@inproceedings{KurtzSchneiderBorkowskietal.1988, author = {Kurtz, Beth and Schneider, Wolfgang and Borkowski, John G. and Carr, Martha and Turner, Lisa A.}, title = {Sources of memory and metamemory development: Societal, parental, and educational influences}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-50524}, year = {1988}, abstract = {This project had two goals: (1) to examine the impact of strategy training on memory performance in German and American children, and (2) to search for environmental correlates of individual differences in cognitive processes. Following pretesting, 437 children were divided into training and control groups, with the former receiving training in clustering strategies. Trained children showed sizable strategy maintenance and transfer effects two weeks and six months later. Parents and teachers completed questionnaires about the teaching of strategies and their attributional beliefs about children's academic successes and failures. The differences in strategie behavior and attributions of German and American children were due, in part, to differences in strategy-enriched environments.}, subject = {Psychologie}, language = {en} } @article{CarrKurtzSchneideretal.1989, author = {Carr, Martha and Kurtz, Beth E. and Schneider, Wolfgang and Turner, Lisa A. and Borkowski, John G.}, title = {Strategy acquisition and transfer among American and German children: Environmental influences on metacognitive development}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62082}, year = {1989}, abstract = {This study explored the differential effects of strategy training on German and American elementaryschool children and assessed the role of parents in the development of their children's strategic behavior and metacognition. 184 German and 161 American children were pretested on memory and metamemory tasks. Children were then assigned to either an organizational strategy training condition or a control condition. All children were tested on the maintenance and far-transfer of the strategy and task-related metamemory 1 week following training. Parents completed questionnaires about strategy instruction in the home. Strategy maintenance and metacognition were reassessed 6 months following training. German children were more strategic than American children. Instructed children performed better than control children. German parents reported more instruction of strategies in the home. These data suggest that formal education is responsible for aspects of cognitive development that have sometimes been viewed as a function of age.}, subject = {Psychologie}, language = {en} } @article{KurtzSchneiderCarretal.1990, author = {Kurtz, Beth E. and Schneider, Wolfgang and Carr, Martha and Borkowski, John G. and Rellinger, Elizabeth}, title = {Strategy instruction and attributional beliefs in West Germany and the United States: Do teachers foster metacognitive development?}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62145}, year = {1990}, abstract = {Previous research has shown German children to be more strategic on sort-recall memory tasks than their American age-mates, and to show fewer effort-related attributions. We conducted this study to determine if those differences are due to systematic differences in the strategy instruction and attributional beliefs of German and U.S. teachers, and to explore metacognitive instructional practices in the two countries. Teachers responded to a questionnaire that inquired about their use of strategy instructions, fostering of reflective thinking in pupils, sources of children's learning problems, and modeling of metacognitive skills such as monitoring. The second part of the questionnaire asked about the reasons underlying children's academic successes and failures. German teachers reported more instruction of task-specific strategies, while American teachers showed more effort-related attributions. The types of strategies instructed and types of learning problems most frequently described varied across the two countries, and also according to how many years the teachers had taught. Results were discussed regarding their implications for metacognitive developmental theory, particularly regarding culture and other environmental influences on the development of controlled processing.}, subject = {Psychologie}, language = {en} } @article{CarrSchneider1991, author = {Carr, Martha and Schneider, Wolfgang}, title = {Long-term maintenance of organizational strategies in kindergarten children}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-62157}, year = {1991}, abstract = {The goal of the present study was to determine whether 4- and 5-year-old kindergarten children could be trained to maintain an organizational strategy over 2- and 8 week periods through an elaborate training program. A second goal was to assess the effects of the training program on strategy awareness. Twenty-eight kindergarten children were pretested on two sort-recall tasks and their awareness of the use of the clustering strategy was assessed through a protocol type procedure. Half the children received seven half-hour sessions of individual training in the clustering strategy and half the children participated in a control group. Both groups were post-tested on two sort-recall tasks 2 weeks following training and again 8 weeks following training. Strategy awareness, as measured by verbal protocol, was assessed at both post-test points. The elaborate strategy training program was successful in inducing short- and long-term strategy maintenance of the clustering strategy. Trained children's clustering during sorting and clustering during recall was consistently related to the amount of items correctly recalled. No differences in strategy awareness were found. These findings demonstrate that the elaborate training procedure used in this study can be a very effective memory technique for young kindergarten children.}, subject = {Psychologie}, language = {en} }