@article{TucaBernardellideMattosFunketal.2022,
  author    = {Tuca, Alexandru-Cristian and Bernardelli de Mattos, Ives and Funk, Martin and Winter, Raimund and Palackic, Alen and Groeber-Becker, Florian and Kruse, Daniel and Kukla, Fabian and Lemarchand, Thomas and Kamolz, Lars-Peter},
  title     = {Orchestrating the dermal/epidermal tissue ratio during wound healing by controlling the moisture content},
  series = {Biomedicines},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Biomedicines},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {2227-9059},
  doi       = {10.3390/biomedicines10061286},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-275115},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {A balanced and moist wound environment and surface increases the effect of various growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines, stimulating cell growth and wound healing. Considering this fact, we tested in vitro and in vivo water evaporation rates from the cellulose dressing epicite\(^{hydro}\) when combined with different secondary dressings as well as the resulting wound healing efficacy in a porcine donor site model. The aim of this study was to evaluate how the different rates of water evaporation affected wound healing efficacy. To this end, epicite\(^{hydro}\) primary dressing, in combination with different secondary dressing materials (cotton gauze, JELONET\(^◊\), AQUACEL\(^®\) Extra\(^™\), and OPSITE\(^◊\) Flexifix), was placed on 3 × 3 cm-sized dermatome wounds with a depth of 1.2 mm on the flanks of domestic pigs. The healing process was analyzed histologically and quantified by morphometry. High water evaporation rates by using the correct secondary dressing, such as cotton gauze, favored a better re-epithelialization in comparison with the low water evaporation resulting from an occlusive secondary dressing, which favored the formation of a new and intact dermal tissue that nearly fully replaced all the dermis that was removed during wounding. This newly available evidence may be of great benefit to clinical wound management.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DjuzenovaFiedlerMemmeletal.2019,
  author    = {Djuzenova, Cholpon S. and Fiedler, Vanessa and Memmel, Simon and Katzer, Astrid and Sisario, Dmitri and Brosch, Philippa K. and G{\"o}hrung, Alexander and Frister, Svenja and Zimmermann, Heiko and Flentje, Michael and Sukhorukov, Vladimir L.},
  title     = {Differential effects of the Akt inhibitor MK-2206 on migration and radiation sensitivity of glioblastoma cells},
  series = {BMC Cancer},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {BMC Cancer},
  doi       = {10.1186/s12885-019-5517-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-200290},
  pages     = {299},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background Most tumor cells show aberrantly activated Akt which leads to increased cell survival and resistance to cancer radiotherapy. Therefore, targeting Akt can be a promising strategy for radiosensitization. Here, we explore the impact of the Akt inhibitor MK-2206 alone and in combination with the dual PI3K and mTOR inhibitor PI-103 on the radiation sensitivity of glioblastoma cells. In addition, we examine migration of drug-treated cells. Methods Using single-cell tracking and wound healing migration tests, colony-forming assay, Western blotting, flow cytometry and electrorotation we examined the effects of MK-2206 and PI-103 and/or irradiation on the migration, radiation sensitivity, expression of several marker proteins, DNA damage, cell cycle progression and the plasma membrane properties in two glioblastoma (DK-MG and SNB19) cell lines, previously shown to differ markedly in their migratory behavior and response to PI3K/mTOR inhibition. Results We found that MK-2206 strongly reduces the migration of DK-MG but only moderately reduces the migration of SNB19 cells. Surprisingly, MK-2206 did not cause radiosensitization, but even increased colony-forming ability after irradiation. Moreover, MK-2206 did not enhance the radiosensitizing effect of PI-103. The results appear to contradict the strong depletion of p-Akt in MK-2206-treated cells. Possible reasons for the radioresistance of MK-2206-treated cells could be unaltered or in case of SNB19 cells even increased levels of p-mTOR and p-S6, as compared to the reduced expression of these proteins in PI-103-treated samples. We also found that MK-2206 did not enhance IR-induced DNA damage, neither did it cause cell cycle distortion, nor apoptosis nor excessive autophagy. Conclusions Our study provides proof that MK-2206 can effectively inhibit the expression of Akt in two glioblastoma cell lines. However, due to an aberrant activation of mTOR in response to Akt inhibition in PTEN mutated cells, the therapeutic window needs to be carefully defined, or a combination of Akt and mTOR inhibitors should be considered.},
  language  = {en}
}