@article{BittnerBingenerCaseyDietzetal.2014,
  author    = {Bittner, R. and Bingener-Casey, J. and Dietz, U. and Fabian, M. and Ferzli, G. S. and Fortelny, R. H. and K{\"o}ckerling, F. and Kukleta, J. and LeBlanc, K. and Lomanto, D. and Misra, M. C. and Morales-Conde, S. and Ramshaw, B. and Reinpold, W. and Rim, S. and Rohr, M. and Schrittwieser, R. and Simon, T. and Smietanski, M. and Stechemesser, B. and Timoney, M. and Chowbey, P.},
  title     = {Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society [IEHS])—Part 2},
  series = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  number    = {2},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00464-013-3171-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121510},
  pages     = {353 - 379},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Guidelines are increasingly determining the decision process in day-to-day clinical work. Guidelines describe the current best possible standard in diagnostics and therapy. They should be developed by an international panel of experts, whereby alongside individual experience, above all, the results of comparative studies are decisive. According to the results of high-ranking scientific studies published in peer-reviewed journals, statements and recommendations are formulated, and these are graded strictly according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine. Guidelines can therefore be valuable in helping particularly the young surgeon in his or her day-to-day work to find the best decision for the patient when confronted with a wide and confusing range of options. However, even experienced surgeons benefit because by virtue of a heavy workload and commitment, they often find it difficult to keep up with the ever-increasing published literature. All guidelines require regular updating, usually every 3 years, in line with progress in the field. The current Guidelines focus on technique and perioperative management of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and constitute the first comprehensive guidelines on this topic. In this issue of Surgical Endoscopy, the first part of the Guidelines is published including sections on basics, indication for surgery, perioperative management, and key points of technique. The next part (Part 2) of the Guidelines will address complications and comparisons between open and laparoscopic techniques. Part 3 will cover mesh technology, hernia prophylaxis, technique-related issues, new technologic developments, lumbar and other unusual hernias, and training/education.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BittnerBingenerCaseyDietzetal.2014,
  author    = {Bittner, R. and Bingener-Casey, J. and Dietz, U. and Fabian, M. and Ferzli, G. S. and Fortelny, R. H. and K{\"o}ckerling, F. and Kukleta, J. and LeBlanc, K. and Lomanto, D. and Misra, M. C. and Bansal, V. K. and Morales-Conde, S. and Ramshaw, B. and Reinpold, W. and Rim, S. and Rohr, M. and Schrittwieser, R. and Simon, T. and Smietanski, M. and Stechemesser, B. and Timoney, M. and Chowbey, P.},
  title     = {Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)—Part 1},
  series = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Surgical Endoscopy},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-121294},
  pages     = {2-29},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Guidelines are increasingly determining the decision process in day-to-day clinical work. Guidelines describe the current best possible standard in diagnostics and therapy. They should be developed by an international panel of experts, whereby alongside individual experience, above all, the results of comparative studies are decisive. According to the results of high-ranking scientific studies published in peer-reviewed journals, statements and recommendations are formulated, and these are graded strictly according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine. Guidelines can therefore be valuable in helping particularly the young surgeon in his or her day-to-day work to find the best decision for the patient when confronted with a wide and confusing range of options. However, even experienced surgeons benefit because by virtue of a heavy workload and commitment, they often find it difficult to keep up with the ever-increasing published literature. All guidelines require regular updating, usually every 3 years, in line with progress in the field. The current Guidelines focus on technique and perioperative management of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair and constitute the first comprehensive guidelines on this topic. In this issue of Surgical Endoscopy, the first part of the Guidelines is published including sections on basics, indication for surgery, perioperative management, and key points of technique. The next part (Part 2) of the Guidelines will address complications and comparisons between open and laparoscopic techniques. Part 3 will cover mesh technology, hernia prophylaxis, technique-related issues, new technologic developments, lumbar and other unusual hernias, and training/education.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WillmsSchwabvonWebskyetal.2022,
  author    = {Willms, A. G. and Schwab, R. and von Websky, M. W. and Berrevoet, F. and Tartaglia, D. and S{\"o}relius, K. and Fortelny, R. H. and Bj{\"o}rck, M. and Monchal, T. and Brennfleck, F. and Bulian, D. and Beltzer, C. and Germer, C. T. and Lock, J. F.},
  title     = {Factors influencing the fascial closure rate after open abdomen treatment: Results from the European Hernia Society (EuraHS) Registry. Surgical technique matters},
  series = {Hernia},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {Hernia},
  number    = {1},
  organization    = {EURAHS Open Abdomen Group},
  issn      = {1265-4906},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10029-020-02336-x},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234871},
  pages     = {61-73},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Purpose Definitive fascial closure is an essential treatment objective after open abdomen treatment and mitigates morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of evidence on factors that promote or prevent definitive fascial closure. Methods A multi-center multivariable analysis of data from the Open Abdomen Route of the European Hernia Society included all cases between 1 May 2015 and 31 December 2019. Different treatment elements, i.e. the use of a visceral protective layer, negative-pressure wound therapy and dynamic closure techniques, as well as patient characteristics were included in the multivariable analysis. The study was registered in the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform via the German Registry for Clinical Trials (DRK00021719). Results Data were included from 630 patients from eleven surgical departments in six European countries. Indications for OAT were peritonitis (46\%), abdominal compartment syndrome (20.5\%), burst abdomen (11.3\%), abdominal trauma (9\%), and other conditions (13.2\%). The overall definitive fascial closure rate was 57.5\% in the intention-to-treat analysis and 71\% in the per-protocol analysis. The multivariable analysis showed a positive correlation of negative-pressure wound therapy (odds ratio: 2.496, p < 0.001) and dynamic closure techniques (odds ratio: 2.687, p < 0.001) with fascial closure and a negative correlation of intra-abdominal contamination (odds ratio: 0.630, p = 0.029) and the number of surgical procedures before OAT (odds ratio: 0.740, p = 0.005) with DFC. Conclusion The clinical course and prognosis of open abdomen treatment can significantly be improved by the use of treatment elements such as negative-pressure wound therapy and dynamic closure techniques, which are associated with definitive fascial closure.},
  language  = {en}
}