@article{AverdunkBernhagenFehnleetal.2020, author = {Averdunk, Luisa and Bernhagen, J{\"u}rgen and Fehnle, Karl and Surowy, Harald and L{\"u}decke, Hermann-Josef and Mucha, S{\"o}ren and Meybohm, Patrick and Wieczorek, Dagmar and Leng, Lin and Marx, Gernot and Leaf, David E. and Zarbock, Alexander and Zacharowski, Kai and Bucala, Richard and Stoppe, Christian}, title = {The Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) promoter polymorphisms (rs3063368, rs755622) predict acute kidney injury and death after cardiac surgery}, series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, volume = {9}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, number = {9}, issn = {2077-0383}, doi = {10.3390/jcm9092936}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-213126}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background: Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) is highly elevated after cardiac surgery and impacts the postoperative inflammation. The aim of this study was to analyze whether the polymorphisms CATT\(_{5-7}\) (rs5844572/rs3063368,"-794") and G>C single-nucleotide polymorphism (rs755622,-173) in the MIF gene promoter are related to postoperative outcome. Methods: In 1116 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the MIF gene polymorphisms were analyzed and serum MIF was measured by ELISA in 100 patients. Results: Patients with at least one extended repeat allele (CATT\(_7\)) had a significantly higher risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to others (23\% vs. 13\%; OR 2.01 (1.40-2.88), p = 0.0001). Carriers of CATT\(_7\) were also at higher risk of death (1.8\% vs. 0.4\%; OR 5.12 (0.99-33.14), p = 0.026). The GC genotype was associated with AKI (20\% vs. GG/CC:13\%, OR 1.71 (1.20-2.43), p = 0.003). Multivariate analyses identified CATT\(_7\) predictive for AKI (OR 2.13 (1.46-3.09), p < 0.001) and death (OR 5.58 (1.29-24.04), p = 0.021). CATT\(_7\) was associated with higher serum MIF before surgery (79.2 vs. 50.4 ng/mL, p = 0.008). Conclusion: The CATT\(_7\) allele associates with a higher risk of AKI and death after cardiac surgery, which might be related to chronically elevated serum MIF. Polymorphisms in the MIF gene may constitute a predisposition for postoperative complications and the assessment may improve risk stratification and therapeutic guidance.}, language = {en} } @article{BergauerAkbasBraunetal.2023, author = {Bergauer, Lisa and Akbas, Samira and Braun, Julia and Ganter, Michael T. and Meybohm, Patrick and Hottenrott, Sebastian and Zacharowski, Kai and Raimann, Florian J. and Rivas, Eva and L{\´o}pez-Baamonde, Manuel and Spahn, Donat R. and Noethiger, Christoph B. and Tscholl, David W. and Roche, Tadzio R.}, title = {Visual Blood, visualisation of blood gas analysis in virtual reality, leads to more correct diagnoses: a computer-based, multicentre, simulation study}, series = {Bioengineering}, volume = {10}, journal = {Bioengineering}, number = {3}, issn = {2306-5354}, doi = {10.3390/bioengineering10030340}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-310979}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Interpreting blood gas analysis results can be challenging for the clinician, especially in stressful situations under time pressure. To foster fast and correct interpretation of blood gas results, we developed Visual Blood. This computer-based, multicentre, noninferiority study compared Visual Blood and conventional arterial blood gas (ABG) printouts. We presented six scenarios to anaesthesiologists, once with Visual Blood and once with the conventional ABG printout. The primary outcome was ABG parameter perception. The secondary outcomes included correct clinical diagnoses, perceived diagnostic confidence, and perceived workload. To analyse the results, we used mixed models and matched odds ratios. Analysing 300 within-subject cases, we showed noninferiority of Visual Blood compared to ABG printouts concerning the rate of correctly perceived ABG parameters (rate ratio, 0.96; 95\% CI, 0.92-1.00; p = 0.06). Additionally, the study revealed two times higher odds of making the correct clinical diagnosis using Visual Blood (OR, 2.16; 95\% CI, 1.42-3.29; p < 0.001) than using ABG printouts. There was no or, respectively, weak evidence for a difference in diagnostic confidence (OR, 0.84; 95\% CI, 0.58-1.21; p = 0.34) and perceived workload (Coefficient, 2.44; 95\% CI, -0.09-4.98; p = 0.06). This study showed that participants did not perceive the ABG parameters better, but using Visual Blood resulted in more correct clinical diagnoses than using conventional ABG printouts. This suggests that Visual Blood allows for a higher level of situation awareness beyond individual parameters' perception. However, the study also highlighted the limitations of today's virtual reality headsets and Visual Blood.}, language = {en} } @article{FischerThiesAwadetal.2022, author = {Fischer, Dania and Thies, Fabian and Awad, Omar and Brat, Camilla and Meybohm, Patrick and Baer, Patrick C. and M{\"u}ller, Markus M. and Urbschat, Anja and Maier, Thorsten J. and Zacharowski, Kai and Roos, Jessica}, title = {Red blood cell-derived microparticles exert no cancer promoting effects on colorectal cancer cells in vitro}, series = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences}, volume = {23}, journal = {International Journal of Molecular Sciences}, number = {16}, issn = {1422-0067}, doi = {10.3390/ijms23169323}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-286018}, year = {2022}, abstract = {The biomedical consequences of allogeneic blood transfusions and the possible pathomechanisms of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality are still not entirely understood. In retrospective studies, allogeneic transfusion was associated with increased rates of cancer recurrence, metastasis and death in patients with colorectal cancer. However, correlation does not imply causation. The purpose of this study was to elucidate this empirical observation further in order to address insecurity among patients and clinicians. We focused on the in vitro effect of microparticles derived from red blood cell units (RMPs). We incubated different colon carcinoma cells with RMPs and analyzed their effects on growth, invasion, migration and tumor marker expression. Furthermore, effects on Wnt, Akt and ERK signaling were explored. Our results show RMPs do not seem to affect functional and phenotypic characteristics of different colon carcinoma cells and did not induce or inhibit Wnt, Akt or ERK signaling, albeit in cell culture models lacking tumor microenvironment. Allogeneic blood transfusions are associated with poor prognosis, but RMPs do not seem to convey tumor-enhancing effects. Most likely, the circumstances that necessitate the transfusion, such as preoperative anemia, tumor stage, perioperative blood loss and extension of surgery, take center stage.}, language = {en} } @article{HenckertMalorgioSchweigeretal.2023, author = {Henckert, David and Malorgio, Amos and Schweiger, Giovanna and Raimann, Florian J. and Piekarski, Florian and Zacharowski, Kai and Hottenrott, Sebastian and Meybohm, Patrick and Tscholl, David W. and Spahn, Donat R. and Roche, Tadzio R.}, title = {Attitudes of anesthesiologists toward artificial intelligence in anesthesia: a multicenter, mixed qualitative-quantitative study}, series = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, volume = {12}, journal = {Journal of Clinical Medicine}, number = {6}, issn = {2077-0383}, doi = {10.3390/jcm12062096}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-311189}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Artificial intelligence (AI) is predicted to play an increasingly important role in perioperative medicine in the very near future. However, little is known about what anesthesiologists know and think about AI in this context. This is important because the successful introduction of new technologies depends on the understanding and cooperation of end users. We sought to investigate how much anesthesiologists know about AI and what they think about the introduction of AI-based technologies into the clinical setting. In order to better understand what anesthesiologists think of AI, we recruited 21 anesthesiologists from 2 university hospitals for face-to-face structured interviews. The interview transcripts were subdivided sentence-by-sentence into discrete statements, and statements were then grouped into key themes. Subsequently, a survey of closed questions based on these themes was sent to 70 anesthesiologists from 3 university hospitals for rating. In the interviews, the base level of knowledge of AI was good at 86 of 90 statements (96\%), although awareness of the potential applications of AI in anesthesia was poor at only 7 of 42 statements (17\%). Regarding the implementation of AI in anesthesia, statements were split roughly evenly between pros (46 of 105, 44\%) and cons (59 of 105, 56\%). Interviewees considered that AI could usefully be used in diverse tasks such as risk stratification, the prediction of vital sign changes, or as a treatment guide. The validity of these themes was probed in a follow-up survey of 70 anesthesiologists with a response rate of 70\%, which confirmed an overall positive view of AI in this group. Anesthesiologists hold a range of opinions, both positive and negative, regarding the application of AI in their field of work. Survey-based studies do not always uncover the full breadth of nuance of opinion amongst clinicians. Engagement with specific concerns, both technical and ethical, will prove important as this technology moves from research to the clinic.}, language = {en} } @article{HerrmannAdamNotzetal.2020, author = {Herrmann, Johannes and Adam, Elisabeth Hannah and Notz, Quirin and Helmer, Philipp and Sonntagbauer, Michael and Ungemach-Papenberg, Peter and Sanns, Andreas and Zausig, York and Steinfeldt, Thorsten and Torje, Iuliu and Schmid, Benedikt and Schlesinger, Tobias and Rolfes, Caroline and Reyher, Christian and Kredel, Markus and Stumpner, Jan and Brack, Alexander and Wurmb, Thomas and Gill-Schuster, Daniel and Kranke, Peter and Weismann, Dirk and Klinker, Hartwig and Heuschmann, Peter and R{\"u}cker, Viktoria and Frantz, Stefan and Ertl, Georg and Muellenbach, Ralf Michael and Mutlak, Haitham and Meybohm, Patrick and Zacharowski, Kai and Lotz, Christopher}, title = {COVID-19 Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome — A Multicenter Observational Study}, series = {Frontiers in Medicine}, volume = {7}, journal = {Frontiers in Medicine}, issn = {2296-858X}, doi = {10.3389/fmed.2020.599533}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-219834}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background: Proportions of patients dying from the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) vary between different countries. We report the characteristics; clinical course and outcome of patients requiring intensive care due to COVID-19 induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: This is a retrospective, observational multicentre study in five German secondary or tertiary care hospitals. All patients consecutively admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in any of the participating hospitals between March 12 and May 4, 2020 with a COVID-19 induced ARDS were included. Results: A total of 106 ICU patients were treated for COVID-19 induced ARDS, whereas severe ARDS was present in the majority of cases. Survival of ICU treatment was 65.0\%. Median duration of ICU treatment was 11 days; median duration of mechanical ventilation was 9 days. The majority of ICU treated patients (75.5\%) did not receive any antiviral or anti-inflammatory therapies. Venovenous (vv) ECMO was utilized in 16.3\%. ICU triage with population-level decision making was not necessary at any time. Univariate analysis associated older age, diabetes mellitus or a higher SOFA score on admission with non-survival during ICU stay. Conclusions: A high level of care adhering to standard ARDS treatments lead to a good outcome in critically ill COVID-19 patients.}, language = {en} } @article{Jung‐KoenigFuellenbachMurphyetal.2020, author = {Jung-K{\"o}nig, Mona and F{\"u}llenbach, Christoph and Murphy, Michael F. and Manzini, Paola and Laspina, Stefan and Pendry, Kate and M{\"u}hling, J{\"o}rg and Wikman, Agneta and Humbrecht, Catherine and Rigal, Jean-Christophe and Lasocki, Sigismond and Foll{\´e}a, Gilles and Seifried, Erhard and M{\"u}ller, Markus M. and Geisen, Christof and Aranko, Kari and Zacharowski, Kai and Meybohm, Patrick}, title = {Programmes for the management of preoperative anaemia: audit in ten European hospitals within the PaBloE (Patient Blood Management in Europe) working group}, series = {Vox Sanguinis}, volume = {115}, journal = {Vox Sanguinis}, number = {3}, doi = {10.1111/vox.12872}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214049}, pages = {182 -- 191}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background and objectives Preoperative anaemia is an independent risk factor for a higher morbidity and mortality, a longer hospitalization and increased perioperative transfusion rates. Managing preoperative anaemia is the first of three pillars of Patient Blood Management (PBM), a multidisciplinary concept to improve patient safety. While various studies provide medical information on (successful) anaemia treatment pathways, knowledge of organizational details of diagnosis and management of preoperative anaemia across Europe is scarce. Materials and methods To gain information on various aspects of preoperative anaemia management including organization, financing, diagnostics and treatment, we conducted a survey (74 questions) in ten hospitals from seven European nations within the PaBloE (Patient Blood Management in Europe) working group covering the year 2016. Results Organization and activity in the field of preoperative anaemia management were heterogeneous in the participating hospitals. Almost all hospitals had pathways for managing preoperative anaemia in place, however, only two nations had national guidelines. In six of the ten participating hospitals, preoperative anaemia management was organized by anaesthetists. Diagnostics and treatment focused on iron deficiency anaemia which, in most hospitals, was corrected with intravenous iron. Conclusion Implementation and approaches of preoperative anaemia management vary across Europe with a primary focus on treating iron deficiency anaemia. Findings of this survey motivated the hospitals involved to critically evaluate their practice and may also help other hospitals interested in PBM to develop action plans for diagnosis and management of preoperative anaemia.}, language = {en} } @article{MarxSchindlerMoschetal.2016, author = {Marx, Gernot and Schindler, Achim W. and Mosch, Christoph and Albers, Joerg and Bauer, Michael and Gnass, Irmela and Hobohm, Carsten and Janssens, Uwe and Kluge, Stefan and Kranke, Peter and Maurer, Tobias and Merz, Waltraut and Neugebauer, Edmund and Quintel, Michael and Senninger, Norbert and Trampisch, Hans-Joachim and Waydhas, Christian and Wildenauer, Rene and Zacharowski, Kai and Eikermann, Michaela}, title = {Intravascular volume therapy in adults guidelines from the association of the scientific medical societies in Germany}, series = {European Journal of Anaesthesiology}, volume = {33}, journal = {European Journal of Anaesthesiology}, number = {7}, doi = {10.1097/EJA.0000000000000447}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-188223}, pages = {488-521}, year = {2016}, abstract = {No abstract available.}, language = {en} } @article{MeybohmStraubFuellenbachetal.2020, author = {Meybohm, Patrick and Straub, Niels and F{\"u}llenbach, Christoph and Judd, Leonie and Kleiner{\"u}schkamp, Adina and Taeuber, Isabel and Zacharowski, Kai and Choorapoikayil, Suma}, title = {Health economics of Patient Blood Management: a cost-benefit analysis based on a meta-analysis}, series = {Vox Sanguinis}, volume = {115}, journal = {Vox Sanguinis}, number = {2}, doi = {10.1111/vox.12873}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-214084}, pages = {182 -- 188}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Background and Objectives Patient Blood Management (PBM) is the timely application of evidence-based medical and surgical concepts designed to improve haemoglobin concentration, optimize haemostasis and minimize blood loss in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The focus of this cost-benefit analysis is to analyse the economic benefit of widespread implementation of a multimodal PBM programme. Materials and Methods Based on a recent meta-analysis including 17 studies (>235 000 patients) comparing PBM with control care and data from the University Hospital Frankfurt, a cost-benefit analysis was performed. Outcome data were red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rate, number of transfused RBC units, and length of hospital stay (LOS). Costs were considered for the following three PBM interventions as examples: anaemia management including therapy of iron deficiency, use of cell salvage and tranexamic acid. For sensitivity analysis, a Monte Carlo simulation was performed. Results Iron supplementation was applied in 3·1\%, cell salvage in 65\% and tranexamic acid in 89\% of the PBM patients. In total, applying these three PBM interventions costs €129·04 per patient. However, PBM was associated with a reduction in transfusion rate, transfused RBC units per patient, and LOS which yielded to mean savings of €150·64 per patient. Thus, the overall benefit of PBM implementation was €21·60 per patient. In the Monte Carlo simulation, the cost savings on the outcome side exceeded the PBM costs in approximately 2/3 of all repetitions and the total benefit was €1 878 000 in 100·000 simulated patients. Conclusion Resources to implement a multimodal PBM concept optimizing patient care and safety can be cost-effectively.}, language = {en} } @article{SchmittMeybohmNeefetal.2022, author = {Schmitt, Elke and Meybohm, Patrick and Neef, Vanessa and Baumgarten, Peter and Bayer, Alexandra and Choorapoikayil, Suma and Friederich, Patrick and Friedrich, Jens and Geisen, Christof and G{\"u}resir, Erdem and Gr{\"u}newald, Matthias and Gutjahr, Martin and Helmer, Philipp and Herrmann, Eva and M{\"u}ller, Markus and Narita, Diana and Raadts, Ansgar and Schwendner, Klaus and Seifried, Erhard and Stark, Patrick and Steinbicker, Andrea U. and Thoma, Josef and Velten, Markus and Weigt, Henry and Wiesenack, Christoph and Wittmann, Maria and Zacharowski, Kai and Piekarski, Florian}, title = {Preoperative anaemia and red blood cell transfusion in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid and intracerebral haemorrhage - a multicentre subanalysis of the German PBM Network Registry}, series = {Acta Neurochirurgica}, volume = {164}, journal = {Acta Neurochirurgica}, organization = {German PBM Network Collaborators}, doi = {10.1007/s00701-022-05144-7}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-346754}, pages = {985-999}, year = {2022}, abstract = {Purpose Anaemia is common in patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid (aSAH) and intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). In surgical patients, anaemia was identified as an idenpendent risk factor for postoperative mortality, prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) and increased risk of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. This multicentre cohort observation study describes the incidence and effects of preoperative anaemia in this critical patient collective for a 10-year period. Methods This multicentre observational study included adult in-hospital surgical patients diagnosed with aSAH or ICH of 21 German hospitals (discharged from 1 January 2010 to 30 September 2020). Descriptive, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the incidence and association of preoperative anaemia with RBC transfusion, in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in patients with aSAH and ICH. Results A total of n = 9081 patients were analysed (aSAH n = 5008; ICH n = 4073). Preoperative anaemia was present at 28.3\% in aSAH and 40.9\% in ICH. RBC transfusion rates were 29.9\% in aSAH and 29.3\% in ICH. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative anaemia is associated with a higher risk for RBC transfusion (OR = 3.25 in aSAH, OR = 4.16 in ICH, p < 0.001), for in-hospital mortality (OR = 1.48 in aSAH, OR = 1.53 in ICH, p < 0.001) and for several postoperative complications. Conclusions Preoperative anaemia is associated with increased RBC transfusion rates, in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in patients with aSAH and ICH.}, language = {en} } @article{SchweigerMalorgioHenckertetal.2023, author = {Schweiger, Giovanna and Malorgio, Amos and Henckert, David and Braun, Julia and Meybohm, Patrick and Hottenrott, Sebastian and Froehlich, Corinna and Zacharowski, Kai and Raimann, Florian J. and Piekarski, Florian and Noethiger, Christoph B. and Spahn, Donat R. and Tscholl, David W. and Roche, Tadzio R.}, title = {Visual Blood, a 3D animated computer model to optimize the interpretation of blood gas analysis}, series = {Bioengineering}, volume = {10}, journal = {Bioengineering}, number = {3}, issn = {2306-5354}, doi = {10.3390/bioengineering10030293}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-304150}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Acid-base homeostasis is crucial for all physiological processes in the body and is evaluated using arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis. Screens or printouts of ABG results require the interpretation of many textual elements and numbers, which may delay intuitive comprehension. To optimise the presentation of the results for the specific strengths of human perception, we developed Visual Blood, an animated virtual model of ABG results. In this study, we compared its performance with a conventional result printout. Seventy physicians from three European university hospitals participated in a computer-based simulation study. Initially, after an educational video, we tested the participants' ability to assign individual Visual Blood visualisations to their corresponding ABG parameters. As the primary outcome, we tested caregivers' ability to correctly diagnose simulated clinical ABG scenarios with Visual Blood or conventional ABG printouts. For user feedback, participants rated their agreement with statements at the end of the study. Physicians correctly assigned 90\% of the individual Visual Blood visualisations. Regarding the primary outcome, the participants made the correct diagnosis 86\% of the time when using Visual Blood, compared to 68\% when using the conventional ABG printout. A mixed logistic regression model showed an odds ratio for correct diagnosis of 3.4 (95\%CI 2.00-5.79, p < 0.001) and an odds ratio for perceived diagnostic confidence of 1.88 (95\%CI 1.67-2.11, p < 0.001) in favour of Visual Blood. A linear mixed model showed a coefficient for perceived workload of -3.2 (95\%CI -3.77 to -2.64) in favour of Visual Blood. Fifty-one of seventy (73\%) participants agreed or strongly agreed that Visual Blood was easy to use, and fifty-five of seventy (79\%) agreed that it was fun to use. In conclusion, Visual Blood improved physicians' ability to diagnose ABG results. It also increased perceived diagnostic confidence and reduced perceived workload. This study adds to the growing body of research showing that decision-support tools developed around human cognitive abilities can streamline caregivers' decision-making and may improve patient care.}, language = {en} }