@article{WischnewskySchwentnerDiessneretal.2021,
  author    = {Wischnewsky, Manfred and Schwentner, Lukas and Diessner, Joachim and De Gregorio, Amelie and Joukhadar, Ralf and Davut, Dayan and Salmen, Jessica and Bekes, Inga and Kiesel, Matthias and M{\"u}ller-Reiter, Max and Blettner, Maria and Wolters, Regine and Janni, Wolfgang and Kreienberg, Rolf and W{\"o}ckel, Achim and Ebner, Florian},
  title     = {BRENDA-Score, a hghly significant, internally and externally validated prognostic marker for metastatic recurrence: analysis of 10,449 primary breast cancer patients},
  series = {Cancers},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Cancers},
  number    = {13},
  issn      = {2072-6694},
  doi       = {10.3390/cancers13133121},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-241064},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Background Current research in breast cancer focuses on individualization of local and systemic therapies with adequate escalation or de-escalation strategies. As a result, about two-thirds of breast cancer patients can be cured, but up to one-third eventually develop metastatic disease, which is considered incurable with currently available treatment options. This underscores the importance to develop a metastatic recurrence score to escalate or de-escalate treatment strategies. Patients and methods Data from 10,499 patients were available from 17 clinical cancer registries (BRENDA-project. In total, 8566 were used to develop the BRENDA-Index. This index was calculated from the regression coefficients of a Cox regression model for metastasis-free survival (MFS). Based on this index, patients were categorized into very high, high, intermediate, low, and very low risk groups forming the BRENDA-Score. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation and an independent dataset of 1883 patients for external validation. The predictive accuracy was checked by Harrell's c-index. In addition, the BRENDA-Score was analyzed as a marker for overall survival (OS) and compared to the Nottingham prognostic score (NPS). Results: Intrinsic subtypes, tumour size, grading, and nodal status were identified as statistically significant prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. The five prognostic groups of the BRENDA-Score showed highly significant (p < 0.001) differences regarding MFS:low risk: hazard ratio (HR) = 2.4, 95\%CI (1.7-3.3); intermediate risk: HR = 5.0, 95\%CI.(3.6-6.9); high risk: HR = 10.3, 95\%CI (7.4-14.3) and very high risk: HR = 18.1, 95\%CI (13.2-24.9). The external validation showed congruent results. A multivariate Cox regression model for OS with BRENDA-Score and NPS as covariates showed that of these two scores only the BRENDA-Score is significant (BRENDA-Score p < 0.001; NPS p = 0.447). Therefore, the BRENDA-Score is also a good prognostic marker for OS. Conclusion: The BRENDA-Score is an internally and externally validated robust predictive tool for metastatic recurrence in breast cancer patients. It is based on routine parameters easily accessible in daily clinical care. In addition, the BRENDA-Score is a good prognostic marker for overall survival. Highlights: The BRENDA-Score is a highly significant predictive tool for metastatic recurrence of breast cancer patients. The BRENDA-Score is stable for at least the first five years after primary diagnosis, i.e., the sensitivities and specificities of this predicting system is rather similar to the NPI with AUCs between 0.76 and 0.81 the BRENDA-Score is a good prognostic marker for overall survival.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BekesLoebHolzheuetal.2019,
  author    = {Bekes, Inga and L{\"o}b, Sanja and Holzheu, Iris and Janni, Wolfgang and Baumann, Lisa and W{\"o}ckel, Achim and Wulff, Christine},
  title     = {Nectin-2 in ovarian cancer: how is it expressed and what might be its functional role?},
  series = {Cancer Science},
  volume    = {110},
  journal   = {Cancer Science},
  number    = {6},
  doi       = {10.1111/cas.13992},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-202748},
  pages     = {1872- 1882},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Nectin-2 is an adhesion molecule that has been reported to play a role in tumor growth, metastasis and tumor angiogenesis. Herein, we investigated Nectin-2 in ovarian cancer patients and in cell culture. Tumor as well as peritoneal biopsies of 60 ovarian cancer patients and 22 controls were dual stained for Nectin-2 and CD31 using immunohistochemistry. Gene expression of Nectin-2 was quantified by real-time PCR and differences analyzed in relation to various tumor characteristics. In the serum of patients, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was quantified by ELISA. Effect of VEGF on Nectin-2 expression as well as permeability was investigated in HUVEC. In tumor biopsies, Nectin-2 protein was mainly localized in tumor cells, whereas in peritoneal biopsies, clear colocalization was found in the vasculature. T3 patients had a significantly higher percentage of positive lymph nodes and this correlated with survival. Nectin-2 was significantly upregulated in tumor biopsies in patients with lymph node metastasis and with residual tumor >1 cm after surgery. Nectin-2 expression was significantly suppressed in the peritoneal endothelium of patients associated with significantly increased VEGF serum levels. In cell culture, VEGF stimulation led to a significant downregulation of Nectin-2 which was reversed by VEGF-inhibition. In addition, Nectin-2 knockdown in endothelial cells was associated with significantly increased endothelial permeability. Nectin-2 expression in ovarian cancer may support tumor cell adhesion, leading to growth and lymph node metastasis. In addition, VEGF-induced Nectin-2 suppression in peritoneal endothelium may support an increase in vascular permeability leading to ascites production.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BekesFriedlKoehleretal.2016,
  author    = {Bekes, Inga and Friedl, Thomas W. P. and K{\"o}hler, Tanja and M{\"o}bus, Volker and Janni, Wolfgang and W{\"o}ckel, Achim and Wulff, Christine},
  title     = {Does VEGF facilitate local tumor growth and spread into the abdominal cavity by suppressing endothelial cell adhesion, thus increasing vascular peritoneal permeability followed by ascites production in ovarian cancer?},
  series = {Molecular Cancer},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Molecular Cancer},
  number    = {13},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12943-016-0497-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-169298},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Background Ovarian cancer is mostly associated with pathologically regulated permeability of peritoneal vessels, leading to ascites. Here, we investigated the molecular regulation of endothelial permeability by the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and both tight and adherens junction proteins (VE-cadherin and claudin 5) with regards to the tumor biology of different ovarian cancer types. Methods Serum and ascites samples before and after surgery, as well as peritoneal biopsies of 68 ovarian cancer patients and 20 healthy controls were collected. In serum and ascites VEGF protein was measured by ELISA. In peritoneal biopsies co-localization of VE-cadherin and claudin 5 was investigated using immunohistochemical dual staining. In addition, the gene expression of VE-cadherin and claudin 5 was quantified by Real-time PCR. Differences in VEGF levels, VE-cadherin and claudin 5 gene expression were analyzed in relation to various tumor characteristics (tumor stage, grading, histological subtypes, resection status after surgery) and then compared to controls. Furthermore, human primary ovarian cancer cells were co-cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and changes in VE-cadherin and claudin 5 were investigated after VEGF inhibition. Results VEGF was significantly increased in tumor patients in comparison to controls and accumulates in ascites. The highest VEGF levels were found in patients diagnosed with advanced tumor stages, with tumors of poor differentiation, or in the group of solid / cystic-solid tumors. Patients with residual tumor after operation showed significantly higher levels of VEGF both before and after surgery as compared to tumor-free resected patients. Results of an immunohistochemical double-staining experiment indicated co-localization of VE-cadherin and claudin 5 in the peritoneal vasculature. Compared to controls, expression of VE-cadherin and claudin 5 was significantly suppressed in peritoneal vessels of tumor patients, but there were no significant differences regarding VE-cadherin and claudin 5 expression in relation to different tumor characteristics. A significant positive correlation was found between VE-cadherin and claudin 5 expression. VEGF inhibition in vitro was associated with significant increase in VE-cadherin and claudin 5. Conclusions Our results indicate that increased peritoneal permeability in ovarian cancer is due to down-regulation of adhesion proteins via tumor derived VEGF. Advanced ovarian cancer with aggressive tumor biology may be associated with early dysregulation of vascular permeability leading to ascites. These patients may benefit from therapeutic VEGF inhibition.},
  language  = {en}
}