@article{MerzDechowScheytetal.2020,
  author    = {Merz, Maximilian and Dechow, Tobias and Scheyt, Mithun and Schmidt, Christian and Knop, Stefan},
  title     = {The clinical management of lenalidomide-based therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma},
  series = {Annals of Hematology},
  volume    = {99},
  journal   = {Annals of Hematology},
  issn      = {0939-5555},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00277-020-04023-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-231862},
  pages     = {1709-1725},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Lenalidomide is an integral, yet evolving, part of current treatment pathways for both transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). It is approved in combination with dexamethasone as first-line therapy for transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM, and as maintenance treatment following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Although strong clinical trial evidence has supported the integration of lenalidomide into current treatment paradigms for NDMM, applying those paradigms to individual patients and determining which patients are most likely to benefit from lenalidomide treatment are more complex. In this paper, we utilize the available clinical trial evidence to provide recommendations for patient selection and lenalidomide dosing in both the first-line setting in patients ineligible for ASCT and the maintenance setting in patients who have undergone ASCT. In addition, we provide guidance on management of those adverse events that are most commonly associated with lenalidomide treatment, and consider the optimal selection and sequencing of next-line agents following long-term frontline or maintenance treatment with lenalidomide.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WurmbFrankeSchorscheretal.2020,
  author    = {Wurmb, Thomas and Franke, Axel and Schorscher, Nora and Kowalzik, Barbara and Helm, Matthias and Bohnen, Renate and Helmerichs, Jutta and Grueneisen, Ulrich and Cwojdzinski, Detlef and Jung, Georg and L{\"u}cking, Gesa and Weber, Martin},
  title     = {Emergency response to terrorist attacks: results of the federal-conducted evaluation process in Germany},
  series = {European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery},
  volume    = {46},
  journal   = {European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery},
  issn      = {1863-9933},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00068-020-01347-8},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-231777},
  pages     = {725-730},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose Rescue missions during terrorist attacks are extremely challenging for all rescue forces (police as well as non-police forces) involved. To improve the quality and safety of the rescue missions during an active killing event, it is obligatory to adapt common rescue mission goals and strategies. Methods After the recent attacks in Europe, the Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance started an evaluation process on behalf of the Federal Ministry of the Interior and the Federal Ministry of Health. This was done to identify weaknesses, lessons learned and to formulate new adapted guidelines. Results The presented bullet point recommendations summarise the basic and most important results of the ongoing evaluation process for the Federal Republic of Germany. The safety of all the rescue forces and survival of the greatest possible number of casualties are the priority goals. Furthermore, the preservation and re-establishment of the socio-political integrity are the overarching goals of the management of active killing events. Strategic incident priorities are to stop the killing and to save as much lives as possible. The early identification and prioritised transportation of casualties with life-threatening non-controllable bleeding are major tasks and the shortest possible on-scene time is an important requirement with respect to safety issues. Conclusion With respect to hazard prevention tactics within Germany, we attributed the highest priority impact to the bullet points. The focus of the process has now shifted to intense work about possible solutions for the identified deficits and implementation strategies of such solutions during mass killing incidents.},
  language  = {en}
}