@article{WunschPfisterHenningetal.2016,
  author    = {Wunsch, Kathrin and Pfister, Roland and Henning, Anne and Aschersleben, Gisa and Weigelt, Matthias},
  title     = {No Interrelation of Motor Planning and Executive Functions across Young Ages},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  number    = {1031},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01031},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-165281},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The present study examined the developmental trajectories of motor planning and executive functioning in children. To this end, we tested 217 participants with three motor tasks, measuring anticipatory planning abilities (i.e., the bar-transport-task, the sword-rotation-task and the grasp-height-task), and three cognitive tasks, measuring executive functions (i.e., the Tower-of-Hanoi-task, the Mosaic-task, and the D2-attention-endurance-task). Children were aged between 3 and 10 years and were separated into age groups by 1-year bins, resulting in a total of eight groups of children and an additional group of adults. Results suggested (1) a positive developmental trajectory for each of the sub-tests, with better task performance as children get older; (2) that the performance in the separate tasks was not correlated across participants in the different age groups; and (3) that there was no relationship between performance in the motor tasks and in the cognitive tasks used in the present study when controlling for age. These results suggest that both, motor planning and executive functions are rather heterogeneous domains of cognitive functioning with fewer interdependencies than often suggested.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GueldenpenningKoesterKundeetal.2011,
  author    = {G{\"u}ldenpenning, Iris and Koester, Dirk and Kunde, Wilfried and Weigelt, Matthias and Schack, Thomas},
  title     = {Motor expertise modulates the unconscious processing of human body postures},
  series = {Experimental Brain Research},
  volume    = {213},
  journal   = {Experimental Brain Research},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00221-011-2788-7},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-141089},
  pages     = {383-391},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Little is known about the cognitive background of unconscious visuomotor control of complex sports movements. Therefore, we investigated the extent to which novices and skilled high-jump athletes are able to identify visually presented body postures of the high jump unconsciously. We also asked whether or not the manner of processing differs (qualitatively or quantitatively) between these groups as a function of their motor expertise. A priming experiment with not consciously perceivable stimuli was designed to determine whether subliminal priming of movement phases (same vs. different movement phases) or temporal order (i.e. natural vs. reversed movement order) affects target processing. Participants had to decide which phase of the high jump (approach vs. flight phase) a target photograph was taken from. We found a main effect of temporal order for skilled athletes, that is, faster reaction times for prime-target pairs that reflected the natural movement order as opposed to the reversed movement order. This result indicates that temporal-order information pertaining to the domain of expertise plays a critical role in athletes' perceptual capacities. For novices, data analyses revealed an interaction between temporal order and movement phases. That is, only the reversed movement order of flight-approach pictures increased processing time. Taken together, the results suggest that the structure of cognitive movement representation modulates unconscious processing of movement pictures and points to a functional role of motor representations in visual perception.},
  language  = {en}
}