@article{GorskiVogelSalibaetal.2014,
  author    = {Gorski, Stanislaw A. and Vogel, J{\"o}rg and Saliba, Antoine-Emmanuel and Westermann, Alexander J.},
  title     = {Single-cell RNA-seq: advances and future challenges},
  doi       = {10.1093/nar/gku555},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-110993},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Phenotypically identical cells can dramatically vary with respect to behavior during their lifespan and this variation is reflected in their molecular composition such as the transcriptomic landscape. Singlecell transcriptomics using next-generation transcript sequencing (RNA-seq) is now emerging as a powerful tool to profile cell-to-cell variability on a genomic scale. Its application has already greatly impacted our conceptual understanding of diverse biological processes with broad implications for both basic and clinical research. Different single-cell RNAseq protocols have been introduced and are reviewed here - each one with its own strengths and current limitations. We further provide an overview of the biological questions single-cell RNA-seq has been used to address, the major findings obtained from such studies, and current challenges and expected future developments in this booming field.},
  subject      = {RNS},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EulalioFroehlichManoetal.2011,
  author    = {Eulalio, Ana and Fr{\"o}hlich, Kathrin S. and Mano, Miguel and Giacca, Mauro and Vogel, J{\"o}rg},
  title     = {A Candidate Approach Implicates the Secreted Salmonella Effector Protein SpvB in P-Body Disassembly},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-68928},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {P-bodies are dynamic aggregates of RNA and proteins involved in several post-transcriptional regulation processes. Pbodies have been shown to play important roles in regulating viral infection, whereas their interplay with bacterial pathogens, specifically intracellular bacteria that extensively manipulate host cell pathways, remains unknown. Here, we report that Salmonella infection induces P-body disassembly in a cell type-specific manner, and independently of previously characterized pathways such as inhibition of host cell RNA synthesis or microRNA-mediated gene silencing. We show that the Salmonella-induced P-body disassembly depends on the activation of the SPI-2 encoded type 3 secretion system, and that the secreted effector protein SpvB plays a major role in this process. P-body disruption is also induced by the related pathogen, Shigella flexneri, arguing that this might be a new mechanism by which intracellular bacterial pathogens subvert host cell function.},
  subject      = {Salmonella},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BodemSchromMoschalletal.2013,
  author    = {Bodem, Jochen and Schrom, Eva-Maria and Moschall, Rebecca and Hartl, Maximilian J. and Weitner, Helena and Fecher, David and Langemeier, J{\"o}rg and W{\"o}hrl, Brigitta M.},
  title     = {U1snRNP-mediated suppression of polyadenylation in conjunction with the RNA structure controls poly (A) site selection in foamy viruses},
  series = {Retrovirology},
  journal   = {Retrovirology},
  doi       = {10.1186/1742-4690-10-55},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-96085},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Background During reverse transcription, retroviruses duplicate the long terminal repeats (LTRs). These identical LTRs carry both promoter regions and functional polyadenylation sites. To express full-length transcripts, retroviruses have to suppress polyadenylation in the 5′LTR and activate polyadenylation in the 3′LTR. Foamy viruses have a unique LTR structure with respect to the location of the major splice donor (MSD), which is located upstream of the polyadenylation signal. Results Here, we describe the mechanisms of foamy viruses regulating polyadenylation. We show that binding of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U1snRNP) to the MSD suppresses polyadenylation at the 5′LTR. In contrast, polyadenylation at the 3′LTR is achieved by adoption of a different RNA structure at the MSD region, which blocks U1snRNP binding and furthers RNA cleavage and subsequent polyadenylation. Conclusion Recently, it was shown that U1snRNP is able to suppress the usage of intronic cryptic polyadenylation sites in the cellular genome. Foamy viruses take advantage of this surveillance mechanism to suppress premature polyadenylation at the 5'end of their RNA. At the 3'end, Foamy viruses use a secondary structure to presumably block access of U1snRNP and thereby activate polyadenylation at the end of the genome. Our data reveal a contribution of U1snRNP to cellular polyadenylation site selection and to the regulation of gene expression.},
  subject      = {Polyadenylierung},
  language  = {en}
}