@article{BliziotisKluijtmansTinneveltetal.2022,
  author    = {Bliziotis, Nikolaos G. and Kluijtmans, Leo A. J. and Tinnevelt, Gerjen H. and Reel, Parminder and Reel, Smarti and Langton, Katharina and Robledo, Mercedes and Pamporaki, Christina and Pecori, Alessio and Van Kralingen, Josie and Tetti, Martina and Engelke, Udo F. H. and Erlic, Zoran and Engel, Jasper and Deutschbein, Timo and N{\"o}lting, Svenja and Prejbisz, Aleksander and Richter, Susan and Adamski, Jerzy and Januszewicz, Andrzej and Ceccato, Filippo and Scaroni, Carla and Dennedy, Michael C. and Williams, Tracy A. and Lenzini, Livia and Gimenez-Roqueplo, Anne-Paule and Davies, Eleanor and Fassnacht, Martin and Remde, Hanna and Eisenhofer, Graeme and Beuschlein, Felix and Kroiss, Matthias and Jefferson, Emily and Zennaro, Maria-Christina and Wevers, Ron A. and Jansen, Jeroen J. and Deinum, Jaap and Timmers, Henri J. L. M.},
  title     = {Preanalytical pitfalls in untargeted plasma nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics of endocrine hypertension},
  series = {Metabolites},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Metabolites},
  number    = {8},
  issn      = {2218-1989},
  doi       = {10.3390/metabo12080679},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-282930},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Despite considerable morbidity and mortality, numerous cases of endocrine hypertension (EHT) forms, including primary aldosteronism (PA), pheochromocytoma and functional paraganglioma (PPGL), and Cushing's syndrome (CS), remain undetected. We aimed to establish signatures for the different forms of EHT, investigate potentially confounding effects and establish unbiased disease biomarkers. Plasma samples were obtained from 13 biobanks across seven countries and analyzed using untargeted NMR metabolomics. We compared unstratified samples of 106 PHT patients to 231 EHT patients, including 104 PA, 94 PPGL and 33 CS patients. Spectra were subjected to a multivariate statistical comparison of PHT to EHT forms and the associated signatures were obtained. Three approaches were applied to investigate and correct confounding effects. Though we found signatures that could separate PHT from EHT forms, there were also key similarities with the signatures of sample center of origin and sample age. The study design restricted the applicability of the corrections employed. With the samples that were available, no biomarkers for PHT vs. EHT could be identified. The complexity of the confounding effects, evidenced by their robustness to correction approaches, highlighted the need for a consensus on how to deal with variabilities probably attributed to preanalytical factors in retrospective, multicenter metabolomics studies.},
  language  = {en}
}