@article{DewulfDietzMontgomeryetal.2022,
  author    = {Dewulf, Maxime and Dietz, Ulrich A. and Montgomery, Agneta and Pauli, Eric M. and Marturano, Matthew N. and Ayuso, Sullivan A. and Augenstein, Vedra A. and Lambrecht, Jan R. and K{\"o}hler, Gernot and Keller, Nicola and Wiegering, Armin and Muysoms, Filip},
  title     = {Robotic hernia surgery IV. English version},
  series = {Chirurgie},
  volume    = {93},
  journal   = {Chirurgie},
  number    = {Suppl 2},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-022-01779-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323875},
  pages     = {S129-S140},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The surgical treatment of parastomal hernias is considered complex and is known to be prone to complications. Traditionally, this condition was treated using relocation techniques or local suture repairs. Since then, several mesh-based techniques have been proposed and are nowadays used in minimally invasive surgery. Since the introduction of robot-assisted surgery to the field of abdominal wall surgery, several adaptations to these techniques have been made, which may significantly improve patient outcomes. In this contribution, we provide an overview of available techniques in robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair. Technical considerations and preliminary results of robot-assisted modified Sugarbaker repair, robot-assisted Pauli technique, and minimally invasive use of a funnel-shaped mesh in the treatment of parastomal hernias are presented. Furthermore, challenges in robot-assisted ileal conduit parastomal hernia repair are discussed. These techniques are illustrated by photographic and video material. Besides providing a comprehensive overview of robot-assisted parastomal hernia repair, this article focuses on the specific advantages of robot-assisted techniques in the treatment of this condition.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BaurRamserKelleretal.2021,
  author    = {Baur, Johannes and Ramser, Michaela and Keller, Nicola and Muysoms, Filip and D{\"o}rfer, J{\"o}rg and Wiegering, Armin and Eisner, Lukas and Dietz, Ulrich A.},
  title     = {Robotic hernia repair II. English version},
  series = {Der Chirurg},
  volume    = {92},
  journal   = {Der Chirurg},
  number    = {Suppl 1},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00104-021-01479-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-323866},
  pages     = {S15-S26},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Endoscopic management of umbilical and incisional hernias has adapted to the limitations of conventional laparoscopic instruments over the past 30 years. This includes the development of meshes for intraperitoneal placement (intraperitoneal onlay mesh, IPOM), with antiadhesive coatings; however, adhesions do occur in a significant proportion of these patients. Minimally invasive procedures result in fewer perioperative complications, but with a slightly higher recurrence rate. With the ergonomic resources of robotics, which offers angled instruments, it is now possible to implant meshes in a minimally invasively manner in different abdominal wall layers while achieving morphologic and functional reconstruction of the abdominal wall. This video article presents the treatment of ventral and incisional hernias with mesh implantation into the preperitoneal space (robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal ventral hernia repair, r‑ventral TAPP) as well as into the retrorectus space (r-Rives and robotic transabdominal retromuscular umbilical prosthetic repair, r‑TARUP, respectively). The results of a cohort study of 118 consecutive patients are presented and discussed with regard to the added value of the robotic technique in extraperitoneal mesh implantation and in the training of residents.},
  language  = {en}
}