@article{BeykanDamEberleinetal.2016, author = {Beykan, Seval and Dam, Jan S. and Eberlein, Uta and Kaufmann, Jens and Kj{\ae}rgaard, Benedict and J{\o}dal, Lars and Bouterfa, Hakim and Bejot, Romain and Lassmann, Michael and Jensen, Svend Borup}, title = {\(^{177}\)Lu-OPS201 targeting somatostatin receptors: in vivo biodistribution and dosimetry in a pig model}, series = {EJNMMI Research}, volume = {6}, journal = {EJNMMI Research}, number = {50}, doi = {10.1186/s13550-016-0204-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-146888}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Background \(^{177}\)Lu is used in peptide receptor radionuclide therapies for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Based on the recent literature, SST2 antagonists are superior to agonists in tumor uptake. The compound OPS201 is the novel somatostatin antagonist showing the highest SST2 affinity. The aim of this study was to measure the in vivo biodistribution and dosimetry of \(^{177}\)Lu-OPS201 in five anesthetized Danish Landrace pigs as an appropriate substitute for humans to quantitatively assess the absorbed doses for future clinical applications. Results \(^{177}\)Lu-OPS201 was obtained with a specific activity ranging from 10 to 17 MBq/μg. Prior to administration, the radiochemical purity was measured as s > 99.7 \% in all cases. After injection, fast clearance of the compound from the blood stream was observed. Less than 5 \% of the injected activity was presented in blood 10 min after injection. A series of SPECT/CT and whole-body scans conducted until 10 days after intravenous injection showed uptake mostly in the liver, spine, and kidneys. There was no visible uptake in the spleen. Blood samples were taken to determine the time-activity curve in the blood. Time-activity curves and time-integrated activity coefficients were calculated for the organs showing visible uptake. Based on these data, the absorbed organ dose coefficients for a 70-kg patient were calculated with OLINDA/EXM. For humans after an injection of 5 GBq \(^{177}\)Lu-OPS201, the highest predicted absorbed doses are obtained for the kidneys (13.7 Gy), the osteogenic cells (3.9 Gy), the urinary bladder wall (1.8 Gy), and the liver (1.0 Gy). No metabolites of 177Lu-OPS201 were found by radio HPLC analysis. None of the absorbed doses calculated will exceed organ toxicity levels. Conclusions The \(^{177}\)Lu-OPS201 was well tolerated and caused no abnormal physiological or behavioral signs. In vivo distributions and absorbed doses of pigs are comparable to those observed in other publications. According to the biodistribution data in pigs, presented in this work, the expected radiation exposure in humans will be within the acceptable range.}, language = {en} } @article{BeykanFaniJensenetal.2019, author = {Beykan, Seval and Fani, Melpomeni and Jensen, Svend Borup and Nicolas, Guillaume and Wild, Damian and Kaufmann, Jens and Lassmann, Michael}, title = {In vivo biokinetics of \(^{177}\)Lu-OPS201 in Mice and Pigs as a Model for Predicting Human Dosimetry}, series = {Contrast Media \& Molecular Imaging}, volume = {2019}, journal = {Contrast Media \& Molecular Imaging}, doi = {10.1155/2019/6438196}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-177382}, pages = {6438196}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Introduction. \(^{177}\)Lu-OPS201 is a high-affinity somatostatin receptor subtype 2 antagonist for PRRT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The aim is to find the optimal scaling for dosimetry and to compare the biokinetics of \(^{177}\)Lu-OPS201 in animals and humans. Methods. Data on biokinetics of \(^{177}\)Lu-OPS201 were analyzed in athymic nude Foxn1\(^{nu}\) mice (28 F, weight: 26 ± 1 g), Danish Landrace pigs (3 F-1 M, weight: 28 ± 2 kg), and patients (3 F-1 M, weight: 61 ± 17 kg) with administered activities of 0.19-0.27 MBq (mice), 97-113 MBq (pigs), and 850-1086 MBq (patients). After euthanizing mice (up to 168 h), the organ-specific activity contents (including blood) were measured. Multiple planar and SPECT/CT scans were performed until 250 h (pigs) and 72 h (patients) to quantify the uptake in the kidneys and liver. Blood samples were taken up to 23 h (patients) and 300 h (pigs). In pigs and patients, kidney protection was applied. Time-dependent uptake data sets were created for each species and organ/tissue. Biexponential fits were applied to compare the biokinetics in the kidneys, liver, and blood of each species. The time-integrated activity coefficients (TIACs) were calculated by using NUKFIT. To determine the optimal scaling, several methods (relative mass scaling, time scaling, combined mass and time scaling, and allometric scaling) were compared. Results. A fast blood clearance of the compound was observed in the first phase (<56 h) for all species. In comparison with patients, pigs showed higher liver retention. Based on the direct comparison of the TIACs, an underestimation in mice (liver and kidneys) and an overestimation in pigs' kidneys compared to the patient data (kidney TIAC: mice = 1.4 h, pigs = 7.7 h, and patients = 5.8 h; liver TIAC: mice = 0.7 h, pigs = 4.1 h, and patients = 5.3 h) were observed. Most similar TIACs were obtained by applying time scaling (mice) and combined scaling (pigs) (kidney TIAC: mice = 3.9 h, pigs = 4.8 h, and patients = 5.8 h; liver TIAC: mice = 0.9 h, pigs = 4.7 h, and patients = 5.3 h). Conclusion. If the organ mass ratios between the species are high, the combined mass and time scaling method is optimal to minimize the interspecies differences. The analysis of the fit functions and the TIACs shows that pigs are better mimicking human biokinetics.}, language = {en} } @article{SchumannScherthanFranketal.2020, author = {Schumann, Sarah and Scherthan, Harry and Frank, Torsten and Lapa, Constantin and M{\"u}ller, Jessica and Seifert, Simone and Lassmann, Michael and Eberlein, Uta}, title = {DNA Damage in Blood Leukocytes of Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing PET/CT Examinations with [\(^{68}\)Ga]Ga-PSMA I\&T}, series = {Cancers}, volume = {12}, journal = {Cancers}, number = {2}, issn = {2072-6694}, doi = {10.3390/cancers12020388}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200585}, pages = {388}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The aim was to investigate the induction and repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) as a function of the absorbed dose to the blood of patients undergoing PET/CT examinations with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA. Blood samples were collected from 15 patients before and at four time points after [68Ga]Ga-PSMA administration, both before and after the PET/CT scan. Absorbed doses to the blood were calculated. In addition, blood samples with/without contrast agent from five volunteers were irradiated ex vivo by CT while measuring the absorbed dose. Leukocytes were isolated, fixed, and stained for co-localizing γ-H2AX+53BP1 DSB foci that were enumerated manually. In vivo, a significant increase in γ-H2AX+53BP1 foci compared to baseline was observed at all time points after administration, although the absorbed dose to the blood by 68Ga was below 4 mGy. Ex vivo, the increase in radiation-induced foci depended on the absorbed dose and the presence of contrast agent, which could have caused a dose enhancement. The CT-dose contribution for the patients was estimated at about 12 mGy using the ex vivo calibration. The additional number of DSB foci induced by CT, however, was comparable to the one induced by 68Ga. The significantly increased foci numbers after [68Ga]Ga-PSMA administration may suggest a possible low-dose hypersensitivity.}, language = {en} } @article{KonijnenbergHerrmannKobeetal.2021, author = {Konijnenberg, Mark and Herrmann, Ken and Kobe, Carsten and Verburg, Frederik and Hindorf, Cecilia and Hustinx, Roland and Lassmann, Michael}, title = {EANM position paper on article 56 of the Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom (basic safety standards) for nuclear medicine therapy}, series = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging}, volume = {48}, journal = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging}, issn = {1619-7070}, doi = {10.1007/s00259-020-05038-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-235280}, pages = {67-72}, year = {2021}, abstract = {The EC Directive 2013/59/Euratom states in article 56 that exposures of target volumes in nuclear medicine treatments shall be individually planned and their delivery appropriately verified. The Directive also mentions that medical physics experts should always be appropriately involved in those treatments. Although it is obvious that, in nuclear medicine practice, every nuclear medicine physician and physicist should follow national rules and legislation, the EANM considered it necessary to provide guidance on how to interpret the Directive statements for nuclear medicine treatments. For this purpose, the EANM proposes to distinguish three levels in compliance to the optimization principle in the directive, inspired by the indication of levels in prescribing, recording and reporting of absorbed doses after radiotherapy defined by the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU): Most nuclear medicine treatments currently applied in Europe are standardized. The minimum requirement for those treatments is ICRU level 1 ("activity-based prescription and patient-averaged dosimetry"), which is defined by administering the activity within 10\% of the intended activity, typically according to the package insert or to the respective EANM guidelines, followed by verification of the therapy delivery, if applicable. Non-standardized treatments are essentially those in developmental phase or approved radiopharmaceuticals being used off-label with significantly (> 25\% more than in the label) higher activities. These treatments should comply with ICRU level 2 ("activity-based prescription and patient-specific dosimetry"), which implies recording and reporting of the absorbed dose to organs at risk and optionally the absorbed dose to treatment regions. The EANM strongly encourages to foster research that eventually leads to treatment planning according to ICRU level 3 ("dosimetry-guided patient-specific prescription and verification"), whenever possible and relevant. Evidence for superiority of therapy prescription on basis of patient-specific dosimetry has not been obtained. However, the authors believe that a better understanding of therapy dosimetry, i.e. how much and where the energy is delivered, and radiobiology, i.e. radiation-related processes in tissues, are keys to the long-term improvement of our treatments.}, language = {en} } @article{AertsEberleinHolmetal.2021, author = {Aerts, An and Eberlein, Uta and Holm, S{\"o}ren and Hustinx, Roland and Konijnenberg, Mark and Strigari, Lidia and van Leeuwen, Fijs W. B. and Glatting, Gerhard and Lassmann, Michael}, title = {EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine}, series = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging}, volume = {48}, journal = {European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging}, number = {11}, doi = {10.1007/s00259-021-05345-9}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265595}, pages = {3365-3377}, year = {2021}, abstract = {With an increasing variety of radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic or therapeutic nuclear medicine as valuable diagnostic or treatment option, radiobiology plays an important role in supporting optimizations. This comprises particularly safety and efficacy of radionuclide therapies, specifically tailored to each patient. As absorbed dose rates and absorbed dose distributions in space and time are very different between external irradiation and systemic radionuclide exposure, distinct radiation-induced biological responses are expected in nuclear medicine, which need to be explored. This calls for a dedicated nuclear medicine radiobiology. Radiobiology findings and absorbed dose measurements will enable an improved estimation and prediction of efficacy and adverse effects. Moreover, a better understanding on the fundamental biological mechanisms underlying tumor and normal tissue responses will help to identify predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as biomarkers for treatment follow-up. In addition, radiobiology can form the basis for the development of radiosensitizing strategies and radioprotectant agents. Thus, EANM believes that, beyond in vitro and preclinical evaluations, radiobiology will bring important added value to clinical studies and to clinical teams. Therefore, EANM strongly supports active collaboration between radiochemists, radiopharmacists, radiobiologists, medical physicists, and physicians to foster research toward precision nuclear medicine.}, language = {en} } @article{LassmannEberlein2023, author = {Lassmann, Michael and Eberlein, Uta}, title = {Comparing absorbed doses and radiation risk of the α-emitting bone-seekers [\(^{223}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\) and [\(^{224}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\)}, series = {Frontiers in Medicine}, volume = {9}, journal = {Frontiers in Medicine}, issn = {2296-858X}, doi = {10.3389/fmed.2022.1057373}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-301509}, year = {2023}, abstract = {[\(^{223}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\) and [\(^{224}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\) are bone seekers, emitting high LET, and short range (< 100 μm) alpha-particles. Both radionuclides show similar decay properties; the total alpha energies are comparable (\(^{223}\)Ra: ≈28 MeV, \(^{224}\)Ra: ≈26 MeV). [\(^{224}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\) has been used from the mid-1940s until 1990 for treating different bone and joint diseases with activities of up to approximately 50 MBq [\(^{224}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\). In 2013 [\(^{223}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\) obtained marketing authorization by the FDA and by the European Union for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with an activity to administer of 0.055 MBq per kg body weight for six cycles. For intravenous injections in humans a model calculation using the biokinetic model of ICRP67 shows a ratio of organ absorbed dose coefficients (\(^{224}\)Ra:\(^{223}\)Ra) between 0.37 (liver) and 0.97 except for the kidneys (2.27) and blood (1.57). For the red marrow as primary organ-at-risk, the ratio is 0.57. The differences are mainly caused be the differing half-lives of the decay products of both radium isotopes. Both radionuclides show comparable DNA damage patterns in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after internal ex-vivo irradiation. Data on the long-term radiation-associated side effects are only available for treatment with [\(^{224}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\). Two epidemiological studies followed two patient groups treated with [\(^{224}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\) for more than 25 years. One of them was the "Spiess study", a cohort of 899 juvenile patients who received several injections of [\(^{224}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\) with a mean specific activity of 0.66 MBq/kg. Another patient group of ankylosing spondylitis patients was treated with 10 repeated intravenous injections of [\(^{224}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\), 1 MBq each, 1 week apart. In total 1,471 of these patients were followed-up in the "Wick study". In both studies, an increased cancer mortality by leukemia and solid cancers was observed. Similar considerations on long-term effects likely apply to [\(^{223}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\) as well since the biokinetics are similar and the absorbed doses in the same range. However, this increased risk will most likely not be observed due to the much shorter life expectancy of prostate cancer patients treated with [\(^{223}\)Ra]RaCl\(_2\).}, language = {en} }