@article{LueckerathLapaAlbertetal.2015,
  author    = {L{\"u}ckerath, Katharina and Lapa, Constantin and Albert, Christa and Herrmann, Ken and J{\"o}rg, Gerhard and Samnick, Samuel and Einsele, Herrmann and Knop, Stefan and Buck, Andreas K.},
  title     = {\(^{11}\)C-Methionine-PET: a novel and sensitive tool for monitoring of early response to treatment in multiple myeloma},
  series = {Oncotarget},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Oncotarget},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.18632/oncotarget.3053},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-148688},
  pages     = {8418-8429},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Multiple myeloma (MM) remains an essentially incurable hematologic malignancy. However, new treatment modalities and novel drugs have been introduced and thus additional tools for therapy monitoring are increasingly needed. Therefore, we evaluated the radiotracers \(^{11}\)C-Methionine (paraprotein-biosynthesis) and \(^{18}\)F-FDG (glucose-utilization) for monitoring response to anti-myeloma-therapy and outcome prediction. Influence of proteasome-inhibition on radiotracer-uptake of different MM cell-lines and patient-derived CD138\(^{+}\) plasma cells was analyzed and related to tumor-biology. Mice xenotransplanted with MM. 1S tumors underwent MET- and FDG-\(\mu\)PET. Tumor-to-background ratios before and after 24 h, 8 and 15 days treatment with bortezomib were correlated to survival. Treatment reduced both MET and FDG uptake; changes in tracer-retention correlated with a switch from high to low CD138-expression. In xenotransplanted mice, MET-uptake significantly decreased by 30-79\% as early as 24 h after bortezomib injection. No significant differences were detected thus early with FDG. This finding was confirmed in patient-derived MM cells. Importantly, early reduction of MET-but not FDG-uptake correlated with improved survival and reduced tumor burden in mice. Our results suggest that MET is superior to FDG in very early assessment of response to anti-myeloma-therapy. Early changes in MET-uptake have predictive potential regarding response and survival. MET-PET holds promise to individualize therapies in MM in future.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DimopoulosWeiselSongetal.2015,
  author    = {Dimopoulos, Meletios A. and Weisel, Katja C. and Song, Kevin W. and Delforge, Michel and Karlin, Lionel and Goldschmidt, Hartmut and Moreau, Philippe and Banos, Anne and Oriol, Albert and Garderet, Laurent and Cavo, Michele and Ivanova, Valentina and Alegre, Adrian and Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin and Chen, Christine and Spencer, Andrew and Knop, Stefan and Bahlis, Nizar J. and Renner, Christoph and Yu, Xin and Hong, Kevin and Sternas, Lars and Jacques, Christian and Zaki, Mohamed H. and San Miguel, Jesus F.},
  title     = {Cytogenetics and long-term survival of patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone},
  series = {Haematologica},
  volume    = {100},
  journal   = {Haematologica},
  number    = {10},
  doi       = {10.3324/haematol.2014.117077},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-140349},
  pages     = {1327 -- 1333},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Patients with refractory or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who no longer receive benefit from novel agents have limited treatment options and short expected survival. del(17p) and t(4;14) are correlated with shortened survival. The phase 3 MM-003 trial demonstrated significant progression-free and overall survival benefits from treatment with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone compared to high-dose dexamethasone among patients in whom bortezomib and lenalidomide treatment had failed. At an updated median follow-up of 15.4 months, the progression-free survival was 4.0 versus 1.9 months (HR, 0.50; P<0.001), and median overall survival was 13.1 versus 8.1 months (HR, 0.72; P=0.009). Pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone, compared with high-dose dexamethasone, improved progression-free survival in patients with del(17p) (4.6 versus 1.1 months; HR, 0.34; P < 0.001), t(4;14) (2.8 versus 1.9 months; HR, 0.49; P=0.028), and in standard-risk patients (4.2 versus 2.3 months; HR, 0.55; P<0.001). Although the majority of patients treated with high-dose dexamethasone took pomalidomide after discontinuation, the overall survival of patients treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone or highdose dexamethasone was 12.6 versus 7.7 months (HR, 0.45; P=0.008) in patients with del(17p), 7.5 versus 4.9 months (HR, 1.12; P=0.761) in those with t(4;14), and 14.0 versus 9.0 months (HR, 0.85; P=0.380) in standard-risk subjects. The overall response rate was higher in patients treated with pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone than in those treated with high-dose dexamethasone both among standard-risk patients (35.2\% versus 9.7\%) and those with del(17p) (31.8\% versus 4.3\%), whereas it was similar in patients with t(4; 14) (15.9\% versus 13.3\%). The safety of pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone was consistent with initial reports. In conclusion, pomalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is efficacious in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and del(17p) and/or t(4;14).},
  language  = {en}
}