is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library, and on the current guidelines of the German Neurological Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Neurologie, DGN). Results: DBS is usually performed to treat neurological diseases, most often movement disorders and, in particular, Parkinson's disease. Multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that DBS improves tremor, dyskinesia, and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease by 25\% to 50\%, depending on the rating scales used. DBS for tremor usually involves stimulation in the cerebello-thalamo-cortical regulatory loop. In an RCT of DBS for the treatment of primary generalized dystonia, the patients who underwent DBS experienced a 39.3\% improvement of dystonia, compared to only 4.9\% in the control group. Two multicenter trials of DBS for depression were terminated early because of a lack of efficacy. Conclusion: DBS is an established treatment for various neurological and psychiatric diseases. It has been incorporated in the DGN guidelines and is now considered a standard treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease. The safety and efficacy of DBS can be expected to improve with the application of new technical developments in electrode geometry and new imaging techniques. Controlled trials would be helpful so that DBS could be extended to further indications, particularly psychiatric ones.}, language = {en} }