@phdthesis{Schaper2019,
  author    = {Schaper, Philipp},
  title     = {Errors in Prospective Memory},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-175217},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Prospektives Ged{\"a}chtnis beschreibt die F{\"a}higkeit Intentionen zu einem sp{\"a}teren Zeitpunkt als Reaktion auf einen Hinweisreiz auszuf{\"u}hren. Derartige Aufgaben finden sich zahlreich in Alltags- wie auch Arbeitskontexten, waren aber im Gegensatz zum retrospektiven Ged{\"a}chtnis lange Zeit nicht im Fokus der Forschung. Erst die Arbeit von Harris (1984) und insbesondere der Artikel von Einstein and McDaniel (1990) wurden Ausgangspunkte eines sich stetig vergr{\"o}ßernden Forschungsfeldes. Aufbauend auf dieser Forschung werden im Rahmen dieser Dissertationsschrift f{\"u}nf Journal-Artikel pr{\"a}sentiert und verkn{\"u}pft, die das Verst{\"a}ndnis zum prospektiven Ged{\"a}chtnis durch die Betrachtung von m{\"o}glichen Fehlern erweitern. Die erste Studie besch{\"a}ftigt sich mit der Frage ob zus{\"a}tzliche kognitiven Ressourcen ben{\"o}tigt werden um eine Intention zwischen dem Hinweisreiz und ihrer Ausf{\"u}hrung aufrecht zu erhalten. Die Folgerungen von Einstein, McDaniel, Williford, Pagan, and Dismukes (2003), die eine derartige Aufrechterhaltung vorschlugen konnten nicht repliziert werden. In der zweiten Studie konnte gezeigt werden, dass Unterbrechungen zwischen Hinweisreiz und Ausf{\"u}hrung der Intention insbesondere dann negative Folgen zeigen, wenn sie mit einem Kontextwechsel verbunden sind. In den Studien drei bis f{\"u}nf stand das irrt{\"u}mliche Ausf{\"u}hren von beendeten prospektiven Ged{\"a}chtnisaufgaben im Zentrum der Untersuchung. Hier konnte nicht nur gezeigt werden, dass die bisherige Theorie zur Vorhersage derartiger Fehler, die vor allem auf Unterdr{\"u}ckung der Reaktion beruht (Bugg, Scullin, \& Rauvola, 2016), mit den Ergebnissen speziell zu deren Pr{\"u}fung entworfener Experimente nicht zu vereinbaren ist. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus wurde im Rahmen der Untersuchungen eine Modifikation der Theorie ausgearbeitet, die besser geeignet erscheint sowohl bisherige Ergebnisse als auch die hinzugekommenen Experimente vorherzusagen. {\"U}ber alle f{\"u}nf Artikel wird zus{\"a}tzlich verdeutlicht, dass der Moment in dem der Hinweisreiz pr{\"a}sentiert wird eine noch gr{\"o}ßere Rolle zu spielen scheint, als durch bisherige Forschung deutlich geworden ist.},
  subject      = {Ged{\"a}chtnis},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Lyutova2019,
  author    = {Lyutova, Radostina},
  title     = {Functional dissection of recurrent feedback signaling within the mushroom body network of the Drosophila larva},
  doi       = {10.25972/OPUS-18728},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-187281},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Behavioral adaptation to environmental changes is crucial for animals' survival. The prediction of the outcome of one owns action, like finding reward or avoiding punishment, requires recollection of past experiences and comparison with current situation, and adjustment of behavioral responses. The process of memory acquisition is called learning, and the Drosophila larva came up to be an excellent model organism for studying the neural mechanisms of memory formation. In Drosophila, associative memories are formed, stored and expressed in the mushroom bodies. In the last years, great progress has been made in uncovering the anatomical architecture of these brain structures, however there is still a lack of knowledge about the functional connectivity. Dopamine plays essential roles in learning processes, as dopaminergic neurons mediate information about the presence of rewarding and punishing stimuli to the mushroom bodies. In the following work, the function of a newly identified anatomical connection from the mushroom bodies to rewarding dopaminergic neurons was dissected. A recurrent feedback signaling within the neuronal network was analyzed by simultaneous genetic manipulation of the mushroom body Kenyon cells and dopaminergic neurons from the primary protocerebral anterior (pPAM) cluster, and learning assays were performed in order to unravel the impact of the Kenyon cells-to-pPAM neurons feedback loop on larval memory formation. In a substitution learning assay, simultaneous odor exposure paired with optogenetic activation of Kenyon cells in fruit fly larvae in absence of a rewarding stimulus resulted in formation of an appetitive memory, whereas no learning behavior was observed when pPAM neurons were ablated in addition to the KC activation. I argue that the activation of Kenyon cells may induce an internal signal that mimics reward exposure by feedback activation of the rewarding dopaminergic neurons. My data further suggests that the Kenyon cells-to-pPAM communication relies on peptidergic signaling via short neuropeptide F and underlies memory stabilization.},
  subject      = {Lernen},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{EngelhardtgebChristiansen2013,
  author    = {Engelhardt [geb. Christiansen], Frauke},
  title     = {Synaptic Connectivity in the Mushroom Body Calyx of Drosophila melanogaster},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-85058},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Learning and memory is considered to require synaptic plasticity at presynaptic specializations of neurons. Kenyon cells are the intrinsic neurons of the primary olfactory learning center in the brain of arthropods - the mushroom body neuropils. An olfactory mushroom body memory trace is supposed to be located at the presynapses of Kenyon cells. In the calyx, a sub-compartment of the mushroom bodies, Kenyon cell dendrites receive olfactory input provided via projection neurons. Their output synapses, however, were thought to reside exclusively along their axonal projections outside the calyx, in the mushroom body lobes. By means of high-resolution imaging and with novel transgenic tools, we showed that the calyx of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster also comprised Kenyon cell presynapses. At these presynapses, synaptic vesicles were present, which were capable of neurotransmitter release upon stimulation. In addition, the newly identified Kenyon cell presynapses shared similarities with most other presynapses: their active zones, the sites of vesicle fusion, contained the proteins Bruchpilot and Syd-1. These proteins are part of the cytomatrix at the active zone, a scaffold controlling synaptic vesicle endo- and exocytosis. Kenyon cell presynapses were present in γ- and α/β-type KCs but not in α/β-type Kenyon cells. The newly identified Kenyon cell derived presynapses in the calyx are candidate sites for an olfactory associative memory trace. We hypothesize that, as in mammals, recurrent neuronal activity might operate for memory retrieval in the fly olfactory system. Moreover, we present evidence for structural synaptic plasticity in the mushroom body calyx. This is the first demonstration of synaptic plasticity in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. The volume of the mushroom body calyx can change according to changes in the environment. Also size and numbers of microglomeruli - sub-structures of the calyx, at which projection neurons contact Kenyon cells - can change. We investigated the synapses within the microglomeruli in detail by using new transgenic tools for visualizing presynaptic active zones and postsynaptic densities. Here, we could show, by disruption of the projection neuron - Kenyon cell circuit, that synapses of microglomeruli were subject to activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. Projection neurons that could not generate action potentials compensated their functional limitation by increasing the number of active zones per microglomerulus. Moreover, they built more and enlarged microglomeruli. Our data provide clear evidence for an activity-induced, structural synaptic plasticity as well as for the activity-induced reorganization of the olfactory circuitry in the mushroom body calyx.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Schleyer2012,
  author    = {Schleyer, Michael},
  title     = {Integrating past, present and future: mechanisms of a simple decision in larval Drosophila},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-78923},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {Is behaviour response or action? In this Thesis I study this question regarding a rather simple organism, the larva of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Despite its numerically simple brain and limited behavioural repertoire, it is nevertheless capable to accomplish surprisingly complex tasks. After association of an odour and a rewarding or punishing reinforcement signal, the learnt odour is able to retrieve the formed memory trace. However, the activated memory trace is not automatically turned into learned behaviour: Appetitive memory traces are behaviourally expressed only in absence of the rewarding tastant whereas aversive memory traces are behaviourally expressed in the presence of the punishing tastant. The 'decision' whether to behaviourally express a memory trace or not relies on a quantitive comparison between memory trace and current situation: only if the memory trace (after odour-sugar training) predicts a stronger sugar reward than currently present, animals show appetitive conditioned behaviour. Learned appetitive behaviour is best seen as active search for food - being pointless in the presence of (enough) food. Learned aversive behaviour, in turn, can be seen as escape from a punishment - being pointless in absence of punishment. Importantly, appetitive and aversive memory traces can be formed and retrieved independent from each other but also can, under appriate circumstances, summate to jointly organise conditioned behaviour. In contrast to learned behaviour, innate olfactory behaviour is not influenced by gustatory processing and vice versa. Thus, innate olfactory and gustatory behaviour is rather rigid and reflexive in nature, being executed almost regardless of other environmental cues. I suggest a behavioural circuit-model of chemosensory behaviour and the 'decision' process whether to behaviourally express a memory trace or not. This model reflects known components of the larval chemobehavioural circuit and provides clear hypotheses about the kinds of architecture to look for in the currently unknown parts of this circuit. The second chapter deals with gustatory perception and processing (especially of bitter substances). Quinine, the bitter tastant in tonic water and bitter lemon, is aversive for larvae, suppresses feeding behaviour and can act as aversive reinforcer in learning experiments. However, all three examined behaviours differ in their dose-effect dynamics, suggesting different molecular and cellular processing streams at some level. Innate choice behaviour, thought to be relatively reflexive and hard-wired, nevertheless can be influenced by the gustatory context. That is, attraction toward sweet tastants is decreased in presence of bitter tastants. The extent of this inhibitory effect depends on the concentration of both sweet and bitter tastant. Importantly, sweet tastants differ in their sensitivity to bitter interference, indicating a stimulus-specific mechanism. The molecular and cellular processes underlying the inhibitory effect of bitter tastants are unknown, but the behavioural results presented here provide a framework to further investigate interactions of gustatory processing streams.},
  subject      = {Lernen},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Kapustjansky2011,
  author    = {Kapustjansky, Alexander},
  title     = {In vivo imaging and optogenetic approach to study the formation of olfactory memory and locomotor behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-69535},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Understanding of complex interactions and events in a nervous system, leading from the molecular level up to certain behavioural patterns calls for interdisciplinary interactions of various research areas. The goal of the presented work is to achieve such an interdisciplinary approach to study and manipulate animal behaviour and its underlying mechanisms. Optical in vivo imaging is a new constantly evolving method, allowing one to study not only the local but also wide reaching activity in the nervous system. Due to ease of its genetic accessibility Drosophila melanogaster represents an extraordinary experimental organism to utilize not only imaging but also various optogenetic techniques to study the neuronal underpinnings of behaviour. In this study four genetically encoded sensors were used to investigate the temporal dynamics of cAMP concentration changes in the horizontal lobes of the mushroom body, a brain area important for learning and memory, in response to various physiological and pharmacological stimuli. Several transgenic lines with various genomic insertion sites for the sensor constructs Epac1, Epac2, Epac2K390E and HCN2 were screened for the best signal quality, one line was selected for further experiments. The in vivo functionality of the sensor was assessed via pharmacological application of 8-bromo-cAMP as well as Forskolin, a substance stimulating cAMP producing adenylyl cyclases. This was followed by recording of the cAMP dynamics in response to the application of dopamine and octopamine, as well as to the presentation of electric shock, odorants or a simulated olfactory signal, induced by acetylcholine application to the observed brain area. In addition the interaction between the shock and the simulated olfactory signal by simultaneous presentation of both stimuli was studied. Preliminary results are supporting a coincidence detection mechanism at the level of the adenylyl cyclase as postulated by the present model for classical olfactory conditioning. In a second series of experiments an effort was made to selecticvely activate a subset of neurons via the optogenetic tool Channelrhodopsin (ChR2). This was achieved by recording the behaviour of the fly in a walking ball paradigm. A new method was developed to analyse the walking behaviour of the animal whose brain was made optically accessible via a dissection technique, as used for imaging, thus allowing one to target selected brain areas. Using the Gal4-UAS system the protocerebral bridge, a substructure of the central complex, was highlighted by expressing the ChR2 tagged by fluorescent protein EYFP. First behavioural recordings of such specially prepared animals were made. Lastly a new experimental paradigm for single animal conditioning was developed (Shock Box). Its design is based on the established Heat Box paradigm, however in addition to spatial and operant conditioning available in the Heat Box, the design of the new paradigm allows one to set up experiments to study classical and semioperant olfactory conditioning, as well as semioperant place learning and operant no idleness experiments. First experiments involving place learning were successfully performed in the new apparatus.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Pahl2011,
  author    = {Pahl, Mario},
  title     = {Honeybee Cognition: Aspects of Learning, Memory and Navigation in a Social Insect},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-66165},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Honeybees (Apis mellifera) forage on a great variety of plant species, navigate over large distances to crucial resources, and return to communicate the locations of food sources and potential new nest sites to nest mates using a symbolic dance language. In order to achieve this, honeybees have evolved a rich repertoire of adaptive behaviours, some of which were earlier believed to be restricted to vertebrates. In this thesis, I explore the mechanisms involved in honeybee learning, memory, numerical competence and navigation. The findings acquired in this thesis show that honeybees are not the simple reflex automats they were once believed to be. The level of sophistication I found in the bees' memory, their learning ability, their time sense, their numerical competence and their navigational abilities are surprisingly similar to the results obtained in comparable experiments with vertebrates. Thus, we should reconsider the notion that a bigger brain automatically indicates higher intelligence.},
  subject      = {Biene},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Gruber2010,
  author    = {Gruber, Franz Andreas},
  title     = {Untersuchung zur Regulation der Expression des zuckerkonditionierten Verhaltens bei Drosophila melanogaster},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-48802},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {In dieser Doktorarbeit habe ich die Regulation der Expression des zuckerbelohnten Verhaltens durch den F{\"u}tterungszustand bei Drosophila melanogaster untersucht. Die Fliegen k{\"o}nnen w{\"a}hrend einer Trainingsphase mit Hilfe einer Zuckerbelohnung auf einen bestimmten Duft konditioniert werden. Nach dem Training k{\"o}nnen die Fliegen dann auf das olfaktorische Ged{\"a}chtnis getestet werden. Die Bereitschaft das zuckerkonditionierte Ged{\"a}chtnis im Test zu zeigen wird vom F{\"u}tterungszustand kontrolliert, wie ich in {\"U}bereinstimmung mit den Ergebnissen fr{\"u}herer Arbeiten demonstrierte (Tempel et al. 1983; Gruber 2006; Krashes et al. 2008). Nur nicht gef{\"u}tterte Fliegen exprimieren das Ged{\"a}chtnis, w{\"a}hrend F{\"u}tterungen bis kurz vor dem Test eine reversibel supprimierende Wirkung haben. Einen {\"a}hnlichen regulatorischen Einfluss {\"u}bt der Futterentzug auch auf die Expression anderer futterbezogener Verhaltensweisen, wie z.B. die naive Zuckerpr{\"a}ferenz, aus. Nachdem ich den drastischen Einfluss des F{\"u}tterungszustands auf die Auspr{\"a}gung des zuckerkonditionierten Verhaltens gezeigt bzw. best{\"a}tigt hatte, habe ich nach verhaltensregulierenden Faktoren gesucht, die bei einer F{\"u}tterung die Ged{\"a}chtnisexpression unterdr{\"u}cken. Als m{\"o}gliche Kandidaten untersuchte ich Parameter, die zum Teil bereits bei verschiedenen futterbezogenen Verhaltensweisen unterschiedlicher Tierarten als „S{\"a}ttigungssignale" identifiziert worden waren (Marty et al. 2007; Powley and Phillips 2004; Havel 2001; Bernays and Chapman 1974; Simpson and Bernays 1983; Gelperin 1971a). Dabei stellte sich heraus, dass weder die „ern{\"a}hrende" Eigenschaft des Futters, noch ein durch Futteraufnahme bedingter Anstieg der internen Glukosekonzentration f{\"u}r die Suppression des zuckerkonditionierten Ged{\"a}chtnisses notwendig sind. Die Unterdr{\"u}ckung der Ged{\"a}chtnisexpression kann auch nicht durch Unterschiede in den aufgenommenen Futtermengen, die als verhaltensinhibitorische Dehnungssignale des Verdauungstrakts wirken k{\"o}nnten, oder mit der St{\"a}rke des s{\"u}ßen Geschmacks erkl{\"a}rt werden. Die Suppression des zuckerbelohnten Verhaltens folgte den Konzentrationen der gef{\"u}tterten Substanzen und war unabh{\"a}ngig von deren chemischen Spezifit{\"a}t. Deshalb wird die Osmolarit{\"a}t des aufgenommenen Futters als ein entscheidender Faktor f{\"u}r die Unterdr{\"u}ckung der zuckerkonditionierten Ged{\"a}chtnisexpression angenommen. Weil nur inkorporierte Substanzen einen Unterdr{\"u}ckungseffekt hatten, wird ein osmolarit{\"a}tsdetektierender Mechanismus im K{\"o}rper 67 postuliert, wahrscheinlich im Verdauungstrakt und/oder der H{\"a}molymphe. Die H{\"a}molymphosmolarit{\"a}t ist als „S{\"a}ttigungssignal" bei einigen wirbellosen Tieren bereits nachgewiesen worden (Bernays and Chapman 1974; Simpson and Raubenheimer 1993; Gelperin 1971a; Phifer and Prior 1985). Deshalb habe ich mit Hilfe genetischer Methoden und ohne die Fliegen zu f{\"u}ttern, versucht {\"u}ber einen k{\"u}nstlich induzierten Anstieg der Trehaloseund Lipidkonzentrationen die Osmolarit{\"a}t der H{\"a}molymphe in Drosophila zu erh{\"o}hen. Eine solche konzentrationserh{\"o}hende Wirkung f{\"u}r Lipide und die Trehalose, dem Hauptblutzucker der Insekten, ist bereits f{\"u}r das adipokinetische Hormon (AKH), das von Zellen der Corpora cardiaca exprimiert wird, nachgewiesen worden (Kim and Rulifson 2004; Lee and Park 2004; Isabel et al. 2005). Es stellte sich heraus, dass die k{\"u}nstliche Stimulierung AKH-produzierender Neurone das zuckerkonditionierten Verhalten tempor{\"a}r, reversible und selektiv unterdr{\"u}ckt. Gleiche Behandlungen hatten keinen Effekt auf ein aversiv konditioniertes olfaktorisches Ged{\"a}chtnis oder ein naives Zuckerpr{\"a}ferenzverhalten. Wie aus dieser Arbeit hervorgeht, stellt wahrscheinlich die Osmolarit{\"a}t des Verdauungstrakts und der H{\"a}molymphe oder nur der H{\"a}molymphe ein physiologisches Korrelat zum F{\"u}tterungszustand dar und wirkt als unterdr{\"u}ckendes Signal. Dass F{\"u}tterungen das zuckerkonditionierte Verhalten und die Zuckerpr{\"a}ferenz supprimieren, die k{\"u}nstliche Stimulation AKH-produzierender Zellen aber selektiv nur die zuckerbelohnte Ged{\"a}chtnisexpression unterdr{\"u}ckt, deutet auf mindestens zwei unterschiedliche „S{\"a}ttigungssignalwege" hin. Außerdem macht es deutlich wie uneinheitlich futterbezogene Verhaltensweisen, wie das zuckerbelohnte Verhalten und die naive Zuckerpr{\"a}ferenz, reguliert werden.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Bertolucci2008,
  author    = {Bertolucci, Franco},
  title     = {Operant and classical learning in Drosophila melanogaster: the ignorant gene (ign)},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-33984},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {One of the major challenges in neuroscience is to understand the neuronal processes that underlie learning and memory. For example, what biochemical pathways underlie the coincidence detection between stimuli during classical conditioning, or between an action and its consequences during operant conditioning? In which neural substructures is this information stored? How similar are the pathways mediating these two types of associative learning and at which level do they diverge? The fly Drosophila melanogaster is an appropriate model organism to address these questions due to the availability of suitable learning paradigms and neurogenetic tools. It permits an extensive study of the functional role of the gene S6KII which in Drosophila had been found to be differentially involved in classical and operant conditioning (Bertolucci, 2002; Putz et al., 2004). Genomic rescue experiments showed that olfactory conditioning in the Tully machine, a paradigm for Pavlovian olfactory conditioning, depends on the presence of an intact S6KII gene. This rescue was successfully performed on both the null mutant and a partial deletion, suggesting that the removal of the phosphorylating unit of the kinase was the main cause of the functional defect. The GAL4/UAS system was used to achieve temporal and spatial control of S6KII expression. It was shown that expression of the kinase during the adult stage was essential for the rescue. This finding ruled out a developmental origin of the mutant learning phenotype. Furthermore, targeted spatial rescue of S6KII revealed a requirement in the mushroom bodies and excluded other brain structures like the median bundle, the antennal lobes and the central complex. This pattern is very similar to the one previously identified with the rutabaga mutant (Zars et al., 2000). Experiments with the double mutant rut, ign58-1 suggest that both rutabaga and S6KII operate in the same signalling pathway. Previous studies had already shown that deviating results from operant and classical conditioning point to different roles for S6KII in the two types of learning (Bertolucci, 2002; Putz, 2002). This conclusion was further strengthened by the defective performance of the transgenic lines in place learning and their normal behavior in olfactory conditioning. A novel type of learning experiment, called "idle experiment", was designed. It is based on the conditioning of the walking activity and represents a purely operant task, overcoming some of the limitations of the "standard" heat-box experiment, a place learning paradigm. The novel nature of the idle experiment allowed exploring "learned helplessness" in flies, unveiling astonishing similarities to more complex organisms such as rats, mice and humans. Learned helplessness in Drosophila is found only in females and is sensitive to antidepressants.},
  subject      = {Klassische Konditionierung},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Thum2006,
  author    = {Thum, Andreas Stephan},
  title     = {Sugar reward learning in Drosophila : neuronal circuits in Drosophila associative olfactory learning},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-17930},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Genetic intervention in the fly Drosophila melanogaster has provided strong evidence that the mushroom bodies of the insect brain act as the seat of memory traces for aversive and appetitive olfactory learning (reviewed in Heisenberg, 2003). In flies, electroshock is mainly used as negative reinforcer. Unfortunately this fact complicates a comparative consideration with other inscets as most studies use sugar as positive reinforcer. For example, several lines of evidence from honeybee and moth have suggested another site, the antennal lobe, to house neuronal plasticity underlying appetitive olfactory memory (reviewed in Menzel, 2001; Daly et al., 2004). Because of this I focused my work mainly on appetitive olfactory learning. In the first part of my thesis, I used a novel genetic tool, the TARGET system (McGuire et al., 2003), which allows the temporally controlled expression of a given effector gene in a defined set of cells. Comparing effector genes which either block neurotransmission or ablate cells showed important differences, revealing that selection of the appropriate effector gene is critical for evaluating the function of neural circuits. In the second part, a new engram of olfactory memory in the Drosophila projection neurons is described by restoring Rutabaga adenlylate cyclase (rut-AC) activity specifically in these cells. Expression of wild-type rutabaga in the projection neurons fully rescued the defect in sugar reward memory, but not in aversive electric shock memory. No difference was found in the stability of the appetitive memories rescued either in projection neurons or Kenyon cells. In the third part of the thesis I tried to understand how the reinforcing signals for sugar reward are internally represented. In the bee Hammer (1993) described a single octopaminergic neuron - called VUMmx1 - that mediates the sugar stimulus in associative olfactory reward learning. Analysis of single VUM neurons in the fly (Selcho, 2006) identified a neuron with a similar morphology as the VUMmx1 neuron. As there is a mutant in Drosophila lacking the last enzymatic step in octopamine synthesis (Monastirioti et al., 1996), Tyramine beta Hydroxylase, I was able to show that local Tyramine beta Hydroxylase expression successfully rescued sugar reward learning. This allows to conclude that about 250 cells including the VUM cluster are sufficient for mediating the sugar reinforcement signal in the fly. The description of a VUMmx1 similar neuron and the involvement of the VUM cluster in mediating the octopaminergic sugar stimulus are the first steps in establishing a neuronal map for US processing in Drosophila. Based on this work several experiments are contrivable to reach this ultimate goal in the fly. Taken together, the described similiarities between Drosophila and honeybee regarding the memory organisation in MBs and PNs and the proposed internal representation of the sugar reward suggest an evolutionarily conserved mechanism for appetitive olfactory learning in insects.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Masek2005,
  author    = {Masek, Pavel},
  title     = {Odor intensity learning in Drosophila},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-15546},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {It has been known for a long time that Drosophila can learn to discriminate not only between different odorants but also between different concentrations of the same odor. Olfactory associative learning has been described as a pairing between odorant and electric shock and since then, most of the experiments conducted in this respect have largely neglected the dual properties of odors: quality and intensity. For odorant-coupled short-term memory, a biochemical model has been proposed that mainly relies on the known cAMP signaling pathway. Mushroom bodies (MB) have been shown to be necessary and sufficient for this type of memory, and the MB-model of odor learning and short-term memory was established. Yet, theoretically, based on the MB-model, flies should not be able to learn concentrations if trained to the lower of the two concentrations in the test. In this thesis, I investigate the role of concentration-dependent learning, establishment of a concentration-dependent memory and their correlation to the standard two-odor learning as described by the MB-model. In order to highlight the difference between learning of quality and learning of intensity of the same odor I have tried to characterize the nature of the stimulus that is actually learned by the flies, leading to the conclusion that during the training flies learn all possible cues that are presented at the time. The type of the following test seems to govern the usage of the information available. This revealed a distinction between what flies learned and what is actually measured. Furthermore, I have shown that learning of concentration is associative and that it is symmetrical between high and low concentrations. I have also shown how the subjective quality perception of an odor changes with changing intensity, suggesting that one odor can have more than one scent. There is no proof that flies perceive a range of concentrations of one odorant as one (odor) quality. Flies display a certain level of concentration invariance that is limited and related to the particular concentration. Learning of concentration is relevant only to a limited range of concentrations within the boundaries of concentration invariance. Moreover, under certain conditions, two chemically distinct odorants could smell sufficiently similarly such, that they can be generalized between each other like if they would be of the same quality. Therefore, the abilities of the fly to identify the difference in quality or in intensity of the stimuli need to be distinguished. The way how the stimulus is analyzed and processed speaks in favor of a concept postulating the existence of two separated memories. To follow this concept, I have proposed a new form of memory called odor intensity memory (OIM), characterized it and compared it to other olfactory memories. OIM is independent of some members of the known cAMP signaling pathway and very likely forms the rutabaga-independent component of the standard two-odor memory. The rutabaga-dependent odor memory requires qualitatively different olfactory stimuli. OIM is revealed within the limits of concentration invariance where the memory test gives only sub-optimal performance for the concentration differences but discrimination of odor quality is not possible at all. Based on the available experimental tools, OIM seems to require the mushroom bodies the same as odor-quality memory but its properties are different. Flies can memorize the quality of several odorants at a given time but a newly formed memory of one odor interferes with the OIM stored before. In addition, the OIM lasts only 1 to 3 hours - much shorter than the odor-quality memory.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Bennetz2004,
  author    = {Bennetz, Maike},
  title     = {Auff{\"a}lligkeiten in Ged{\"a}chtnisfunktionen bei Kindern mit Lese-Rechtschreibschw{\"a}che},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-10941},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Ziel der Studie war die Exploration von Funktionen des Kurzzeitged{\"a}chtnisses bei lese-rechtschreibschwachen Kindern (LRS) im Vergleich zu einer schriftsprachlich normal entwickelten Kontrollgruppe (KG). Ged{\"a}chtnisfunktionen sollten im Hinblick auf Entwicklungsver{\"a}nderungen {\"u}ber eine Altersspanne von acht bis dreizehn Jahren untersucht werden. Bei einem m{\"o}glichen Ged{\"a}chtnisdefizit sollte {\"u}berpr{\"u}ft werden, ob dieses sich nur bei schriftsprach{\"a}hnlichem Material {\"a}ußerte oder ob es sich um ein allgemeineres Defizit handelte. Insgesamt 65 lese-rechtschreibschwache und schriftsprachlich normal entwickelte Kinder der Altersgruppen 8-9 Jahre, 10-11 Jahre und 12-13 Jahre wurden Aufgaben zur Ged{\"a}chtnisspanne, zur Benennungsgeschwindigkeit und zur Suchrate unterzogen. In den Aufgaben zur Ged{\"a}chtnisspanne und zur Benennungsgeschwindigkeit zeigten die lese-rechtschreibschwachen Kinder deutlich schlechtere Leistungen als die Kontrollgruppe, und beide untersuchten Gruppen verbesserten sich in ihren Leistungen mit ansteigendem Alter. Hinweise f{\"u}r ein schriftsprachorientiertes Defizit im Falle der Rechtschreibschwachen ließen sich den Aufgaben zur Ged{\"a}chtnisspanne und zur Suchrate entnehmen. Zusammenfassend best{\"a}tigen die vorliegenden Ergebnisse Defizite in Funktionen des Kurzzeitged{\"a}chtnisses bei LRS. {\"U}ber die untersuchte Altersspanne hinweg kam es nicht zu einer Ann{\"a}herung der Leistungen der Rechtschreibschwachen an die der Kontrollgruppe, was f{\"u}r ein bleibendes Defizit im Fall der LRS spricht. Um zu eindeutigen Ergebnissen hinsichtlich der Schriftsprachabh{\"a}ngigkeit der Ged{\"a}chtnisdefizite bei LRS kommen zu k{\"o}nnen, m{\"u}ssen weitere Studien abgewartet werden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Fischer2004,
  author    = {Fischer, Matthias},
  title     = {Lokalisierung eines Ged{\"a}chtnisses bei Drosophila melanogaster},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-8050},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {Es konnte in dieser Arbeit gezeigt werden, daß das olfaktorische Kurzzeitged{\"a}chtnis von Drosophila melanogaster in den Pilzk{\"o}rpern lokalisiert ist. Zu Beginn dieser Doktorarbeit war bekannt, daß die Pilzk{\"o}rper notwendig f{\"u}r das Geruchsged{\"a}chtnis sind. Drei unabh{\"a}ngige Methoden der Ablation bzw. Ver{\"a}nderung der biochemischen Eigenschaften der Pilzk{\"o}rper hatten zu dem selben Ergebnis gef{\"u}hrt, daß funktionierende Pilzk{\"o}rper unentbehrlich f{\"u}r den Aufbau eines Geruchsged{\"a}chtnisses sind. Noch informativer als ein Experiment, in dem durch Zerst{\"o}rung einer Struktur eine Leistung unm{\"o}glich gemacht wird ist der umgekehrte Weg, der durch einen gewebespezifischen „rescue" die Leistung wiederherstellt. Dazu wurde in dieser Arbeit das wildtypische Allel des Gens rutabaga in rut-mutanten Fliegen mit Hilfe des Gal4/UAS-Systems ausschließlich in den Pilzk{\"o}rpern, bzw., im Gegenexperiment, nur außerhalb der Pilzk{\"o}rper zur Expression gebracht. rut kodiert f{\"u}r die Adenylatcyclase I, die mit synaptischer Plastizit{\"a}t bei Drosophila, Aplysia und M{\"a}usen in Verbindung gebracht wird. Man geht davon aus, daß synaptische Plastizit{\"a}t die molekulare Grundlage f{\"u}r Lernen und Ged{\"a}chtnis ist. Die AC I stellt cAMP her, dessen Menge und pr{\"a}zise Regulation die {\"U}bertragungsst{\"a}rke an Neuronen beeinflußt. Eine St{\"o}rung dieses Signalweges z. B. durch die rut-Mutation f{\"u}hrt zu einer Beeintr{\"a}chtigung des Ged{\"a}chtnisses bei Drosophila. rut wurde mit Hilfe des in Drosophila etablierten Gal4/UAS-Systems exprimiert: Der gewebespezifisch aktive Hefe-Transkriptionsfaktor Gal4 f{\"u}hrt dazu, daß das hinter einen Gal4-spezifischen UAS-Promotor klonierte wildtypische rut-Gen in denjenigen Zellen transkribiert wird, in denen der Transkriptionsfaktor vorhanden ist. Dies wurde in einer rut-Mutante durchgef{\"u}hrt, so daß in allen anderen Zellen keine funktionierende AC I vorhanden war. Die rut-abh{\"a}ngige synaptische Plastizit{\"a}t wurde damit ausschließlich auf die gew{\"u}nschten Regionen beschr{\"a}nkt. Das Expressionsmuster der Gal4-Linien wurde durch Immuncytochemie (Anti-Tau) sichtbar gemacht. Diese Fliegen wurden in einem klassischen Konditionierungsexperiment auf ihr Geruchs-Ged{\"a}chtnis untersucht. Dazu wurden einer Gruppe von Fliegen nacheinander 2 Ger{\"u}che pr{\"a}sentiert, von denen einer mit Elektroschocks gepaart war. Nach ca. 2 min konnten diese Fliegen sich f{\"u}r einen der beiden Ger{\"u}che entscheiden, die nun gleichzeitig aus 2 unterschiedlichen Richtungen dargeboten wurden. Je nach Lernleistung entschieden sich mehr oder weniger Fliegen f{\"u}r den vorher unbestraften Geruch. Es ergab sich, daß der Ort im Gehirn, an dem die wildtypische AC I exprimiert wurde, {\"u}ber die H{\"o}he des Ged{\"a}chtniswertes entschied: Die AC I ausschließlich in den Pilzk{\"o}rpern gew{\"a}hrte ein v{\"o}llig normales Ged{\"a}chtnis, wogegen die AC I außerhalb der Pilzk{\"o}rper das Ged{\"a}chtnis nicht gegen{\"u}ber der rut-Mutante verbessern konnte. Die Analyse der Expressionsverteilung von insgesamt 9 getesteten Fliegenlinien mißt {\"u}berdies dem \&\#61543;-Lobus des Pilzk{\"o}rpers eine besondere Bedeutung bei und l{\"a}ßt den Schluß zu, daß das hier untersuchte Ged{\"a}chtnis ausschließlich in den \&\#61543;-Loben lokalisiert ist. Dieses erfolgreiche rut-„rescue" - Experiment zeigt, daß rut-abh{\"a}ngige synaptische Plastizit{\"a}t ausschließlich in den Pilzk{\"o}rpern ausreichend f{\"u}r ein wildtypisches Ged{\"a}chtnis ist. Dieses Ergebnis vervollst{\"a}ndigt die Erkenntnisse von den Pilzk{\"o}rper-Ablationsexperimenten insofern, als nun die Aussage zutrifft, daß die Pilzk{\"o}rper notwendig und hinreichend f{\"u}r das olfaktorische Kurzzeitged{\"a}chtnis sind.},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Schwaerzel2003,
  author    = {Schw{\"a}rzel, Martin},
  title     = {Localizing engrams of olfactory memories in Drosophila},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-5065},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {Zars and co-workers were able to localize an engram of aversive olfactory memory to the mushroom bodies of Drosophila (Zars et al., 2000). In this thesis, I followed up on this finding in two ways. Inspired by Zars et al. (2000), I first focused on the whether it would also be possible to localize memory extinction.While memory extinction is well established behaviorally, little is known about the underlying circuitry and molecular mechanisms. In extension to the findings by Zars et al (2000), I show that aversive olfactory memories remain localized to a subset of mushroom body Kenyon cells for up to 3 hours. Extinction localizes to the same set of Kenyon cells. This common localization suggests a model in which unreinforced presentations of a previously learned odorant intracellularly antagonizes the signaling cascades underlying memory formation. The second part also targets memory localization, but addresses appetitive memory. I show that memories for the same olfactory cue can be established through either sugar or electric shock reinforcement. Importantly, these memories localize to the same set of neurons within the mushroom body. Thus, the question becomes apparent how the same signal can be associated with different events. It is shown that two different monoamines are specificaly necessary for formation of either of these memories, dopamine in case of electric shock and octopamine in case of sugar memory, respectively. Taking the representation of the olfactory cue within the mushroom bodies into account, the data suggest that the two memory traces are located in the same Kenyon cells, but in separate subcellular domains, one modulated by dopamine, the other by octopamine. Taken together, this study takes two further steps in the search for the engram. (1) The result that in Drosophila olfactory learning several memories are organized within the same set of Kenyon cells is in contrast to the pessimism expressed by Lashley that is might not be possible to localize an engram. (2) Beyond localization, a possibible mechanism how several engrams about the same stimulus can be localized within the same neurons might be suggested by the models of subcellular organisation, as postulated in case of appetitive and aversive memory on the one hand and acquisition and extinction of aversive memory on the other hand.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Putz2002,
  author    = {Putz, Gabriele},
  title     = {Characterization of memories and ignorant (S6KII) mutants in operant conditioning in the heat-box},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-4195},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2002},
  abstract  = {Learning and memory processes of operant conditioning in the heat-box were analysed. Age, sex, and larval desity were not critical parameters influencing memory, while low or high activity levels of flies were negatively correlated with their performance. In a search for conditioning parameters leading to high retention scores, intermittent training was shown to give better results than continuous training. As the memory test is the immediate continuation of the conditioning phase just omitting reinforcement, we obtain a memory which consists of two components: a spatial preference for one side of the chamber and a stay-where-you-are effect in which the side preference is contaminated by the persistence of heat avoidance. Intermittent training strengthens the latter. In the next part, memory retention was investigated. Flies were trained in one chamber and tested in a second one after a brief reminder training. With this direct transfer, memory scores reflect an associative learning process in the first chamber. To investigate memory retention after extended time periods, indirect transfer experiments were performed. The fly was transferred to a different environment between training and test phases. With this procedure an after-effect of the training was still observed two hours later. Surprisingly, exposure to the chamber without conditioning also lead to a memory effect in the indirect transfer experiment. This exposure effect revealed a dispositional change that facilitates operant learning during the reminder training. The various memory effects are independent of the mushroom bodies. The transfer experiments and yoked controls proved that the heat-box records an associative memory. Even two hours after the operant conditioning procedure, the fly remembers that its position in the chamber controls temperature. The cAMP signaling cascade is involved in heat-box learning. Thus, amnesiac, rutabaga, and dunce mutants have an impaired learning / memory. Searching for, yet unknown, genes and signaling cascades involved in operant conditioning, a Drosophila melanogaster mutant screen with 1221 viable X-chromosome P-element lines was performed. 29 lines with consistently reduced heat avoidance/ learning or memory scores were isolated. Among those, three lines have the p[lacW] located in the amnesiac ORF, confirming that with the chosen candidate criteria the heat-box is a useful tool to screen for learning and /or memory mutants. The mutant line ignP1 (8522), which is defective in the gene encoding p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (S6KII), was investigated. The P-insertion of line ignP1 is the first Drosophila mutation in the ignorant (S6KII) gene. It has the transposon inserted in the first exon. Mutant males are characterized by low training performance, while females perform well in the standard experiment. Several deletion mutants of the ignorant gene have been generated. In precise jumpouts the phenotype was reverted. Imprecise jumpouts with a partial loss of the coding region were defective in operant conditioning. Surprisingly, null mutants showed wild-type behavior. This might indicate an indirect effect of the mutated ignorant gene on learning processes. In classical odor avoidance conditioning, ignorant null mutants showed a defect in the 3-min, 30-min, and 3-hr memory, while the precise jumpout of the transposon resulted in a reversion of the behavioral phenotype. Deviating results from operant and classical conditioning indicate different roles for S6KII in the two types of learning.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Brembs2000,
  author    = {Brembs, Bj{\"o}rn},
  title     = {An Analysis of Associative Learning in Drosophila at the Flight Simulator},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-1039},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {2000},
  abstract  = {Most natural learning situations are of a complex nature and consist of a tight conjunction of the animal's behavior (B) with the perceived stimuli. According to the behavior of the animal in response to these stimuli, they are classified as being either biologically neutral (conditioned stimuli, CS) or important (unconditioned stimuli, US or reinforcer). A typical learning situation is thus identified by a three term contingency of B, CS and US. A functional characterization of the single associations during conditioning in such a three term contingency has so far hardly been possible. Therefore, the operational distinction between classical conditioning as a behavior-independent learning process (CS-US associations) and operant conditioning as essentially behavior-dependent learning (B-US associations) has proven very valuable. However, most learning experiments described so far have not been successful in fully separating operant from classical conditioning into single-association tasks. The Drosophila flight simulator in which the relevant behavior is a single motor variable (yaw torque), allows for the first time to completely separate the operant (B-US, B-CS) and the classical (CS-US) components of a complex learning situation and to examine their interactions. In this thesis the contributions of the single associations (CS-US, B-US and B-CS) to memory formation are studied. Moreover, for the first time a particularly prominent single association (CS-US) is characterized extensively in a three term contingency. A yoked control shows that classical (CS-US) pattern learning requires more training than operant pattern learning. Additionally, it can be demonstrated that an operantly trained stimulus can be successfully transferred from the behavior used during training to a new behavior in a subsequent test phase. This result shows unambiguously that during operant conditioning classical (CS-US) associations can be formed. In an extension to this insight, it emerges that such a classical association blocks the formation of an operant association, which would have been formed without the operant control of the learned stimuli. Instead the operant component seems to develop less markedly and is probably merged into a complex three-way association. This three-way association could either be implemented as a sequential B-CS-US or as a hierarchical (B-CS)-US association. The comparison of a simple classical (CS-US) with a composite operant (B, CS and US) learning situation and of a simple operant (B-US) with another composite operant (B, CS and US) learning situation, suggests a hierarchy of predictors of reinforcement. Operant behavior occurring during composite operant conditioning is hardly conditioned at all. The associability of classical stimuli that bear no relation to the behavior of the animal is of an intermediate value, as is operant behavior alone. Stimuli that are controlled by operant behavior accrue associative strength most easily. If several stimuli are available as potential predictors, again the question arises which CS-US associations are formed? A number of different studies in vertebrates yielded amazingly congruent results. These results inspired to examine and compare the properties of the CS-US association in a complex learning situation at the flight simulator with these vertebrate results. It is shown for the first time that Drosophila can learn compound stimuli and recall the individual components independently and in similar proportions. The attempt to obtain second-order conditioning with these stimuli, yielded a relatively small effect. In comparison with vertebrate data, blocking and sensory preconditioning experiments produced conforming as well as dissenting results. While no blocking could be found, a sound sensory preconditioning effect was obtained. Possible reasons for the failure to find blocking are discussed and further experiments are suggested. The sensory preconditioning effect found in this study is revealed using simultaneous stimulus presentation and depends on the amount of preconditioning. It is argued that this effect is a case of 'incidental learning', where two stimuli are associated without the need of reinforcement. Finally, the implications of the results obtained in this study for the general understanding of memory formation in complex learning situations are discussed.},
  subject      = {Taufliege},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GruberRenklSchneider1994,
  author    = {Gruber, Hans and Renkl, Alexander and Schneider, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Expertise und Ged{\"a}chtnisentwicklung: L{\"a}ngsschnittliche Befunde aus der Dom{\"a}ne Schach},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87473},
  year      = {1994},
  abstract  = {Die vorliegende Arbeit ging zwei Hauptfragestellungen nach: (I) Inwiefern unterscheiden sich Experten in der Dom{\"a}ne Schach von Aussteigern aus der Expertisekarriere? (2) Wie ver{\"a}ndern sich schachspezifische und generelle Ged{\"a}chtnisparameter {\"u}ber einen Zeitraum von mehreren Jahren? Es wurden 27 Experten und Novizen mit einem durchschnittlichen Alter von knapp 12 Jahren zum ersten Meßzeitpunkt und von 16 Jahren zum zweiten Meßzeitpunkt untersucht. Die Aussteiger aus der Expertisekarriere zeigten bereits bei der Erstmessung schlechtere schachspezifische Ged{\"a}chtnisleistungen als die {\"u}brigen Experten; die Annahme selektiver Aussteiger, die die Aussagekraft querschnittlicher Experten-Novizen-Vergleiche in Frage stellt, wird damit best{\"a}tigt. Sowohl f{\"u}r die Experten als auch f{\"u}r die Novizen zeigte sich ein Anstieg der schachspezifischen Ged{\"a}chtnisleistung von der Erst- zur Zweitmessung. W{\"a}hrend daf{\"u}r bei Experten dom{\"a}nenspezifische Faktoren verantwortlich sein d{\"u}rften, scheint dies bei Novizen auf die Entwicklung allgemeiner Ged{\"a}chtnisparameter zur{\"u}ckzugehen.},
  subject      = {Expertise},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hoffmann1993,
  author    = {Hoffmann, Joachim},
  title     = {Ged{\"a}chtnis und Lernen, Prozeß und Resultat, Inzidentell und Intentional: eine Erwiderung auf den Kommentar von H. J. Markowitsch},
  series = {Psychologische Rundschau},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {Psychologische Rundschau},
  number    = {2},
  issn      = {0033-3042},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-127719},
  pages     = {109-112},
  year      = {1993},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{SodianSchneider1990,
  author    = {Sodian, Beate and Schneider, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Ged{\"a}chtnisentwicklung im Vorschulalter: "Theoriewandel" im kindlichen Verst{\"a}ndnis des Lernens und Erinnerns?},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87505},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {1990},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  subject      = {Ged{\"a}chtnis},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{SchneiderSodian1990,
  author    = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Sodian, Beate},
  title     = {Ged{\"a}chtnisentwicklung im Vorschulalter: "Theoriewandel" im kindlichen Verst{\"a}ndnis des Lernens und Erinnerns?},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87183},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {1990},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  subject      = {Entwicklungspsychologie},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SchneiderWeinert1989,
  author    = {Schneider, Wolfgang and Weinert, Franz E.},
  title     = {Der Einfluß von Wissen auf das Behalten und Verstehen von Texten},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-86495},
  year      = {1989},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  subject      = {Wissen},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KurtzSchneider1988,
  author    = {Kurtz, Beth E. and Schneider, Wolfgang},
  title     = {The effects of age, study time, and importance of text units on strategy use and memory for texts},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87408},
  year      = {1988},
  abstract  = {This study investigated study behavior and recall of a narrative text as a function of the reader's age, study time, and importance level of text units. Fifth graders, seventh graders, young- and older adults were asked to read a fairy tale, and do anything they liked to prepare for verbatim recall. Half of the subjects in each age group were assigned to an immediate recall condition; half were given additional study time. Examination of recall data showed that all subjects showed higher recall of important units in the text than unimportant units. This effect was independent of age and study time condition. Study behaviors varied significantly across age groups and study conditions: while adults underlined or took notes with equal frequency, children preferred note-taking as a study strategy. With additional study time, fifth graders, seventh graders, and older adults increased their strategic behavior; young adults did not.},
  subject      = {Studienzeit},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{KnopfKoerkelSchneideretal.1986,
  author    = {Knopf, Monika and K{\"o}rkel, Joachim and Schneider, Wolfgang and Weinert, Franz E.},
  title     = {Human memory as a faculty versus human memory as a set of specific abilities: Evidence from a life-span approach},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-87394},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t W{\"u}rzburg},
  year      = {1986},
  abstract  = {No abstract available.},
  subject      = {Ged{\"a}chtnis},
  language  = {en}
}