@article{MertensAndriesKurzetal.2022,
  author    = {Mertens, Griet and Andries, Ellen and Kurz, Anja and Tȧvora-Vieira, Dayse and Calvino, Miryam and Amann, Edda and Anderson, Ilona and Lorens, Artur},
  title     = {Towards a consensus on an ICF-based classification system for horizontal sound-source localization},
  series = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Journal of Personalized Medicine},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {2075-4426},
  doi       = {10.3390/jpm12121971},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-297319},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The study aimed to develop a consensus classification system for the reporting of sound localization testing results, especially in the field of cochlear implantation. Against the background of an overview of the wide variations present in localization testing procedures and reporting metrics, a novel classification system was proposed to report localization errors according to the widely accepted International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. The obtained HEARRING_LOC_ICF scale includes the ICF graded scale: 0 (no impairment), 1 (mild impairment), 2 (moderate impairment), 3 (severe impairment), and 4 (complete impairment). Improvement of comparability of localization results across institutes, localization testing setups, and listeners was demonstrated by applying the classification system retrospectively to data obtained from cohorts of normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners at our institutes. The application of our classification system will help to facilitate multi-center studies, as well as allowing better meta-analyses of data, resulting in improved evidence-based practice in the field.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RajeswaranTavoraVieiraMertensetal.2022,
  author    = {Rajeswaran, Ranjith and Tavora-Vieira, Dayse and Mertens, Griet and Dillon, Margaret and Narayan, Saranya and Kameswaran, Mohan and Kurz, Anja},
  title     = {Audiological practice and COVID-19: recommendations that audiological centers can use to maintain the safety and quality of service-expert opinion},
  series = {European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology},
  volume    = {279},
  journal   = {European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology},
  number    = {3},
  issn      = {1434-4726},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00405-021-06766-w},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-266774},
  pages     = {1251-1256},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose Audiology is an essential service for some patient groups and some interventions. This article sets forth experience-based recommendations for how audiological centers can continue to safely and effectively function during COVID-19. Methods The recommendations are the result of panel discussion and are based on the clinical experience of the panelists/authors. Results The recommendations cover which patient groups and which interventions should be treated when and whether this can be performed in the clinic or remotely; how to maintain the safety of workplace via optimizing patient flow within the clinic and the sanitation of rooms and equipment; and overcoming communication challenges that COVID-19 intensifies. Conclusion For essential audiological services to continue under COVID-19, safety measures must be implemented and maintained, and treatment and communication strategies must be adapted to offset communication difficulties due to personal protective equipment (PPE) and social distancing and to bolster patient confidence. In short, it is vital that staff feel safe, that patients either feel the clinic is safe enough to visit or that remote treatment may be an option, and that clinics and patients have a broad agreement on the urgency of any needed service. We hope that these recommendations help clinics effectively accomplish these goals.},
  language  = {en}
}