@article{HagemannNeuhausDahlmannetal.2019,
  author    = {Hagemann, Carsten and Neuhaus, Nikolas and Dahlmann, Mathias and Kessler, Almuth F. and Kobelt, Dennis and Herrmann, Pia and Eyrich, Matthias and Freitag, Benjamin and Linsenmann, Thomas and Monoranu, Camelia M. and Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo and L{\"o}hr, Mario and Stein, Ulrike},
  title     = {Circulating MACC1 transcripts in glioblastoma patients predict prognosis and treatment response},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers11060825},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-197327},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Glioblastoma multiforme is the most aggressive primary brain tumor of adults, but lacksreliable and liquid biomarkers. We evaluated circulating plasma transcripts of metastasis-associatedin colon cancer-1 (MACC1), a prognostic biomarker for solid cancer entities, for prediction of clinicaloutcome and therapy response in glioblastomas. MACC1 transcripts were significantly higher inpatients compared to controls. Low MACC1 levels clustered together with other prognosticallyfavorable markers. It was associated with patients' prognosis in conjunction with the isocitratedehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status: IDH1 R132H mutation and low MACC1 was most favorable(median overall survival (OS) not yet reached), IDH1 wildtype and high MACC1 was worst (medianOS 8.1 months), while IDH1 wildtype and low MACC1 was intermediate (median OS 9.1 months).No patients displayed IDH1 R132H mutation and high MACC1. Patients with low MACC1 levelsreceiving standard therapy survived longer (median OS 22.6 months) than patients with high MACC1levels (median OS 8.1 months). Patients not receiving the standard regimen showed the worstprognosis, independent of MACC1 levels (low: 6.8 months, high: 4.4 months). Addition of circulatingMACC1 transcript levels to the existing prognostic workup may improve the accuracy of outcomeprediction and help define more precise risk categories of glioblastoma patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FeldheimKesslerMonoranuetal.2019,
  author    = {Feldheim, Jonas and Kessler, Almuth F. and Monoranu, Camelia M. and Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo and L{\"o}hr, Mario and Hagemann, Carsten},
  title     = {Changes of O\(^6\)-Methylguanine DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation in glioblastoma relapse—a meta-analysis type literature review},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {12},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers11121837},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-193040},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Methylation of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter has emerged as strong prognostic factor in the therapy of glioblastoma multiforme. It is associated with an improved response to chemotherapy with temozolomide and longer overall survival. MGMT promoter methylation has implications for the clinical course of patients. In recent years, there have been observations of patients changing their MGMT promoter methylation from primary tumor to relapse. Still, data on this topic are scarce. Studies often consist of only few patients and provide rather contrasting results, making it hard to draw a clear conclusion on clinical implications. Here, we summarize the previous publications on this topic, add new cases of changing MGMT status in relapse and finally combine all reports of more than ten patients in a statistical analysis based on the Wilson score interval. MGMT promoter methylation changes are seen in 115 of 476 analyzed patients (24\%; CI: 0.21-0.28). We discuss potential reasons like technical issues, intratumoral heterogeneity and selective pressure of therapy. The clinical implications are still ambiguous and do not yet support a change in clinical practice. However, retesting MGMT methylation might be useful for future treatment decisions and we encourage clinical studies to address this topic},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LinsenmannMonoranuAlkonyietal.2019,
  author    = {Linsenmann, Thomas and Monoranu, Camelia M. and Alkonyi, Balint and Westermaier, Thomas and Hagemann, Carsten and Kessler, Almuth F. and Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo and L{\"o}hr, Mario},
  title     = {Cerebellar liponeurocytoma - molecular signature of a rare entity and the importance of an accurate diagnosis},
  series = {Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.inat.2018.10.017},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177652},
  pages     = {7-11},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background: Cerebellar liponeurocytoma is an extremely rare tumour entity of the central nervous system. It is histologically characterised by prominent neuronal/neurocytic differentiation with focal lipidisation and corresponding histologically to WHO grade II. It typically develops in adults, and usually shows a low proliferative potential. Recurrences have been reported in almost 50\% of cases, and in some cases the recurrent tumour may display increased mitotic activity and proliferation index, vascular proliferations and necrosis. Thus pathological diagnosis of liponeurocytoma is challenging. This case presentation highlights the main clinical, radiographic and pathological features of a cerebellar liponeurocytoma. Case presentation: A 59-year-old, right-handed woman presented at our department with a short history of persistent headache, vertigo and gait disturbances. Examination at presentation revealed that the patient was awake, alert and fully oriented. The cranial nerve status was normal. Uncertainties were noted in the bilateral finger-to-nose testing with bradydiadochokinesis on both sides. Strength was full and no pronator drift was observed. Sensation was intact. No signs of pyramidal tract dysfunction were detected. Her gait appeared insecure. The patient underwent surgical resection. Afterward no further disturbances could be detected. Conclusions: To date >40 cases of liponeurocytoma have been reported, including cases with supratentorial location. A review of the 5 published cases of recurrent cerebellar. Liponeurocytoma revealed that the median interval between the first and second relapse was rather short, indicating uncertain malignant potential. The most recent WHO classification of brain tumours (2016) classifies the cerebellar liponeurocytoma as a separate entity and assigns the tumour to WHO grade II. Medulloblastoma is the most important differential diagnosis commonly seen in children and young adults. In contrast, cerebellar liponeurocytoma is typically diagnosed in adults. The importance of accurate diagnosis should not be underestimated especially in the view of possible further therapeutic interventions and for the determination of the patient's prognosis.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BreunMonoranuKessleretal.2019,
  author    = {Breun, Maria and Monoranu, Camelia M. and Kessler, Almuth F. and Matthies, Cordula and L{\"o}hr, Mario and Hagemann, Carsten and Schirbel, Andreas and Rowe, Steven P. and Pomper, Martin G. and Buck, Andreas K. and Wester, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Ernestus, Ralf-Ingo and Lapa, Constantin},
  title     = {[\(^{68}\)Ga]-Pentixafor PET/CT for CXCR4-mediated imaging of vestibular schwannomas},
  series = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Oncology},
  number    = {503},
  doi       = {10.3389/fonc.2019.00503},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-201863},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {We have recently demonstrated CXCR4 overexpression in vestibular schwannomas (VS). This study investigated the feasibility of CXCR4-directed positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging of VS using the radiolabeled chemokine ligand [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor. Methods: 4 patients with 6 primarily diagnosed or pre-treated/observed VS were enrolled. All subjects underwent [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT prior to surgical resection. Images were analyzed visually and semi-quantitatively for CXCR4 expression including calculation of tumor-to-background ratios (TBR). Immunohistochemistry served as standard of reference in three patients. Results: [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT was visually positive in all cases. SUV\(_{mean}\) and SUV\(_{max}\) were 3.0 ± 0.3 and 3.8 ± 0.4 and TBR\(_{mean}\) and TBR\(_{max}\) were 4.0 ± 1.4 and 5.0 ± 1.7, respectively. Histological analysis confirmed CXCR4 expression in tumors. Conclusion: Non-invasive imaging of CXCR4 expression using [\(^{68}\)Ga]Pentixafor PET/CT of VS is feasible and could prove useful for in vivo assessment of CXCR4 expression.},
  language  = {en}
}