@article{BaurRitterGermeretal.2016, author = {Baur, Johannes and Ritter, Christian O. and Germer, Christoph-Thomas and Klein, Ingo and Kickuth, Ralph and Steger, Ulrich}, title = {Transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma}, series = {Hepatic Medicine}, volume = {2016}, journal = {Hepatic Medicine}, number = {8}, doi = {10.2147/HMER.S105395}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-146553}, pages = {69-74}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Purpose: In hepatocellular carcinoma patients with large or multinodal tumors, where curative treatment options are not feasible, transarterial therapies play a major role. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) is a promising new approach due to higher intratumoral and lower systemic concentration of the chemotherapeutic agent compared to conventional TACE (cTACE). Patients and methods: In a retrospective analysis, 32 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who received either DEB or a cTACE were compared regarding survival time, disease recurrence, and side effects such as pain and fever. Results: No significant differences could be detected between the cTACE and DEB-TACE groups with regard to mean hospital stay, appearance of postinterventional fever, or 30-day mortality. However, the application of intravenous analgesics as postinterventional pain medication was needed more often in patients treated with DEB-TACE (57.1\% vs 12.5\%, P=0.0281). The overall median survival after the initial procedure was 10.8 months in the cTACE group and 9.2 months in the DEB-TACE group, showing no significant difference. Conclusion: No survival benefit for patients treated with either DEB-TACE or cTACE was observed. Surprisingly, a higher rate of postinterventional pain could be detected after DEB-TACE.}, language = {en} } @article{BaurSchedelbeckPulzeretal.2015, author = {Baur, Johannes and Schedelbeck, Ulla and Pulzer, Alina and Bluemel, Christina and Wild, Vanessa and Fassnacht, Martin and Steger, U.}, title = {A case report of a solitary pancreatic metastasis of an adrenocortical carcinoma}, series = {BMC Surgery}, volume = {15}, journal = {BMC Surgery}, number = {93}, doi = {10.1186/s12893-015-0076-3}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-126130}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Background Solitary metastases to the pancreas are rare. Therefore the value of resection in curative intention remains unclear. In the literature there are several promising reports about resection of solitary metastasis to the pancreas mainly of renal origin. Case presentation Here we report for the first time on the surgical therapy of a 1.5 cm solitary pancreatic metastasis of an adrenocortical carcinoma. The metastasis occurred almost 6 years after resection of the primary tumor. A partial pancreatoduodenectomy was performed and postoperatively adjuvant mitotane treatment was initiated. During the follow-up of 3 years after surgery no evidence of tumor recurrence occurred. Conclusion Resection of pancreatic tumors should be considered, even if the mass is suspicious for metastatic disease including recurrence of adrenocortical cancer.}, language = {en} }