@article{SchmidtJakubietzGilbertetal.2019,
  author    = {Schmidt, Karsten and Jakubietz, Michael Gregor and Gilbert, Fabian and Hausknecht, Franca and Meffert, Rainer Heribert and Jakubietz, Rafael Gregor},
  title     = {Quality of life after flap reconstruction of the distal lower extremity: is there a difference between a pedicled suralis flap and a free anterior lateral thigh flap?},
  series = {Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open},
  number    = {4},
  doi       = {10.1097/GOX.0000000000002114},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-203940},
  pages     = {e2114},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background: Flap reconstruction of the distal lower extremity is challenging. Especially, the concept of perforator surgery has increased available surgical options. Although results are generally judged in terms of objective facts, patients-perceived quality of life has largely remained unexamined. The aim of the study was to compare quality of life after lower extremity reconstruction with pedicled and free flaps. Methods: Patients were evaluated retrospectively after reconstruction of defects of the distal lower extremity either with distally based adipofascial sural flap (pedicled reverse sural flap) or an anterior lateral thigh (ALT) flap. A specific questionnaire was developed to measure the patient's quality of life, based on short form health survey-12, Dresden Body Image Score-35, Patient Health Questionnaire-4, and XSMFA questionnaires with additional specific questions. Furthermore, results, secondary surgeries, and complications were analyzed. Results: Thirty-seven patients with reconstruction of lower limb defects treated with a pedicled reverse sural flap and 34 patients treated with an ALT flap were included in the study. There was no statistical significant difference in the overall satisfaction with the procedure in the long-term follow-up between both groups, but patients with ALT showed a higher satisfaction with the treatment in the initial postoperative period. Both groups demonstrated approximately similar results in the long term for self-acceptance and vitality. Conclusions: Although anatomic situation may dictate flap choice coverage with free flaps, a less-complicated flap is by no means regarded as an inferior treatment option in patient's estimation. Despite the intuitive speculation that patients with more advanced reconstruction methods should have better function and subsequently higher quality of life, this assumption was clearly not supported by data in this study.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HeiligSandnerJordanetal.2021,
  author    = {Heilig, Philipp and Sandner, Phoebe and Jordan, Martin Cornelius and Jakubietz, Rafael Gregor and Meffert, Rainer Heribert and Gbureck, Uwe and Hoelscher-Doht, Stefanie},
  title     = {Experimental drillable magnesium phosphate cement is a promising alternative to conventional bone cements},
  series = {Materials},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Materials},
  number    = {8},
  issn      = {1996-1944},
  doi       = {10.3390/ma14081925},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-236633},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Clinically used mineral bone cements lack high strength values, absorbability and drillability. Therefore, magnesium phosphate cements have recently received increasing attention as they unify a high mechanical performance with presumed degradation in vivo. To obtain a drillable cement formulation, farringtonite (Mg\(_3\)(PO\(_4\))\(_2\)) and magnesium oxide (MgO) were modified with the setting retardant phytic acid (C\(_6\)H\(_{18}\)O\(_{24}\)P\(_6\)). In a pre-testing series, 13 different compositions of magnesium phosphate cements were analyzed concentrating on the clinical demands for application. Of these 13 composites, two cement formulations with different phytic acid content (22.5 wt\% and 25 wt\%) were identified to meet clinical demands. Both formulations were evaluated in terms of setting time, injectability, compressive strength, screw pullout tests and biomechanical tests in a clinically relevant fracture model. The cements were used as bone filler of a metaphyseal bone defect alone, and in combination with screws drilled through the cement. Both formulations achieved a setting time of 5 min 30 s and an injectability of 100\%. Compressive strength was shown to be ~12-13 MPa and the overall displacement of the reduced fracture was <2 mm with and without screws. Maximum load until reduced fracture failure was ~2600 N for the cements only and ~3800 N for the combination with screws. Two new compositions of magnesium phosphate cements revealed high strength in clinically relevant biomechanical test set-ups and add clinically desired characteristics to its strength such as injectability and drillability.},
  language  = {en}
}