@article{WurmbSchlerethKredeletal.2014,
  author    = {Wurmb, Thomas Erik and Schlereth, Stefan and Kredel, Markus and Muellenbach, Ralf M. and Wunder, Christian and Brederlau, J{\"o}rg and Roewer, Norbert and Kenn, Werner and Kunze, Ekkehard},
  title     = {Routine Follow-Up Cranial Computed Tomography for Deeply Sedated, Intubated, and Ventilated Multiple Trauma Patients with Suspected Severe Head Injury},
  series = {BioMed Research International},
  journal   = {BioMed Research International},
  number    = {361949},
  doi       = {10.1155/2014/361949},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-120084},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Background. Missed or delayed detection of progressive neuronal damage after traumatic brain injury (TBI) may have negative impact on the outcome. We investigated whether routine follow-up CT is beneficial in sedated and mechanically ventilated trauma patients. Methods. The study design is a retrospective chart review. A routine follow-up cCT was performed 6 hours after the admission scan. We defined 2 groups of patients, group I: patients with equal or recurrent pathologies and group II: patients with new findings or progression of known pathologies. Results. A progression of intracranial injury was found in 63 patients (42\%) and 18 patients (12\%) had new findings in cCT 2 (group II). In group II a change in therapy was found in 44 out of 81 patients (54\%). 55 patients with progression or new findings on the second cCT had no clinical signs of neurological deterioration. Of those 24 patients (44\%) had therapeutic consequences due to the results of the follow-up cCT. Conclusion. We found new diagnosis or progression of intracranial pathology in 54\% of the patients. In 54\% of patients with new findings and progression of pathology, therapy was changed due to the results of follow-up cCT. In trauma patients who are sedated and ventilated for different reasons a routine follow-up CT is beneficial.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DuhrKennKickuthetal.2011,
  author    = {Duhr, Carolin D. and Kenn, Werner and Kickuth, Ralph and Kerscher, Alexander G. and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Hahn, Dietbert and Pelz, Joerg O. W.},
  title     = {Optimizing of preoperative computed tomography for diagnosis in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis},
  series = {World Journal of Surgical Oncology},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {World Journal of Surgical Oncology},
  number    = {171},
  doi       = {10.1186/1477-7819-9-171},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-138024},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Background and Objective This study evaluates whether Computer Tomography is an effective procedure for preoperative staging of patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis. Method A sample of 37 patients was analyzed with contrast enhanced abdominal Computer Tomography, followed by surgical staging. All Computer Tomography scans were evaluated 3 times by 2 radiologists with one radiologist reviewing 2 times. The efficacy of Computer Tomography was evaluated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Correlations were analyzed by abdominopelvic region to assess results of the Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI) aggregating the 13 regions. Surgical findings were compared to radiological findings. Results Results indicate high correlations between the surgical and radiological Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Indices. Analyses of the intra-class correlation between the first and second reading of one radiologist suggest high intra-observer reliability. Correlations by abdominopelvic region show higher values in the upper and middle regions and relatively lower values in the lower regions and the small bowel (correlation coefficients range between 0.418 and 0.726, p < 0.010; sensitivities range between 50\% and 96\%; and specificities range between 62\% and 100\%). Conclusion Computer Tomography represents an effective procedure in the preoperative staging of patients with PC. However, results by abdominopelvic region show lower correlation, therefore suggest lower efficacy. These results are supported by analyses of sensitivity and accuracy by lesion size. This suggests that Computer Tomography is an effective procedure for pre-operative staging but less for determining a tumor's accurate extent.},
  language  = {en}
}