@article{LukasczikGerlichSchuleretal.2015, author = {Lukasczik, Matthias and Gerlich, Christian and Schuler, Michael and Neuderth, Silke and Dlugosch, Gabriele and Faller, Hermann}, title = {Stress and resources in women attending an inpatient prevention/rehabilitation measure for parents: Secondary analysis of quality assurance data}, series = {Open Journal of Medical Psychology}, volume = {4}, journal = {Open Journal of Medical Psychology}, doi = {10.4236/ojmp.2015.42003}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-125316}, pages = {23-34}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Questionnaire data from two projects on the development of quality assurance instruments for an inpatient rehabilitation/prevention program for parents were used for a secondary analysis. In this analysis, the associations of gains in a psychosocial resource (parenting self-efficacy) and two types of stressors experienced by mothers at the start of treatment (parenting hassles, depressive symptoms) with general life satisfaction and satisfaction with health at the end of treatment were explored. Structural equation modeling was applied to data from N = 1724 female patients. Potential resource-stressor interactions were tested using the Latent Moderated Structural Equations approach. Results showed that parenting hassles were negatively associated with general life satisfaction and satisfaction with health while self-efficacy gains were weakly positively correlated with both variables. No interaction of parenting hassles and self-efficacy gains was found. Depressive symptoms were negatively associated with both satisfaction measures. In these models, self-efficacy gains were not substantially correlated with life satisfaction, but showed a small association with satisfaction with health. There was no significant interaction of depressive symptoms and self-efficacy gains. The findings imply that interventions for distressed mothers—as exemplarily illustrated by this inpatient setting—should focus on identifying and reducing initial stressors as these may continue to impair mothers' subjective health despite gains in parenting-related resources.}, language = {en} } @article{LukasczikGerlichWolfetal.2020, author = {Lukasczik, Matthias and Gerlich, Christian and Wolf, Hans Dieter and Vogel, Heiner}, title = {Beyond oncology: question prompt lists in healthcare — A scoping review protocol}, series = {Methods and Protocols}, volume = {3}, journal = {Methods and Protocols}, number = {1}, issn = {2409-9279}, doi = {10.3390/mps3010009}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200832}, pages = {9}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Question prompt lists (QPL) are an instrument to promote patient participation in medical encounters by providing a set of questions patients can use during consultations. QPL have predominantly been examined in oncology. Less is known about their use in other contexts. Therefore, we plan to conduct a scoping review to provide an overview of the fields of healthcare in which QPL have been developed and evaluated. MEDLINE/PUBMED, PSYCINFO, PSYNDEX, WEB OF SCIENCE, and CINAHL will be systematically searched. Primary studies from different healthcare contexts that address the following participants/target groups will be included: persons with an acute, chronic, or recurring health condition other than cancer; healthy persons in non-oncological primary preventive measures. There will be no restrictions in terms of study design, sample size, or outcomes. However, only published studies will be included. Studies that were published in English and German between 1990 and 2019 will be examined. Two independent reviewers will apply defined inclusion/exclusion criteria and determine study eligibility in the review process guided by the PRISMA statement.}, language = {en} } @article{LukasczikWolfGerlichetal.2016, author = {Lukasczik, Matthias and Wolf, Hans-Dieter and Gerlich, Christian and K{\"u}ffner, Roland and Vogel, Heiner and Neuderth, Silke}, title = {Addressing Work-Related Issues in Medical Rehabilitation: Revision of an Online Information Tool for Healthcare Professionals}, series = {Rehabilitation Research and Practice}, volume = {2016}, journal = {Rehabilitation Research and Practice}, doi = {10.1155/2016/7621690}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-146911}, pages = {7621690}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Background. Medical rehabilitation increasingly considers occupational issues as determinants of health and work ability. Information on work-related rehabilitation concepts should therefore be made available to healthcare professionals. Objective. To revise a website providing healthcare professionals in medical rehabilitation facilities with information on work-related concepts in terms of updating existing information and including new topics, based on recommendations from implementation research. Method. The modification process included a questionnaire survey of medical rehabilitation centers (n=28); two workshops with experts from rehabilitation centers, health payers, and research institutions (n=14); the selection of new topics and revision of existing text modules based on expert consensus; and an update of good practice descriptions of work-related measures. Results. Health payers' requirements, workplace descriptions, and practical implementation aids were added as new topics. The database of good practice examples was extended to 63 descriptions. Information on introductory concepts was rewritten and supplemented by current data. Diagnostic tools were updated by including additional assessments. Conclusions. Recommendations from implementation research such as assessing user needs and including expert knowledge may serve as a useful starting point for the dissemination of information on work-related medical rehabilitation into practice. Web-based information tools such as the website presented here can be quickly adapted to current evidence and changes in medicolegal regulations.}, language = {en} }