@article{MainzSarhanRothetal.2022,
  author    = {Mainz, Laura and Sarhan, Mohamed A. F. E. and Roth, Sabine and Sauer, Ursula and Maurus, Katja and Hartmann, Elena M. and Seibert, Helen-Desiree and Rosenwald, Andreas and Diefenbacher, Markus E. and Rosenfeldt, Mathias T.},
  title     = {Autophagy blockage reduces the incidence of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in the context of mutant Trp53},
  series = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology},
  issn      = {2296-634X},
  doi       = {10.3389/fcell.2022.785252},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266005},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) is a homeostatic process that preserves cellular integrity. In mice, autophagy regulates pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) development in a manner dependent on the status of the tumor suppressor gene Trp53. Studies published so far have investigated the impact of autophagy blockage in tumors arising from Trp53-hemizygous or -homozygous tissue. In contrast, in human PDACs the tumor suppressor gene TP53 is mutated rather than allelically lost, and TP53 mutants retain pathobiological functions that differ from complete allelic loss. In order to better represent the patient situation, we have investigated PDAC development in a well-characterized genetically engineered mouse model (GEMM) of PDAC with mutant Trp53 (Trp53\(^{R172H}\)) and deletion of the essential autophagy gene Atg7. Autophagy blockage reduced PDAC incidence but had no impact on survival time in the subset of animals that formed a tumor. In the absence of Atg7, non-tumor-bearing mice reached a similar age as animals with malignant disease. However, the architecture of autophagy-deficient, tumor-free pancreata was effaced, normal acinar tissue was largely replaced with low-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasias (PanINs) and insulin expressing islet β-cells were reduced. Our data add further complexity to the interplay between Atg7 inhibition and Trp53 status in tumorigenesis.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchartlShenMaurusetal.2015,
  author    = {Schartl, Manfred and Shen, Yingjia and Maurus, Katja and Walter, Ron and Tomlinson, Chad and Wilson, Richard K. and Postlethwait, John and Warren, Wesley C.},
  title     = {Whole body melanoma transcriptome response in medaka},
  series = {PLoS ONE},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {PLoS ONE},
  number    = {12},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0143057},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-144714},
  pages     = {e0143057},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {The incidence of malignant melanoma continues to increase each year with poor prognosis for survival in many relapse cases. To reverse this trend, whole body response measures are needed to discover collaborative paths to primary and secondary malignancy. Several species of fish provide excellent melanoma models because fish and human melanocytes both appear in the epidermis, and fish and human pigment cell tumors share conserved gene expression signatures. For the first time, we have examined the whole body transcriptome response to invasive melanoma as a prelude to using transcriptome profiling to screen for drugs in a medaka (Oryzias latipes) model. We generated RNA-seq data from whole body RNA isolates for controls and melanoma fish. After testing for differential expression, 396 genes had significantly different expression (adjusted p-value <0.02) in the whole body transcriptome between melanoma and control fish; 379 of these genes were matched to human orthologs with 233 having annotated human gene symbols and 14 matched genes that contain putative deleterious variants in human melanoma at varying levels of recurrence. A detailed canonical pathway evaluation for significant enrichment showed the top scoring pathway to be antigen presentation but also included the expected melanocyte development and pigmentation signaling pathway. Results revealed a profound down-regulation of genes involved in the immune response, especially the innate immune system. We hypothesize that the developing melanoma actively suppresses the immune system responses of the body in reacting to the invasive malignancy, and that this mal-adaptive response contributes to disease progression, a result that suggests our whole-body transcriptomic approach merits further use. In these findings, we also observed novel genes not yet identified in human melanoma expression studies and uncovered known and new candidate drug targets for further testing in this malignant melanoma medaka model.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HaydnHufnagelGrimmetal.2014,
  author    = {Haydn, Johannes M. and Hufnagel, Anita and Grimm, Johannes and Maurus, Katja and Schartl, Manfred and Meierjohann, Svenja},
  title     = {The MAPK pathway as an apoptosis enhancer in melanoma},
  series = {Oncotarget},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Oncotarget},
  number    = {13},
  issn      = {1949-2553},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-120649},
  pages     = {5040-53},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Inhibition of RAF/MEK/ERK signaling is beneficial for many patients with BRAFV600E-mutated melanoma. However, primary and secondary resistances restrict long-lasting therapy success. Combination therapies are therefore urgently needed. Here, we evaluate the cellular effect of combining a MEK inhibitor with a genotoxic apoptosis inducer. Strikingly, we observed that an activated MAPK pathway promotes in several melanoma cell lines the pro-apoptotic response to genotoxic stress, and MEK inhibition reduces intrinsic apoptosis. This goes along with MEK inhibitor induced increased RAS and P-AKT levels. The protective effect of the MEK inhibitor depends on PI3K signaling, which prevents the induction of pro-apoptotic PUMA that mediates apoptosis after DNA damage. We could show that the MEK inhibitor dependent feedback loop is enabled by several factors, including EGF receptor and members of the SPRED family. The simultaneous knockdown of SPRED1 and SPRED2 mimicked the effects of MEK inhibitor such as PUMA repression and protection from apoptosis. Our data demonstrate that MEK inhibition of BRAFV600E-positive melanoma cells can protect from genotoxic stress, thereby achieving the opposite of the intended anti-tumorigenic effect of the combination of MEK inhibitor with inducers of intrinsic apoptosis.},
  language  = {en}
}