@article{TrudzinskiMinkoRappetal.2016,
  author    = {Trudzinski, Franziska C. and Minko, Peter and Rapp, Daniel and F{\"a}hndrich, Sebastian and Haake, Hendrik and Haab, Myriam and Bohle, Rainer M. and Flaig, Monika and Kaestner, Franziska and Bals, Robert and Wilkens, Heinrike and Muellenbach, Ralf M. and Link, Andreas and Groesdonk, Heinrich V. and Lensch, Christian and Langer, Frank and Lepper, Philipp M.},
  title     = {Runtime and aPTT predict venous thrombosis and thromboembolism in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective analysis},
  series = {Annals of Intensive Care},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Annals of Intensive Care},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13613-016-0172-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-164455},
  pages     = {66},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background Even though bleeding and thromboembolic events are major complications of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), data on the incidence of venous thrombosis (VT) and thromboembolism (VTE) under ECMO are scarce. This study analyzes the incidence and predictors of VTE in patients treated with ECMO due to respiratory failure. Methods Retrospective analysis of patients treated on ECMO in our center from 04/2010 to 11/2015. Patients with thromboembolic events prior to admission were excluded. Diagnosis was made by imaging in survivors and postmortem examination in deceased patients. Results Out of 102 screened cases, 42 survivors and 21 autopsy cases [mean age 46.0 ± 14.4 years; 37 (58.7 \%) males] fulfilling the above-mentioned criteria were included. Thirty-four patients (54.0 \%) underwent ECMO therapy due to ARDS, and 29 patients (46.0 \%) with chronic organ failure were bridged to lung transplantation. Despite systemic anticoagulation at a mean PTT of 50.6 ± 12.8 s, [VT/VTE 47.0 ± 12.3 s and no VT/VTE 53.63 ± 12.51 s (p = 0.037)], VT and/or VTE was observed in 29 cases (46.1 \%). The rate of V. cava thrombosis was 15/29 (51.7 \%). Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism prevailed in deceased patients [5/21 (23.8 \%) vs. 2/42 (4.8 \%) (p = 0.036)]. In a multivariable analysis, only aPTT and time on ECMO predicted VT/VTE. There was no difference in the incidence of clinically diagnosed VT in ECMO survivors and autopsy findings. Conclusions Venous thrombosis and thromboembolism following ECMO therapy are frequent. Quality of anticoagulation and ECMO runtime predicted thromboembolic events. "},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HeldHesseGoettetal.2014,
  author    = {Held, Matthias and Hesse, Alexander and G{\"o}tt, Franziska and Holl, Regina and H{\"u}bner, Gudrun and Kolb, Philipp and Langen, Heinz Jakob and Romen, Tobias and Walter, Franziska and Sch{\"a}fers, Hans Joachim and Wilkens, Heinrike and Jany, Berthold},
  title     = {A symptom-related monitoring program following pulmonary embolism for the early detection of CTEPH: a prospective observational registry study},
  series = {BMC Pulmonary Medicine},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {BMC Pulmonary Medicine},
  doi       = {10.1186/1471-2466-14-141},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-119281},
  pages     = {141},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Background Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a long-term complication following an acute pulmonary embolism (PE). It is frequently diagnosed at advanced stages which is concerning as delayed treatment has important implications for favourable clinical outcome. Performing a follow-up examination of patients diagnosed with acute PE regardless of persisting symptoms and using all available technical procedures would be both cost-intensive and possibly ineffective. Focusing diagnostic procedures therefore on only symptomatic patients may be a practical approach for detecting relevant CTEPH. This study aimed to evaluate if a follow-up program for patients with acute PE based on telephone monitoring of symptoms and further examination of only symptomatic patients could detect CTEPH. In addition, we investigated the role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) as a diagnostic tool. Methods In a prospective cohort study all consecutive patients with newly diagnosed PE (n=170, 76 males, 94 females within 26 months) were recruited according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were contacted via telephone and asked to answer standardized questions relating to symptoms. At the time of the final analysis 130 patients had been contacted. Symptomatic patients underwent a structured evaluation with echocardiography, CPET and complete work-up for CTEPH. Results 37.7\%, 25.5\% and 29.3\% of the patients reported symptoms after three, six, and twelve months respectively. Subsequent clinical evaluation of these symptomatic patients saw 20.4\%, 11.5\% and 18.8\% of patients at the respective three, six and twelve months time points having an echocardiography suggesting pulmonary hypertension (PH). CTEPH with pathological imaging and a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥ 25 mm Hg at rest was confirmed in eight subjects. Three subjects with mismatch perfusion defects showed an exercise induced increase of PAP without increasing pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP). Two subjects with pulmonary hypertension at rest and one with an exercise induced increase of mPAP with normal PAOP showed perfusion defects without echocardiographic signs of PH but a suspicious CPET. Conclusion A follow-up program based on telephone monitoring of symptoms and further structured evaluation of symptomatic subjects can detect patients with CTEPH. CPET may serve as a complementary diagnostic tool.},
  language  = {en}
}