@article{WagnerWannerSchichetal.2017,
  author    = {Wagner, Martin and Wanner, Christoph and Schich, Martin and Kotseva, Kornelia and Wood, David and Hartmann, Katrin and Fette, Georg and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Oezkur, Mehmet and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Heuschmann, Peter U.},
  title     = {Patient's and physician's awareness of kidney disease in coronary heart disease patients - a cross-sectional analysis of the German subset of the EUROASPIRE IV survey},
  series = {BMC Nephrology},
  volume    = {18},
  journal   = {BMC Nephrology},
  number    = {321},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12882-017-0730-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-158387},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common comorbid condition in coronary heart disease (CHD). CKD predisposes the patient to acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalization. Data on awareness of kidney dysfunction among CHD patients and their treating physicians are lacking. In the current cross-sectional analysis of the German EUROASPIRE IV sample we aimed to investigate the physician's awareness of kidney disease of patients hospitalized for CHD and also the patient's awareness of CKD in a study visit following hospital discharge. Methods All serum creatinine (SCr) values measured during the hospital stay were used to describe impaired kidney function (eGFR\(_{CKD-EPI}\) < 60 ml/min/1.73m2) at admission, discharge and episodes of AKI (KDIGO definition). Information extracted from hospital discharge letters and correct ICD coding for kidney disease was studied as a surrogate of physician's awareness of kidney disease. All patients were interrogated 0.5 to 3 years after hospital discharge, whether they had ever been told about kidney disease by a physician. Results Of the 536 patients, 32\% had evidence for acute or chronic kidney disease during the index hospital stay. Either condition was mentioned in the discharge letter in 22\%, and 72\% were correctly coded according to ICD-10. At the study visit in the outpatient setting 35\% had impaired kidney function. Of 158 patients with kidney disease, 54 (34\%) were aware of CKD. Determinants of patient's awareness were severity of CKD (OR\(_{eGFR}\) 0.94; 95\%CI 0.92-0.96), obesity (OR 1.97; 1.07-3.64), history of heart failure (OR 1.99; 1.00-3.97), and mentioning of kidney disease in the index event's hospital discharge letter (OR 5.51; 2.35-12.9). Conclusions Although CKD is frequent in CHD, only one third of patients is aware of this condition. Patient's awareness was associated with kidney disease being mentioned in the hospital discharge letter. Future studies should examine how raising physician's awareness for kidney dysfunction may improve patient's awareness of CKD.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GybergDeBacquerDeBackeretal.2015,
  author    = {Gyberg, Viveca and De Bacquer, Dirk and De Backer, Guy and Jennings, Catriona and Kotseva, Kornelia and Mellbin, Linda and Schnell, Oliver and Tuomilehto, Jaakko and Wood, David and Ryden, Lars and Amouyel, Philippe and Bruthans, Jan and Conde, Almudena Castro and Cifkova, Renata and Deckers, Jaap W. and De Sutter, Johan and Dilic, Mirza and Dolzhenko, Maryna and Erglis, Andrejs and Fras, Zlatko and Gaita, Dan and Gotcheva, Nina and Goudevenos, John and Heuschmann, Peter and Laucevicius, Aleksandras and Lehto, Seppo and Lovic, Dragan and Milicic, Davor and Moore, David and Nicolaides, Evagoras and Oganov, Raphae and Pajak, Andrzej and Pogosova, Nana and Reiner, Zeljko and Stagmo, Martin and St{\"o}rk, Stefan and Tokg{\"o}zoglu, Lale and Vulic, Dusko},
  title     = {Patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes need improved management: a report from the EUROASPIRE IV survey: a registry from the EuroObservational Research Programme of the European Society of Cardiology},
  series = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Cardiovascular Diabetology},
  number    = {133},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12933-015-0296-y},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141358},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: In order to influence every day clinical practice professional organisations issue management guidelines. Cross-sectional surveys are used to evaluate the implementation of such guidelines. The present survey investigated screening for glucose perturbations in people with coronary artery disease and compared patients with known and newly detected type 2 diabetes with those without diabetes in terms of their life-style and pharmacological risk factor management in relation to contemporary European guidelines. Methods: A total of 6187 patients (18-80 years) with coronary artery disease and known glycaemic status based on a self reported history of diabetes (previously known diabetes) or the results of an oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c (no diabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes) were investigated in EUROASPIRE IV including patients in 24 European countries 2012-2013. The patients were interviewed and investigated in order to enable a comparison between their actual risk factor control with that recommended in current European management guidelines and the outcome in previously conducted surveys. Results: A total of 2846 (46 \%) patients had no diabetes, 1158 (19 \%) newly diagnosed diabetes and 2183 (35 \%) previously known diabetes. The combined use of all four cardioprotective drugs in these groups was 53, 55 and 60 \%, respectively. A blood pressure target of <140/90 mmHg was achieved in 68, 61, 54 \% and a LDL-cholesterol target of <1.8 mmol/L in 16, 18 and 28 \%. Patients with newly diagnosed and previously known diabetes reached an HbA1c <7.0 \% (53 mmol/mol) in 95 and 53 \% and 11 \% of those with previously known diabetes had an HbA1c >9.0 \% (>75 mmol/mol). Of the patients with diabetes 69 \% reported on low physical activity. The proportion of patients participating in cardiac rehabilitation programmes was low (approximate to 40 \%) and only 27 \% of those with diabetes had attended diabetes schools. Compared with data from previous surveys the use of cardioprotective drugs had increased and more patients were achieving the risk factor treatment targets. Conclusions: Despite advances in patient management there is further potential to improve both the detection and management of patients with diabetes and coronary artery disease.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KotsevaDeBackerDeBacqueretal.2019,
  author    = {Kotseva, Kornelia and De Backer, Guy and De Bacquer, Dirk and Ryd{\´e}n, Lars and Hoes, Arno and Grobbee, Diederick and Maggioni, Aldo and Marques-Vidal, Pedro and Jennings, Catriona and Abreu, Ana and Aguiar, Carlos and Badariene, Jolita and Bruthans, Jan and Castro Conde, Almudena and Cifkova, Renata and Crowley, Jim and Davletov, Kairat and Deckers, Jaap and De Smedt, Delphine and De Sutter, Johan and Dilic, Mirza and Dolzhenko, Marina and Dzerve, Vilnis and Erglis, Andrejs and Fras, Zlatko and Gaita, Dan and Gotcheva, Nina and Heuschmann, Peter and Hasan-Ali, Hosam and Jankowski, Piotr and Lalic, Nebojsa and Lehto, Seppo and Lovic, Dragan and Mancas, Silvia and Mellbin, Linda and Milicic, Davor and Mirrakhimov, Erkin and Oganov, Rafael and Pogosova, Nana and Reiner, Zeljko and St{\"o}erk, Stefan and Tokg{\"o}zoğlu, L{\^a}le and Tsioufis, Costas and Vulic, Dusko and Wood, David},
  title     = {Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries: Results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry},
  series = {European Journal of Preventive Cardiology},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {European Journal of Preventive Cardiology},
  number    = {8},
  organization    = {EUROASPIRE Investigators},
  issn      = {2047-4873},
  doi       = {10.1177/2047487318825350},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-205526},
  pages     = {824-835},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Aims The aim of this study was to determine whether the Joint European Societies guidelines on secondary cardiovascular prevention are followed in everyday practice. Design A cross-sectional ESC-EORP survey (EUROASPIRE V) at 131 centres in 81 regions in 27 countries. Methods Patients (<80 years old) with verified coronary artery events or interventions were interviewed and examined ≥6 months later. Results A total of 8261 patients (females 26\%) were interviewed. Nineteen per cent smoked and 55\% of them were persistent smokers, 38\% were obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), 59\% were centrally obese (waist circumference: men ≥102 cm; women ≥88 cm) while 66\% were physically active <30 min 5 times/week. Forty-two per cent had a blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg (≥140/85 if diabetic), 71\% had low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥1.8 mmol/L (≥70 mg/dL) and 29\% reported having diabetes. Cardioprotective medication was: anti-platelets 93\%, beta-blockers 81\%, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers 75\% and statins 80\%. Conclusion A large majority of coronary patients have unhealthy lifestyles in terms of smoking, diet and sedentary behaviour, which adversely impacts major cardiovascular risk factors. A majority did not achieve their blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glucose targets. Cardiovascular prevention requires modern preventive cardiology programmes delivered by interdisciplinary teams of healthcare professionals addressing all aspects of lifestyle and risk factor management, in order to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MorbachWagnerGuentneretal.2017,
  author    = {Morbach, Caroline and Wagner, Martin and G{\"u}ntner, Stefan and Malsch, Carolin and Oezkur, Mehmet and Wood, David and Kotseva, Kornelia and Leyh, Rainer and Ertl, Georg and Karmann, Wolfgang and Heuschmann, Peter U and St{\"o}rk, Stefan},
  title     = {Heart failure in patients with coronary heart disease: Prevalence, characteristics and guideline implementation - Results from the German EuroAspire IV cohort},
  series = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {BMC Cardiovascular Disorders},
  number    = {108},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12872-017-0543-0},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-157738},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background: Adherence to pharmacotherapeutic treatment guidelines in patients with heart failure (HF) is of major prognostic importance, but thorough implementation of guidelines in routine care remains insufficient. Our aim was to investigate prevalence and characteristics of HF in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), and to assess the adherence to current HF guidelines in patients with HF stage C, thus identifying potential targets for the optimization of guideline implementation. Methods: Patients from the German sample of the European Action on Secondary and Primary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events (EuroAspire) IV survey with a hospitalization for CHD within the previous six to 36 months providing valid data on echocardiography as well as on signs and symptoms of HF were categorized into stages of HF: A, prevalence of risk factors for developing HF; B, asymptomatic but with structural heart disease; C, symptomatic HF. A Guideline Adherence Indicator (GAI-3) was calculated for patients with reduced (≤40\%) left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) as number of drugs taken per number of drugs indicated; beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) were considered. Results: 509/536 patients entered analysis. HF stage A was prevalent in n = 20 (3.9\%), stage B in n = 264 (51.9\%), and stage C in n = 225 (44.2\%) patients; 94/225 patients were diagnosed with HFrEF (42\%). Stage C patients were older, had a longer duration of CHD, and a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension. Awareness of pre-diagnosed HF was low (19\%). Overall GAI-3 of HFrEF patients was 96.4\% with a trend towards lower GAI-3 in patients with lower LVEF due to less thorough MRA prescription. Conclusions: In our sample of CHD patients, prevalence of HF stage C was high and a sizable subgroup suffered from HFrEF. Overall, pharmacotherapy was fairly well implemented in HFrEF patients, although somewhat worse in patients with more reduced ejection fraction. Two major targets were identified possibly suited to further improve the implementation of HF guidelines: 1) increase patients´ awareness of diagnosis and importance of HF; and 2) disseminate knowledge about the importance of appropriately implementing the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Trial registration: This is a cross-sectional analysis of a non-interventional study. Therefore, it was not registered as an interventional trial.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{YurdadoganMalschKotsevaetal.2021,
  author    = {Yurdadogan, Tino and Malsch, Carolin and Kotseva, Kornelia and Wood, David and Leyh, Rainer and Ertl, Georg and Karmann, Wolfgang and M{\"u}ller-Scholden, Lara and Morbach, Caroline and Breuning, Margret and Wagner, Martin and Gelbrich, G{\"o}tz and Bots, Michiel L. and Heuschmann, Peter U. and St{\"o}rk, Stefan},
  title     = {Functional versus morphological assessment of vascular age in patients with coronary heart disease},
  series = {Scientific Reports},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Scientific Reports},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41598-021-96998-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265810},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Communicating cardiovascular risk based on individual vascular age (VA) is a well acknowledged concept in patient education and disease prevention. VA may be derived functionally, e.g. by measurement of pulse wave velocity (PWV), or morphologically, e.g. by assessment of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether both approaches produce similar results. Within the context of the German subset of the EUROASPIRE IV survey, 501 patients with coronary heart disease underwent (a) oscillometric PWV measurement at the aortic, carotid-femoral and brachial-ankle site (PWVao, PWVcf, PWVba) and derivation of the aortic augmentation index (AIao); (b) bilateral cIMT assessment by high-resolution ultrasound at three sites (common, bulb, internal). Respective VA was calculated using published equations. According to VA derived from PWV, most patients exhibited values below chronological age indicating a counterintuitive healthier-than-anticipated vascular status: for VA(PWVao) in 68\% of patients; for VA\(_{AIao}\) in 52\% of patients. By contrast, VA derived from cIMT delivered opposite results: e.g. according to VA\(_{total-cIMT}\) accelerated vascular aging in 75\% of patients. To strengthen the concept of VA, further efforts are needed to better standardise the current approaches to estimate VA and, thereby, to improve comparability and clinical utility.},
  language  = {en}
}