@article{WiechmannRoehSaueretal.2019,
  author    = {Wiechmann, Tobias and R{\"o}h, Simone and Sauer, Susann and Czamara, Darina and Arloth, Janine and K{\"o}del, Maik and Beintner, Madita and Knop, Lisanne and Menke, Andreas and Binder, Elisabeth B. and Proven{\c{c}}al, Nadine},
  title     = {Identification of dynamic glucocorticoid-induced methylation changes at the FKBP5 locus},
  series = {Clinical Epigenetics},
  volume    = {11},
  journal   = {Clinical Epigenetics},
  doi       = {10.1186/s13148-019-0682-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-233673},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Background Epigenetic mechanisms may play a major role in the biological embedding of early-life stress (ELS). One proposed mechanism is that glucocorticoid (GC) release following ELS exposure induces long-lasting alterations in DNA methylation (DNAm) of important regulatory genes of the stress response. Here, we investigate the dynamics of GC-dependent methylation changes in key regulatory regions of the FKBP5 locus in which ELS-associated DNAm changes have been reported. Results We repeatedly measured DNAm in human peripheral blood samples from 2 independent cohorts exposed to the GC agonist dexamethasone (DEX) using a targeted bisulfite sequencing approach, complemented by data from Illumina 450K arrays. We detected differentially methylated CpGs in enhancers co-localizing with GC receptor binding sites after acute DEX treatment (1 h, 3 h, 6 h), which returned to baseline levels within 23 h. These changes withstood correction for immune cell count differences. While we observed main effects of sex, age, body mass index, smoking, and depression symptoms on FKBP5 methylation levels, only the functional FKBP5 SNP (rs1360780) moderated the dynamic changes following DEX. This genotype effect was observed in both cohorts and included sites previously shown to be associated with ELS. Conclusion Our study highlights that DNAm levels within regulatory regions of the FKBP5 locus show dynamic changes following a GC challenge and suggest that factors influencing the dynamics of this regulation may contribute to the previously reported alterations in DNAm associated with current and past ELS exposure.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PishvaDrukkerViechtbaueretal.2014,
  author    = {Pishva, Ehsan and Drukker, Marjan and Viechtbauer, Wolfgang and Decoster, Jeroen and Collip, Dina and van Winkel, Ruud and Wichers, Marieke and Jacobs, Nele and Thiery, Evert and Derom, Catherine and Geschwind, Nicole and van den Hove, Daniel and Lataster, Tineke and Myin-Germeys, Inez and van Os, Jim and Rutten, Bart P. F. and Kenis, Gunter},
  title     = {Epigenetic Genes and Emotional Reactivity to Daily Life Events: A Multi-Step Gene-Environment Interaction Study},
  series = {PLOS ONE},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {PLOS ONE},
  number    = {6},
  issn      = {1932-6203},
  doi       = {10.1371/journal.pone.0100935},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-115956},
  pages     = {e100935},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Recent human and animal studies suggest that epigenetic mechanisms mediate the impact of environment on development of mental disorders. Therefore, we hypothesized that polymorphisms in epigenetic-regulatory genes impact stress-induced emotional changes. A multi-step, multi-sample gene-environment interaction analysis was conducted to test whether 31 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in epigenetic-regulatory genes, i.e. three DNA methyltransferase genes DNMT1, DNMT3A, DNMT3B, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), moderate emotional responses to stressful and pleasant stimuli in daily life as measured by Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM). In the first step, main and interactive effects were tested in a sample of 112 healthy individuals. Significant associations in this discovery sample were then investigated in a population-based sample of 434 individuals for replication. SNPs showing significant effects in both the discovery and replication samples were subsequently tested in three other samples of: (i) 85 unaffected siblings of patients with psychosis, (ii) 110 patients with psychotic disorders, and iii) 126 patients with a history of major depressive disorder. Multilevel linear regression analyses showed no significant association between SNPs and negative affect or positive affect. No SNPs moderated the effect of pleasant stimuli on positive affect. Three SNPs of DNMT3A (rs11683424, rs1465764, rs1465825) and 1 SNP of MTHFR (rs1801131) moderated the effect of stressful events on negative affect. Only rs11683424 of DNMT3A showed consistent directions of effect in the majority of the 5 samples. These data provide the first evidence that emotional responses to daily life stressors may be moderated by genetic variation in the genes involved in the epigenetic machinery.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Menke2019,
  author    = {Menke, Andreas},
  title     = {Is the HPA axis as target for depression outdated, or is there a new hope?},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychiatry},
  number    = {101},
  issn      = {1664-0640},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00101},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-195780},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a very common stress-related mental disorder that carries a huge burden for affected patients and the society. It is associated with a high mortality that derives from suicidality and the development of serious medical conditions such as heart diseases, diabetes, and stroke. Although a range of effective antidepressants are available, more than 50\% of the patients do not respond to the first treatment they are prescribed and around 30\% fail to respond even after several treatment attempts. The heterogeneous condition of MDD, the lack of biomarkers matching patients with the right treatments and the situation that almost all available drugs are only targeting the serotonin, norepinephrine, or dopamine signaling, without regulating other potentially dysregulated systems may explain the insufficient treatment status. The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is one of these other systems, there is numerous and robust evidence that it is implicated in MDD and other stress-related conditions, but up to date there is no specific drug targeting HPA axis components that is approved and no test that is routinely used in the clinical setting identifying patients for such a specific treatment. Is there still hope after these many years for a breakthrough of agents targeting the HPA axis? This review will cover tests detecting altered HPA axis function and the specific treatment options such as glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonists, corticotropin-releasing hormone 1 (CRH1) receptor antagonists, tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) inhibitors and FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5) receptor antagonists.},
  language  = {en}
}