@article{WernerHiguchiPomperetal.2021, author = {Werner, Rudolf A. and Higuchi, Takahiro and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven P.}, title = {Theranostics in oncology — thriving, now more than ever}, series = {Diagnostics}, volume = {11}, journal = {Diagnostics}, number = {5}, issn = {2075-4418}, doi = {10.3390/diagnostics11050805}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-236662}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Tracing its roots back to the 1940s, theranostics in nuclear oncology has proved successful mainly due to the beneficial effects of image-guided therapeutic concepts for patients afflicted with a variety of different cancers. The majority of these treatments are not only characterized by substantial prolongation of progression-free and overall survival, but are also generally safe, rendering theranostic agents as an attractive treatment option in various clinical scenarios in oncology. In this Special Issue Novel Theranostic Agents, nine original articles from around the globe provide further evidence on the use of the theranostic concept for neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN), prostate cancer (PC), meningioma, and neuroblastoma. The investigated diagnostic and therapeutic radiotracers target not only established structures, such as somatostatin receptor, prostate-specific membrane antigen or norepinephrine transporter, but also recently emerging targets such as the C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4. Moreover, the presented original articles also combine the concept of theranostics with in-depth read-out techniques such as radiomics or novel reconstruction algorithms on pretherapeutic scans, e.g., for outcome prediction. Even 80 years after its initial clinical introduction, theranostics in oncology continues to thrive, now more than ever.}, language = {en} } @article{EisslerWernerAriasLozaetal.2021, author = {Eissler, Cristoph and Werner, Rudolf A. and Arias-Loza, Paula and Nose, Naoko and Chen, Xinyu and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven P. and Lapa, Constantin and Buck, Andreas K. and Higuchi, Takahiro}, title = {The number of frames on ECG-gated \(^{18}\)F-FDG small animal PET has a significant impact on LV systolic and diastolic functional parameters}, series = {Molecular Imaging}, volume = {2021}, journal = {Molecular Imaging}, doi = {10.1155/2021/4629459}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-265778}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Objectives. This study is aimed at investigating the impact of frame numbers in preclinical electrocardiogram- (ECG-) gated \(^{18}\)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (\(^{18}\)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) on systolic and diastolic left ventricular (LV) parameters in rats. Methods. \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET imaging using a dedicated small animal PET system with list mode data acquisition and continuous ECG recording was performed in diabetic and control rats. The list-mode data was sorted and reconstructed with different numbers of frames (4, 8, 12, and 16) per cardiac cycle into tomographic images. Using an automatic ventricular edge detection software, left ventricular (LV) functional parameters, including ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV), were calculated. Diastolic variables (time to peak filling (TPF), first third mean filling rate (1/3 FR), and peak filling rate (PFR)) were also assessed. Results. Significant differences in multiple parameters were observed among the reconstructions with different frames per cardiac cycle. EDV significantly increased by numbers of frames (353.8 \& PLUSMN; 57.7 mu l*, 380.8 \& PLUSMN; 57.2 mu l*, 398.0 \& PLUSMN; 63.1 mu l*, and 444.8 \& PLUSMN; 75.3 mu l at 4, 8, 12, and 16 frames, respectively; *P < 0.0001 vs. 16 frames), while systolic (EF) and diastolic (TPF, 1/3 FR and PFR) parameters were not significantly different between 12 and 16 frames. In addition, significant differences between diabetic and control animals in 1/3 FR and PFR in 16 frames per cardiac cycle were observed (P < 0.005), but not for 4, 8, and 12 frames. Conclusions. Using ECG-gated PET in rats, measurements of cardiac function are significantly affected by the frames per cardiac cycle. Therefore, if you are going to compare those functional parameters, a consistent number of frames should be used.}, language = {en} } @article{ToyamaWernerRuizBedoyaetal.2021, author = {Toyama, Yoshitaka and Werner, Rudolf A. and Ruiz-Bedoya, Camilo A. and Ordonez, Alvaro A. and Takase, Kei and Lapa, Constantin and Jain, Sanjay K. and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven P. and Higuchi, Takahiro}, title = {Current and future perspectives on functional molecular imaging in nephro-urology: theranostics on the horizon}, series = {Theranostics}, volume = {11}, journal = {Theranostics}, number = {12}, doi = {10.7150/thno.58682}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-260090}, pages = {6105-6119}, year = {2021}, abstract = {In recent years, a paradigm shift from single-photon-emitting radionuclide radiotracers toward positron-emission tomography (PET) radiotracers has occurred in nuclear oncology. Although PET-based molecular imaging of the kidneys is still in its infancy, such a trend has emerged in the field of functional renal radionuclide imaging. Potentially allowing for precise and thorough evaluation of renal radiotracer urodynamics, PET radionuclide imaging has numerous advantages including precise anatomical co-registration with CT images and dynamic three-dimensional imaging capability. In addition, relative to scintigraphic approaches, PET can allow for significantly reduced scan time enabling high-throughput in a busy PET practice and further reduces radiation exposure, which may have a clinical impact in pediatric populations. In recent years, multiple renal PET radiotracers labeled with C-11, Ga-68, and F-18 have been utilized in clinical studies. Beyond providing a precise non-invasive read-out of renal function, such radiotracers may also be used to assess renal inflammation. This manuscript will provide an overview of renal molecular PET imaging and will highlight the transformation of conventional scintigraphy of the kidneys toward novel, high-resolution PET imaging for assessing renal function. In addition, future applications will be introduced, e.g. by transferring the concept of molecular image-guided diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) to the field of nephrology.}, language = {en} } @article{WeichWernerBucketal.2021, author = {Weich, Alexander and Werner, Rudolf A. and Buck, Andreas K. and Hartrampf, Philipp E. and Serfling, Sebastian E. and Scheurlen, Michael and Wester, Hans-J{\"u}rgen and Meining, Alexander and Kircher, Stefan and Higuchi, Takahiro and Pomper, Martin G. and Rowe, Steven P. and Lapa, Constantin and Kircher, Malte}, title = {CXCR4-Directed PET/CT in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Neuroendocrine Carcinomas}, series = {Diagnostics}, volume = {11}, journal = {Diagnostics}, number = {4}, issn = {2075-4418}, doi = {10.3390/diagnostics11040605}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-234231}, year = {2021}, abstract = {We aimed to elucidate the diagnostic potential of the C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4)-directed positron emission tomography (PET) tracer \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor in patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), relative to the established reference standard \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT). In our database, we retrospectively identified 11 treatment-na{\"i}ve patients with histologically proven NEC, who underwent \(^{18}\)F-FDG and CXCR4-directed PET/CT for staging and therapy planning. The images were analyzed on a per-patient and per-lesion basis and compared to immunohistochemical staining (IHC) of CXCR4 from PET-guided biopsies. \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor visualized tumor lesions in 10/11 subjects, while \(^{18}\)F-FDG revealed sites of disease in all 11 patients. Although weak to moderate CXCR4 expression could be corroborated by IHC in 10/11 cases, \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/CT detected significantly more tumor lesions (102 vs. 42; total lesions, n = 107; p < 0.001). Semi-quantitative analysis revealed markedly higher 18F-FDG uptake as compared to \(^{68}\)Ga-Pentixafor (maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUV) and tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) of cancerous lesions, SUVmax: 12.8 ± 9.8 vs. 5.2 ± 3.7; SUVmean: 7.4 ± 5.4 vs. 3.1 ± 3.2, p < 0.001; and, TBR 7.2 ± 7.9 vs. 3.4 ± 3.0, p < 0.001). Non-invasive imaging of CXCR4 expression in NEC is inferior to the reference standard \(^{18}\)F-FDG PET/CT.}, language = {en} }